Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Cells generate demand that DNA fulfills. Complexity is emergent from the market

    Cells generate demand that DNA fulfills. Complexity is emergent from the market interchange, both directly and indirectly. There are a surprisingly small number of proteins (mechanisms) and a lot of regulatory expression. It’s not like maufacturing metal parts.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-26 01:10:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353872870913552384

    Reply addressees: @oswaldspangled @JFGariepy @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353872323233898500

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @oswaldspangled @JFGariepy @WorMartiN We can’t do it yet. And computationally the idea is terrifyingly complex. DNA isn’t a proactive recipe it’s a reactive manufacturing agent. It’s not omnidirectional engineering but a MARKET producing externalities. That’s why we’re having so much difficulty with the complexity.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1353872323233898500

  • NO, EUROPEANS ARE THE CHOSEN PEOPLE The Jews are not gods chosen people, europea

    NO, EUROPEANS ARE THE CHOSEN PEOPLE

    The Jews are not gods chosen people, europeans are – beause we alone discovered the word of god written in his hand, in the fabric of the universe, and we alone serve as the hand of god, discovering, adapting to, applying those laws, and serving god by his words – not by the lies of the jews. Abraham was a devil, jews are his followers, jesus tried to rescue them, and Paul invented churchianity, and muhammed islam to restore them to ignorance, superstition, and dysgenia.

    -“@curtd Fabric of the universe you say, so how do you interact with this fabric and when did it tell you about Europeans being the chosen people.”-

    1) Theu’re called the Formal (logical), Physical, Behavioral, and Evolutionary laws of the universe. The universe is made from those laws.

    2) Men lie. Abraham invented advanced lying. Abrahamism teaches lying. Judaism, Churchianity, and Islam are made from Abrahamic lying. These lies do not corresponde to the evidence of gods word and deed. If anything, abraham was a devil, and the jews chose him as their god.

    3) Only Europeans discovered, adapted to, and applied those laws of the universe, and the universe’s god.

    4) Jesus told us how to tolerate those tragic laws: love.

    5) Paul and the rest of the Jews converted it into magic and lies of ignorance superstition deceit, and servitude. The rabbinical movement reformed the jews to undermine our civilization as well, and Islam imitated Christianity as outright warfare, rather than insurrection against the indo-europea (Iranic and European) empires.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-26 00:47:59 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105619264399939150

  • NO, EUROPEANS ARE THE CHOSEN PEOPLE The Jews are not gods chosen people, europea

    NO, EUROPEANS ARE THE CHOSEN PEOPLE

    The Jews are not gods chosen people, europeans are – beause we alone discovered the word of god written in his hand, in the fabric of the universe, and we alone serve as the hand of god, discovering, adapting to, applying those laws, and serving god by his words – not by the lies of the jews. Abraham was a devil, jews are his followers, jesus tried to rescue them, and Paul invented churchianity, and muhammed islam to restore them to ignorance, superstition, and dysgenia.

    -“@curtd Fabric of the universe you say, so how do you interact with this fabric and when did it tell you about Europeans being the chosen people.”-

    1) Theu’re called the Formal (logical), Physical, Behavioral, and Evolutionary laws of the universe. The universe is made from those laws.

    2) Men lie. Abraham invented advanced lying. Abrahamism teaches lying. Judaism, Churchianity, and Islam are made from Abrahamic lying. These lies do not corresponde to the evidence of gods word and deed.

    3) Only Europeans discovered, adapted to, and applied those laws of the universe, and the universe’s god.

    4) Jesus told us how to tolerate those tragic laws: love.

    5) Paul and the rest of the Jews converted it into magic and lies of ignorance superstition deceit, and servitude. The rabbinical movement reformed the jews to undermine our civilization as well, and Islam imitated Christianity as outright warfare, rather than insurrection against the indo-europea (Iranic and European) empires.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-26 00:46:39 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105619259020658442

  • THE CHOICE OF THREE POSSIBLE ELITES – AND THE CONSEQUENCES There are only three

    THE CHOICE OF THREE POSSIBLE ELITES – AND THE CONSEQUENCES

    There are only three sets of these elites in the West vying for power:

    1. The Jewish Female Authoritarian strategy of undermining, and continuing the rapid conquest of western civilization by incentivizing race, class, sex, cultural, informational conflict – and even logical conflict, and underclass invasion – repeating the fall of Rome, and their repetition in Bolshevik revolution and terrors, and German counter-revolution against it.

    2. The Semitic Roman Catholic and French Feminine Authoritarian strategy of state dominance, bloody terrors, and socialism leading to slow conquest of Europe by Islam.

    3. Or the European, Germanic, and Anglo continuation of our masculine ancient rule of law repeating the otherwise unimaginable success of Europeans in the Bronze Age of pre-literate Indo-European expansion, the Iron Age Greek reason Roman administration and Roman peace – that dragged mankind out into reason and failed, and the European age of sail and steel’s that dragged mankind single-handedly, kicking and screaming all the while, out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vice of oppression between human tyranny and the vicissitudes of a nature, geology, climate, solar system, and universe all but hostile to the existence of life – and is on the verge of failure.

    We have a choice between a future under the Jewish Muslim Semitic civilization of endemic lying, parasitism, stagnation, decline, and dysgenia – another dark age and the very real possibility of failing to pass through the Great Filter – or to continue the European Tradition and its high costs, and to transcend ourselves into the gods we imagine by continuing our long history of discovery, adaptation to, and application of, the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, nature, and nature’s god.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-25 14:56:19 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105616938023477020

  • Answer: No, Democracy and Capitalism aren’t the same thing.

    –“Q: Are democracy and capitalism the same thing in the culture of the United States?”–

    This question is a framing generated by the left’s attempt to undermining western civilization.

    Democracy: a means of selecting priorities in the production of commons given the scarcity of resources and the endless demand for returns.

    Republic: Representative democracy with Executive, Legislative, and Judicial division of labor.

    Capitalism: a bias to the private ownership and management of production of production distribution and trade of goods, services, and information, given the natural tendencies of government organizations to produce negative returns, maximize rents, maximize corruption, minimize benefits to the people, fail at core mission, be unaccountable for doing so.

    Socialism: Globalist movement for the centralization of production, distribution, and trade in the state, and pursuit of world domination by this economic model.

    Democratic Socialism: a bias to the state ownership and management of resources, production distribution, and trade. (France) and maximization of distribution of benefits to citizens.

    Mixed Economy: State an Private Partnership in strategic industries, private management of non-strategic industries.

    Fascism: Ethnocentric, Mixed Economy, Maximizing State-Private partnerships in strategic industries, private management of non-strategic industries.

    UNDERSTANDING THE USA

    (a) The USA is not a country, it is a federation of states (like europe is trying and failing to create). The USA uses the British form of government, but is modeled after the holy roman empire o the german people, that only fell after napoleon’s conquest after having existed for a thousand years: a loose federation of many micro states.

    (b) The USA is not a democracy. it is a Republic under rule of law – meaning LIMITED power granted to the executive, legislature and courts, by the people to act on their behalf. A republic is intended to use representatives with demonstrated evidence of skills necessary to make political economic and military decisions. (We no longer do that.)

    (c) The constitution is not a living document. It is a statement of natural law, (reciprocity) and amendments, legislation, and findings of the court (case law) are transactions that modify that law. It’s an accounting system in law.

    (d) The law is not open to reinterpretation or judicial discretion – the court interprets the text (textualism) as by original meaning (originalism) so that the transactions against the constitution are performed only by the legislature. (Thanks to Saint Judge Antonin Scalia.)

    (d) The purpose of limiting the court to those measurements is to demanding that all changes pass thru the public debate through the legislature and that no ‘specialist, or ‘authority’ exists other than survival of adversarial competition in the legislature on behalf of the people who voted for the representatives.

    (e) Rule of law does not mean rule by law. Rule of law by natural law means that the law is sovereign and every individual sovereign under it. Rule by law means the laws of the universe (natural law), and the people are not sovereignty – but the legislature is. America is the only country where the law is sovereign. Every other country now has parliamentary sovereignty. And rule of law by natural law is the only method of maintaining human adaptation to changes in circumstances (scientific government).

    (f) Some form of Democracy is necessary under rule of law – because there is no authority other than the law, and therefore only the people can decide, only as a jury (congress) and only after adversarial competition (argument, and voting)

    (g) Every form of Democracy functions as market. Multiple house government functions as a market between states, and classes. (We Broke that by direct election of the senate).

    Markets under rule of law will produce moral consumer capitalism. Markets under rule by law will not. Markets under arbitrary rule will produce black markets. Attempting to circumvent markets will produce black markets, corruption, disincentives, starvation, and decline.

    So the capitalism socialism dichotomy is a marxist deceit creating a false dichotomy. All economies are mixed economies because states are the investors of last resort and insurers of last resort.

    States START capital intensive industries because they are too high risk for private markets, then must be taken over by private companies and competition in order to make efficient use of capital and disincentivize corruption.

    Success at this process provides income to the state as an investor, or income to the state by taxation or both. This income is then used to create commons – goods, services, information- for the public. At least theoretically. And some is siphoned off by the bureaucracy and their clients (Special interests) as various forms of rent-seeking.

    So the problem with America is that we have no method of bringing suit against the government for ‘procedural and process corruption’ – and that corruption is worse in the states than in most other countries for historical reasons.

    The fact that this isn’t something every American can recite without thought is an intentional distortion of the American form of government by the left’s propaganda campaign, and ‘march through the institutions’ to destroy the meaning of terms, causes, and ideas.

  • Answer: No, Democracy and Capitalism aren’t the same thing.

    –“Q: Are democracy and capitalism the same thing in the culture of the United States?”–

    This question is a framing generated by the left’s attempt to undermining western civilization.

    Democracy: a means of selecting priorities in the production of commons given the scarcity of resources and the endless demand for returns.

    Republic: Representative democracy with Executive, Legislative, and Judicial division of labor.

    Capitalism: a bias to the private ownership and management of production of production distribution and trade of goods, services, and information, given the natural tendencies of government organizations to produce negative returns, maximize rents, maximize corruption, minimize benefits to the people, fail at core mission, be unaccountable for doing so.

    Socialism: Globalist movement for the centralization of production, distribution, and trade in the state, and pursuit of world domination by this economic model.

    Democratic Socialism: a bias to the state ownership and management of resources, production distribution, and trade. (France) and maximization of distribution of benefits to citizens.

    Mixed Economy: State an Private Partnership in strategic industries, private management of non-strategic industries.

    Fascism: Ethnocentric, Mixed Economy, Maximizing State-Private partnerships in strategic industries, private management of non-strategic industries.

    UNDERSTANDING THE USA

    (a) The USA is not a country, it is a federation of states (like europe is trying and failing to create). The USA uses the British form of government, but is modeled after the holy roman empire o the german people, that only fell after napoleon’s conquest after having existed for a thousand years: a loose federation of many micro states.

    (b) The USA is not a democracy. it is a Republic under rule of law – meaning LIMITED power granted to the executive, legislature and courts, by the people to act on their behalf. A republic is intended to use representatives with demonstrated evidence of skills necessary to make political economic and military decisions. (We no longer do that.)

    (c) The constitution is not a living document. It is a statement of natural law, (reciprocity) and amendments, legislation, and findings of the court (case law) are transactions that modify that law. It’s an accounting system in law.

    (d) The law is not open to reinterpretation or judicial discretion – the court interprets the text (textualism) as by original meaning (originalism) so that the transactions against the constitution are performed only by the legislature. (Thanks to Saint Judge Antonin Scalia.)

    (d) The purpose of limiting the court to those measurements is to demanding that all changes pass thru the public debate through the legislature and that no ‘specialist, or ‘authority’ exists other than survival of adversarial competition in the legislature on behalf of the people who voted for the representatives.

    (e) Rule of law does not mean rule by law. Rule of law by natural law means that the law is sovereign and every individual sovereign under it. Rule by law means the laws of the universe (natural law), and the people are not sovereignty – but the legislature is. America is the only country where the law is sovereign. Every other country now has parliamentary sovereignty. And rule of law by natural law is the only method of maintaining human adaptation to changes in circumstances (scientific government).

    (f) Some form of Democracy is necessary under rule of law – because there is no authority other than the law, and therefore only the people can decide, only as a jury (congress) and only after adversarial competition (argument, and voting)

    (g) Every form of Democracy functions as market. Multiple house government functions as a market between states, and classes. (We Broke that by direct election of the senate).

    Markets under rule of law will produce moral consumer capitalism. Markets under rule by law will not. Markets under arbitrary rule will produce black markets. Attempting to circumvent markets will produce black markets, corruption, disincentives, starvation, and decline.

    So the capitalism socialism dichotomy is a marxist deceit creating a false dichotomy. All economies are mixed economies because states are the investors of last resort and insurers of last resort.

    States START capital intensive industries because they are too high risk for private markets, then must be taken over by private companies and competition in order to make efficient use of capital and disincentivize corruption.

    Success at this process provides income to the state as an investor, or income to the state by taxation or both. This income is then used to create commons – goods, services, information- for the public. At least theoretically. And some is siphoned off by the bureaucracy and their clients (Special interests) as various forms of rent-seeking.

    So the problem with America is that we have no method of bringing suit against the government for ‘procedural and process corruption’ – and that corruption is worse in the states than in most other countries for historical reasons.

    The fact that this isn’t something every American can recite without thought is an intentional distortion of the American form of government by the left’s propaganda campaign, and ‘march through the institutions’ to destroy the meaning of terms, causes, and ideas.

  • Religiosity is Genetic. A Derivation of Personality Traits. A Female Cognitive Bias.

    I’ll reiterate the science: There does exist the stereotypical difference between male and female cognition, personality, and religiosity. And there is an overlap with males having those female traits likewise religious. The effect isn’t small. It’s .92. So Religiosity is a TRAIT. The same is true in the reverse. Male cognition, personality, and martial LOYALTY is driven by traits, and some overlap in females with same traits. Female devotion (social burden) and male loyalty (political burden) are evolutionarily necessary differences in TRAIT expression. The point being, that males with male traits need the military or equivalent (substitute) like females with female traits need the church or equivalent (substitute) – and there is an overlap of these two trait distributions. This is how we obtain(ed) ‘mindfulness’ in European civ. And we have destroyed, all those institutions that have provided the civil society and prevented us from devolving back into extended families and low trust societies like the rest of the world tries to escape from. And the present ‘new religion of hate’ masquerading as a religion of compassion is just a change of clothes on the murderous pseudoscientific cult we call Marxism. “War between classes? That failed. Let’s do war between classes, sexes, religions, cultures!”  That’s all it is. HATE.

  • Religiosity is Genetic. A Derivation of Personality Traits. A Female Cognitive Bias.

    I’ll reiterate the science: There does exist the stereotypical difference between male and female cognition, personality, and religiosity. And there is an overlap with males having those female traits likewise religious. The effect isn’t small. It’s .92. So Religiosity is a TRAIT. The same is true in the reverse. Male cognition, personality, and martial LOYALTY is driven by traits, and some overlap in females with same traits. Female devotion (social burden) and male loyalty (political burden) are evolutionarily necessary differences in TRAIT expression. The point being, that males with male traits need the military or equivalent (substitute) like females with female traits need the church or equivalent (substitute) – and there is an overlap of these two trait distributions. This is how we obtain(ed) ‘mindfulness’ in European civ. And we have destroyed, all those institutions that have provided the civil society and prevented us from devolving back into extended families and low trust societies like the rest of the world tries to escape from. And the present ‘new religion of hate’ masquerading as a religion of compassion is just a change of clothes on the murderous pseudoscientific cult we call Marxism. “War between classes? That failed. Let’s do war between classes, sexes, religions, cultures!”  That’s all it is. HATE.

  • Notes on a speech by Yual Harari

    “We limit ourselves to Property(Permission) and Range(Duty,Responsibility)” “Fictions or Narratives create a paradigm (system of measurement) of property(permission) and range(duty), creating a system of cooperative rules” “Human rights are a fiction” … that’s not really true. Those Human rights that are Natural Rights are an extension of life and phenotype. They are in fact a universal paradigm and measure. We can separate out natural rights (true) from fantasies (false). “everybody believes in money” not really true. everyoe believes in acquisition and money is the most frictionless resource for use in acqusition. “Money has no objective value”. That’s not really true. Money has no resource (commodity) value that can be directly consumed without exchange for a resoucre(commodity) that can be consumed or transformed. What does Liberalism mean: “Individualsm”… No. its self determination. the philosophy and strategy of aristoracy, and the west promised everyone the opporutnity to join it – because the west has been eugenic for its entire history. So no, it’s not individualistic. It’s rapid evolution by rapid meritocratic adaptation – and equal suppression of reproduction. It’s not liberty (permission) but self determination (reciprocity0. We believed our own promise of an aristocracy of everyone was made possible by the industrial ervolution. It wasn’t. We opened the franchise without completing the project of an aristocracy of everyone. No he doesn’t understand liberal politics. Instead if forces continuous empirical adaptation for forcing thepeople to make choices, and gain the benefits or consequences. OMG this guy is a liar or an idiot. No the highest authority is’t the customer, it’s that making erros forces changethroughut the polity. It’s continuing natural selection.  Note how he keeps making use of the word authority – showing he does not understand it. OMG he talks about duchamp. But duchamp was forcing the jewish marxist revolt against western aesthetic. that’s not liberlism. That’s jewish marxists attack on western aesthetics. Ethics: the priest determines ethics – as an authority. No that individualism judgement of aesthetics was jewish marxist introduction, not a ueropean one. “Edcaton”… the student is the highest authority. No. we are forcng them to  adapt to the laws of the universe. “Human rights a religion” No. human rights were invented to constrain postwar states to self improvement in order to prevent another world war. “China has little to offer the world” – no only jews try to offer the world with idoelogy and religion. The europeans try to EVOLVE the world materially. There are only two elites and jews are only elites because of european tolerance. “Islam has no alternative to liberalism.” No. There is no evidence that islam cannot go through a protestant reformation as they develop a middle class. I could do it. THey can do it. they have to have the NEED to do it.  

  • Notes on a speech by Yual Harari

    “We limit ourselves to Property(Permission) and Range(Duty,Responsibility)” “Fictions or Narratives create a paradigm (system of measurement) of property(permission) and range(duty), creating a system of cooperative rules” “Human rights are a fiction” … that’s not really true. Those Human rights that are Natural Rights are an extension of life and phenotype. They are in fact a universal paradigm and measure. We can separate out natural rights (true) from fantasies (false). “everybody believes in money” not really true. everyoe believes in acquisition and money is the most frictionless resource for use in acqusition. “Money has no objective value”. That’s not really true. Money has no resource (commodity) value that can be directly consumed without exchange for a resoucre(commodity) that can be consumed or transformed. What does Liberalism mean: “Individualsm”… No. its self determination. the philosophy and strategy of aristoracy, and the west promised everyone the opporutnity to join it – because the west has been eugenic for its entire history. So no, it’s not individualistic. It’s rapid evolution by rapid meritocratic adaptation – and equal suppression of reproduction. It’s not liberty (permission) but self determination (reciprocity0. We believed our own promise of an aristocracy of everyone was made possible by the industrial ervolution. It wasn’t. We opened the franchise without completing the project of an aristocracy of everyone. No he doesn’t understand liberal politics. Instead if forces continuous empirical adaptation for forcing thepeople to make choices, and gain the benefits or consequences. OMG this guy is a liar or an idiot. No the highest authority is’t the customer, it’s that making erros forces changethroughut the polity. It’s continuing natural selection.  Note how he keeps making use of the word authority – showing he does not understand it. OMG he talks about duchamp. But duchamp was forcing the jewish marxist revolt against western aesthetic. that’s not liberlism. That’s jewish marxists attack on western aesthetics. Ethics: the priest determines ethics – as an authority. No that individualism judgement of aesthetics was jewish marxist introduction, not a ueropean one. “Edcaton”… the student is the highest authority. No. we are forcng them to  adapt to the laws of the universe. “Human rights a religion” No. human rights were invented to constrain postwar states to self improvement in order to prevent another world war. “China has little to offer the world” – no only jews try to offer the world with idoelogy and religion. The europeans try to EVOLVE the world materially. There are only two elites and jews are only elites because of european tolerance. “Islam has no alternative to liberalism.” No. There is no evidence that islam cannot go through a protestant reformation as they develop a middle class. I could do it. THey can do it. they have to have the NEED to do it.