Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • EUROPEANS AND OUR LEGAL ORIGINS Authority by prohibiting authority. Social Engin

    EUROPEANS AND OUR LEGAL ORIGINS
    Authority by prohibiting authority.
    Social Engineering by prohibiting social engineering.
    Forcing all into adaptive service of one another.
    Maximizing Self Determination and Natural Selection
    Transcending man into gods.

    EUROPEAN RULE OF LAW
    Creating harmony in continuous adaptation by market disharmony where every other person is both a potential competitor and customer and productivity and reciprocity necessary for survival. Our strength and weakness is resulting adaptive tolerance and trust.

    European common law functions as a continuous ledger of the discovery of, and incremental suppression of, irreciprocity under self-determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, and duty. Our law is scientific legal accounting, and Jewish law is only wisdom literature.

    STRICT CONSTRUCTION VS TEXTUAL LITERALISM
    Under Textualism, ‘Strict Construction’ ~means “take the text literally”. Under P-Law, which is also textual, ‘Strict Construction” means Legislative, Regulatory and Case law must be built from the first principle of self-determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, and duty.

    In other words, the meaning of strict construction is in P-law reflects the common-sense meaning. The legislature, State, or Court must justify (write a proof of) its authority to impose such an Act.

    DECIDABILITY
    In European Empirical Tradition Judges do not make law, they apply law and discover new applications of it. They DISCOVER applications of the law. The feedback loop was broken at modern rates of change because there is no constitutional route for forcing the legislature rule.

    NECESSARY REVISION OF OUR CONSTITUTION
    No Judge under the natural common law, may deprive legislature or people of choice by creating case law for social, political, economic, or strategic reasons, rather than applying the original intent of law to the present case before it. Natural law itself prohibits judges from that ‘THEFT’ from the commons. Judicial legislation from the bench enfeebles the legislature, which enfeebles the people, and descends into arbitrary kritarky of the jews and muslims.

    JUSTICE SCALIA AGREED
    The constitution does not define common law, dependence on natural law, or the means by which justices interpret the law, but he doesn’t want congress telling the court that. So even an amendment man not fix the ‘pilpul-ization’ of our law.

    SCALIA’S LIMITS
    However, despite Scalia’s success at restoring scientific law, despite Jewish attempts to undermine it from activism within the academy, and profession, he lacked the formal knowledge of how to explain WHY. But at least he gave us a recipe of 13 failings to fix.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-07 23:55:01 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105517134488813132

  • STOICISM AND EPICUREANISM? “What’s the difference between training Stoicism and

    STOICISM AND EPICUREANISM?
    “What’s the difference between training Stoicism and providing education in Folk Religions?”

    Stoicism can be practiced as a ritual of self-transformation toward specific goals. It is just organized cognitive behavioral therapy and there is no substitute for it. It provides mindfulness. Folk religions are social. pagan martial, and Christianity is a political religion

    ‘The stoic method is simply a rational discipline of cognitive-behavioral therapy (and an action-driven alternative to the passive woo woo of Buddhism), and is the most effective and scientific method of self-authoring.

    The Epicurean philosophy is the least divergent from the physical nature and evolutionary laws, and it advocates a lifestyle that is optimum for the vast majority.

    The primary difference in application is that stoicism seeks to insulate you from status signal, status pressure, and conflict, and epicureanism seeks to provide you means of avoiding it and tolerating what little you do experience.

    So we see stoicism for the analytic personality that tolerates conflict and epicureanism for the empathic personality that seeks to avoid it.

    Realistically these are the optimum personal philosophies, just as hero, ancestor, and nature thanks (worship) is the optimum religion.

    So if you study the sciences, history, learn to practice the stoic methodology, live an epicurean life, you are pretty much living the optimum human existence because you are least divergent from the constraints of the universe.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-07 23:51:22 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105517120372052728

  • OUR CHRISTIAN AND SECULAR WEAKNESSES Christian ethics, Abrahamic theology, and o

    OUR CHRISTIAN AND SECULAR WEAKNESSES
    Christian ethics, Abrahamic theology, and our FAILURE to articulate the science of our law and our civilization that imprison us in susceptibility to the suite of Jewish counter-revolutions against european scientific civilization.

    We solve that problem with our law

    “Conservatism is a fight against entropy premised on the recognition of a fundamental asymmetry: in one day, people can destroy what took hundreds of years to create.”- Bo Winegard

    Close. Conservatism(Europeanism) is a fight to preserve continuous adaptation by natural selection by self-determination by self-determined means, limiting us to sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, and adversarial markets in all walks of life. Progressivism(Abrahamic) is maladaptive: hyperconsumptive, asymmetrically reproductive, decapitalizing, devolutionary, and dysgenic.

    BUT XIANITY REMAINS
    The debate over Christianity is over. Whether you are faithful, philosophical, or scientific, Christian doesn’t matter. Christianity must be the state religion of western civilization, and our pagan and heathen religions the natural traditional religion of western civilization.

    We are all Christians in one way or another whether we realize it or not just as we are platonists vs realists. We are what we are not. Christianity defends against social evil, paganism against political and heathen against ethnic. Together they insure us against all evils.

    Christianity solves a very serious problem which is why Christian countries are wealthier per capita than the rest. The question is how can we re-nationalize it and de-globalize it, and restore european historical study.

    It solves problem for the people who have the problem and they can’t be converted.

    Replacing Christianity is just a practical impossibility and an unfair ask. I’m closest to a germanic pagan, and I’m an anti-Abrahamist, but I recognize that MY BROTHERS ARE NOT, and so loyalty is sufficient for blood.

    I think it is fixable without throwing out the baby with the bathwater. It is the hardest problem to solve.

    So there are things we must compromise on in order to worth together, and that means secular (philosophical), theological(Christian), and natural religion.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-07 23:51:09 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105517119494350355

  • We are all Christians in one way or another whether we realize it or not just as

    We are all Christians in one way or another whether we realize it or not just as we are platonists vs realists. We are what we are not. Christianity defends against social evil, paganism against political and heathen against ethnic. Together they insure us against all evils.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-07 03:50:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1347027895957549056

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1347025734917902339

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    The debate over Christianity is over. Whether you are faithful, philosophical, or scientific, Christian doesn’t matter. Christianity must be the state religion of western civilization, and our pagan and heathen religions the natural traditional religion of western civilization.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1347025734917902339

  • MASKS? Of course I wear a mask, wash my hands constantly and go out sparingly. I

    MASKS?
    Of course I wear a mask, wash my hands constantly and go out sparingly. I’m older, have chronic asthma, and take care of an elderly parent on constant oxygen. I’m in the target demographic and interact with medical and elder care staff. But I don’t ask OTHER people to wear masks.

    Like leash laws, masks punish the Fit, Healthy, Cautious, Active and CLEAN, when it’s the unfit, unhealthy, incautious, lazy, and unclean who interact, contract, and transmit the disease – at do so largely at home. These people, medical, and elder care are the at-risk demographic.

    However, how do we isolate people by those behaviors? Well, age, occupation, class, and race is part of it because of race differences in demographic distribution (class) and resulting behavior. But there is no way to do that.

    We always have a few choices: Isolate if you’re in a risky occupation. Stay home if you’re afraid. Don’t if you aren’t. But the risky will spread it anyway. So bad actors spoil it for everyone.

    If we were homogenous like the chinese or japanese how would this problem differ?

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-04 18:18:58 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105498826416685793

  • Regarding FB Purge over Halloween – Ironically: Yes It Was The Nazis, Not The Left.

    FWIW: AFAIK the FB purge was organized by US nazis who systematically reported every person associated with the movement by going through everyone’s friends and history and reporting multiple posts. They kept pinging me as they were doing it and gloating afterward. By reporting multiple posts the post-reporter can construct a narrative. That narrative overcomes our technique of addressing taboos by crafting inexplicit content understood only by both P’s value-neutral language, and inference across posts. So it’s not that we were purged just because of Facebook – we were too cautious for that. It’s that Facebook was looking for purge opportunities and a group of American nazis organized to get us purged. In other words, the nazis adopted Cancel Culture. This is why I don’t trust Christians or Nazis. They don’t want to unify the right even if it’s only on law and policy. They want their authoritarian leadership from either the church or the state. Fundamentally P-Law produces a ‘libertarian’ (legalistic, market, competitive) framework, dependent on the institution of law. There are only three ‘totalitarian’ institutions. Church(Faith), State, and Law. And law is the hardest to understand. Especially because it is a via-negativa organization (permissive) and church (empathic) and state (forceful) are easy to understand AND they provide a positive narrative that advances people’s interests FOR them. Law, sovereignty, and markets enable people to advance themselves and sort naturally by meritocracy. This is intolerable for nazis who are the least competitive demographic, and only less so for xians, who cannot politically compete in modernity. So even if we produce a polity of ethnocentric, intolerant, rule of law, market “fascism” that secures xianity, provides ethnocentric policy, the fact that it requires a compromise between family-faith, market-law, ethnocentric-state interests, maintaining ALL group interests – in historical european trifunctional fashion – the xians(or civnats which are just secular xians) or and nazis(or totalitarian ethnocentrists of any stripe) will be defectors from the group that prevents success by unity. And the only POSSIBLE unity is law since we differ in everything other than wanting self-determination precisely because of those biases. It is impossible to create an Xian or Nazi elite in modernity, so it is only possible create a military-legal elite. that’s the only choice. Ergo “Divided we fall.” -Cheers

  • Regarding FB Purge over Halloween – Ironically: Yes It Was The Nazis, Not The Left.

    FWIW: AFAIK the FB purge was organized by US nazis who systematically reported every person associated with the movement by going through everyone’s friends and history and reporting multiple posts. They kept pinging me as they were doing it and gloating afterward. By reporting multiple posts the post-reporter can construct a narrative. That narrative overcomes our technique of addressing taboos by crafting inexplicit content understood only by both P’s value-neutral language, and inference across posts. So it’s not that we were purged just because of Facebook – we were too cautious for that. It’s that Facebook was looking for purge opportunities and a group of American nazis organized to get us purged. In other words, the nazis adopted Cancel Culture. This is why I don’t trust Christians or Nazis. They don’t want to unify the right even if it’s only on law and policy. They want their authoritarian leadership from either the church or the state. Fundamentally P-Law produces a ‘libertarian’ (legalistic, market, competitive) framework, dependent on the institution of law. There are only three ‘totalitarian’ institutions. Church(Faith), State, and Law. And law is the hardest to understand. Especially because it is a via-negativa organization (permissive) and church (empathic) and state (forceful) are easy to understand AND they provide a positive narrative that advances people’s interests FOR them. Law, sovereignty, and markets enable people to advance themselves and sort naturally by meritocracy. This is intolerable for nazis who are the least competitive demographic, and only less so for xians, who cannot politically compete in modernity. So even if we produce a polity of ethnocentric, intolerant, rule of law, market “fascism” that secures xianity, provides ethnocentric policy, the fact that it requires a compromise between family-faith, market-law, ethnocentric-state interests, maintaining ALL group interests – in historical european trifunctional fashion – the xians(or civnats which are just secular xians) or and nazis(or totalitarian ethnocentrists of any stripe) will be defectors from the group that prevents success by unity. And the only POSSIBLE unity is law since we differ in everything other than wanting self-determination precisely because of those biases. It is impossible to create an Xian or Nazi elite in modernity, so it is only possible create a military-legal elite. that’s the only choice. Ergo “Divided we fall.” -Cheers

  • THE ENEMY doesn’t have a revolutionary instinct it has an instinct to undermine

    THE ENEMY doesn’t have a revolutionary instinct it has an instinct to undermine harmony, to profit from it, and to specialize in industries that facilitate doing so by baiting hosts into hazards.

    The Present Crisis – the result of the migration of Ashkenazi bolshevism, and false promises by pseudoscience, and sophistry to the postwar USA – is not an effort to help the poor. It is an effort to destroy western civilization just as judaism&christiantiy were to destroy Rome.

    P-LAW COUNTERS THE ENEMY’S LIES, PROPAGANDA, UNDERMINING, SUBVERSION, SEDITION, AND TREASON
    This is the core purpose of the methodology: it extends the protection of our law of tort to commons, institutions, informational commons (knowledge), and speech in the commons (public).

    THE FORMAL LOGIC AND SCIENCE OF LAW
    Theoreticians have been working for centuries to formalize law as we have math, logic, and science – without success until now. P-Law enables strict construction from first causes, and with it, scientific’ government.

    “No More Lies”

    P-Law is counter-subversion

    – requires ownership of testimony
    – eliminates disambiguation of costs
    – prevents externalization of costs
    – expands standing to any violation of reciprocity
    – preserves investment in commons

    Restore and build men’s agency.
    Adopt and implement P-Law.

    FASCISM – BUT RULE OF LAW FASCISM: SCIENTIFIC GOVERNMENT
    With 100% certainty, history will judge fascism, at least in the Italian, German, present Chinese, and emergent Russian forms, as the winner of the great debate – and every globalism whether political, religious or trade, a ludicrous cult of moderns as was monotheism of ancients.

    RELIGION
    When falsifying a religion, one must replace it with a reformation else an even worse cult will emerge (leftism). The Anglo caste system ignored the problem, French made socialism, Jews communism and pseudosciences, and Germans almost succeeded in the romantic and fascist age.

    My understanding of all religions, philosophies, pseudoscience, sophisms is identical: What is true, reciprocal, and evolutionary, and what is false, irreciprocal, and devolutionary? You seek guidance as an individual, and I seek decidability as a ruler.

    Exchange loyalty between the military-state, the law-court, the-government commons, the faith. And put forward a religion that is not false.

    The europeans discovered

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-03 19:41:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105493488673857971

  • A SHIFT IN THE PUBLIC BUT I CAN’T PUT MY FINGER ON IT? by Brandon Hayes —“Can

    A SHIFT IN THE PUBLIC BUT I CAN’T PUT MY FINGER ON IT?
    by Brandon Hayes

    —“Can you give me your read on current public sentiments? I can feel some sort of shift going on and I can’t put my finger on it.”— CurtD

    This is precisely it. No one can put their finger on it because it isn’t a point. At this point we must free our hands, become more capable & put both hands & our arms around what matters & hold onto it like letting it go may kill us; it just may!

    Humans export sanity. But our means of exportation has been crippled, as socializing as such has become a punishable offense. So, we are feeling the hangover from re-orientation. The 6th is going to provide directionality to the future. It doesn’t end on the 6th. It begins.

    The story of democracy has ended. The narrative history of the West has now been put into question. The fictional history fed to the last half dozen subsequent generations is making them ill. They now understand eating bullshit from a shovel isn’t nutritious; plus they’re full.

    The new narrative is comprised of an emergent convergence of truth tellers. Public sentiment is common sentiment. I’m not sure it exists but via negativa. Meaning, people understand what they don’t want now. They understand what they don’t need. This vision was forced.

    All of what the average human thought they wanted, even if they still wanted it (doubt), has been put out of reach. The safety nets have human sized holes in them. Human sized holes are best filled by humans they’ve figured. The shift to caring for kin has been kickstarted.

    The narratives are phony & they all know. The US is the 22 year old kid who just realized their abusive father isn’t big enough to threaten them any longer; & the kid vividly remembers each time he was struck unjustly.

    My generation (millennials) are 10 years late to the party. That’s the big gap. The new baby boom is coming. The elder millennials, my cohorts, set trends. We’re less about consumption than Peter Zeihan believes. Fancy consumption gifted status in the 2000s; but no longer.

    The global stooges don’t have anything to offer America. Traveling round the world is a cosmopolitan sentiment; real Americans loathe cosmopolitans. We long for the cosmos not leisure.

    The great reset has sparked a great awakening. It’s not them it’s us. People are reevaluating themselves. The veil has been lifted. They understand now, they fund their captors. The next step is to rob those captors of sustenance. Ordinary people become extraordinary under less than ordinary conditions.

    The great shift is one of consciousness.

    We’re merely stewards of Eden; we’ve neglected to pull the weeds. We’re supposed to shepherd our people, but amongst us reside too many wolves. We’re meant to keep our brothers; yet we’ve afforded for their slaughter.

    Recognition, revelation, revolution, & recompense or righteous retaliation & reset. Some of us sit in service the rest will be served; and the dish on the menu is co

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-02 20:55:20 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105488116585484476

  • THE POWER LAW Half the value (work, creativity, competitiveness, value) in any o

    THE POWER LAW
    Half the value (work, creativity, competitiveness, value) in any organization, is produced by the square root of the number of people – and group competitiveness and standard of living depends on forming that hierarchy (Pareto distribution). Alternative? Eugenics.

    POWER LAW SCALE
    In a company, city, or army of 20,000 people the president, mayor, or general can personally know the ~150 key people and manage them (strategy), using the root of 150 or ~12 senior executives, and ~3 final authorities (finance, logistics, operations). 1>3>12>150.

    POWER LAW SCALE CONSEQUENCES
    This means that 1% of the people in an org, regardless of scale, provide all the competitive advantage. It’s why 1% end up holding all working capital. It means if your society cannot produce that hierarchy with genetic talent – you’re screwed.

    INTERNATIONAL POWER SCALE
    This is why group aggregate IQ matters – because elites compete against world peers on behalf of citizens. And it’s also why organizations must be national, not international, and why states must now take over strategic capital investment as has China.

    GRAND CONSEQUENCES
    It’s why India needed castes, Europe martial aristocracy, china the bureaucratic state, It’s also why Arabs need Israelis like Latins need germans, like germans need anglos, like conservatives need libertarians, and underclasses need liberals (marxists).

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-02 18:39:38 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105487583029384710