Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • I WANT TO RESTORE AND COMPLETE THE CONSTITUTION – AS SCIENCE CAUTION: My work tr

    I WANT TO RESTORE AND COMPLETE THE CONSTITUTION – AS SCIENCE

    CAUTION:  My work tries to RESTORE the constitution to its intentions of an alliance of states under a weak federation, in the thousand-year history of the holy roman empire, an the successful Germanic and English model of a rule of law of the natural common law, an independent judiciary, and houses of government as a market for commons.

    What I do is legal in the United States. (for now). What’s illegal is planning, organizing, and committing crimes. I have a long-standing policy of separating activism from action. And I have a long-standing policy of stating that we only act as one, not as individuals or small groups. It’s counter-productive.

    The only way to avoid violence is to organize on a scale that the chance of violence by either side is untenable for both sides.  So if you have ‘designs’ that conflict with this strategy, then do not contact me regarding it. I don’t want to know. And I consider it harmful. Ok?

    When we DO ask you to show up, DO show up. And show up ready to play Gandhi until we have no choice but to go viking.

    That is the only path to the moral high ground. There is NO OTHER PATH no matter how horrific you see the present injustices, crimes, and war of genocide against our people.

    The way we win is to demand the same protections for political identity as we do for religious, racial, and sex identity – and to have an honest discussion over the future and policies – and to go our own ways.

    Until we can’t do that because they have demonstrated their criminality in open discourse.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 19:06:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105646234860089390

  • Another FBI Visit

    Warning:  My work tries to RESTORE the constitution to its intentions of an alliance of states under a weak federation, in the thousand-year history of the holy roman empire, an the successful Germanic and English model of a rule of law of the natural common law, an independent judiciary, and houses of government as a market for commons. What I do is legal in the United States. (for now). What’s illegal is planning, organizing, and committing crimes. I have a long-standing policy of separating activism from action. And I have a long-standing policy of stating that we only act as one, not as individuals or small groups. It’s counter-productive. The only way to avoid violence is to organize on a scale that the chance of violence by either side is untenable for both sides.  So if you have ‘designs’ that conflict with this strategy, then do not contact me regarding it. I don’t want to know. And I consider it harmful. Ok? When we DO ask you to show up, DO show up. And show up ready to play Gandhi until we have no choice but to go viking. That is the only path to the moral high ground. There is NO OTHER PATH no matter how horrific you see the present injustices, crimes, and war of genocide against our people. The way we win is to demand the same protections for political identity as we do for religious, racial, and sex identity – and to have an honest discussion over the future and policies – and to go our own ways.

      Long visit from the FBI today – I enjoyed it. Well informed. Knew our work and history. Some thoughts that came up. 1) They have a far more realistic handle on the state of things than I thought they would. Not worried about me but about what some fringe crazy might do from reading my work out of context. 2) They seemed to think it was as ironic as I do that the nitwits accuse me of working for the govt. when the right turned on john and I. They asked why I would continue when they turn on us, underminine us for trying to help them, and they clearly don’t have the brains to do other than rabble rouse. it’s because there is zero conservative thought leadership other than us with any solution other than us, and it’s a moral obligation. 3) They seemed concerned I might have ‘plans’ if I went from tech magnate and world traveler to taking care of a little old lady. It’s not complicated, she was a great mother, she won’t last much longer, I get to do nothing but write this way rather than putting her in a home, and being a bit of a playboy while she’s in a home is immoral. I feel trying to save our people is a moral obligation. And its’ something that I’ve worked on for over a decade. 4) My goal has been the same: restore truthful free speech, so that we can have an honest national dialog, and find a peaceful solution to what must deterministically end in civil war otherwise. 5) I use agitprop and king of the hill games for marketing purposes because that’s all that spreads on social media, and precisely because conservatives are naturally anti-intellectual, and men learn best in adversarial competition. 6) We have similar ambitions but at different scales. They’re trying to solve the problem of violence and crime where one a few will die, and I’m trying to prevent the bloodiest civil war in history, the fall of western civilization, and another dark age that might prevent us from passing through the great filter. There is no comparison in my opinion. 7) I told them that they’re looking at their problem incorrectly, It’s not the talking heads, or me, or the proud boys that try to build organizations that maintain clean hands until the last moment that are a risk. It’s the cells of naturally untrusting guys in one to five or eight, that are silent except between themselves, that will take a risk at a protest and flip the crowd despite the low-level leadership. And the likely trigger event will be anything 2nd amendment related because that’s the red line. 8) IMO the genii is out of the bottle, and civil war is a certainty because there is extraordinary rage, no leadership to direct it to political or policy ends, so the only direction it can go is violence.

  • Another FBI Visit

    Warning:  My work tries to RESTORE the constitution to its intentions of an alliance of states under a weak federation, in the thousand-year history of the holy roman empire, an the successful Germanic and English model of a rule of law of the natural common law, an independent judiciary, and houses of government as a market for commons. What I do is legal in the United States. (for now). What’s illegal is planning, organizing, and committing crimes. I have a long-standing policy of separating activism from action. And I have a long-standing policy of stating that we only act as one, not as individuals or small groups. It’s counter-productive. The only way to avoid violence is to organize on a scale that the chance of violence by either side is untenable for both sides.  So if you have ‘designs’ that conflict with this strategy, then do not contact me regarding it. I don’t want to know. And I consider it harmful. Ok? When we DO ask you to show up, DO show up. And show up ready to play Gandhi until we have no choice but to go viking. That is the only path to the moral high ground. There is NO OTHER PATH no matter how horrific you see the present injustices, crimes, and war of genocide against our people. The way we win is to demand the same protections for political identity as we do for religious, racial, and sex identity – and to have an honest discussion over the future and policies – and to go our own ways.

      Long visit from the FBI today – I enjoyed it. Well informed. Knew our work and history. Some thoughts that came up. 1) They have a far more realistic handle on the state of things than I thought they would. Not worried about me but about what some fringe crazy might do from reading my work out of context. 2) They seemed to think it was as ironic as I do that the nitwits accuse me of working for the govt. when the right turned on john and I. They asked why I would continue when they turn on us, underminine us for trying to help them, and they clearly don’t have the brains to do other than rabble rouse. it’s because there is zero conservative thought leadership other than us with any solution other than us, and it’s a moral obligation. 3) They seemed concerned I might have ‘plans’ if I went from tech magnate and world traveler to taking care of a little old lady. It’s not complicated, she was a great mother, she won’t last much longer, I get to do nothing but write this way rather than putting her in a home, and being a bit of a playboy while she’s in a home is immoral. I feel trying to save our people is a moral obligation. And its’ something that I’ve worked on for over a decade. 4) My goal has been the same: restore truthful free speech, so that we can have an honest national dialog, and find a peaceful solution to what must deterministically end in civil war otherwise. 5) I use agitprop and king of the hill games for marketing purposes because that’s all that spreads on social media, and precisely because conservatives are naturally anti-intellectual, and men learn best in adversarial competition. 6) We have similar ambitions but at different scales. They’re trying to solve the problem of violence and crime where one a few will die, and I’m trying to prevent the bloodiest civil war in history, the fall of western civilization, and another dark age that might prevent us from passing through the great filter. There is no comparison in my opinion. 7) I told them that they’re looking at their problem incorrectly, It’s not the talking heads, or me, or the proud boys that try to build organizations that maintain clean hands until the last moment that are a risk. It’s the cells of naturally untrusting guys in one to five or eight, that are silent except between themselves, that will take a risk at a protest and flip the crowd despite the low-level leadership. And the likely trigger event will be anything 2nd amendment related because that’s the red line. 8) IMO the genii is out of the bottle, and civil war is a certainty because there is extraordinary rage, no leadership to direct it to political or policy ends, so the only direction it can go is violence.

  • No. Europeans Are the Chosen People

    NO, EUROPEANS ARE THE CHOSEN PEOPLE The Jews are not gods chosen people, Europeans are – because we alone discovered the word of god written in his hand, in the fabric of the universe, and we alone serve as the hand of God, discovering, adapting to, applying those laws, and serving God by his words – not by the lies of the jews. Abraham was a devil, jews are his followers, Jesus tried to rescue them, and Paul invented Churchianity, and Muhammed Islam to restore them to ignorance, superstition, and dysgenia.

    -“@curtd Fabric of the universe you say, so how do you interact with this fabric and when did it tell you about Europeans being the chosen people.”-

    1) They’re called the Formal (logical), Physical, Behavioral, and Evolutionary laws of the universe. The universe is made from those laws. 2) Men lie. Abraham invented advanced lying. Abrahamism teaches lying. Judaism, Churchianity, and Islam are made from Abrahamic lying. These lies do not correspond to the evidence of God’s word and deed. If anything, Abraham was a devil, and the Jews chose him as their god. 3) Only Europeans discovered, adapted to, and applied those laws of the universe, and the universe’s god. 4) Jesus told us how to tolerate those tragic laws: love. 5) Paul and the rest of the Jews converted it into magic and lies of ignorance superstition deceit, and servitude. The rabbinical movement reformed the jews to undermine our civilization as well, and Islam imitated Christianity as outright warfare, rather than insurrection against the indo-europea (Iranic and European) empires.

  • Woke: a repetition of the Jewish Christian ad Muslim destruction of the ancient world

    Once you switch over to understanding marxism-neo-marxism, pomo, feminism, pc/wok, anti-whiteness, white replacement, white genocide, is just a repetition of the Jewish Christian ad Muslim destruction of the ancient world by inventing the great lie of monotheism to deny the discovery of the laws of nature, then the present repetition of the Jewish, Christian, Muslim destruction of the ancient world and the present Jewish, pomo, Muslim destruction of the modern world is rather easy to understand. Our problem is that our church didn’t reform and we are stuck with fundamentalist Christians and a failed system of churches, rather than a reformed church that was compatible with and reinforced our group strategy of discovery, adaptation to, and application of the laws of the universe, with Jesus’ love as the means of tolerating the tragedy of those laws.

  • Woke: a repetition of the Jewish Christian ad Muslim destruction of the ancient world

    Once you switch over to understanding marxism-neo-marxism, pomo, feminism, pc/wok, anti-whiteness, white replacement, white genocide, is just a repetition of the Jewish Christian ad Muslim destruction of the ancient world by inventing the great lie of monotheism to deny the discovery of the laws of nature, then the present repetition of the Jewish, Christian, Muslim destruction of the ancient world and the present Jewish, pomo, Muslim destruction of the modern world is rather easy to understand. Our problem is that our church didn’t reform and we are stuck with fundamentalist Christians and a failed system of churches, rather than a reformed church that was compatible with and reinforced our group strategy of discovery, adaptation to, and application of the laws of the universe, with Jesus’ love as the means of tolerating the tragedy of those laws.

  • Chinese, Semites, and Europeans

    IMPORTANT Chinese developed state and harmony first, so they can conquer and assimilate tribes and subraces by slow institutional educational linguistic and cultural integration. Europeans developed law and heroic competition. So we can innovate but not conquer and assimilate. Likewise, the Chinese can defend culturally and militarily, while Europeans can defend militarily but not culturally. The Semites war against culture by total war against the institutions of culture, and state and military as a byproduct. But they can’t produce states or law (or economies for that matter). Fascism was an attempt to eliminate this vulnerability by eliminating tolerance for competition in religion, education, and culture, thereby preserving economy, state, and military – and self-determination. This prevents the west and far east from falling to Semitic undermining of civilization. Gramsci wasn’t inventing anything. He was merely repeating what the Jews, Christians and Muslims had done in the ancient world. Just explaining it in secular prose.

  • Putin’s Accusation of Munich “Betrayal” in Context

    -“In late 2019, I read an article on RT news in which Putin was arguing with the revisionist historians about WWII who wanted to change history. Putin mentioned “the Munich Betrayal,” but it was not explained what it is. Sincere question: what is the Munich Betrayal?”- A Friend

    This topic requires more than a few tweets. The Munich betrayal was the appeasement of Germany by the handover of germanic Czech territory. However, ‘betrayal’ fails to grasp that:

    a) containing the bolsheviks/communists was equal or more important than containing the germans/fascists. b) the people in politically Czech territory were in fact Germans, c) the post-napoleon restoration of the HRE/Germanic federation/empire. d) the same had been done to the Russians prior to the war by the English and french etc (preventing retaking Constantinople, and restoring the orthodox civ). So moralizing events is misleading, and rearview mirror moralizing naive. The French Revolution started it, Napoleon, did the dirty deed. Think of Napoleon and France as continuing the wars of religion between feminine latin authoritarianism and masculine germanic meritocracy.

    1. The French were the most backward country in Europe and the french revolution the most dramatic and violent. The germanic countries modernized fine. The French didn’t. They were still a ‘catholic’ country with authoritarian tendencies. (like the Russians).
    2. the Napoleonic conquest of Europe and the ideas of the french revolution were spread by force as were Arab Islam and Jewish Communism. A counter-reaction against the wars of religion.
    3. Betrayal presumes people are more than bots. They aren’t. They’re bots. This is an ancient dispute between people in an Atlantic to Urals spectrum, just as China had the north-south spectrum of people in their ‘warring states period’. The Chinese managed to homogenize but lost their rate of adaptation. Europeans didn’t manage to homogenize and maintained their rate of adaptation.
    4. Our betrayal is (a) not saving the Russians from the Jewish bolsheviks, (b) not leaving the germans a path to reconstruction without totalitarianism, (c) not saving the Russians when the soviet union collapsed. (d) Anglo virtue-signaling policy is ALWAYS WRONG EVERY TIME.
    5. And (e) Perhaps worst of all, we didn’t suppress the Jewish communist, socialist, neo-marxist, and postmodern movements in the 1950’s because we were drunk on our own virtues, the certainty of our cultural and institutional victory.

    Gramsci (cultural Marxism): Leninism (authoritarian marxism) “Have to have a political party”: Lenin v1 > Stalin v2 > Mao v3 > Woke v4

  • Putin’s Accusation of Munich “Betrayal” in Context

    -“In late 2019, I read an article on RT news in which Putin was arguing with the revisionist historians about WWII who wanted to change history. Putin mentioned “the Munich Betrayal,” but it was not explained what it is. Sincere question: what is the Munich Betrayal?”- A Friend

    This topic requires more than a few tweets. The Munich betrayal was the appeasement of Germany by the handover of germanic Czech territory. However, ‘betrayal’ fails to grasp that:

    a) containing the bolsheviks/communists was equal or more important than containing the germans/fascists. b) the people in politically Czech territory were in fact Germans, c) the post-napoleon restoration of the HRE/Germanic federation/empire. d) the same had been done to the Russians prior to the war by the English and french etc (preventing retaking Constantinople, and restoring the orthodox civ). So moralizing events is misleading, and rearview mirror moralizing naive. The French Revolution started it, Napoleon, did the dirty deed. Think of Napoleon and France as continuing the wars of religion between feminine latin authoritarianism and masculine germanic meritocracy.

    1. The French were the most backward country in Europe and the french revolution the most dramatic and violent. The germanic countries modernized fine. The French didn’t. They were still a ‘catholic’ country with authoritarian tendencies. (like the Russians).
    2. the Napoleonic conquest of Europe and the ideas of the french revolution were spread by force as were Arab Islam and Jewish Communism. A counter-reaction against the wars of religion.
    3. Betrayal presumes people are more than bots. They aren’t. They’re bots. This is an ancient dispute between people in an Atlantic to Urals spectrum, just as China had the north-south spectrum of people in their ‘warring states period’. The Chinese managed to homogenize but lost their rate of adaptation. Europeans didn’t manage to homogenize and maintained their rate of adaptation.
    4. Our betrayal is (a) not saving the Russians from the Jewish bolsheviks, (b) not leaving the germans a path to reconstruction without totalitarianism, (c) not saving the Russians when the soviet union collapsed. (d) Anglo virtue-signaling policy is ALWAYS WRONG EVERY TIME.
    5. And (e) Perhaps worst of all, we didn’t suppress the Jewish communist, socialist, neo-marxist, and postmodern movements in the 1950’s because we were drunk on our own virtues, the certainty of our cultural and institutional victory.

    Gramsci (cultural Marxism): Leninism (authoritarian marxism) “Have to have a political party”: Lenin v1 > Stalin v2 > Mao v3 > Woke v4

  • Every Single Civ Resists Anglo Civilization. Here’s Why.

    1) Every single culture within western civilization and every civilization outside of it has revolted against the Anglo Empirical Revolution. The french, then germans, then Jewish, now Russian, Chinese, and Indian and all of Islam. Why? That’s relatively easy to answer (really). 2) English Empirical Revolution > French ‘Enlightenment’ > Germans > Jews(Mendelsohn v1, Marx v2) > Communists > Gramsci > Lenin > Jewish Frankfurt School > Derrida/Foucault and the endless tream of Jewish postmodernists > ADL+SPLC > PC+Woke >Anti-White(Ness) >White Replacement. 3) It’s the most correspondent with the laws of the universe, continuous natural selection using markets in aspect of life, including trifunctionalism of elites and classes, and military loyalty and duty between them: Military-State, Natural Law-Commerce, and Family-Faith. And… 4) Is the most behaviorally costly social order of all, and most controversially requires suppression of the reproduction of those unfit for those markets. And even such Christian charity to care for those unfit by demonstrated failure in those markets. 5) This is what ‘whiteness’ means. This is why the Jewish postwar attack on every aspect of our civilization began with an attack on prewar eugenics and flooding the country with immigrants unable to adapt to the high cost of western civilization. 6) They did this by false promise of freedom from physical laws (entropy, scarcity), behavioral laws (acquisition, self-interest, reciprocity, kin preference, norms=ratio of IQ to the economy), and evolutionary laws (load, regression to the mean, natural selection, the red queen). 7) And so they cast white civilization as oppressors rather than darwin, and created a pseudoscientific and sophomoric religion of the hatred of white people, and white civilization, despite having rescued them from ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease, and child mortality. 8) BECAUSE THEY CAN’T COMPETE IN IT and will bring down the European civilization as the Jewish Christians brought down the roman empire, and the Muslims destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world.