Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • In Govt, you must organize bureaucrats by various incentives and processes to sl

    In Govt, you must organize bureaucrats by various incentives and processes to slowly build consensus around a plan. In business and the military, you have strategic goals and you gather information and seize every strategic opportunity that advances them.

    Trump = Biz and Mil.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 02:00:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352073436026314761

    Reply addressees: @DineshDSouza

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352072320995774465

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DineshDSouza Dinesh: Trump was unable to find, and make use of, a press secretary that could articulate how any given issue fit into his strategy. I’m not sure trump himself could articulate it so much as understand the goals he was after and incrementally seize opportunities to advance them.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1352072320995774465

  • The Problem Is Obvoius

    THE PROBLEM IS OBVIOUS
     
    -“Some argue that cultural Marxism is a silly term, but I think it works well. It describes a leveling desire that is no longer primarily interested in class, but it demographic groups. It sees society as a battle between races, sexes, and sexualities for power.”-Bo Winegard
     
    Bo:
    The problem?
     
    Reciprocity and Proportionality (Merit) = Eugenic: adversarial competition maintaining natural selection. Necessary for clan, tribe, nation, survival.
    -vs-
    Reciprocity and Equality (Non-Merit) = Dysgenic: social conformity maintaining stasis. Rise and Fall All.
     
    The whole of the Left’s Postwar (Jewish) program is a revolt against Darwin and Malthus’ explanation of the success of the western tradition, using false promise of freedom from scarcity, self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, kin preference, and genetic load, regression-2-mean.
     
    So it’s not cultural marxism alone, it’s Islam Judaism, marxism, socialism, cultural marxism, postmodernism, anti-male feminism, science denial, pc/woke, anti-white, anti-west.
     
    Why? It’s not possible to compete given their <95 medians.
     
    It’s not possible to prey upon 105+ medians.
     
    So it’s a war over power to defeat the only eugenic civilization this side of china, and reduce the west to ashes as they have done with every other that semitic civilization has come into contact with.

  • The Problem Is Obvoius

    THE PROBLEM IS OBVIOUS
     
    -“Some argue that cultural Marxism is a silly term, but I think it works well. It describes a leveling desire that is no longer primarily interested in class, but it demographic groups. It sees society as a battle between races, sexes, and sexualities for power.”-Bo Winegard
     
    Bo:
    The problem?
     
    Reciprocity and Proportionality (Merit) = Eugenic: adversarial competition maintaining natural selection. Necessary for clan, tribe, nation, survival.
    -vs-
    Reciprocity and Equality (Non-Merit) = Dysgenic: social conformity maintaining stasis. Rise and Fall All.
     
    The whole of the Left’s Postwar (Jewish) program is a revolt against Darwin and Malthus’ explanation of the success of the western tradition, using false promise of freedom from scarcity, self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, kin preference, and genetic load, regression-2-mean.
     
    So it’s not cultural marxism alone, it’s Islam Judaism, marxism, socialism, cultural marxism, postmodernism, anti-male feminism, science denial, pc/woke, anti-white, anti-west.
     
    Why? It’s not possible to compete given their <95 medians.
     
    It’s not possible to prey upon 105+ medians.
     
    So it’s a war over power to defeat the only eugenic civilization this side of china, and reduce the west to ashes as they have done with every other that semitic civilization has come into contact with.
  • The Mathematics of Beauty

    The Mathematics of Beauty

    Reality: There are tens of thousands of women more beautiful than ‘beautiful’ actresses, which is obvious from looking around at any college football game. Browse through the top twenty modeling agencies, and there are dozens of women (for example, Ford’s Johanna Schapfeld) and more in the Direct set that tend to be less ‘severe’.  When sitting outside a restaurant in St Petersburg or Moscow  – not so much Kiev any longer – on any summer evening, and packs of flawless women walk by together. (And there are cities in certain countries where the very opposite is true.) Modeling takes a little work, and acting more so, and capturing the audience’s attention harder than those outside the field. So beauty isn’t enough so to speak for modeling or acting. There was a definite German-Scandinavian preference earlier last century for stronger squarer faces (ie: Rita Hayworth), instead of the slightly softer ‘perfect’ shape we see below. (Scandinavian women looked more masculine in the early middle ages, we don’t know why the shift has occurred.) The present trend is more androgenous and tilted to women less fit for repeated childbirth. Add that we used more stoic and subtle facial expressions in the past, and were ‘less desperate’ for attention. So facial muscles have changed, and so has diet. And women are not aging well for reasons we don’t understand. Also, the post 1950’s ‘slumming’ of the movie industry favors oddities rather than qualities. Worse, there is a long-standing war by our ‘local enemies’ that seeks to trash classical beauty (genetic perfection) just as they have trashed our arts, literature, history, values, institutions, religion, and laws. Also, genetic beauty ages well. Oddity doesn’t. The current fashion trend remains excessively thin women, with wide eyes, and long faces. So that trend ‘obscures’ women that are genetically perfect. That said, a study of beauty is easier with well-known characters. But trying to find a picture of a woman as we can see on the top left as Florence Colgate, with natural lighting, and limited or no makeup is almost impossible. Example of Golden Ratio Conformity

    Florence Colgate UK Mathematically Perfect

    Grace Kelly Irish-German American Gold Standard
    Charlize Theron Dutch South African Gold Standard
    Sienna Miller UK
    Valentina Zelyaeva Russia
    Naiomi Watts UK
    Nina Loseth Norway, Skier Perfect
    Johanna Schapfeld Ford Models
    Candace Bergen Swedish American
    Catherine Deneuve French
    Anita Ekberg Swedish (Questionable inclusion)
    Jean Seabring Swedish American Another that’s perfect but it’s impossible to find a photo.
    Vivian Leigh (Hartley) UK Another difficult one to find a good photo.
    Audrey Hepburn
       
    Emily De Ravin More Gracile    		   

      Can’t Find This Woman’s Name: Jacksonville Jaguars Cheerleader “Jessica K.” first half of 20 teens. She’s from Phoenix AZ, and went to Arizona State University.

  • The Mathematics of Beauty

    The Mathematics of Beauty

    Reality: There are tens of thousands of women more beautiful than ‘beautiful’ actresses, which is obvious from looking around at any college football game. Browse through the top twenty modeling agencies, and there are dozens of women (for example, Ford’s Johanna Schapfeld) and more in the Direct set that tend to be less ‘severe’.  When sitting outside a restaurant in St Petersburg or Moscow  – not so much Kiev any longer – on any summer evening, and packs of flawless women walk by together. (And there are cities in certain countries where the very opposite is true.) Modeling takes a little work, and acting more so, and capturing the audience’s attention harder than those outside the field. So beauty isn’t enough so to speak for modeling or acting. There was a definite German-Scandinavian preference earlier last century for stronger squarer faces (ie: Rita Hayworth), instead of the slightly softer ‘perfect’ shape we see below. (Scandinavian women looked more masculine in the early middle ages, we don’t know why the shift has occurred.) The present trend is more androgenous and tilted to women less fit for repeated childbirth. Add that we used more stoic and subtle facial expressions in the past, and were ‘less desperate’ for attention. So facial muscles have changed, and so has diet. And women are not aging well for reasons we don’t understand. Also, the post 1950’s ‘slumming’ of the movie industry favors oddities rather than qualities. Worse, there is a long-standing war by our ‘local enemies’ that seeks to trash classical beauty (genetic perfection) just as they have trashed our arts, literature, history, values, institutions, religion, and laws. Also, genetic beauty ages well. Oddity doesn’t. The current fashion trend remains excessively thin women, with wide eyes, and long faces. So that trend ‘obscures’ women that are genetically perfect. That said, a study of beauty is easier with well-known characters. But trying to find a picture of a woman as we can see on the top left as Florence Colgate, with natural lighting, and limited or no makeup is almost impossible. Example of Golden Ratio Conformity

    Florence Colgate UK Mathematically Perfect

    Grace Kelly Irish-German American Gold Standard
    Charlize Theron Dutch South African Gold Standard
    Sienna Miller UK
    Valentina Zelyaeva Russia
    Naiomi Watts UK
    Nina Loseth Norway, Skier Perfect
    Johanna Schapfeld Ford Models
    Candace Bergen Swedish American
    Catherine Deneuve French
    Anita Ekberg Swedish (Questionable inclusion)
    Jean Seabring Swedish American Another that’s perfect but it’s impossible to find a photo.
    Vivian Leigh (Hartley) UK Another difficult one to find a good photo.
    Audrey Hepburn
       
    Emily De Ravin More Gracile    		   

      Can’t Find This Woman’s Name: Jacksonville Jaguars Cheerleader “Jessica K.” first half of 20 teens. She’s from Phoenix AZ, and went to Arizona State University.

  • Determinism in Prediction: Zeihan on China, Rubini on 2008, many in 2001, 87 etc.

    Regarding “Zeihan’s been predicting china’s decline for ten years” So have I and others. Zeihan is just the best at explaining it. I predicted in 04-06 that China’s economy would correct between 10 and 14. I was wrong. But their data is terrible, the degree to which they had done to the west’s technology and economy what America did the the european economy in the late 1800’s and the Germans after World War Two difficult is to observe from afar, and perhaps most importantly, when the State as primary investor can’t fall to fear and flight like major banks, institutional and retail investors (something the west must learn), and when they had until this year an endless labor pool to price arbitrage against the world – it was very hard to get the timing right. The Layers of Prediction:

    1. Those of us who begin with Geography and Demographics in Everything, will be right over the long term – we have to be. It’s down to physics over the long term.  That’s why we must teach geography, and demographics, and end our fear of discussing the genetic differences between populations. Because those genetics generate demand for culture, and for political system, and group strategy and tactics.

    2. The next layer down that determines the future is strategic power – again dependent on geography demographics economy and culture. This is why we must teach military history lest we become the victims of not doing so (like now). The left sought to claim the european industrial revolution brought a bout the end of history and the utopia of universalism. It was a false promise. (And we’re seeing the consequences)

    3. The next layer down is patterns of sustainable production and trade that makes that economy and culture possible. This requires a great deal of economic knowledge by industry. While you might not think so, it’s possible to develop a basic understanding of world industries, just as it is a basic understanding of all the sciences. And thanks to technology that data is readily available. All three of these layers provide a general understanding of the world system of human behavior, and loosely predict long term trends within which we an profit from cycles of medium and shorter term opportunities. So by studying Trends and Risk from the top down, Zeihan, others, and we, learn of strategic, governmental, and industrial opportunities and risks in the world. And the investment and entrepreneurial sectors seek opportunities within that ‘sea of continuous global change’. And domestic entrepreneurs and political entrepreneurs learn of industrial commercial and social opportunities at home. And the difference between global thinkers is their audience. Zeihan’s audience is industrial and as a consequences of interest to the general public whose opportunities s are largely the restult of industrial and trade shifts.  Friedman’s audience is more likely the state, whose opportunities are strategic and political both. In the past, under American hegemony, that was a more interesting topic for the general public. But hundreds of thousands of people in the investment economy and millions in industrial economies, all study their window into those broader world trends. (And we teach our children nothing of it other than to deride it.) But the lesson to learn is that their ‘fascist’ state-investment economy was more successful than our ‘capitalist’ (private) at both rapid expansion, and softening decline. Fascism arose to fight global communism, just as Napoleon arose to destroy the Holy Roman Empire of the greater european peoples. Because Napoleonic France, Jewish Communism, and European Fascism make possible total war by ethnic, religious, cultural, informational, economic means in addition to military means.  And that’s a hard lesson in a democracy whose econommy is governed by private investors and entrepreneurs rather than history’s traditional private-public parternships, or the less visible strategy of the Americans, which until undermined, was to use the military for basic research, and let the private sector exploit it.  In other words our present values of democracy and social democracy, and consumer capitalism, are privileges of the windfall of the European unification of the world in the age of sail, and the Northern Italian restoration of empiricism by Classical Reason, German printing press, the Atlantic state age of sail in response to the Muslim conquest of Byzantium, and the subsequent rapid sequence of British agrarian, commercial, financial, industrial, revolutions, the German second scientific revolution, and the American technological revolution. But back to China. In her rapid modernization, China didn’t emulate the global communists but the nationalist fascists. Unfortunately, the fascists were right: capitalism, socialism, and communism are incapable of long term governance since all are dependent on cheap opportunity created by the european modernization of the world. As such the world returns to historical norm as Huntington predicted as a conflict (competition) of races, civilizations, core states, demographics, genetics, and geography. The European, British, American unification of the world by trade in an effort to continue the strategy of european aristocracy: domestication of man and his matters – ‘our burden’ – has come to an end. As our attempts have historically come to an end: because our demographic and cultural resources to do so are overwhelmed by the sheer scale of the task.

  • Determinism in Prediction: Zeihan on China, Rubini on 2008, many in 2001, 87 etc.

    Regarding “Zeihan’s been predicting china’s decline for ten years” So have I and others. Zeihan is just the best at explaining it. I predicted in 04-06 that China’s economy would correct between 10 and 14. I was wrong. But their data is terrible, the degree to which they had done to the west’s technology and economy what America did the the european economy in the late 1800’s and the Germans after World War Two difficult is to observe from afar, and perhaps most importantly, when the State as primary investor can’t fall to fear and flight like major banks, institutional and retail investors (something the west must learn), and when they had until this year an endless labor pool to price arbitrage against the world – it was very hard to get the timing right. The Layers of Prediction:

    1. Those of us who begin with Geography and Demographics in Everything, will be right over the long term – we have to be. It’s down to physics over the long term.  That’s why we must teach geography, and demographics, and end our fear of discussing the genetic differences between populations. Because those genetics generate demand for culture, and for political system, and group strategy and tactics.

    2. The next layer down that determines the future is strategic power – again dependent on geography demographics economy and culture. This is why we must teach military history lest we become the victims of not doing so (like now). The left sought to claim the european industrial revolution brought a bout the end of history and the utopia of universalism. It was a false promise. (And we’re seeing the consequences)

    3. The next layer down is patterns of sustainable production and trade that makes that economy and culture possible. This requires a great deal of economic knowledge by industry. While you might not think so, it’s possible to develop a basic understanding of world industries, just as it is a basic understanding of all the sciences. And thanks to technology that data is readily available. All three of these layers provide a general understanding of the world system of human behavior, and loosely predict long term trends within which we an profit from cycles of medium and shorter term opportunities. So by studying Trends and Risk from the top down, Zeihan, others, and we, learn of strategic, governmental, and industrial opportunities and risks in the world. And the investment and entrepreneurial sectors seek opportunities within that ‘sea of continuous global change’. And domestic entrepreneurs and political entrepreneurs learn of industrial commercial and social opportunities at home. And the difference between global thinkers is their audience. Zeihan’s audience is industrial and as a consequences of interest to the general public whose opportunities s are largely the restult of industrial and trade shifts.  Friedman’s audience is more likely the state, whose opportunities are strategic and political both. In the past, under American hegemony, that was a more interesting topic for the general public. But hundreds of thousands of people in the investment economy and millions in industrial economies, all study their window into those broader world trends. (And we teach our children nothing of it other than to deride it.) But the lesson to learn is that their ‘fascist’ state-investment economy was more successful than our ‘capitalist’ (private) at both rapid expansion, and softening decline. Fascism arose to fight global communism, just as Napoleon arose to destroy the Holy Roman Empire of the greater european peoples. Because Napoleonic France, Jewish Communism, and European Fascism make possible total war by ethnic, religious, cultural, informational, economic means in addition to military means.  And that’s a hard lesson in a democracy whose econommy is governed by private investors and entrepreneurs rather than history’s traditional private-public parternships, or the less visible strategy of the Americans, which until undermined, was to use the military for basic research, and let the private sector exploit it.  In other words our present values of democracy and social democracy, and consumer capitalism, are privileges of the windfall of the European unification of the world in the age of sail, and the Northern Italian restoration of empiricism by Classical Reason, German printing press, the Atlantic state age of sail in response to the Muslim conquest of Byzantium, and the subsequent rapid sequence of British agrarian, commercial, financial, industrial, revolutions, the German second scientific revolution, and the American technological revolution. But back to China. In her rapid modernization, China didn’t emulate the global communists but the nationalist fascists. Unfortunately, the fascists were right: capitalism, socialism, and communism are incapable of long term governance since all are dependent on cheap opportunity created by the european modernization of the world. As such the world returns to historical norm as Huntington predicted as a conflict (competition) of races, civilizations, core states, demographics, genetics, and geography. The European, British, American unification of the world by trade in an effort to continue the strategy of european aristocracy: domestication of man and his matters – ‘our burden’ – has come to an end. As our attempts have historically come to an end: because our demographic and cultural resources to do so are overwhelmed by the sheer scale of the task.

  • WE ARE INCOMPATIBLE – END THE VICIOUS CYCLE OF WAR BETWEEN EUROPE AND SEMITES As

    WE ARE INCOMPATIBLE – END THE VICIOUS CYCLE OF WAR BETWEEN EUROPE AND SEMITES

    As we see with ‘the purge’ the Jews have become the Nazis and Ethnic Europeans the Jews.

    Anti-Whiteness, Critical Race Theory, Anti-Aristocracy, Anti-Military, Anti-Colonialism, Anti-Christianity, Freud-Boaz-Gould pseudoscience, Marxism, Neocon, Pomo, Libertarian, Anti-Family Feminism, Anti-Rule of Law Positive Law, Anti Democratic Judicial Activism, Anti-Testimonial Truth, PC/Woke

    END THE VICIOUS CYCLE
    1. Alexander Crossing the Bosphorus vs Persia -> infection of the west with oriental authoritarian mysticism.
    2. Rome vs Judea -> Diaspora -> Infection of Europe by Jews.
    3. Jews-xians vs Rome -> Fall Of Rome and the Semitic Abrahamic Dark Age
    4. Nazi vs Jews -> Fall of European Empires
    5. Jews vs Russia, EU, USA -> the present collapse and coming second Semitic Dark Age

    We have only these choices:
    1 – Outlaw the many crimes possible by the Abrahamic method of false promise, baiting into hazard, hiding behind plausible deniability, and demand for Jewish religious legal and cultural reform, equally prohibiting the Abrahamic methods of parasitism and deceit.
    2 – A Great Silence: ending Jewish public speech in all forms.
    3 – Restoration of the Prohibition from institutional participation in state, academy, media,
    4 – Restoration of the bans on jews and Judaism in western civilization
    5 – War.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-11 16:38:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105538066609091756

  • The Origin of Bad Law

    THE ORIGIN OF BAD LAW IS JEWISH PILPUL I don’t know whether Scalia didnt know or whether he was afraid to say so, but the ‘big lies’ of ‘living constitution’, ‘interpretation’, and judicial activism, were introduced postwar Jews’ pilpul and critique, from interpreting Jewish Law. LEGAL DECIDABILITY In just a few decades, by 1980, Jewish pilpul and critique, positive law, and Jewish kritarchy, had succeeded in incrementally rewriting the constitution against the will of the people. Scalia alone is responsible for restoring scientific (textualist) law. JOHN RAWLS With his test of “the veil of ignorance” Rawls tried to extend reciprocity from its necessity in interpersonal action, cumulatively producing a normal distribution, into reciprocity in economic, social, and political producing an abnormal (equalitarian) distribution. THE 20TH CENTURY The introduction to my work explains the great failure of western civ to adapt to modernity beginning with Babbage’s failure to produce a general theory. Weber loosely understood: calculation. But the Jewish counter-revolution restored verbal sophistry instead. EUROPEANS AND OUR LEGAL ORIGINS Authority by prohibiting authority. Social Engineering by prohibiting social engineering. Forcing all into adaptive service of one another. Maximizing Self Determination and Natural Selection Transcending man into gods. EUROPEAN RULE OF LAW Creating harmony in continuous adaptation by market disharmony where every other person is both a potential competitor and customer and productivity and reciprocity necessary for survival. Our strength and weakness is resulting adaptive tolerance and trust. European common law functions as a continuous ledger of the discovery of, and incremental suppression of, irreciprocity under self-determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, and duty. Our law is scientific legal accounting, and Jewish law is only wisdom literature. STRICT CONSTRUCTION VS TEXTUAL LITERALISM Under Textualism, ‘Strict Construction’ ~means “take the text literally”. Under P-Law, which is also textual, ‘Strict Construction” means Legislative, Regulatory and Case law must be built from the first principle of self-determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, and duty. In other words, the meaning of strict construction is in P-law reflects the common-sense meaning. The legislature, State, or Court must justify (write a proof of) its authority to impose such an Act. DECIDABILITY In European Empirical Tradition Judges do not make law, they apply law and discover new applications of it. They DISCOVER applications of the law. The feedback loop was broken at modern rates of change because there is no constitutional route for forcing the legislature rule. NECESSARY REVISION OF OUR CONSTITUTION No Judge under the natural common law, may deprive legislature or people of choice by creating case law for social, political, economic, or strategic reasons, rather than applying the original intent of law to the present case before it. Natural law itself prohibits judges from that ‘THEFT’ from the commons. Judicial legislation from the bench enfeebles the legislature, which enfeebles the people, and descends into arbitrary kritarky of the jews and muslims. JUSTICE SCALIA AGREED The constitution does not define common law, dependence on natural law, or the means by which justices interpret the law, but he doesn’t want congress telling the court that. So even an amendment man not fix the ‘pilpul-ization’ of our law. SCALIA’S LIMITS However, despite Scalia’s success at restoring scientific law, despite Jewish attempts to undermine it from activism within the academy, and profession, he lacked the formal knowledge of how to explain WHY. But at least he gave us a recipe of 13 failings to fix. CAUSES OF NOW: SURVIVING THE RESTORATION AND COUNTER-REVOLUTIONS 1. Italy 1400’s: Italian-anglo classical thought restoration and Aesthetic-Cultural-Accounting Revolution 2. England 1600’s: Anglo legal-empirical restoration and Legal-Empirical-Financial-Commercial-industrial revolution 3. France 1700’s: French secular Catholic counter-revolution and Roman Total-War-State 4. Germany 1800’s German secular Protestant counter-revolution, German Secular Rational revolution, 2nd Scientific Revolution, and Failed Romantic Classical Revolution 5. Jews 1900’s Jewish Sophistry/Pseudoscientific counter-revolution, Intellectual Counter-Revolution. 6. Leading to …. The Present Revolt Do we restore western civ in the 2000’s or do we have another abrahamic dark age? THE 20th CENTURY JUDICIAL THEORISTS Kritarchy (Authority, Philosophical): Kelsen AUS(J) Pos Hartt UK(J) Pos Dworkin US(J) Pos Rawls US(P) Pos -vs- Sovereignty (Markets, Empirical): Epstein, US(J) Nat/Sci Hayek, AUS(C>A) Econ/Sci Scalia, US(C) Sci/Tech (Doolittle US(P/C>A), Sci/Tech/Econ) OUR FAILURE So we must add Kelsen-Dworkin-Hartt, to Cantor-Bohr, Boaz-Freud, Marx-Lenin, Trotsky-Strauss-Kristol, Adorno-Marcuse-Fromm, Gramsci-Derrida, Friedan-Steinem, Rand-Rothbard: The sophomoric and pseudoscientific revolution against european scientific civilization. OUR CHRISTIAN AND SECULAR WEAKNESSES Christian ethics, Abrahamic theology, and our FAILURE to articulate the science of our law and our civilization that imprison us in susceptibility to the suite of Jewish counter-revolutions against european scientific civilization. We solve that problem with our law “Conservatism is a fight against entropy premised on the recognition of a fundamental asymmetry: in one day, people can destroy what took hundreds of years to create.”- Bo Winegard Close. Conservatism(Europeanism) is a fight to preserve continuous adaptation by natural selection by self-determination by self-determined means, limiting us to sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, and adversarial markets in all walks of life. Progressivism(Abrahamic) is maladaptive: hyperconsumptive, asymmetrically reproductive, decapitalizing, devolutionary, and dysgenic. BUT XIANITY REMAINS The debate over Christianity is over. Whether you are faithful, philosophical, or scientific, Christian doesn’t matter. Christianity must be the state religion of western civilization, and our pagan and heathen religions the natural traditional religion of western civilization. We are all Christians in one way or another whether we realize it or not just as we are platonists vs realists. We are what we are not. Christianity defends against social evil, paganism against political and heathen against ethnic. Together they insure us against all evils. Christianity solves a very serious problem which is why Christian countries are wealthier per capita than the rest. The question is how can we re-nationalize it and de-globalize it, and restore european historical study. It solves problem for the people who have the problem and they can’t be converted. Replacing Christianity is just a practical impossibility and an unfair ask. I’m closest to a germanic pagan, and I’m an anti-Abrahamist, but I recognize that MY BROTHERS ARE NOT, and so loyalty is sufficient for blood. I think it is fixable without throwing out the baby with the bathwater. It is the hardest problem to solve. So there are things we must compromise on in order to worth together, and that means secular (philosophical), theological(Christian), and natural religion.

  • The Origin of Bad Law

    THE ORIGIN OF BAD LAW IS JEWISH PILPUL I don’t know whether Scalia didnt know or whether he was afraid to say so, but the ‘big lies’ of ‘living constitution’, ‘interpretation’, and judicial activism, were introduced postwar Jews’ pilpul and critique, from interpreting Jewish Law. LEGAL DECIDABILITY In just a few decades, by 1980, Jewish pilpul and critique, positive law, and Jewish kritarchy, had succeeded in incrementally rewriting the constitution against the will of the people. Scalia alone is responsible for restoring scientific (textualist) law. JOHN RAWLS With his test of “the veil of ignorance” Rawls tried to extend reciprocity from its necessity in interpersonal action, cumulatively producing a normal distribution, into reciprocity in economic, social, and political producing an abnormal (equalitarian) distribution. THE 20TH CENTURY The introduction to my work explains the great failure of western civ to adapt to modernity beginning with Babbage’s failure to produce a general theory. Weber loosely understood: calculation. But the Jewish counter-revolution restored verbal sophistry instead. EUROPEANS AND OUR LEGAL ORIGINS Authority by prohibiting authority. Social Engineering by prohibiting social engineering. Forcing all into adaptive service of one another. Maximizing Self Determination and Natural Selection Transcending man into gods. EUROPEAN RULE OF LAW Creating harmony in continuous adaptation by market disharmony where every other person is both a potential competitor and customer and productivity and reciprocity necessary for survival. Our strength and weakness is resulting adaptive tolerance and trust. European common law functions as a continuous ledger of the discovery of, and incremental suppression of, irreciprocity under self-determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, and duty. Our law is scientific legal accounting, and Jewish law is only wisdom literature. STRICT CONSTRUCTION VS TEXTUAL LITERALISM Under Textualism, ‘Strict Construction’ ~means “take the text literally”. Under P-Law, which is also textual, ‘Strict Construction” means Legislative, Regulatory and Case law must be built from the first principle of self-determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, and duty. In other words, the meaning of strict construction is in P-law reflects the common-sense meaning. The legislature, State, or Court must justify (write a proof of) its authority to impose such an Act. DECIDABILITY In European Empirical Tradition Judges do not make law, they apply law and discover new applications of it. They DISCOVER applications of the law. The feedback loop was broken at modern rates of change because there is no constitutional route for forcing the legislature rule. NECESSARY REVISION OF OUR CONSTITUTION No Judge under the natural common law, may deprive legislature or people of choice by creating case law for social, political, economic, or strategic reasons, rather than applying the original intent of law to the present case before it. Natural law itself prohibits judges from that ‘THEFT’ from the commons. Judicial legislation from the bench enfeebles the legislature, which enfeebles the people, and descends into arbitrary kritarky of the jews and muslims. JUSTICE SCALIA AGREED The constitution does not define common law, dependence on natural law, or the means by which justices interpret the law, but he doesn’t want congress telling the court that. So even an amendment man not fix the ‘pilpul-ization’ of our law. SCALIA’S LIMITS However, despite Scalia’s success at restoring scientific law, despite Jewish attempts to undermine it from activism within the academy, and profession, he lacked the formal knowledge of how to explain WHY. But at least he gave us a recipe of 13 failings to fix. CAUSES OF NOW: SURVIVING THE RESTORATION AND COUNTER-REVOLUTIONS 1. Italy 1400’s: Italian-anglo classical thought restoration and Aesthetic-Cultural-Accounting Revolution 2. England 1600’s: Anglo legal-empirical restoration and Legal-Empirical-Financial-Commercial-industrial revolution 3. France 1700’s: French secular Catholic counter-revolution and Roman Total-War-State 4. Germany 1800’s German secular Protestant counter-revolution, German Secular Rational revolution, 2nd Scientific Revolution, and Failed Romantic Classical Revolution 5. Jews 1900’s Jewish Sophistry/Pseudoscientific counter-revolution, Intellectual Counter-Revolution. 6. Leading to …. The Present Revolt Do we restore western civ in the 2000’s or do we have another abrahamic dark age? THE 20th CENTURY JUDICIAL THEORISTS Kritarchy (Authority, Philosophical): Kelsen AUS(J) Pos Hartt UK(J) Pos Dworkin US(J) Pos Rawls US(P) Pos -vs- Sovereignty (Markets, Empirical): Epstein, US(J) Nat/Sci Hayek, AUS(C>A) Econ/Sci Scalia, US(C) Sci/Tech (Doolittle US(P/C>A), Sci/Tech/Econ) OUR FAILURE So we must add Kelsen-Dworkin-Hartt, to Cantor-Bohr, Boaz-Freud, Marx-Lenin, Trotsky-Strauss-Kristol, Adorno-Marcuse-Fromm, Gramsci-Derrida, Friedan-Steinem, Rand-Rothbard: The sophomoric and pseudoscientific revolution against european scientific civilization. OUR CHRISTIAN AND SECULAR WEAKNESSES Christian ethics, Abrahamic theology, and our FAILURE to articulate the science of our law and our civilization that imprison us in susceptibility to the suite of Jewish counter-revolutions against european scientific civilization. We solve that problem with our law “Conservatism is a fight against entropy premised on the recognition of a fundamental asymmetry: in one day, people can destroy what took hundreds of years to create.”- Bo Winegard Close. Conservatism(Europeanism) is a fight to preserve continuous adaptation by natural selection by self-determination by self-determined means, limiting us to sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, and adversarial markets in all walks of life. Progressivism(Abrahamic) is maladaptive: hyperconsumptive, asymmetrically reproductive, decapitalizing, devolutionary, and dysgenic. BUT XIANITY REMAINS The debate over Christianity is over. Whether you are faithful, philosophical, or scientific, Christian doesn’t matter. Christianity must be the state religion of western civilization, and our pagan and heathen religions the natural traditional religion of western civilization. We are all Christians in one way or another whether we realize it or not just as we are platonists vs realists. We are what we are not. Christianity defends against social evil, paganism against political and heathen against ethnic. Together they insure us against all evils. Christianity solves a very serious problem which is why Christian countries are wealthier per capita than the rest. The question is how can we re-nationalize it and de-globalize it, and restore european historical study. It solves problem for the people who have the problem and they can’t be converted. Replacing Christianity is just a practical impossibility and an unfair ask. I’m closest to a germanic pagan, and I’m an anti-Abrahamist, but I recognize that MY BROTHERS ARE NOT, and so loyalty is sufficient for blood. I think it is fixable without throwing out the baby with the bathwater. It is the hardest problem to solve. So there are things we must compromise on in order to worth together, and that means secular (philosophical), theological(Christian), and natural religion.