1) Every single culture within western civilization and every civilization outside of it has revolted against the Anglo Empirical Revolution. The french, then germans, then Jewish, now Russian, Chinese, and Indian and all of Islam. Why? That’s relatively easy to answer (really).
2) English Empirical Revolution > French ‘Enlightenment’ > Germans > Jews(Mendelsohn v1, Marx v2) > Communists > Gramsci > Lenin > Jewish Frankfurt School > Derrida/Foucault and the endless tream of Jewish postmodernists > ADL+SPLC > PC+Woke >Anti-White(Ness) >White Replacement.
3) It’s the most correspondent with the laws of the universe, continuous natural selection using markets in aspect of life, including trifunctionalism of elites and classes, and military loyalty and duty between them: Military-State, Natural Law-Commerce, and Family-Faith. And…
4) Is the most behaviorally costly social order of all, and most controversially requires suppression of the reproduction of those unfit for those markets. And even such Christian charity to care for those unfit by demonstrated failure in those markets.
5) This is what ‘whiteness’ means. This is why the Jewish postwar attack on every aspect of our civilization began with an attack on prewar eugenics and flooding the country with immigrants unable to adapt to the high cost of western civilization.
6) They did this by false promise of freedom from physical laws (entropy, scarcity), behavioral laws (acquisition, self-interest, reciprocity, kin preference, norms=ratio of IQ to the economy), and evolutionary laws (load, regression to the mean, natural selection, the red queen).
7) And so they cast white civilization as oppressors rather than darwin, and created a pseudoscientific and sophomoric religion of the hatred of white people, and white civilization, despite having rescued them from ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease, and child mortality.
8) BECAUSE THEY CAN’T COMPETE IN IT and will bring down the European civilization as the Jewish Christians brought down the roman empire, and the Muslims destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world.
Form: Mini Essay
-
Why Do Western Women Undermine Western Civilization?
WHY DO WESTERN WOMEN UNDERMINE WESTERN CIVILIZATION? 1. Anglos converted to 100% middle class, seeking cheap success in democracy without paying the cost of maintaining our intellectual, social, economic, political advantage by military service, unity, political control. 2. Aryanism (European civilization’s core drive) is heroic so breeds altruism and virtue signaling. 3. Christianity teaches submission, pacifism, tolerance, and amplifies altruism, altruistic punishment, and virtue signal spirals if virtue can be proxied through political pretense instead of personal action at personal cost. Fake Christians. Fake Christian Ethics. 4. And Women are Worst. They seek attention. They seek attention as aggressively as men seek sex. And verbal signaling is cheaper for them than men’s signaling status by demonstrated achievement. And they seek safety. They seek safety by signaling non-aggression. They seek safety by virtue-signaling non-aggression. They used mass communication combined with women in the voting pool, to virtue signal without personal cost. They created a market of escalating demands for attention, and escalating demand for attention by virtue signaling of non-aggression, thereby producing virtue signal spirals that convert from non-aggression and tolerance to aggression and intolerance. (Just as Popper predicted.) 5. This demand for attention, the pretense of non-aggression, virtue signaling (value signaling), and escalating demand for attention by virtue-signaling into virtue signal spirals, that turns into intolerance, aggression and undermining is simply female social super-predation industrialized by mass communication, where the costs of their political ‘accommodation’ of the enemies of civilization are born by men and men alone.
-
Why Do Western Women Undermine Western Civilization?
WHY DO WESTERN WOMEN UNDERMINE WESTERN CIVILIZATION? 1. Anglos converted to 100% middle class, seeking cheap success in democracy without paying the cost of maintaining our intellectual, social, economic, political advantage by military service, unity, political control. 2. Aryanism (European civilization’s core drive) is heroic so breeds altruism and virtue signaling. 3. Christianity teaches submission, pacifism, tolerance, and amplifies altruism, altruistic punishment, and virtue signal spirals if virtue can be proxied through political pretense instead of personal action at personal cost. Fake Christians. Fake Christian Ethics. 4. And Women are Worst. They seek attention. They seek attention as aggressively as men seek sex. And verbal signaling is cheaper for them than men’s signaling status by demonstrated achievement. And they seek safety. They seek safety by signaling non-aggression. They seek safety by virtue-signaling non-aggression. They used mass communication combined with women in the voting pool, to virtue signal without personal cost. They created a market of escalating demands for attention, and escalating demand for attention by virtue signaling of non-aggression, thereby producing virtue signal spirals that convert from non-aggression and tolerance to aggression and intolerance. (Just as Popper predicted.) 5. This demand for attention, the pretense of non-aggression, virtue signaling (value signaling), and escalating demand for attention by virtue-signaling into virtue signal spirals, that turns into intolerance, aggression and undermining is simply female social super-predation industrialized by mass communication, where the costs of their political ‘accommodation’ of the enemies of civilization are born by men and men alone.
-
Example of When Men Argue as Women – and Explaining Why It Matters
EXAMPLE OF WHEN MEN ARGUE AS WOMEN – AND EXPLAINING WHY IT MATTERS
-“Even your opinions wrong.”- a hostile
I pretty much never err. It’s my job not to. I do make one mistake on a regular basis – I overestimate the common man, and in particular, I underestimate the degree to which a third of the male sex was born with female personality and cognitive traits. (“Men without chests”)
-“Even your follow up opinion is wrong”-
And you respond with a cognitively female expression of disapproval in the absence of testifiable argument rather than a male expression of truth or falsehood by use of a testifiable argument. … Like I said. I don’t err.
-“And you continue to miss the point”-
Again: female cognitive bias from female personality traits by avoiding questions of truth or falsehood. My point is, and will remain, that the sexes demonstrate marginal indifference in task processing other than preference but vast differences in intuition and accountability in social and political performance. (It’s the science). So you have to ask yourself why you’re lying and denying,evading and ad hom, disapproval instead of argument. The reason is, as I stated because you’re demonstrating cognitively female traits – not education, information, cognitive, and testimonial discipline. And you continue to miss the point: Truth permits reciprocal exchange. Truth evasion avoids reciprocity and produces a race to the bottom. There is a reason for western civilization’s historical hyper innovation and adaptation: “Truth Before Face Regardless of Cost.” So in simple terms, you’re a social tax evader. Failing to pay the normative and behavioral tax of truth before face regardless of cost, that is necessary for the jury, for rule of law, for democracy,and for the high trust society that produces disproportionate economic velocity.
-
Example of When Men Argue as Women – and Explaining Why It Matters
EXAMPLE OF WHEN MEN ARGUE AS WOMEN – AND EXPLAINING WHY IT MATTERS
-“Even your opinions wrong.”- a hostile
I pretty much never err. It’s my job not to. I do make one mistake on a regular basis – I overestimate the common man, and in particular, I underestimate the degree to which a third of the male sex was born with female personality and cognitive traits. (“Men without chests”)
-“Even your follow up opinion is wrong”-
And you respond with a cognitively female expression of disapproval in the absence of testifiable argument rather than a male expression of truth or falsehood by use of a testifiable argument. … Like I said. I don’t err.
-“And you continue to miss the point”-
Again: female cognitive bias from female personality traits by avoiding questions of truth or falsehood. My point is, and will remain, that the sexes demonstrate marginal indifference in task processing other than preference but vast differences in intuition and accountability in social and political performance. (It’s the science). So you have to ask yourself why you’re lying and denying,evading and ad hom, disapproval instead of argument. The reason is, as I stated because you’re demonstrating cognitively female traits – not education, information, cognitive, and testimonial discipline. And you continue to miss the point: Truth permits reciprocal exchange. Truth evasion avoids reciprocity and produces a race to the bottom. There is a reason for western civilization’s historical hyper innovation and adaptation: “Truth Before Face Regardless of Cost.” So in simple terms, you’re a social tax evader. Failing to pay the normative and behavioral tax of truth before face regardless of cost, that is necessary for the jury, for rule of law, for democracy,and for the high trust society that produces disproportionate economic velocity.
-
EXAMPLE OF WHEN MEN ARGUE AS WOMEN – AND EXPLAINING WHY IT MATTERS -“Even your o
EXAMPLE OF WHEN MEN ARGUE AS WOMEN – AND EXPLAINING WHY IT MATTERS
-“Even your opinions wrong.”- a hostile
I pretty much never err. It’s my job not to. I do make one mistake on a regular basis – I overestimate the common man, and in particular, I underestimate the degree to which a third of the male sex was born with female personality and cognitive traits. (“Men without chests”)
-“Even your follow up opinion is wrong”-
And you respond with a cognitively female expression of disapproval in the absence of testifiable argument rather than a male expression of truth or falsehood by use of a testifiable argument. … Like I said. I don’t err.
-“And you continue to miss the point”-
Again: female cognitive bias from female personality traits by avoiding questions of truth or falsehood. My point is, and will remain, that the sexes demonstrate marginal indifference in task processing other than preference but vast differences in intuition and accountability in social and political performance.
(It’s the science). So you have to ask yourself why you’re lying and denying,evading and ad hom, disapproval instead of argument. The reason is, as I stated because you’re demonstrating cognitively female traits – not education, information, cognitive, and testimonial discipline.
And you continue to miss the point: Truth permits reciprocal exchange. Truth evasion avoids reciprocity and produces a race to the bottom. There is a reason for western civilization’s historical hyper innovation and adaptation: “Truth Before Face Regardless of Cost.”
So in simple terms, you’re a social tax evader. Failing to pay the normative and behavioral tax of truth before face regardless of cost, that is necessary for the jury, for rule of law, for democracy,and for the high trust society that produces disproportionate economic velocity.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 15:48:22 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105645454301901640
-
WHY DO WESTERN WOMEN UNDERMINE WESTERN CIVILIZATION? 1. Anglos converted to 100%
WHY DO WESTERN WOMEN UNDERMINE WESTERN CIVILIZATION?
1. Anglos converted to 100% middle class, seeking cheap success in democracy without paying the cost of maintaining our intellectual, social, economic, political advantage by military service, unity, political control.
2. Aryanism (European civilization’s core drive) is heroic so breeds altruism and virtue signaling.
3. Christianity teaches submission, pacifism, tolerance, and amplifies altruism, altruistic punishment, and virtue signal spirals if virtue can be proxied through political pretense instead of personal action at personal cost. Fake Christians. Fake Christian Ethics.
4. And Women are Worst. They seek attention. They seek attention as aggressively as men seek sex. And verbal signaling is cheaper for them than men’s signaling status by demonstrated achievement.
And they seek safety. They seek safety by signaling non-aggression. They seek safety by virtue-signaling non-aggression. They used mass communication combined with women in the voting pool, to virtue signal without personal cost.
They created a market of escalating demands for attention, and escalating demand for attention by virtue signaling of non-aggression, thereby producing virtue signal spirals that convert from non-aggression and tolerance to aggression and intolerance. (Just as Popper predicted.)
5. This demand for attention, the pretense of non-aggression, virtue signaling (value signaling), and escalating demand for attention by virtue-signaling into virtue signal spirals, that turns into intolerance, aggression and undermining is simply female social super-predation industrialized by mass communication, where the costs of their political ‘accommodation’ of the enemies of civilization are born by men and men alone.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 13:05:59 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105644815784542670
-
PUTIN’S ACCUSATION OF MUNICH “BETRAYAL” IN CONTEXT -“In late 2019, I read an art
PUTIN’S ACCUSATION OF MUNICH “BETRAYAL” IN CONTEXT
-“In late 2019, I read an article on RT news in which Putin was arguing with the revisionist historians about WWII who wanted to change history. Putin mentioned “the Munich Betrayal,” but it was not explained what it is.
Sincere question: what is the Munich Betrayal?”- A FriendThis topic requires more than a few tweets. The Munich betrayal was the appeasement of Germany by the handover of germanic Czech territory.
However, ‘betrayal’ fails to grasp that:
a) containing the bolsheviks/communists was equal or more important than containing the germans/fascists.
b) the people in politically Czech territory were in fact Germans,
c) the post-napoleon restoration of the HRE/Germanic federation/empire.
d) the same had been done to the Russians prior to the war by the English and french etc (preventing retaking Constantinople, and restoring the orthodox civ).So moralizing events is misleading, and rearview mirror moralizing naive. The French Revolution started it, Napoleon, did the dirty deed. Think of Napoleon and France as continuing the wars of religion between feminine latin authoritarianism and masculine germanic meritocracy.
The French were the most backward country in Europe and the french revolution the most dramatic and violent. The germanic countries modernized fine. The French didn’t. They were still a ‘catholic’ country with authoritarian tendencies. (like the Russians).
the Napoleonic conquest of Europe and the ideas of the french revolution were spread by force as were Arab Islam and Jewish Communism. A counter-reaction against the wars of religion.
Betrayal presumes people are more than bots. They aren’t. They’re bots. This is an ancient dispute between people in an Atlantic to Urals spectrum, just as China had the north-south spectrum of people in their ‘warring states period’. The Chinese managed to homogenize but lost their rate of adaptation. Europeans didn’t manage to homogenize and maintained their rate of adaptation.
Our betrayal is (a) not saving the Russians from the Jewish bolsheviks, (b) not leaving the germans a path to reconstruction without totalitarianism, (c) not saving the Russians when the soviet union collapsed. (d) Anglo virtue-signaling policy is ALWAYS WRONG EVERY TIME.
And (e) Perhaps worst of all, we didn’t suppress the Jewish communist, socialist, neo-marxist, and postmodern movements in the 1950’s because we were drunk on our own virtues, the certainty of our cultural and institutional victory.
Gramsci (cultural Marxism): Leninism (authoritarian marxism) “Have to have a political party”: Lenin v1 > Stalin v2 > Mao v3 > Woke v4
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-29 14:44:21 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105639540271060271
-
IMPORTANT Chinese developed state and harmony first, so they can conquer and ass
IMPORTANT
Chinese developed state and harmony first, so they can conquer and assimilate tribes and subraces by slow institutional educational linguistic and cultural integration.
Europeans developed law and heroic competition. So we can innovate but not conquer and assimilate.
Likewise, the Chinese can defend culturally and militarily, while Europeans can defend militarily but not culturally.
The Semites war against culture by total war against the institutions of culture, and state and military as a byproduct. But they can’t produce states or law (or economies for that matter).
Fascism was an attempt to eliminate this vulnerability by eliminating tolerance for competition in religion, education, and culture, thereby preserving economy, state, and military – and self determiniation.
This prevents the west and far east from falling to semitic undermining of civilization.
Gramsci wasn’t inventing anything. He was merely repeating what the jews christians and muslims had done in the ancient world. Just explaining it in secular prose.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-27 15:59:44 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105628512025857776
-
DEFEATING THE LEFT IS EASY -“Seems to me the entire objective of communism (Marx
DEFEATING THE LEFT IS EASY
-“Seems to me the entire objective of communism (Marxist) is for Abrahamists to be in control of every institution of global influence, the masses to be impoverished (lowest common denominator), ignorant, and dependent on those institutions, and to replace the White race.”-
The reason for Marx’s hatred: European Capitalism’s organized investment in production, vs Jewish Financialism: organized investment in parasitism. Marx was fine with organized parasitism, poverty but socialized, but not with organized production and prosperous but re-socialized.
The objective of marxism was underclass (labor) rule by revolutionary overthrow of meritocracy. Lenin understood this must be done by gaining political power. Then by violence against meritocratic peoples. When the underclass failed, Gramsci demanded the destruction of culture.
As I have said since the beginning, (a) absence of our own ‘bible’ of western civ(Law) (b) tolerance for thought-competition under self-determination and trifunctionalism (c) roman failure to exterminate supernatural Christianity (d) remnants superstition, (e) make us vulnerable.
The way we easily defeat cultural marxism, postmodernism, and the White-Hate’s march through the institutions of cultural production is by stating the foundations of the culture scientifically in law as a public asset that may not be harmed. The Legal market will do the rest.
And as I have said since the beginning, my project is to produce that ‘bible’, and embed it in a constitution and use the natural incentives of markets to exterminate competition. This is possible b/c European civ (alone) fully reflects the formal, physical, natural, & evo laws.
I just didn’t expect to discover (a) that European civ was in fact just the laws of the universe applied, and (b) Jesus’ teaching as the means by which the half-humans, slaves, and serfs unfit for civilization can not only tolerate but enjoy life through saturation in reciprocal love.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-27 15:41:18 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105628439506211315