Source: Facebook

  • THE LIMITS OF P IN MATE RELATIONSHIPS —“I’ve falling in love with the phrase,

    THE LIMITS OF P IN MATE RELATIONSHIPS

    —“I’ve falling in love with the phrase, “Baiting into hazard”. I use it on my wife almost daily. She looks at me funny. That’s ok, she can’t help it. It’s genetic.”—@EricLiford

    Women function by seduction of men by sex and affection; women by attention, cooperation, alliance, and insurance; and children by affection, information, care taking, dependency, and protection. So trying to get women to stop using seduction will just masculinize them and lose all their value as the central unit of family and social cooperation. The question isn’t whether women are seducing you, but whether the promise offered by their seduction is true.

    Just don’t lie to each other.

    It’s not complicated.

    You will find both men and women who make false promises in order to obtain discounts on acquisition of experience, information, cooperation, consumption, or capital. Men have only loyalty and strength women have only devotion and seduction.

    Let women be women. Encourage them to be women. The more seduction in the world the more wonderful it is. The only question is whether it’s a false promise or an truthful reciprocal, warrantied offer of exchange.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 12:09:00 UTC

  • EDUCATE, DON’T COMPROMISE Do not compromise because of people’s ignorance. Educa

    EDUCATE, DON’T COMPROMISE

    Do not compromise because of people’s ignorance. Educate. We have to reverse the entire Marxist, Cultural Marxist, Postmodern, Feminist, Multiculturalist, Denialist era of false promise, baiting into hazard, as a means of destroying the market between the classes, the rule of law of reciprocity, and the myths, history, traditions, that made our civilization possible.

    Yes. Heroism, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Monarchy, Cabinet, Senate, Industry, Commons, and Dependents (Church), and markets in everything where we suppress the reproduction of the unproductive and divert the proceeds to the production of intergenerational continuously capitalizing commons.

    If you want socialism, then leave. you have a whole world willing to take you.

    If you want western civilization, and the proceeds of it, then there is only one country left to have it. And we are going to keep it, no matter what the cost – including no matter what cost to you.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 11:43:00 UTC

  • Is there any democrat that isn’t trying to buy the election with bread and circu

    Is there any democrat that isn’t trying to buy the election with bread and circuses for the masses?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 11:13:00 UTC

  • The greatest mistakes our country made were not letting the south secede, expand

    The greatest mistakes our country made were not letting the south secede, expanding the franchise to those unproductive and lacking responsibility, and the hart cellar act to open the gates to the underclasses – destroying the American experiment in a third way: middle class civ. These are followed closely by tolerating the postwar suppression of the american eugenics movement, and not brutally crushing the communist movement, marxist-postmodernist movements.

    We were tolerant in greek, roman, germanic, and british civilizations.

    Tolerance is a weakness not a virtue.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 11:12:00 UTC

  • READ HOPPE TO UNDERSTAND “WHY MONARCHY?” by Scott De Warren ‘Democracy: The God

    READ HOPPE TO UNDERSTAND “WHY MONARCHY?”

    by Scott De Warren

    ‘Democracy: The God that Failed’ by Hoppe is available online and to help expand people’s thinking on monarchies.

    Also, it will help to know that the founding fathers originally intended to stay under the monarchy and that George Washington’s officers regularly toasted the health of the King.

    Their fight was with the King’s ministers in their mind . Even after the decision to break was made many of the officers and leaders were open to monarchy in the United States.

    Our enemies have greatly exaggerated the extent to which radical anti-monarchical elements played in the founding of our Republic. The military leaders wanted to make Washington king, but he declined in the face of the radical fringe democratic elements.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 11:02:00 UTC

  • “IT”S HARD TO GET ON BOARD WITH MONARCHY” I wasn’t on board with it either. It’s

    “IT”S HARD TO GET ON BOARD WITH MONARCHY”

    I wasn’t on board with it either. It’s just eventually I couldn’t deny it any longer.

    Constitutional monarchy with power of veto, termination of ministers, dissolution of parliament. That’s all.

    Monarchy = Kinship government, and Intergenerational Incentives, and capitalization rather than tragedy of the commons, and compensates for fashion, political, and procedural failure.

    The enemy wanted to end our monarchy to replace it with an organized crime family.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 09:53:00 UTC

  • VOTING —“Universal suffrage was a mistake…and practically everyone knew it w

    VOTING

    —“Universal suffrage was a mistake…and practically everyone knew it would have a great cost, but did it anyway because it’s “right”…the cost was exactly what they predicted it would be: the quality of civilization itself.”—Mike Harvey

    From Alexander Hamilton:

    —“It is also, undeniably, certain, that no Englishman, who can be deemed a free agent in a political view, can be bound by laws, to which he has not consented, either in person, or by his representative. Or, in other words, every Englishman (exclusive of the mercantile and trading part of the nation) who possesses a freehold, to the value of forty shillings per annum, has a right to a share in the legislature, which he exercises, by giving his vote in the election of some person, he approves of, as his representative.

    “The true reason (says Blackstone) of requiring any qualification, with regard to property in voters, is to exclude such persons, as are in so mean a situation, that they are esteemed to have no will of their own. If these persons had votes, they would be tempted to dispose of them, under some undue influence, or other. This would give a great, an artful, or a wealthy man, a larger share in elections, than is consistent with general liberty. If it were probable, that every man would give his vote, freely, and without influence of any kind, then, upon the true theory and genuine principles of Liberty, every member of the community, however poor, should have a vote, in electing those delegates, to whose charge is committed the disposal of his property, his liberty and life. But since that can hardly be expected, in persons of indigent fortunes, or such as are under the immediate dominion of others, all popular states have been obliged to establish certain qualifications, whereby, some who are suspected to have no will of their own, are excluded from voting; in order, to set other individuals, whose wills may be supposed independent, more thoroughly upon a level with each other.”

    Hence it appears, that such “of the people as have no vote in the choice of representatives, and therefore, are govern’d, by laws, to which they have not consented, either by themselves or by their representatives, are only those persons, who are in so mean a situation, that they are esteemed to have no will of their own.” Every free agent, every free man, possessing a freehold of forty shillings per annum, is, by the British constitution, intitled to a vote, in the election of those who are invested with the disposal of his life, his liberty and property.”—

    Source:

    Alexander Hamilton, The Farmer Refuted, or A more impartial and comprehensive View of the Dispute between Great-Britain and the Colonies. . . . (New York, 1775), in Harold C. Syrett, ed., The Papers of Alexander Hamilton (New York: Columbia University Press, 1961-1979), 1:81-165.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 09:50:00 UTC

  • Little Old Lady. Morning. Ritual: “the Tease Curt by Stealing his Coffee when he

    Little Old Lady. Morning. Ritual: “the Tease Curt by Stealing his Coffee when he’s not looking game.”

    Me: “Mom. Where is my coffee?”

    Her: “What?”

    Me: “Do I have to discipline you this morning?”

    Her: “Ha. You’re a wus. You can’t discipline anybody.”

    Waits till I’m writing. Seals my coffee, water, headphones, or unplugs my laptop.

    It’s like she can’t start her day without getting a reaction out of me. lol

    Crazy old ladies. Grandmother was the same. Always up to mischief. Playing cards? If she starts giggling, it’s because she cheated openly, obviously, right in front of your face – and you didn’t notice. Not because she wants to win. But because she wants to mess with you.

    Women in my family are dangerous in a totally adorable way.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 09:46:00 UTC

  • TESTIMONY —“My father taught me, that if you keep your mouth shut and listen,

    TESTIMONY

    —“My father taught me, that if you keep your mouth shut and listen, you might learn something. For what it’s worth, you have my gratitude and thanks. I feel like I’m attending the best school in the country, free of charge.”—Robby Thorne


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 09:21:00 UTC

  • Updated Feb 12, 2020, 8:47 AM

    Updated Feb 12, 2020, 8:47 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 08:47:00 UTC