—“(((Emanuel Celler))) fought the 1924 Act and then spent his whole career trying to get it overturned.”—Matt LawIor
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 09:52:00 UTC
—“(((Emanuel Celler))) fought the 1924 Act and then spent his whole career trying to get it overturned.”—Matt LawIor
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 09:52:00 UTC
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/482762-utah-senate-committee-unanimously-approves-bill-to-decriminalizeby Alexander Brown
The March 06, 1957 independence of Ghana was the product of an act of parliament in England. The Ghana Independence Act 1957 was passed on February 07, 1957 to take effect on March 06, 1957. Were this law to be repealed today in England, Ghana may remain a sovereign and thanks to international recognition of it’s statehood.
In 1896, the United States Congress extended statehood to Utah on condition that it would end POLYGAMY. Given that the State of Utah is in the process of decriminalising polygamy [ 1 ] in our times, could this constitute a violation of the congressional mandate of 1896? And if it does, would Utah revert to a territory and no longer a state? Or like Ghana’s recognition, US federal recognition may supersede the consequence of violating the 19th century congressional mandate?
INSIGHT: There is a brewing right wing wave that aim to fracture and separate the United States into agreeable, homogenous states of all markets possible from the cosmopolitan, globalism – welcoming leftist states. Could happenings in Mitt Romney’s Utah illuminate the coming re – structuring of the United States?
I do not know for certain. But, this could be very interesting overall.
[ 1 ].Updated Feb 13, 2020, 9:47 AM
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 09:47:00 UTC
—“Propertarianism is the ego-killer.”–Patrick Smyth
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 09:45:00 UTC
THE THREE AXIS OF DEMAND FOR THE THREE FICTIONALISMS
The Three Fictionalisms: Physical: Magic->Pseudoscience, Verbal: Idealism->Sophistry, Imaginary: Occult->Theology
SUPERNATURAL SUBMISSION
1) If you need supernatural mental sedation in order to have confidence in your thoughts, words, and deeds, then I understand that uncertainty is burdensome for those with higher neuroticism (worry).
I understand that in economic terms you are seeking to acquire mindfulness, and have little or no control over this psychological demand. Likewise I understand that some of us do not.
The fact that fulfilling that demand can ALSO be the demand for means of dominance expression despite one’s lack of agency, is the more accusatory theory. The difference is only whether you’re insecure in the self, or insecure in dominating others. But these are the two motivations for fictionalisms.
SUPERNATURAL DOMINANCE
It is very hard for females to find mindfulness without sedation of social insecurity and it’s hard for males to find mindfulness without sedation of dominance insecurity.
There are males with female cognitive bias, and females with male cognitive bias, but we can fairly readily (as in this case) determine which defense people are resorting to theology to sedate.
PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE
3) There is also however, a universal truth that all of us merely find comfort in the social and private rituals. For me, and for the greeks, the host of temples, the play, the jury, the senate, sport, war, and festival (markets) functioned as church (monopoly). But these people do not argue security(defense), dominance (offense), they just say the truth “it’s probably nonsense it makes me happy”.
( And it should be obvious that I satisfy my dominance expression in knowledge, business (wealth), and natural law – all of which are true – I don’t resort to fictionalisms. )
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 09:42:00 UTC
–“I believe an alternative name for Corded Ware culture was ‘Battle Axe’ culture but political correctness won the day.”–Arno Kæland
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 09:33:00 UTC
(Little old Lady: “Ooh. James Marsden. I’d like to take him to a hotel, mmm…. and right to bed.”
Me: (laughing) “Why isn’t it ok when I say “I wonder if I could get her to spend a week in five star hotel with me?”
Little Old Lady “Because mine is all imagination, and yours is a possibility.”
Me: (laughing) “I think you mean ambition – not possibility.”)
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 09:28:00 UTC
—“The mandatory response to having ‘Incel’ thrown at you is to offer your sympathies for their dad issues and reproductive problems.”—Zach Edward
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 08:50:00 UTC
—“Curt was trying to defend his statement that “Entropy is the prime mover” to refute the theistic claim that God is the prime mover. In the analysis of entropy, he reduced all phenomena to a “fundamental” component, namely “Differences in charge”.
There are plenty of other obtuse statements that Curt ought to defend in order to protect his reputation, such as his declaration that “philosophy is a pseudoscience.” That is a wildly hilarious and blatant domain error, that it ought to have disqualified anything Curt has to say on metaphysics or reason.”—- Josef Kalinin Prem Prayojan
1) Entropy/Charge: Any of the terms: entropy( order to disorder), equilibration (equalization of differences), energy(frequency), charge (energy in difference in states), pressure(effect of different states on one another), and difference satisfy the demand for truthful operational speech. The fact that we are as yet uncertain of the classical (geometric) structure of the universe that we describe with quantum mechanics, is a problem of our present technical inability to measure (observe) it. However, there is no evidence it is other than expressible in the same terms of differences in energy, organization, state, and available transformations (operations). No physicist of note will disagree with this statement.
2) Philosophy is a pseudoscience: Yes, as far as I know, the demarcation between philosophy and science is complete with philosophy limited to choice of preference, and science to decidability independent of preference. I can find no evidence that what remains of philosophy consists of other than the history of the evolution of science from philosophy. And I can find no evidence of those practicing philosophy for advocacy of truth claims instead of advocacy for preference claims engaging in other than deception. Part of the reason for this is that we have accumulated evidence of human behavior in large groups across mankind on one hand, and we have discovered the tediously simple method by which brain, mind, and experience are constructed on the other – although I do recognize I’m very current or ahead of the curve in that knowledge.
3) Domain error. There are no domain errors any longer. There is one most parsimonious operational paradigm across all grammars (paradigms) from the deflaitonary to the descriptive to the inflationary to the deceptive. That paradigm is language, because language is the system of measurement we use for thinking and speaking about the world.
It will be very difficult to falsify those arguments.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 08:44:00 UTC
—“You reason that people are fundamentally economic agents, and therefore the whole of human history and sociology is downstream from economics, which Curt himself has declared the highest sociology.”— Josef Kalinin
That’s false. Are you lying or erring?
Instead, all human incentive, thought, and action can be expressed in value neutral economic terms, thereby uniting the physical, psychological, and social sciences in a single commensurable paradigm, vocabulary, and logic, with demarcation dependent upon the absence or presence of memory of state.
This is demonstrably true.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 08:05:00 UTC
—“Free speech is free TRUTHFUL speech. Not carte blanche to spread false allegations, lies, deception, or accusations without a demonstrated attempt at due diligence for truth. You don’t get to be a lying parasite. Your resistance proves your desire for continued parasitism. Under P-Law, truthful speech is always protected. P-Law serves as the Raid for lying deceitful parasites that the left tends to breed like roaches. Your continued slander proves only that you have no real invested time in learning Propertarianism, or do not have the cranial capacity to fully understand Propertarianism. Neither are a good excuse to troll these pages with your ill conceived illogical commentary on a subject matter you clearly have no understanding of… ..”—Clinton McLaggan
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 07:52:00 UTC