Offense is the natural state of a large percent of the population
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 08:47:00 UTC
Offense is the natural state of a large percent of the population
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 08:47:00 UTC
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/entrepreneur-andrew-yang-ends-bid-presidency/story?id=67499153https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/entrepreneur-andrew-yang-ends-bid-presidency/story?id=67499153Updated Feb 11, 2020, 10:03 PM
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 22:03:00 UTC
Updated Feb 11, 2020, 9:51 PM
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:51:00 UTC
P EMPHASIZES THE COURT (effective) NOT VOTING (ineffective)
by John Mark
In any nation there will be capable and incapable people, wealthy and poor, etc – all across the spectrum.
There is a huge difference between giving less capable people (who often tend to vote for free stuff stolen from others) “via-negativa” power thru P-law (the power to STOP violations of reciprocity) and giving them “via-positiva” power thru voting (the power to INITIATE violations of reciprocity).
The Propertarian system does NOT allow less capable (often parasite-minded) people the ability to INITIATE violations of reciprocity, and at the same time it DOES allow everyone to stop violations of reciprocity. So you can see it solves 2 problems at once: It TAKES AWAY via-positiva initiating power from a demographic that has a majority of parasite-instinct people, and GIVES via-negativa power to STOP violations of reciprocity, to everyone.
And under P-Law the average person WILL have MUCH more power to counter the well-heeled than today.
First, keep in mind that poor people even today often have no trouble getting legal representation when the lawyers believe their is strong chance of a big financial reward. P-Law would provide significant $ rewards – violators of reciprocity will have to pay damages, and the richer the violator, the greater the financial reward for taking them to court will be in many cases.
Second, under P-Law there will be very few if any frivolous lawsuits because loser has to pay extra damages. This reduces/eliminates the ability of rich people to use their wealth to “play the lawsuit game” as a tool of control over the poor. Everyone regardless of wealth level will be much more careful about their actions and words in general (so as not to end up in court by violating reciprocity), and careful about going to court (poor people if they have a good case will have no trouble finding a good lawyer, rich people will not be able to use frivolous lawsuits to intimidate & wear out opposition).
(Curt has thought this through very thoroughly. People just need to stick around long enough to find out that the multiple changes outlined in the propertarian system fix multiple problems as well as they can be fixed, keeping in mind that no fix will be 100% perfect.)
—
—“The importance of voting is evidence the American experiment failed. The greater the importance, the greater the evidence, the greater the failure.”— Luke Weinhagen
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:11:00 UTC
—-“Oh I totally get the plan. It’s particularly well presented here, put up next to the parallel issues in mathematics and science. I’m mostly agreeing with you. I’m just saying the ENTIRE current paradigm is based on the necessity of occluding changes in the cultural balance sheet. … That also brings us back to this notion that “capital is a monster.” It is voracious. It doesn’t care about your culture, your people … it doesn’t care about anything but profit. So the process by which one goes to war with the monster that is capital is almost sure to be very very ugly. That’s why I said capital would not like what you propose.”—-
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 20:49:00 UTC
(started out well, but I let churchy people and leftist make me lose my temper today. maybe its time for bad sci-fi tv or something. lol)
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 17:41:00 UTC
THE RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION
We either have the right to self determination – or we have the right to extermination. So choose. (I’m happy either way.)
Genomes, genetic distributions, institutions, culture, traditions, norms, manners, ethics, morals, laws, history, myth, legend, monuments, territory, are all assets. Some assets are valuable. Some are not. Some are harmful. If we choose to preserve an asset, we do so.
1) We know that moral intuition is genetic, sex biased, and that only trauma can change it – even then only slightly. We know that all traits are somewhere between 70-80% heritable and the rest is idiosyncratic accumulation rather than patterns of environment.
2) We know that class is genetic, with lower classes accumulating more loads (defects), upper middle the fewest, and aside from noble families, the upper classes random lottery results from the middle – but otherwise there is little to no class rotation.
3) We know that moral biases reflect female (herd, infant-equality, devotion, consumption) strategy and the male (pack, mature-hierarchy, loyalty, capitalization) instinct and that females use social superpredation by undermining, and males political superpredation by violence.
4) We know that each of us is born with a bias in female (lateral breadth) vs male(longitudinal velocity) brain structures, and that the stereotype of male analytic and female empathic is physical construction, and that given freedom to do so we pursue interests fitting our bias.
5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the female, empathic, equalitarian, consumptive, infantilized, and underdeveloped strategy and some by the male, analytic, hierarchical, capitalizing, and mature strategy. And so we must separate or civil war.
6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic, the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution.
7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of ignorance, this time with social construction of the myth of possible equality, the only result of which will be dysgenia and decline – we are fine with it.
But you can’t take the rest of us with you.
8) Some of us are more than semi domesticated animals sensing, perceiving, feeling, experiencing intuiting, and responding to incentives to hyper consume.
And some of us are willing to let you turn your cities into dysgenic favelas.
Which is what we plan to let you do.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 17:34:00 UTC
It’s Go Year.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 16:07:00 UTC
Oooh…
CATEGORIES OF RELIGION
by Luke Weinhagen
Maybe play off parasitism with other forms of symbiosis –
1. Mutualitic Religion – benefit to practitioners and benefit to non-practitioners
… (Rule of Law)
2. Commensalitic Religion – benefit to practitioners with no cost to non-practitioner
… (christianity, buddhism, animism)
3. Amensalitic Religion – no benefit to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner
….(islam)
4. Parasitic Religion – benefit to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner
…. (judaism)
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 15:54:00 UTC
—Listen twinkles. If you demonstrate a lack of intelligence, reciprocity, comprehension of human capital, the asymmetry of traits and class sizes in racial and sub racial groups, the disproportionate dependence upon the median for standard of living, then defacto you’re an idiot.
Your father raised you to have confidence. That says nothing to do with your intellectual competence. The single greatest falure of the 20th was the successful postwar suppression of the soft eugenics movement, and the hart cellar act that opened the doors to genetic collapse.—
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 15:45:00 UTC