PERCEIVED VS ACTUAL PROGRESS OF MOVEMENTS
You know, when we’re doing all this research, development, learning, educating, and expansion it seems like it’s taking forever – but in retrospect look what we have achieve together in just a few years of hard work.
Revolution comes
Renaissance comes.
This is how.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 11:29:00 UTC
Theology to escape choice, philosophy to choose, science to decide.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 11:24:00 UTC
THE CHOICE OF GODS
Europeans are the gods among men, and first among men. Not because we are yet gods ourselves. But because we think, speak, write, work, create, and spread the evidence of God’s words, his hands, and his will in the language of god’s words, hands, and will: Mathematics (geometry), Science, and Natural Law of Sovereign Men.
For gods must be Sovereign, Omniscient and Omnipotent. And only Sovereign men may transcend into peerage with gods.
And that’s why European man has almost exclusively dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death by mastery of god’s word, written in god’s hand – against other’s false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies.
And if European man did not drag a people out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, diseases, suffering and early death using god’s words, then those people are suffering because god punishes them for their false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies.
And for all people, we are challenged to choose which god is the true god: an impersonal god who tests our ability to achieve sovereignty, omniscience and omniscience by learning his words, hands, and will; a god with whom we trade as allies; or a god who we obey as slaves.
Will you transcend into gods, remain a client, or obey as slave?
—-
(That is about the net of it.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 11:20:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/85050358_206444444087050_7275509518061010944_n_206444440753717.jpg I hadn’t seen this yet but thank you – because that’s exactly the test, the scope of test, and the clarity of findings an accessibility we need.
Again, ethnocentric, small state, low power distance, rule of law of reciprocity, truth telling, markets in everything.
@Ozpin_88I hadn’t seen this yet but thank you – because that’s exactly the test, the scope of test, and the clarity of findings an accessibility we need.
Again, ethnocentric, small state, low power distance, rule of law of reciprocity, truth telling, markets in everything.
@Ozpin_88
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 11:15:00 UTC
What is the purpose of GSRRM? Truth suppression. And why do they suppress the truth of human differences? Truth suppression. And why? Theft. And why? Dysgenia.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 10:29:00 UTC
Under P-Law suppression of truth by GSRRM is illegal.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 10:28:00 UTC
Updated Feb 13, 2020, 10:27 AM
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 10:27:00 UTC
—:Example: Hard eugenics is ir-reciprocal; but so is NOT having soft eugenics.”— Brandon Hayes
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 10:25:00 UTC
THE P CONSTITUTION ISN’T A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL
I don’t think it’s coming across. We aren’t trying to get consensus on reciprocity under some form of a P constitution. We’re saying that the only reason not to conquer, deprive, rule, tax, enserf, enslave, or much worse, is under reciprocity – and there is no possible to counter it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 10:15:00 UTC
WHY THE THREES?
—“The Propertarians are the only group that takes trinities seriously.”—
It takes three points to prove a line. Or conversely, it takes at least three points to falsify any other point. Or said differently, it takes at least three markets to produce and equilibrium.
It’s not a random thing – our emphasis on trifunctionalism, tripartism, and markets in everything. It’s the optimum order possible for maximizing all opportunities on one end while falsifying the maximum error, bias, irreciprocity and deceit on the other end.Updated Feb 13, 2020, 10:00 AM
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 10:00:00 UTC