Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION CONSISTS IN European Civilization Consists in: The Indo Eu

    EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION CONSISTS IN

    European Civilization Consists in: The Indo European language, Heroic, Militaristic, Expansionist, Paternalistic, Sky Worshipping, Metalworking, entrepreneurial warfare of conquest, using technology professional warriors, horse, and chariot, financed by families, and then profiting from conquest by tripartism: the domestication of human animals from slaves, to freemen, to ‘sovereigns’, under the traditional law of trespass (tort, property), where every man is sovereign, reciprocity the means of dispute resolution, restitution demanded in all but cowardice or adultery – the only capital crimes.

    European Civilization consists in Heroism, Competition, Cunning, Maneuver Excellence,Beauty, Truth an Duty, Promise and Contract, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Law of Tort, Jury, and the resulting competition in markets in all aspects of life; and the eugenic suppression of the underclasses by those markets, creating the continuous rapid evolution of european man as a result.

    That is the reason for european success in the ancient world and in the modern: Truth Before Face, Regardless of cost.

    Which is something only heroes can bear.

    European heroism, truth, excellence, and competition, dragged man kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, starvation, hard labor, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, heat, cold, and the chaos of a nature all but hostile to human life.

    Europeanism is Europeanism: The Cult of Sovereignty (Non-Submission) and responsibility.

    Europeanism is Europeanism:”Every man equal at the top – so bring them there with truth.”

    Abrahamism is Semitism: The Cult of Submission and Irresponsibility.

    Semitism is Semitism, and Christianity is Semitic: “Every man equal at the bottom – so bring them there with lies.”

    Christianity is a disease. It’s a religion of women, immigrants, and slaves – not heroes, that we have nearly recovered from, and christians are why we are vulnerable to their allies in judaism and islam.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-04 12:11:00 UTC

  • Tim Beckley-Spillane A few related thoughts I’ve been struggling to make cohere:

    Tim Beckley-Spillane A

    few related thoughts I’ve been struggling to make cohere:

    —“that vitality and not intellect or imagination is the most reliable measure of fitness,

    Fitness for what? Do you mean physical fitness?

    —“as the latter are ancillary to it and will inevitably exhaust themselves without it; “—

    Physical fitness is reliably testable, although it is more important to not be unfit than it is to more than adequately fit.

    Reproduction is the only reliable test of genetic fitness.

    Eugenic reproduction is the only reliable test of the agency.

    Caloric conversion is the only reliable test of group fitness.

    So I don’t understand.

    —“that attacks against vitality are therefore the greatest existential threat faced by the living, “—

    I don’t have any idea what that means. If you mean sugar, corn syrup, carbs, no mandatory exercise in school that creates a life long habit, and no mandatory military service in exchange for retirement funds to maintain it. sure.

    Otherwise, I don’t know what that means.

    —“And so would form the nucleus of an optimally serviceable conception of Evil among the Life-affirming and productive, and of Good among the Life-denying and destructive; that escapist fantasies of non-biological/supernatural life are irreconcilable contradictions born and harbored in the minds of the maladapted and weak and thus rightly fearful, but overcome heroically by Western man; “–

    I think you mean that to have great ambitions for great projects and to be aware of the condition of your people and to fight for it requires physical fitness?

    I would buy that. True as far as I know.

    —“that the high tragicomic works of Western Art represent the constituent elements of an adaptive, scalable native polytheistic religion, the central message of which is reducible to a single three-letter word- not GOD, but YES, in affirmation of the Good, the creative, the true, the beautiful, and the vital, but also of the Evil, the destructive, the false, the ugly, and the dying, with a sharp distinction nevertheless maintained between these two classes, the former recognized as the source of all Life, and the latter as the source and great revealer by way of contrast of Life’s value; “—

    Ok , agreed if we have no aesthetic reprsentation of our heroism and our excellence and no inpsiration to match or exceed it then we can die off … yes.

    —“that the focus and highest achievement of Western Art in the Modern Age was to celebrate the value and richness not of Life merely, but of the Living Moment at ever higher resolutions, just as it had celebrated and deified the individual living form in preceding ages;”—

    I don’t think that’s true, and I’m pretty well versed in the arts across history. I can’t even think of where that idea would come from if it wasn’t the past century.

    —“that the tendency of Western Art has been to judge the quality of Life higher than its quantity/duration,”–

    That’s definitely not true. It’s to celebrate prosperity, plenty, excellence, beauty, heroism and most of all power. Even the submissive heroism of the devoted was for power.

    —“the underlying assumption being that Life not valued is hardly worth living and is wasted regardless of duration; and that Western Art is strongly linked with the philosophy of hedonism and serves as a means of mediation and reconciliation between masculine and feminine biases.”—

    Ok I can’t really figure that out, i think that the undermining by the jews, marxists, postmodernists is to destroy heroism and power, and willingness to defend that aesthetic.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-03 21:29:00 UTC

  • WHY THE HARSH WORDS ON CHRISTIANITY? As always, I’m running a test with multiple

    WHY THE HARSH WORDS ON CHRISTIANITY?

    As always, I’m running a test with multiple ambitions:

    1) Are Christians really all nothing more than virtue signaling cucks, hiding behind a veil faith to mask cowardice, laziness, and lack of agency, or will they fight for their people? We almost never find a ‘devout’ Christian willing to fight. Ever. They always have an excuse. They won’t show up without a guarantee. They won’t fight until it doesn’t matter, and like women with small children, wantto show up and get an everbody-wins-prize if other men do the winning. I mean, isn’t christian tolerance just an excuse to gossip rally and shame while one leftist program after another undermines our civlization? Does christian really mean “I’m a domesticated human farm animal and I need to follow the herd in safety, ignorance and bliss?

    2) Can we shame Christians into restoring masculinity to Christianity? Catholicism is dead in the next generation right? Traditional protestant denominations are dead. We only have the Evangelicals. About half go secular and half evangelical, and we’re gong to run out of christians to go evangelical soon. So, do we have to bring in Orthodoxy? How do we de-feminize de-loser Christianity? Because Orthodoxy works. Why? They don’t appeal to the trend, they stay with tradition.

    3) Can we shame or criticize them into the reality that it doesn’t matter if you OBEY scripture or dogma without question; or if you follow jesus’ example, even if biblical prose is ‘for children'(Spiritualism, Deism); or if you do so because traditionally it has worked (Rational Choice); or understand that natural law and jesus’ example is the scientifically optimum strategy for cooperation – especially in a commercial polity (Scientific Choice)?

    4) Or do we have to just assume all Christians are dead weight, will not fight for anything, will just coower at home and whine, and that we need to restore a pagan religion to save western civlization?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-03 21:06:00 UTC

  • INCENTIVES AT THE BOTTOM (Michael Churchill ) There is no incentive for the peop

    INCENTIVES AT THE BOTTOM

    (Michael Churchill )

    There is no incentive for the people on the sub-optimal side of the curve to voluntarily go along with the extinction of their own DNA line.

    There is declining incentive for the people at the top to enforce laws to prevent reproduction of those who are on the sub-optimal side of the curve.

    And there are strong IN-centives for both capital and fifth-columnists to encourage reproduction on the sub-optimal side of the curve.

    Overall human DNA is weakening in western societies, and the effect is cumulative over generations.

    (Curt Doolittle)

    The Incentive for people on the sub-optimal side of the curve is compensation NOT to reproduce, as well as prosecution IF they reproduce.

    (Martin Štěpán)

    I do see that. We’ve let it go too far. But if we isolate from the left though, I’m pretty sure there won’t be that many on the sub-optimal side of the spectrum. And ones that are, what can you really do with them besides paying them to obey the law and not reproduce, at least not more than one kid? If that’s not okay and they still commit crime, they need to be disposed of. And if we keep doing that, we’ll slowly keep improving.

    I advocated for the same thing in healthcare as welfare, actually. You either pay your own or you use the tax-subsidized healthcare but in the latter case, you submit to one-child policy too, at least unless you manage to pay the money back.

    (Curt Doolittle)

    Yes. That’s the correct Incentive and policy.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-03 09:39:00 UTC

  • Republicans claim to be a populist movement, not the Right. The right claims to

    Republicans claim to be a populist movement, not the Right. The right claims to be a NATIONALIST movement. Republicans still live under the illusion that civic nationalism is possible. It’s isn’t. It’s just the last stage before reverse extermination of host peoples.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 18:49:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190702559729725440

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190673703740354563

    IN REPLY TO:

    @StefanMolyneux

    The Right claims to be a populist movement, yet refuses to reflect the populist view – a significant majority – that legal immigration needs to be severely curtailed.

    GOP, repeat after me:

    You CANNOT be a leader if you are afraid of the media. https://t.co/v6alGnPfuy

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190673703740354563

  • Eugenics in P-Law

    (Curt Doolittle) The only eugenic process Natural Law relies upon is markets. in other words, if you (your family) is self supporting, and not engaging in irreciprocity, we have no other means of testing your fitness other than demonstrated fitness. If you (your family) is not self supporting, an engages in irreciprocity, no matter your excuse, then you are in fact, demonstrating unfitness. (Bill Joslin) Fitness being akin to “good” – anything not unfit, is fit. Fitness remains undecidable (only demonstrable) because of the causal density and unpredictability of future outcomes. But unfitness remains a provisional known (a known subject to being updated with new information). This the demarcation between HARD eugenics (attempting direct control over natural eugenics) and SOFT P-Eugenics would be “anything not unfit remains fit (a fitness candidate) – or rather, we P-eugenics are achieved by NOT practicing dysgenics. (Curt Doolittle) P-law is via negativa, meaning do not reproduce dysgenically, it is not via-positiva, meaning culling of people. It does leave open the possibility of termination for catastrophic birth defects. We don’t answer the question of abortion because it is undecidable under law. It is only decidable within a polity. P-law does not prohibit genetic innovation (Transhuanism) as long as it reversible in the next generation and warranteed. TESTOSTERONE (Curt Doolittle) The generational sink in testosterone levels as far as I know, is almost entirely due to failure to exercise and engage in dominance play, and can be restored by physical activity – we know this because we see people do it every day. THere is some negativity to BPA and other chemicals but tis is as easily rectified as requiring all foods to be shipped (more expensively, and less environmentally costly ) in glass containers. (Bill Joslin) Drop in testosterone relates to prolonged.low level stress, or rather a higher baseline stress level – for example the constant stimulus of living in urban centers, or prolonged financial stress…i.e. anomie Also – occupations that have intermittent physical stress coupled with enough recovery time, tend to elevate testosterone. for example: jobs which include physical exertion but don’t include “taking work home with you” (no worrying about after hours.)

  • Eugenics in P-Law

    (Curt Doolittle) The only eugenic process Natural Law relies upon is markets. in other words, if you (your family) is self supporting, and not engaging in irreciprocity, we have no other means of testing your fitness other than demonstrated fitness. If you (your family) is not self supporting, an engages in irreciprocity, no matter your excuse, then you are in fact, demonstrating unfitness. (Bill Joslin) Fitness being akin to “good” – anything not unfit, is fit. Fitness remains undecidable (only demonstrable) because of the causal density and unpredictability of future outcomes. But unfitness remains a provisional known (a known subject to being updated with new information). This the demarcation between HARD eugenics (attempting direct control over natural eugenics) and SOFT P-Eugenics would be “anything not unfit remains fit (a fitness candidate) – or rather, we P-eugenics are achieved by NOT practicing dysgenics. (Curt Doolittle) P-law is via negativa, meaning do not reproduce dysgenically, it is not via-positiva, meaning culling of people. It does leave open the possibility of termination for catastrophic birth defects. We don’t answer the question of abortion because it is undecidable under law. It is only decidable within a polity. P-law does not prohibit genetic innovation (Transhuanism) as long as it reversible in the next generation and warranteed. TESTOSTERONE (Curt Doolittle) The generational sink in testosterone levels as far as I know, is almost entirely due to failure to exercise and engage in dominance play, and can be restored by physical activity – we know this because we see people do it every day. THere is some negativity to BPA and other chemicals but tis is as easily rectified as requiring all foods to be shipped (more expensively, and less environmentally costly ) in glass containers. (Bill Joslin) Drop in testosterone relates to prolonged.low level stress, or rather a higher baseline stress level – for example the constant stimulus of living in urban centers, or prolonged financial stress…i.e. anomie Also – occupations that have intermittent physical stress coupled with enough recovery time, tend to elevate testosterone. for example: jobs which include physical exertion but don’t include “taking work home with you” (no worrying about after hours.)

  • The Economics and Ethics of Abrahamic Religions

    (this one is going to hurt. hold on to something) [T]here is no god. Only the god imagined by the faithful such that they preserve the peace between them by prohibition on variation in strategy, and prohibition on debate, and prohibition on learning, and prohibition on innovation and evolution. It’s a contract with one another written in fiction. I agree that there is value to the faithful in the production of psychological mindfulness from certainty, conformity, under this contract written in fiction. It re-creates the safety of the herd for those who lack agency, by casting submission, conformity, stagnation as heroic. I also understand that there is value in the freedom from emotional burden, intellectual burden, that the rest of us bear on behalf of Christians, who are nothing but free-riders – Christians ‘free ride’ on our emotional, and mental hard labors. The feminine christian perpetuates the female reproductive strategy of worrying only about the safety of her nest, while the men do the hard labor of transforming reality into safety and resources which she can spend on her nest, herself, her offspring. Yet as christians daily demonstrate, she maintains utility in hostility to his breaking of her illusion, because then she would have to acknowledge the debt, and provide something in trade. Y’all are parasites, liars, and thieves unless you fight – hard, and soon. Just parasites. Why do you think islamism, marxism, feminism, and postmodernism, make the same promise of equality, in exchange for the same contract written in fiction, that the will work together to live parasitically upon the emotional and intellectual efforts of ‘men’: The Aristocracy. So pay your way.

  • The Economics and Ethics of Abrahamic Religions

    (this one is going to hurt. hold on to something) [T]here is no god. Only the god imagined by the faithful such that they preserve the peace between them by prohibition on variation in strategy, and prohibition on debate, and prohibition on learning, and prohibition on innovation and evolution. It’s a contract with one another written in fiction. I agree that there is value to the faithful in the production of psychological mindfulness from certainty, conformity, under this contract written in fiction. It re-creates the safety of the herd for those who lack agency, by casting submission, conformity, stagnation as heroic. I also understand that there is value in the freedom from emotional burden, intellectual burden, that the rest of us bear on behalf of Christians, who are nothing but free-riders – Christians ‘free ride’ on our emotional, and mental hard labors. The feminine christian perpetuates the female reproductive strategy of worrying only about the safety of her nest, while the men do the hard labor of transforming reality into safety and resources which she can spend on her nest, herself, her offspring. Yet as christians daily demonstrate, she maintains utility in hostility to his breaking of her illusion, because then she would have to acknowledge the debt, and provide something in trade. Y’all are parasites, liars, and thieves unless you fight – hard, and soon. Just parasites. Why do you think islamism, marxism, feminism, and postmodernism, make the same promise of equality, in exchange for the same contract written in fiction, that the will work together to live parasitically upon the emotional and intellectual efforts of ‘men’: The Aristocracy. So pay your way.

  • Belief and Profession of It, Are Almost Always Lies

    [I] do not know what you believe. I cannot know. I can only determine judge you by your actions. If you testify to an un-testifiable belief, then you can only lie. If you lie then you have a reason to lie. I can only seek to discover the reason you lie. I cannot distinguish a profession of belief in an un-testifiable lie, from any other lie. Belief is irrelevant. Either you imitate the works of Jesus or you are just another liar, fraud, and thief. Keep a diary of the actions you take in the service of others for no other reason than the love of others, and the cost to you for having done so. If it is not an action, is not in the services of others, is not in the service of others by your personal service to them, at personal cost to you, then you are a liar, fraud, and thief, and your claims of Christianity are no different from wearing the uniform of those who did service when you have not done so, a pretending to equal their honor. No. You are just a free-rider. A parasite on other’s labors. A free rider on those few Christians who exist, just as a free rider on those few warriors that exist. A Christian ACTS. Profession of belief, and belief are irrelevant.