[I] do not know what you believe. I cannot know. I can only determine judge you by your actions. If you testify to an un-testifiable belief, then you can only lie. If you lie then you have a reason to lie. I can only seek to discover the reason you lie. I cannot distinguish a profession of belief in an un-testifiable lie, from any other lie. Belief is irrelevant. Either you imitate the works of Jesus or you are just another liar, fraud, and thief. Keep a diary of the actions you take in the service of others for no other reason than the love of others, and the cost to you for having done so. If it is not an action, is not in the services of others, is not in the service of others by your personal service to them, at personal cost to you, then you are a liar, fraud, and thief, and your claims of Christianity are no different from wearing the uniform of those who did service when you have not done so, a pretending to equal their honor. No. You are just a free-rider. A parasite on other’s labors. A free rider on those few Christians who exist, just as a free rider on those few warriors that exist. A Christian ACTS. Profession of belief, and belief are irrelevant.
Form: Mini Essay
-
The Origins of Political Conflict in Women’s Genetic Strategy
[M]others must talk to their children in moral language in order to control them at low cost – their approval and disapproval – when children are dependent upon mother for cognitive processing and security. Women try to scale this technique to men where it only works in exchange for sex and affection instead of shared cognitive processing and security. Women try to scale this technique to politics where it only works by undermining political orders, by obscuring the physical and economic reality of parasitism they’re pursuing as if they are still feeding their own children, or trading sex with men for resources and security. This is why politics has become impossible. Because women have made us compete by undermining and lying rather than informing and educating the public. Because emotional appeals that justify intuitions of the ignorant semi-domesticated animal is much easier to distribute than knowledge, understanding, and necessity. This wouldn’t be possible if we had given women a separate house of commons, and retained the historical competition between women’s emotionality, manipulation, half-truths, and undermining, and men’s calculation under threat of physical retaliation. We cannot any longer use violence against our women for gossiping, rallying, ridiculing, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing to create deceit by obscuring truth with disapproval, in matters of truth and falsehood. So without a market for exchange-and-compromise on truthful contract terms, and without the ability to punish women’s approval before truth, and punish men’s face before truth, we are reduced to a small number of men perpetuating the origins of the success of western civilization and women’s privileges that derive from them, by demanding truth before face, truth before approval or disapproval, and contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms. The same is true for the jewish (feminine lying) and muslim (masculine lying) means of undermining western civilization’s universal demand for truth regardless of cost in all circumstances. We are the only people who practice truth before face, and truth before approval, forcing contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms, dragging humanity out of ignorance and poverty. And expansion of the franchise to those who have not yet demonstrated truth before face (masculine), and truth before approval (feminine), was our only substantial mistake. And we made that mistake because we did not understand the oath of adulthood, the jury, the size of the jury, the thang, the senate, the senate and house of commons, the house of lords and house of commons, as markets between classes with different responsibilities and abilities and demonstrated FAMILY competencies, just as we had produced markets for goods, services, and information. And we have only realized today that the market for information is as, if not more important, than the market for goods and services in an information economy. As such we must restore our past mistakes, restore our markets, and restore our prosecution, and our zero tolerance, for anything other than truth before face, regardless of the cost to self or others, so that we may produced contracts of reciprocity. Thus Endeth The Lesson
-
The Origins of Political Conflict in Women’s Genetic Strategy
[M]others must talk to their children in moral language in order to control them at low cost – their approval and disapproval – when children are dependent upon mother for cognitive processing and security. Women try to scale this technique to men where it only works in exchange for sex and affection instead of shared cognitive processing and security. Women try to scale this technique to politics where it only works by undermining political orders, by obscuring the physical and economic reality of parasitism they’re pursuing as if they are still feeding their own children, or trading sex with men for resources and security. This is why politics has become impossible. Because women have made us compete by undermining and lying rather than informing and educating the public. Because emotional appeals that justify intuitions of the ignorant semi-domesticated animal is much easier to distribute than knowledge, understanding, and necessity. This wouldn’t be possible if we had given women a separate house of commons, and retained the historical competition between women’s emotionality, manipulation, half-truths, and undermining, and men’s calculation under threat of physical retaliation. We cannot any longer use violence against our women for gossiping, rallying, ridiculing, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing to create deceit by obscuring truth with disapproval, in matters of truth and falsehood. So without a market for exchange-and-compromise on truthful contract terms, and without the ability to punish women’s approval before truth, and punish men’s face before truth, we are reduced to a small number of men perpetuating the origins of the success of western civilization and women’s privileges that derive from them, by demanding truth before face, truth before approval or disapproval, and contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms. The same is true for the jewish (feminine lying) and muslim (masculine lying) means of undermining western civilization’s universal demand for truth regardless of cost in all circumstances. We are the only people who practice truth before face, and truth before approval, forcing contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms, dragging humanity out of ignorance and poverty. And expansion of the franchise to those who have not yet demonstrated truth before face (masculine), and truth before approval (feminine), was our only substantial mistake. And we made that mistake because we did not understand the oath of adulthood, the jury, the size of the jury, the thang, the senate, the senate and house of commons, the house of lords and house of commons, as markets between classes with different responsibilities and abilities and demonstrated FAMILY competencies, just as we had produced markets for goods, services, and information. And we have only realized today that the market for information is as, if not more important, than the market for goods and services in an information economy. As such we must restore our past mistakes, restore our markets, and restore our prosecution, and our zero tolerance, for anything other than truth before face, regardless of the cost to self or others, so that we may produced contracts of reciprocity. Thus Endeth The Lesson
-
THE ORIGINS OF POLITICAL CONFLICT IN WOMEN’S GENETIC STRATEGY Mothers must talk
THE ORIGINS OF POLITICAL CONFLICT IN WOMEN’S GENETIC STRATEGY
Mothers must talk to their children in moral language in order to control them at low cost – their approval and disapproval – when children are dependent upon mother for cognitive processing and security.
Women try to scale this technique to men where it only works in exchange for sex and affection instead of shared cognitive processing and security.
Women try to scale this technique to politics where it only works by undermining political orders, by obscuring the physical and economic reality of parasitism they’re pursuing as if they are still feeding their own children, or trading sex with men for resources and security.
This is why politics has become impossible. Because women have made us compete by undermining and lying rather than informing and educating the public. Because emotional appeals that justify intuitions of the ignorant semi-domesticated animal is much easier to distribute than knowledge, understanding, and necessity.
Tis wouldn’t be possible and we had given women a separate house of commons, and retained the historical competition between women’s emotionality, manipulation, half-truths, and undermining, and men’s calculation under threat of physical retaliation. We cannot any longer use violence against our women for gossiping, rallying, ridiculing, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing to create deceit by obscuring truth with disapproval, in matters of truth and falsehood.
So without a market for exchange-and-compromise on truthful contract terms, and without the ability to punish women’s approval before truth, and punish men’s face before truth, we are reduced to a small number of men perpetuating the origins of the success of western civilization and women’s privileges that derive from them, by demanding truth before face, truth before approval or disapproval, and contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms.
The same is true for the jewish (feminine lying) and muslim (masculine lying) means of undermining western civilization’s universal demand for truth regardless of cost in all circumstances.
We are the only people who practice truth before face, and truth before approval, forcing contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms, dragging humanity out of ignorance and poverty.
And expansion of the franchise to those who have not yet demonstrated truth before face (masculine), and truth before approval (feminine), was our only substantial mistake.
And we made that mistake because we did not understand the oath of adulthood, the jury, the size of the jury, the thang, the senate, the senate and house of commons, the house of lords and house of commons, as markets between classes with different responsibilities and abilities and demonstrated FAMILY competencies, just as we had produced markets for goods, services, and information.
And we have only realized today that the market for information is as, if not more important, than the market for goods and services in an information economy.
As such we must restore our past mistakes, restore our markets, and restore our prosecution, and our zero tolerance, for anything other than truth before face, regardless of the cost to self or others, so that we may produced contracts of reciprocity.
Thus Endeth The Lesson
Curt Doolittle
November 1, 2019
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 08:48:00 UTC
-
THE NEW BIG LIE: “ONE MAN TO TURN THIS COUNTRY UPSIDE DOWN” Genetically Feminine
THE NEW BIG LIE: “ONE MAN TO TURN THIS COUNTRY UPSIDE DOWN”
Genetically Feminine Conflict Strategy,
… Strategic Practiced Feminine Jewish Strategy,
… … Formally Articulated Feminine Jewish Saul Alinsky Technique,
… … … Used in Marxist, Feminist, Postmodernist application;
… … … … Undermining the compromise;
… … … … … between classes, genders, individual differences;
… … … … … … Of Rule of Law, Markets in everything, and The Intergenerational family – as the means of persistence of earned civilizational advantage for all.
By the “New Big Lie” of the new “False Promise of Equality”, by reforming supernatural promise of life after death, with the pseudoscientific promise of elimination of differences in interpersonal, sexual, social, economic, political, market value that are entirely the product of our vast differences in genetic ability, quality, and therefore value to one another.
Man was not oppressed – the families of the unfit classes were domesticated by the families of the better classes like all other plants and animals were domesticated, because of the outsized rewards for humans for having done so, and the necessity of: A Division Of labor, Property, The law of Tort, the Suppression of free riding, parasitism, and corruption by that law of tort, with property as a unit of measure; Causing Markets in Everything; Thereby Suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses;
Who by poor genes, poor ability, poor character, poor discipline, must be genetically left behind for the rest of humanity to evolve out of ignorance, superstition, incompetence, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the hazards of a nature unconcerned, with human life, in a brief period of planetary, solar, and galactic quiet enabling, our persistence, evolution, and transcendence.
Why does the NEW BIG LIE work like every other new big lie? Because we have failed to sufficiently domesticate the remaining demi-human animals into full humans, such that they are not vulnerable to the big lies, that resist, prevent, and reverse our evolutionary progress into the gods we imagined – free of the vicissitudes of a nature hostile to human life.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 08:19:00 UTC
-
WHAT DO MARXISM FEMINISM POSTMODERNISM HAVE TO DO WITH THE IGNORANCE OF THE CURR
WHAT DO MARXISM FEMINISM POSTMODERNISM HAVE TO DO WITH THE IGNORANCE OF THE CURRENT GENERATION… ?
The Octogenarian Little Old Lady (criticizing): “Why is the current generation so ignorant?!”
Me: “They had to make the generations ignorant in order to perpetuate the lie of
Her: “What do marxism, feminism, and postmodernism have to do with the current generation being ignorant?!”
Me: “Marxism to undermine compromise between the classes with straw man of oppression; undermining the compromise between the genders with the straw man of oppression; undermining the compromise between different peoples with the straw man of oppression; No one was oppressed in history. economic necessity isn’t oppression. conformity produces discounts, and unconformity imposes costs, and our people have been the very best in human history at producing those discounts.”
Her: (Pause. Looking off into the distance.) “You think you’re so smart.”
Me: “It’s a curse. And I gotta’ put up with all of you every … single … day … . It’s exhausting.”
Her: (Head shaking).
Me: “Score!”
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 07:52:00 UTC
-
THE ECONOMICS AND ETHICS OF ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS (this one is going to hurt. hold
THE ECONOMICS AND ETHICS OF ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS
(this one is going to hurt. hold on to something)
There is no god. Only the god imagined by the faithful such that they preserve the peace between them by prohibition on variation in strategy, and prohibition on debate, and prohibition on learning, and prohibition on innovation and evolution. It’s a contract with one another written in fiction.
I agree that there is value to the faithful in the production of psychological mindfulness from certainty, conformity, under this contract written in fiction. It re-creates the safety of the herd for those who lack agency, by casting submission, conformity, stagnation as heroic.
I also understand that there is value in the freedom from emotional burden, intellectual burden, that the rest of us bear on behalf of Christians, who are nothing but free-riders – Christians ‘free ride’ on our emotional, and mental hard labors.
The feminine christian perpetuates the female reproductive strategy of worrying only about the safety of her nest, while the men do the hard labor of transforming reality into safety and resources which she can spend on her nest, herself, her offspring.
Yet as christians daily demonstrate, she maintains utility in hostility to his breaking of her illusion, because then she would have to acknowledge the debt, and provide something in trade.
Y’all are parasites, liars, and thieves unless you fight – hard, and soon. Just parasites.
Why do you think islamism, marxism, feminism, and postmodernism, make the same promise of equality, in exchange for the same contract written in fiction, that the will work together to live parasitically upon the emotional and intellectual efforts of ‘men’: The Aristocracy.
So pay your way.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 19:22:00 UTC
-
No the Founders Didn’t Fail, the Church Failed – Repeatedly – Just as It Is Failing Today. We Are Trying to Restore Our Religion if Only in Defense
[O]ne cannot force those of us who cannot believe to lie that we believe. One cannot force those who believe not to. It matters only to believers whether we follow the natural law in for superstitious, philosophical,or scientific reasons. Because you must defend the comforting lie by which you pay the cost of membership in the community of the faithful, and profess observance to the same rules as we simply because they are evidentiary empirically demonstrated laws of nature, whether or not a a deity imposed them. The founders advanced european civilization by advancing the aristotelian project, that advanced the law of our ancestors, using martial truth, truthful testimonial, warranty of that testimony, and test of that testimony before a jury of our peers. In other words, truth must be testifiable. But the founders were part of the first major phase of restoration of western civlization from semitic conquest by false promise, ignorance and deceit. So while between the Declaration, Articles of Confederation, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, So they lacked the knowledge The failure of the founders was trusting the church to teach the ignorant illiterate poor. The Church failed because it failed the reforms I am proposing whereby the natural law and Christian Love are stated in scientific terms, embedded in our law and the constitution constructed from it. So that the reason we obey the natural law, whether by i) command of a depotic evil selfish Semitic god, or ii) the good god of the Persians and romans Jesus transformed and merged into a jewish new testament god; or iii) or of Jesus himself as a philosopher speaking new wisdom literature in the only language the primitive peoples could understand, or iv) of Aristotle himself as the philosopher of truth creating new wisdom literature we call science, or v) the evidence of human success and failure throughout history: science and history of world jurisprudence. Because by putting the natural law and christian love and charity into the law of man, a constitution under that law, and into the education of people- the scientific, the rational, and the faithful act the same, according to an immutable natural law, the transgression of which licenses violence against them. Thereby eliminating all competition from hostile alien religions in scientific, rational, or theological form. Once embedded in our law, the ‘folk’ can govern, adapt, and evolve their religion, as they have for over a thousand years, and no church can fail them. And no competitor can usurp them. So just as the classes can cooperate economically despite different abilities interests, and means of storytelling because of the natural law, the classes can cooperate socially and politically despite different interests, abilities, and means of stories, under that law. Because the law is same for all parties – and all that differs is the story they use to measure theirs and others’ thoughts word and deeds. But the law – the system of measurement is the same regardless of language and grammar of storytelling that provides that system of measurement. [C]hristians are rather … politically incompetent …, because they practice a religion that failed to evolve like islam into a political religion, because their church failed to succeed at governing, as it was doomed to fail from the beginning. The jews, christians, and muslims, forever failed to grasp, that they were creating not a system of rule or civilization, but a system of rebellion against the indo european revolution, of truth, reciprocity, markets, meritocracy, and hierarchy, that created a natural division between the classes, increasing the power-distance between members previously able to directly address headmen and elders – even the corrupt headmen and elders of the semites. And that the consequences of jewish, christian, and muslim civilization was destruction of every single civilization it touches. Christianity succeed in the modern world after failing in the medieval, not succeeding because of anything christian, but because of european military, technology, literacy, commerce, and law that was made possible by the failure of the church to consolidate power among the monarchies, and thereby converting europe into semitic submission, corruption, ignorance and poverty. If anything, as most historians have stated before me, christianity served as a cover story for justifying restoration of European-Indo-Iranic Aryan Tradition of Conquest, that had conquered the world from spain to the borders of china, and made the indo european religion the largest in the world. We have proposed, I have proposed, a correction of this failure of christianity, and that is to complete the conversion of christianity to a European folk religion as we have seen in the american evangelical movement, and away from a semitic, despotic, religion specifically evolved to sell false promise to the underclass in the next world, as a means of their submission to despotism and ignorance in the living world. I propose restoring the churches to central function of family and education, but that these churches may choose to teach the scientific, philosophical, or supernatural versions of natural law and christian love and charity, and if we are lucky, and in addition, restore the debt payment we call worship to nature (heathen), our ancestors, and our heroes(pagan), for those of us who need a good spirit (nature) or a masculine god to rise to (heroes), as well as those of you who need a maternal feminine god to submit to (saints). Or you can in your folly, let happen to protestantism under islam what the catholics have let happen under jewish influence, and take your selfish egos, your arrogance, your un-christ-like intolerance, into extinction, like the jews and muslims have destroyed every great civlization that they have touched. You have only yourselves to blame for your arrogance.
-
No the Founders Didn’t Fail, the Church Failed – Repeatedly – Just as It Is Failing Today. We Are Trying to Restore Our Religion if Only in Defense
[O]ne cannot force those of us who cannot believe to lie that we believe. One cannot force those who believe not to. It matters only to believers whether we follow the natural law in for superstitious, philosophical,or scientific reasons. Because you must defend the comforting lie by which you pay the cost of membership in the community of the faithful, and profess observance to the same rules as we simply because they are evidentiary empirically demonstrated laws of nature, whether or not a a deity imposed them. The founders advanced european civilization by advancing the aristotelian project, that advanced the law of our ancestors, using martial truth, truthful testimonial, warranty of that testimony, and test of that testimony before a jury of our peers. In other words, truth must be testifiable. But the founders were part of the first major phase of restoration of western civlization from semitic conquest by false promise, ignorance and deceit. So while between the Declaration, Articles of Confederation, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, So they lacked the knowledge The failure of the founders was trusting the church to teach the ignorant illiterate poor. The Church failed because it failed the reforms I am proposing whereby the natural law and Christian Love are stated in scientific terms, embedded in our law and the constitution constructed from it. So that the reason we obey the natural law, whether by i) command of a depotic evil selfish Semitic god, or ii) the good god of the Persians and romans Jesus transformed and merged into a jewish new testament god; or iii) or of Jesus himself as a philosopher speaking new wisdom literature in the only language the primitive peoples could understand, or iv) of Aristotle himself as the philosopher of truth creating new wisdom literature we call science, or v) the evidence of human success and failure throughout history: science and history of world jurisprudence. Because by putting the natural law and christian love and charity into the law of man, a constitution under that law, and into the education of people- the scientific, the rational, and the faithful act the same, according to an immutable natural law, the transgression of which licenses violence against them. Thereby eliminating all competition from hostile alien religions in scientific, rational, or theological form. Once embedded in our law, the ‘folk’ can govern, adapt, and evolve their religion, as they have for over a thousand years, and no church can fail them. And no competitor can usurp them. So just as the classes can cooperate economically despite different abilities interests, and means of storytelling because of the natural law, the classes can cooperate socially and politically despite different interests, abilities, and means of stories, under that law. Because the law is same for all parties – and all that differs is the story they use to measure theirs and others’ thoughts word and deeds. But the law – the system of measurement is the same regardless of language and grammar of storytelling that provides that system of measurement. [C]hristians are rather … politically incompetent …, because they practice a religion that failed to evolve like islam into a political religion, because their church failed to succeed at governing, as it was doomed to fail from the beginning. The jews, christians, and muslims, forever failed to grasp, that they were creating not a system of rule or civilization, but a system of rebellion against the indo european revolution, of truth, reciprocity, markets, meritocracy, and hierarchy, that created a natural division between the classes, increasing the power-distance between members previously able to directly address headmen and elders – even the corrupt headmen and elders of the semites. And that the consequences of jewish, christian, and muslim civilization was destruction of every single civilization it touches. Christianity succeed in the modern world after failing in the medieval, not succeeding because of anything christian, but because of european military, technology, literacy, commerce, and law that was made possible by the failure of the church to consolidate power among the monarchies, and thereby converting europe into semitic submission, corruption, ignorance and poverty. If anything, as most historians have stated before me, christianity served as a cover story for justifying restoration of European-Indo-Iranic Aryan Tradition of Conquest, that had conquered the world from spain to the borders of china, and made the indo european religion the largest in the world. We have proposed, I have proposed, a correction of this failure of christianity, and that is to complete the conversion of christianity to a European folk religion as we have seen in the american evangelical movement, and away from a semitic, despotic, religion specifically evolved to sell false promise to the underclass in the next world, as a means of their submission to despotism and ignorance in the living world. I propose restoring the churches to central function of family and education, but that these churches may choose to teach the scientific, philosophical, or supernatural versions of natural law and christian love and charity, and if we are lucky, and in addition, restore the debt payment we call worship to nature (heathen), our ancestors, and our heroes(pagan), for those of us who need a good spirit (nature) or a masculine god to rise to (heroes), as well as those of you who need a maternal feminine god to submit to (saints). Or you can in your folly, let happen to protestantism under islam what the catholics have let happen under jewish influence, and take your selfish egos, your arrogance, your un-christ-like intolerance, into extinction, like the jews and muslims have destroyed every great civlization that they have touched. You have only yourselves to blame for your arrogance.
-
We can train them well and rule them well, train them poorly and rule them poorl
We can train them well and rule them well, train them poorly and rule them poorly,train them not and rule them as serfs at hither cost and lower productivity,and train them not and rule them as slaves at even higher cost and lower productivity. What we cannot do is let them rule.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 15:20:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189925196913893376
Reply addressees: @hunderkoch
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189911903415361536
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189911903415361536