Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE POST MARX-KEYNES ECONOMY: OUR RESTORATION —“There’s plenty wrong with GDP

    THE POST MARX-KEYNES ECONOMY: OUR RESTORATION

    —“There’s plenty wrong with GDP as a global measure of system performance. One of those problems is that no one has yet to come up with a better one.”—Duke Newcomb

    Income != balance sheet. That’s the problem. (Really). GDP P/C @ PPP = Standard of living. Change in Balance Sheet = Gain or Loss (productivity); GDP = Debt Capacity = Military Capacity = Coercive Capacity and that’s all it means. The problem is false productivity, were in consumption of capital is obscured by velocity, in order to maintain keynesian employment as a (bad) means of restoring economic velocity (which is the error) – where under digital and fiat money, liquidity distribution directly to the people will make employment a measure only of demographic utility (which is what the left is afraid of) and the correction of which (as I recommend) will re-suppress immigration, and re-suppress underclass reproduction, and restore middle class reproduction.The only way to increase wealth in this model is reproduction of the middle class, employment of young and old, payment for labor necessary to create an aesthetic commons, one child policy for those who are dependent, and following the japanese in automation.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 11:33:00 UTC

  • THE AUDIENCE IS ‘EVERYONE ABLE, AND NO ONE UNABLE’. —“Seriously, why don’t you

    THE AUDIENCE IS ‘EVERYONE ABLE, AND NO ONE UNABLE’.

    —“Seriously, why don’t you write in sentences, the layperson can understand? Nobody, absolutely nobody wants to carry dictionary or Thesaurus around with them. Again, seriously, who is your audience?”—

    Seriously, why don’t you recognize that I write the same set of concepts in in essay, argument, aphorism, ‘poetic list’, table, graph, and serialized form because each of these forms increases the informational density of the content, providing different minds, different means?

    For some of you, an explanation is required.

    For others, a set of bullet points is required.

    For others an aphorism is required.

    For others a diagram is required.

    Because some of us rapidly understand complex relations quickly and some of us need them explained in prose.

    I can read the equations that capture the entire description of the physical universe. Other people need prose, and others videos, and others cartoons.

    The audience is ‘everyone able, and no one unable’.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 08:22:00 UTC

  • “The White Law” (Lex Europae)

    “THE WHITE LAW” (LEX EUROPAE) (fully extended) [T]he european peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically, faster than all other peoples because of our traditions of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, thereby advancing productive innovations in each others interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, thereby allowing us to divert proceeds of our production to the commons and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, economic and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. The Group Evolutionary Strategy of The European Peoples

    1. Maneuver: Rapid Adaptation
    2. The Use of Entrepreneurial Warfare,
    3. …. contractual conduct of warfare, Technological innovation, and maneuver.
    4. The Asymmetric returns of investments in the Returns on Commons.
    5. The Direction of Dominance Expression to the Production of Returns on Commons.
    6. The Returns on the domestication of animal man, such that some may rise to increase our numbers.
    7. The use of natural eugenics of direction the proceeds of production to the production of commons.

    The Oath: –“I shall not lie, steal, or show cowardice in battle, or may you(all) strike me dead.”— The Way: Excellence, and Beauty, Heroism, and Duty Truth and Contract Reciprocity, and Sovereignty Compatibility and Hierarchy Natural Law and Jury Producing: Markets in Everything And Natural Eugenics, With the direction of proceeds To the production of Commons Producing: The optimum human organization With the fastest innovation With the least resistance With the maximum quality of life, With maximum evolution, in the shortest possible time. Given: the limitations of man, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe hostile to the evolution of man, into the gods we imagine. Because: Every man is, a warrior, a craftsman, a sheriff, a judge, and a sovereign, and warranties all his peers, in the distributed dictatorship of sovereign men. (undone)

  • “The White Law” (Lex Europae)

    “THE WHITE LAW” (LEX EUROPAE) (fully extended) [T]he european peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically, faster than all other peoples because of our traditions of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, thereby advancing productive innovations in each others interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, thereby allowing us to divert proceeds of our production to the commons and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, economic and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. The Group Evolutionary Strategy of The European Peoples

    1. Maneuver: Rapid Adaptation
    2. The Use of Entrepreneurial Warfare,
    3. …. contractual conduct of warfare, Technological innovation, and maneuver.
    4. The Asymmetric returns of investments in the Returns on Commons.
    5. The Direction of Dominance Expression to the Production of Returns on Commons.
    6. The Returns on the domestication of animal man, such that some may rise to increase our numbers.
    7. The use of natural eugenics of direction the proceeds of production to the production of commons.

    The Oath: –“I shall not lie, steal, or show cowardice in battle, or may you(all) strike me dead.”— The Way: Excellence, and Beauty, Heroism, and Duty Truth and Contract Reciprocity, and Sovereignty Compatibility and Hierarchy Natural Law and Jury Producing: Markets in Everything And Natural Eugenics, With the direction of proceeds To the production of Commons Producing: The optimum human organization With the fastest innovation With the least resistance With the maximum quality of life, With maximum evolution, in the shortest possible time. Given: the limitations of man, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe hostile to the evolution of man, into the gods we imagine. Because: Every man is, a warrior, a craftsman, a sheriff, a judge, and a sovereign, and warranties all his peers, in the distributed dictatorship of sovereign men. (undone)

  • As Far as I Know, I’m Trying to Save Christianity

    [I] am pretty sure I’m trying to save Christianity – which is in rapid decline in the west – and restore Christianity as the church should have done, by restating the theological, in philosophical, rational, and scientific terms – and in doing so ending the criticisms of it, and the removal of it from its position as the state religion. But you know, if one’s faith cannot tolerate that it doesn’t matter how we hear and follow the message, that it’s the same message, then I would think something is wrong with with you: that you are neither christian nor good person. If one needs an evil and vengeful god to obey, and the threat of hell as defense against others, and his own nature; Or if one needs a loving Jesus as a parent and guide as defense against the hardship of reality, and to share that love with a community; Or if one wants a set of moral rules that can demand of himself and others to create a society in harmony; Or if someone says that the laws of nature find these moral rules the optimum for himself, others, and the polity and to capture that in law; Then it is against those same Christian rules to deprive people of that which they need in order to obey those rules. That is not Christian love. That’s selfishness and hatred. Thats Semitic Lying and despotism, that our ancestors escaped, not European Christian love that our ancestors sought to extract and preserve as a germanic religion of our people, instead of a means of oppression of the european people that kept them in ignorance, illiteracy, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, and early death. Many men have reformed christianity over the centuries. Many recent men have tried to end. The modern church has needed an Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Locke, Smith, Hume, and our Founding fathers, and instead found jewish communism, jewish feminism, and jewish postmodernism, and an academy media, and state, under our own peoples desire for power, and jewish and now islamic undermining, seeking to destroy not only European christianity but european civlization, and european peoples, in a great genocide that the muslims and jews have brought to every other great civilization that existed in the ancient world. I do not want this job. But we must do these jobs out of duty, to preserve our people, and their way of life – that way of life that has dragged the rest of the world out of poverty, starvation hard labor, ignorance, tyranny, slavery, disease, and unnecessary death and suffering. We did this through our pre-christian traditions and law, and our christian traditions and faith. And the entirety of humanity is punishing us for our gifts. So Christians can help me adapt and restore Christianity and natural law and Aristotelian reason to our age, as the great men of our past have done, or out of arrogance, selfishness, spite, and envy, bring by not acting, end not only christianity but our entire civilization, our nations, and our race.

  • As Far as I Know, I’m Trying to Save Christianity

    [I] am pretty sure I’m trying to save Christianity – which is in rapid decline in the west – and restore Christianity as the church should have done, by restating the theological, in philosophical, rational, and scientific terms – and in doing so ending the criticisms of it, and the removal of it from its position as the state religion. But you know, if one’s faith cannot tolerate that it doesn’t matter how we hear and follow the message, that it’s the same message, then I would think something is wrong with with you: that you are neither christian nor good person. If one needs an evil and vengeful god to obey, and the threat of hell as defense against others, and his own nature; Or if one needs a loving Jesus as a parent and guide as defense against the hardship of reality, and to share that love with a community; Or if one wants a set of moral rules that can demand of himself and others to create a society in harmony; Or if someone says that the laws of nature find these moral rules the optimum for himself, others, and the polity and to capture that in law; Then it is against those same Christian rules to deprive people of that which they need in order to obey those rules. That is not Christian love. That’s selfishness and hatred. Thats Semitic Lying and despotism, that our ancestors escaped, not European Christian love that our ancestors sought to extract and preserve as a germanic religion of our people, instead of a means of oppression of the european people that kept them in ignorance, illiteracy, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, and early death. Many men have reformed christianity over the centuries. Many recent men have tried to end. The modern church has needed an Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Locke, Smith, Hume, and our Founding fathers, and instead found jewish communism, jewish feminism, and jewish postmodernism, and an academy media, and state, under our own peoples desire for power, and jewish and now islamic undermining, seeking to destroy not only European christianity but european civlization, and european peoples, in a great genocide that the muslims and jews have brought to every other great civilization that existed in the ancient world. I do not want this job. But we must do these jobs out of duty, to preserve our people, and their way of life – that way of life that has dragged the rest of the world out of poverty, starvation hard labor, ignorance, tyranny, slavery, disease, and unnecessary death and suffering. We did this through our pre-christian traditions and law, and our christian traditions and faith. And the entirety of humanity is punishing us for our gifts. So Christians can help me adapt and restore Christianity and natural law and Aristotelian reason to our age, as the great men of our past have done, or out of arrogance, selfishness, spite, and envy, bring by not acting, end not only christianity but our entire civilization, our nations, and our race.

  • AS FAR AS I KONW I’M TRYING TO SAVE CHRISTIANITY (important) I am pretty sure I’

    AS FAR AS I KONW I’M TRYING TO SAVE CHRISTIANITY

    (important)

    I am pretty sure I’m trying to save Christianity – which is in rapid decline in the west – and restore Christianity as the church should have done, by restating the theological, in philosophical, rational, and scientific terms – and in doing so ending the criticisms of it, and the removal of it from its position as the state religion.

    But you know, if one’s faith cannot tolerate that it doesn’t matter how we hear and follow the message, that it’s the same message, then I would think something is wrong with with you: that you are neither christian nor good person.

    If one needs an evil and vengeful god to obey, and the threat of hell as defense against others, and his own nature;

    Or if one needs a loving Jesus as a parent and guide as defense against the hardship of reality, and to share that love with a community;

    Or if one wants a set of moral rules that can demand of himself and others to create a society in harmony;

    Or if someone says that the laws of nature find these moral rules the optimum for himself, others, and the polity and to capture that in law;

    Then it is against those same Christian rules to deprive people of that which they need in order to obey those rules. That is not Christian love. That’s selfishness and hatred. Thats Semitic Lying and despotism, that our ancestors escaped, not European Christian love that our ancestors sought to extract and preserve as a germanic religion of our people, instead of a means of oppression of the european people that kept them in ignorance, illiteracy, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, and early death.

    Many men have reformed christianity over the centuries. Many recent men have tried to end. The modern church has needed an Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Locke, Smith, Hume, and our Founding fathers, and instead found jewish communism, jewish feminism, and jewish postmodernism, and an academy media, and state, under our own peoples desire for power, and jewish and now islamic undermining, seeking to destroy not only European christianity but european civlization, and european peoples, in a great genocide that the muslims and jews have brought to every other great civilization that existed in the ancient world.

    I do not want this job. But we must do these jobs out of duty, to preserve our people, and their way of life – that way of life that has dragged the rest of the world out of poverty, starvation hard labor, ignorance, tyranny, slavery, disease, and unnecessary death and suffering.

    We did this through our pre-christian traditions and law, and our christian traditions and faith.

    And the entirety of humanity is punishing us for our gifts.

    So Christians can help me adapt and restore Christianity and natural law and Aristotelian reason to our age, as the great men of our past have done, or out of arrogance, selfishness, spite, and envy, bring by not acting, end not only christianity but our entire civilization, our nations, and our race.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 20:45:00 UTC

  • EUGENICS IN P-LAW (Curt Doolittle) The only eugenic process Natural Law relies u

    EUGENICS IN P-LAW

    (Curt Doolittle)

    The only eugenic process Natural Law relies upon is markets. in other words, if you (your family) is self supporting, and not engaging in irreciprocity, we have no other means of testing your fitness other than demonstrated fitness.

    If you (your family) is not self supporting, an engages in irreciprocity, no matter your excuse, then you are in fact, demonstrating unfitness.

    (Bill Joslin)

    Fitness being akin to “good” – anything not unfit, is fit. Fitness remains undecidable (only demonstrable) because of the causal density and unpredictability of future outcomes. But unfitness remains a provisional known (a known subject to being updated with new information).

    This the demarcation between HARD eugenics (attempting direct control over natural eugenics) and SOFT P-Eugenics would be “anything not unfit remains fit (a fitness candidate) – or rather, we P-eugenics are achieved by NOT practicing dysgenics.

    (Curt Doolittle)

    P-law is via negativa, meaning do not reproduce dysgenically, it is not via-positiva, meaning culling of people. It does leave open the possibility of termination for catastrophic birth defects. We don’t answer the question of abortion because it is undecidable under law. It is only decidable within a polity.

    P-law does not prohibit genetic innovation (Transhuanism) as long as it reversible in the next generation and warranteed.

    TESTOSTERONE

    (Curt Doolittle)

    The generational sink in testosterone levels as far as I know, is almost entirely due to failure to exercise and engage in dominance play, and can be restored by physical activity – we know this because we see people do it every day. THere is some negativity to BPA and other chemicals but tis is as easily rectified as requiring all foods to be shipped (more expensively, and less environmentally costly ) in glass containers.

    (Bill Joslin)

    Drop in testosterone relates to prolonged.low level stress, or rather a higher baseline stress level – for example the constant stimulus of living in urban centers, or prolonged financial stress…i.e. anomie

    Also – occupations that have intermittent physical stress coupled with enough recovery time, tend to elevate testosterone. for example: jobs which include physical exertion but don’t include “taking work home with you” (no worrying about after hours.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 18:47:00 UTC

  • ECONOMIC INFLUENCES ON TODAY”S ART WORLD 1) spaces are now general purpose rathe

    ECONOMIC INFLUENCES ON TODAY”S ART WORLD

    1) spaces are now general purpose rather than designed for function. This makes them less amenable to artistic treatment because they have to be ‘resold’.

    2) Postwar materials (steel, glass, and panel products) are not amenable to organic arts, and it’s organic arts that constitute the majority of the western thematic tradition – particularly the human form.

    3) Architectural software is .. great for engineering and tradesmen but tends to produce ‘sh-tty’ attempts at imitating Lloyd Wright – to mid century, as if the Craftsman never happened. But at least soviet concrete brutalism is done. Fk. Great for government buildings. Sh-t for the artwork they decorated it with.

    4) Hollywood is a black hole for the arts, because it’s possible to make money at it on and off, while keeping ‘other jobs’ going.

    5) Camera first, large printers second and Digital third has eliminated much of the handicraft that went into the production of durable arts.

    6) Decoration will fit anywhere but “Art” (meaning, craftsmanship, materials) has been successfully undermined by the marxist-pomo-feminist tradition, and intentional deprivation of citizens from education in the heroic tradition – replaced with the victim tradition has made high art impossible or unmarketable.

    7) The economics of producing inventory vs the percent of sales is such that, say, if you want to produce 200k of income for a gallery and 60K of income for yourself, you have to do the math on how much time and materials you can put into each work. So at an average of 10k per piece, that means 20ps must sell, that means no less than five galleries, that means 40 pcs in inventory at all times. And that’s only so many days or weeks per piece. Most people produce a production line, and use it to finance their artwork. (I know art jewelry, print and panting the best.) Scale up to sculpture then to play, then to film, and down to print and farther down to photo and farther down to posters and kitch but the general math is the same -just like every other biz. There is a reason single digits of artists make a living, and instead work to fund their art hobby that generates lunch money.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:30:00 UTC

  • WHAT ‘TRADITIONAL’ MEANS, WHAT TO SAY INSTEAD, AND HOW TO RESTORE RECIPROCITY BE

    WHAT ‘TRADITIONAL’ MEANS, WHAT TO SAY INSTEAD, AND HOW TO RESTORE RECIPROCITY BETWEEN GENDERS.

    Advice to Libertarian(ideology), Constitutional (rule of law), Right(normative tradition), and Religious(theological tradition): Avoid “Traditional” as it’s indefensible. (FWIW; it means ’empirically successful in pre technological history because of the division of labor necessary under intergenerational agrarianism.’)

    Better argument is “Biological gender roles constitute the optimum Nash equilibrium under which all of us do the best we can even if none of us or few of us do as well as we’d wish, without imposing irreciprocal hardship upon one another.”

    This is why we evolved paring off and serial monogamy, and only developed long term monogamy as (a) we lived longer (b) we developed property and productivity and (c) were able to perform intergenerational care in exchange for intergenerational inheritance.

    Because of the narrower distribution of desirable men, and the wider distribution of desirable women and the increase in the division of labor such that women are freed from manual household labor like men are (largely)freed from manual environmental labor, we can no longer expect postwar rates of marriage, and will return to pre-industrial rates of marriage – preserving it more commonly among the better classes who have greater interests in property and its returns, and the working and laboring classes who possess sufficient in-class sexual social market value, and sufficient conscientiousness and reciprocity, and returning to serial or parallel relations around maternal households living on the edge of self sufficiency.

    However, we can eliminate ir-reciprocity for MEN in the current era, by (a) ending marriage to the state (redistribution); (b) ending community property, alimony, child support, (c) restore liability for interference in a marriage; (e) restore voluntary disassociation so that men can reform paternal institutions of reciprocal support in lieu of marriage; and (d) forcible savings for retirement that is unattachable by anyone and everyone as insurance by and for the polity from your moral hazard of self insufficiency.

    In other words, we can restore reciprocal interest in the returns on investment in a partnership, by restoring the disincentive to parasitically live off others permitted by their intuition of reciprocity against moral hazard.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:27:00 UTC