Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Law

    JUSTICE VS MORALITY VS LAW? IT STUMPED SOCRATES, BUT SHOULDN’T – THE ERROR OF IDEAL TYPES OVER SPECTRA The terms Justice, Morality and Law refer to spectrums, not states, and that is why the subject is confusing to people when it should not be. Natural Law (logically necessary), customary law (evolved), legislation (commands), and regulations (insurance) —vs— Objective morality (logically necessary), customary morality (evolved), normative reality (practiced), moral theory (advocated) —vs— Objective Justice (logically extant), Evolved Justice (unintended), procedural Justice (intended), subjective justice (imagined) Humans evolved instincts for managing the extreme value of cooperation. Moral instincts prevent free-riding and therefore preserve the incentives to maintain cooperation. Justice instincts do the opposite: they tell us if our cooperation has been accounted for. Cooperate requires sacrifice (payment) and rewards (returns). Law is the means by which we resolve differences between positive moral action and individual perceptions of justice. That justice is simply an accounting system provided for by evolution so that we preserve the incentives to maintain the extraordinary benefits of cooperation is somehow… well, depressing. So morality is the positive and negative instinct. Justice is the sense of whether morality has been preserved in the face of violation and law is the logical means by which we resolve disputes. The reason that it’s confusing is that while necessary morality, justice, and law are logically decidable, as information becomes less visible and less ‘correct’ opinion differs. Some cultures solve this through authority. Westerners solve it through jury. But to solve it by jury requires a largely moral people. which is why some cultures have juries and other cultures have three judges to make bribery more difficult.

    Punishment

    —“The problem with the modern state is not that it uses the death penalty so much, but rather that it uses it far too little. Property in toto serves as a useful metric for what crimes merit the death penalty. if you use fraud, deceit, or some other non-reciprocal criminal means of enriching yourself at the expense of the commons above some arbitrary number, say 5x the average lifetime taxes paid by an average taxpayer, you should face execution. Under such a scheme, nearly every tech monopolist, the Walton family, Bezos, any of the financial elite, nearly every politician and most high ranking bureaucrats would be liable for death. NYT editors lie in the newspapers and it costs 5x the taxes paid of the average worker? Boom. no more problem with lying editors at the NYT. The whole West faces the double problem of a violent, dependent underclass and a parasitical, exploitative oligarchy controlling business and politics. Such measures might seem unduly harsh, but they are necessary. Brazil shows why they must be implemented, Singapore shows that they work.”—-

  • THE PERFECT RELIGION? GOVERNMENT? LAW? AESTHETICS? —“You said Christianity was

    THE PERFECT RELIGION? GOVERNMENT? LAW? AESTHETICS?

    —“You said Christianity was made to destroy Rome. What religion do you think we should embrace instead?”—

    Christianity was made for powerless dim ignorant desert tribes to provide a theology of obedience and inclusion for the underclass that imitated homer and aristotle for the upper classes, and stoicism-epicureanism for the middle classes, and Sol Invictus for the working classes.

    It was successful at creating obedience and inclusion by false promise and lies, and undermining the upper class’ truth, markets, familial meritocracy with a claim of oppression (rather than domestication) at cost of continuous stasis if not decline.

    So it was imposed by force by the eastern non-greco-roman empire on the roman empire, to achieve the middle eastern conquest of the west, just as alexander had conquered the east. In the end, both experiments failed. Eventually Semites(Lies) and Europeans(Truth) reverted.

    The perfect religion?

    1) The Stoic Method-Epicureanism: Mindfulness and Love of Life;

    2) Heathenism: nature and ancestors;

    3) Paganism: Masculine Heroes for the strong;

    4) Scientists/Artists for the Able;

    5) Jesus and the Saints: Feminine Heroes for the weak. And European Transcendence of Man.

    THE PERFECT GOVERNMENT

    –“You said Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Denialism were made to destroy our civilization. So, what is the best government?”–

    We had the Best System of Government (Perfect Government) and we blew it:

    1) Nomocracy (Rule of Law by Natural Law of Torts: Reciprocity, under Property-in-toto, and Transcendence of Man)

    2) A Hereditary Monarchy as Judge of Last Resort, and custodian of territory, institutions, organizations, families, and individuals.

    …. A State(Foreign Relations) Organization,

    …. A Professional Military,

    …. A Professional Judiciary, and

    …. A Treasury of Last Resort.

    3) A Market for Commons consisting of:

    …. Regional Nobility(Persistent Military Families) serving as a normative Supreme Court (Virtues)

    …. A House of Industry(Commons) for those with responsibilities. (prosperity)

    …. A House of Arts (Labor)

    …. A Church Serving as a House of family. (Family)

    4) A Local (Democratic) Polity(private partnership) of Property Owners

    …. A Militia and Sheriffs

    …. Voluntary Civic Organizations

    5) The Nuclear Family. And Family and Nation as subject of policy

    6) The Individual and Property as the subject of law.

    Really. You can’t do much better than that for a ‘steady state’. Because under war or stress the organization can switch from market rule to military rule (Fascism), and under plenty the organization can switch from market rule to (contingent and temporary) redistribution.

    The central problem with all forms of government is nothing more complex than the demographics of the polity. The larger the demonstrated underclass, the less effective a government and the more risk involved and the more limited are one’s options. The smaller the demonstrated underclass, the more effective a government and the less risk involved and the more plentiful (variable) are one’s options.

    Market governments cause a natural eugenic change in the distribution, while creating the greatest adaptability, rate of innovation(competition) and highest standard of living.

    But they require a militia or at least a dedicated military to bring into being.

    PERFECT LAW

    Truth and Duty, Promise and Contract, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Law of Tort, Jury, and the resulting competition in markets in all aspects of life; and the eugenic suppression of the underclasses by those markets, creating the continuous rapid evolution of european man as a result.

    THE PERFECT AESTHETIC

    Heroism and Competition, Cunning and Maneuver Excellence and Beauty, Plenty and Fertility, Masculine men and Feminine Women and the Transcendence of Man into Gods.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-16 08:36:00 UTC

  • Appendix – Three Generations to Our Success

    THREE GENERATIONS: OUR SUCCESS

    THE SUCCESS OF THE LIBERTARIAN RESEARCH PROGRAM

    Rothbard’s idea is INTENTIONALLY UTOPIAN because he was, like dozens before him, creating a ‘religion’ in pre-democratic political terms, or what in democratic political terms is ‘an ideology’, using OBSCURANT LANGUAGE – the purpose of which is to resist criticism, empower argumentation, and create community. The Mises Institute group (Lew Rockwell) then took this ideology and used the internet to propagate that ideology the way the Marxists used inexpensive pamphlets, newspapers, books and universities. But, Rothbard’s libertarianism is an ideology (religion) not politics (formal institutions of cooperation).othbard’s idea is INTENTIONALLY UTOPIAN because he was, like dozens before him, creating a ‘religion’ in pre-democratic political terms, or what in democratic political terms is ‘an ideology’, using OBSCURANT LANGUAGE – the purpose of which is resist criticism, empower argumentation, and create community. That Rothbard used the rebellious ethics of the Jewish ghetto rather than the high trust ethics of the aristocratic egalitarian society (protestant Christianity) is just because it was familiar to him. Hoppe by contrast, repaired many Rothbard’s errors, but in doing so left us with not necessarily utopian, but certainly a system of ethics dependent upon the equality of ethical and moral action, under the nation-states with absolute nuclear families, and therefore fully homogenized property rights. This system cannot tolerate diversity. However, by adding monarchies, and strict property rights, Hoppe’s argument is such that it is possible to have DIVERSE COMMUNITIES each of which uses its own norms and status signals, but which trades and exchanges according to private property rights. And this is possible because, under monarchy and property rights, individuals are denied access to coercive political power. So, in Hoppeian terms, groups may continue to act as extended families. What I have tried to do is empirically demonstrate that both genetics of gender and family structure (the structure of reproduction) determine moral codes. And that the Absolute Nuclear Family is the ultimate compromise between male and female reproductive strategies. But that the evolution of democracy combined with feminism, and the destruction of the nuclear family by feminists in alliance with socialists, has led to a circumstance where women can now ‘marry the state’ for financial support and obtain support from males without the exchange of care and sex. This is not unnatural. Humans are naturally serially monogamous and women in history seize both the best male fertility and the best male support in exchange for sex, that they can – but not from the same person, from many men. Property is not natural. It allowed men to control reproduction, and women resent this because it places a greater burden on them to make a choice of husband, and they are stuck with what they get. And they can no longer control group behavior by trading sex and affection. It is this choice, plus the need to create a home and property to support a family that created the compromise that was the protestant ANF. For this reason, both Rothbard and Hoppe make the mistake that was made by classical liberals: once included in the voting and work pool, women have sought to restore control over their reproduction and independence from the compromise with males. If you want to understand the drive to socialism, there are two axes of cause. This is the first, the second is that small homogenous groups that are out-bred are in fact, family members and as such socialism (in the nordic model) makes sense. There is no ‘belief’ system here. it is all justificationary language. The fact is that the structure of production at any given time can be optimized by a particular structure of reproduction (the family). And that freedom (liberty) is only possible in small, homogenous, out-bred, groups formally forbidden to intermarry as a means of obtaining insurance, and instead, forced to outbreed, and therefore seek insurance from ‘the tribe’ with the state as the insurance broker. This situation cannot change, because it is against the reproductive interests of humans to change. It is suicide to change. Small homogenous outbred families are in fact, highly redistributive, healthy organizations that eliminate near proximity competition and force all competition into the market for goods and services – there is no outlet left. NONE. That is why it works. The ANF, is the genetic institution that creates a compromise. It is, in fact, SOCIALISM. (Let that sink in a bit and it will alter your world.) It explains the diversity and immutability of moral codes, and therefore the political expression of morality informal institutions, as relationships between the structure of production and the structure of the family; And it is illogical to expect humans to act otherwise – against their reproductive and experiential interests. It is NOT PRAXEOLOGICALLY RATIONAL to ask people to act against their interests. SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF SOCIAL SCIENCE IN THREE GENERATIONS ACROSS THREE CIVILIZATIONS: ROTHBARD-Jewish, HOPPE-German, AND DOOLITTLE-Anglo 1) Rothbard (tribal religion of non-landholders) 2) Hoppe (private nation-state of landholders) 3) Doolittle (private federation of states of landholders) With these three models, we complete libertarianism in all its possible forms. This is the corpus of solutions from the most ideological and religious (Rothbard) to the most practical and moral (Hoppe) to the ratio-scientific (Doolittle). All of which are founded on property rights – although I have used DESCRIPTIVE property rights across ALL family structures where Hoppe and Rothbard have used PRESCRIPTIVE property rights and ASSUMED the nuclear family as the unit of reproduction. (That’s what I’m up to. ‘Completing’ libertarianism by restoring it to its european origins as rule of law of sovereign men: sovereignty. ) UTOPIAN? Rothbard’s fantasy is clearly utopian. It hasn’t worked very well for the Jews, that’s for sure. Except for the postwar period, the entire world has been killing them by the hundreds, thousands and millions for millennia. Comparisons to India’s Gypsies is pretty common, except that gypsies are anti-intellectual at the bottom and Jews hyper-intellectual at the top. But, what Rothbard DID, was reduce all rights to property rights, and give us the answer to human cooperation in doing so. Hoppe’s solution is ABSOLUTE GENIUS and so deeply engrained in political discourse by now that everyone’s forgotten it’s his idea already. While Argumentation is an analogy, not a cause, (and so I’m critical of it), he used it to deduce the solution to the problem of monopoly bureaucracy and the state by reducing the state to a contract on property rights, and using insurance companies, which is the States’ actual function, to form a competitive bureaucracy. His solution is not empirically derived, it is rationally derived, and he still makes (unfortunately) moral arguments in the Rothbardian model, but in fact, he DID SOLVE THE PROBLEM that has been the ‘problem of politics’ for 5000 years. And as far as I know, no other thinker has done this – based on argumentation or not. I won’t go into why argumentation worked despite the fact that it’s a bit silly. That would take me too long. But it allowed Hoppe to deduce the correct answers in almost all cases. IN particular, to immigration. Which again, the migratory, non-property owning, progressive Jewish wing of libertarians find understandably uncomfortable. END RESULT : A RESEARCH PROGRAM There is nothing utopian about a RESEARCH PROGRAM, which is what I see Hoppe, Rothbard, and Hayek pursuing. Hayek did not have information theory. Hoppe did not have the empirical evidence we have today. Rothbard either didn’t understand or didn’t want to understand his moral code’s implications. Mises got Praxeology backward. But it was all there. It was all there. We just needed a little more time. And as far as I can tell it is the most valuable political research program since the enlightenment and not matched in creativity since Athens. Calculation is necessary. Reproduction is necessary. Cooperation is necessary. Everything else is preference.

  • Appendix – Three Generations to Our Success

    THREE GENERATIONS: OUR SUCCESS

    THE SUCCESS OF THE LIBERTARIAN RESEARCH PROGRAM

    Rothbard’s idea is INTENTIONALLY UTOPIAN because he was, like dozens before him, creating a ‘religion’ in pre-democratic political terms, or what in democratic political terms is ‘an ideology’, using OBSCURANT LANGUAGE – the purpose of which is to resist criticism, empower argumentation, and create community. The Mises Institute group (Lew Rockwell) then took this ideology and used the internet to propagate that ideology the way the Marxists used inexpensive pamphlets, newspapers, books and universities. But, Rothbard’s libertarianism is an ideology (religion) not politics (formal institutions of cooperation).othbard’s idea is INTENTIONALLY UTOPIAN because he was, like dozens before him, creating a ‘religion’ in pre-democratic political terms, or what in democratic political terms is ‘an ideology’, using OBSCURANT LANGUAGE – the purpose of which is resist criticism, empower argumentation, and create community. That Rothbard used the rebellious ethics of the Jewish ghetto rather than the high trust ethics of the aristocratic egalitarian society (protestant Christianity) is just because it was familiar to him. Hoppe by contrast, repaired many Rothbard’s errors, but in doing so left us with not necessarily utopian, but certainly a system of ethics dependent upon the equality of ethical and moral action, under the nation-states with absolute nuclear families, and therefore fully homogenized property rights. This system cannot tolerate diversity. However, by adding monarchies, and strict property rights, Hoppe’s argument is such that it is possible to have DIVERSE COMMUNITIES each of which uses its own norms and status signals, but which trades and exchanges according to private property rights. And this is possible because, under monarchy and property rights, individuals are denied access to coercive political power. So, in Hoppeian terms, groups may continue to act as extended families. What I have tried to do is empirically demonstrate that both genetics of gender and family structure (the structure of reproduction) determine moral codes. And that the Absolute Nuclear Family is the ultimate compromise between male and female reproductive strategies. But that the evolution of democracy combined with feminism, and the destruction of the nuclear family by feminists in alliance with socialists, has led to a circumstance where women can now ‘marry the state’ for financial support and obtain support from males without the exchange of care and sex. This is not unnatural. Humans are naturally serially monogamous and women in history seize both the best male fertility and the best male support in exchange for sex, that they can – but not from the same person, from many men. Property is not natural. It allowed men to control reproduction, and women resent this because it places a greater burden on them to make a choice of husband, and they are stuck with what they get. And they can no longer control group behavior by trading sex and affection. It is this choice, plus the need to create a home and property to support a family that created the compromise that was the protestant ANF. For this reason, both Rothbard and Hoppe make the mistake that was made by classical liberals: once included in the voting and work pool, women have sought to restore control over their reproduction and independence from the compromise with males. If you want to understand the drive to socialism, there are two axes of cause. This is the first, the second is that small homogenous groups that are out-bred are in fact, family members and as such socialism (in the nordic model) makes sense. There is no ‘belief’ system here. it is all justificationary language. The fact is that the structure of production at any given time can be optimized by a particular structure of reproduction (the family). And that freedom (liberty) is only possible in small, homogenous, out-bred, groups formally forbidden to intermarry as a means of obtaining insurance, and instead, forced to outbreed, and therefore seek insurance from ‘the tribe’ with the state as the insurance broker. This situation cannot change, because it is against the reproductive interests of humans to change. It is suicide to change. Small homogenous outbred families are in fact, highly redistributive, healthy organizations that eliminate near proximity competition and force all competition into the market for goods and services – there is no outlet left. NONE. That is why it works. The ANF, is the genetic institution that creates a compromise. It is, in fact, SOCIALISM. (Let that sink in a bit and it will alter your world.) It explains the diversity and immutability of moral codes, and therefore the political expression of morality informal institutions, as relationships between the structure of production and the structure of the family; And it is illogical to expect humans to act otherwise – against their reproductive and experiential interests. It is NOT PRAXEOLOGICALLY RATIONAL to ask people to act against their interests. SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF SOCIAL SCIENCE IN THREE GENERATIONS ACROSS THREE CIVILIZATIONS: ROTHBARD-Jewish, HOPPE-German, AND DOOLITTLE-Anglo 1) Rothbard (tribal religion of non-landholders) 2) Hoppe (private nation-state of landholders) 3) Doolittle (private federation of states of landholders) With these three models, we complete libertarianism in all its possible forms. This is the corpus of solutions from the most ideological and religious (Rothbard) to the most practical and moral (Hoppe) to the ratio-scientific (Doolittle). All of which are founded on property rights – although I have used DESCRIPTIVE property rights across ALL family structures where Hoppe and Rothbard have used PRESCRIPTIVE property rights and ASSUMED the nuclear family as the unit of reproduction. (That’s what I’m up to. ‘Completing’ libertarianism by restoring it to its european origins as rule of law of sovereign men: sovereignty. ) UTOPIAN? Rothbard’s fantasy is clearly utopian. It hasn’t worked very well for the Jews, that’s for sure. Except for the postwar period, the entire world has been killing them by the hundreds, thousands and millions for millennia. Comparisons to India’s Gypsies is pretty common, except that gypsies are anti-intellectual at the bottom and Jews hyper-intellectual at the top. But, what Rothbard DID, was reduce all rights to property rights, and give us the answer to human cooperation in doing so. Hoppe’s solution is ABSOLUTE GENIUS and so deeply engrained in political discourse by now that everyone’s forgotten it’s his idea already. While Argumentation is an analogy, not a cause, (and so I’m critical of it), he used it to deduce the solution to the problem of monopoly bureaucracy and the state by reducing the state to a contract on property rights, and using insurance companies, which is the States’ actual function, to form a competitive bureaucracy. His solution is not empirically derived, it is rationally derived, and he still makes (unfortunately) moral arguments in the Rothbardian model, but in fact, he DID SOLVE THE PROBLEM that has been the ‘problem of politics’ for 5000 years. And as far as I know, no other thinker has done this – based on argumentation or not. I won’t go into why argumentation worked despite the fact that it’s a bit silly. That would take me too long. But it allowed Hoppe to deduce the correct answers in almost all cases. IN particular, to immigration. Which again, the migratory, non-property owning, progressive Jewish wing of libertarians find understandably uncomfortable. END RESULT : A RESEARCH PROGRAM There is nothing utopian about a RESEARCH PROGRAM, which is what I see Hoppe, Rothbard, and Hayek pursuing. Hayek did not have information theory. Hoppe did not have the empirical evidence we have today. Rothbard either didn’t understand or didn’t want to understand his moral code’s implications. Mises got Praxeology backward. But it was all there. It was all there. We just needed a little more time. And as far as I can tell it is the most valuable political research program since the enlightenment and not matched in creativity since Athens. Calculation is necessary. Reproduction is necessary. Cooperation is necessary. Everything else is preference.

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/74494387_506079669988928_67982803816

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/74494387_506079669988928_67982803816

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/74494387_506079669988928_6798280381654106112_o_506079666655595.jpg Separate Noise from Signal – the Black Swans

    Work on the Signal – the Black Swans

    It’s all going straight to hell. (Really.)

    ===

    The walt disney small world ended.

    Immigration ended it.

    Trade is one thing.

    Internal conflict is another.

    My family, my friends, my nation, into a single entity.

    A very short period of globalization

    And now ‘ts returning to the way it always was.

    EU, wto, one world government, etc – that was the ‘oddity’

    Yes it does feel like the 1930’s … It feels 1910, 1930, 1850, Different nations pursing different ends.

    The nation state is dominant

    Economics no longer deciding factor

    Where tensions within nations more important.

    And where solutions between nations are solved like they have been in most of human history

    The natural process of conflict occurs.

    Declining nations: China. Russia. Struggle to keep their place.

    Rising: japan – Socially Stable. Turkey – Doing fine.

    Wars correct imbalance.It’s not an aberration. It’s how we adjust.

    The current USA is about close to the civil war. Or the depression. Not as much as 1960’s/70’s assassinations, conunter-culture was hated.

    ===

    USA is an empire, domestically which is ok, but globally, totally useless. we aren’t organized or designed to be an empire.

    So we have a choice. To end or expand the global empire. To end or retreat to the domestic empire.

    And that is what I want to envisino.

    Whwat will we do.

    What is possible

    Bcause only europeans can do it – or others would have.

    ===

    We had an age of empires, where each empire protected its own trade own colonies, and was relatively autarkic.

    We had a world war and blew it all up.

    Americans were the only ones left standing…

    American set up the rules for the new age…

    America would pay for the global transport commons completing the british empire’s objectives.

    And this would let everyone rebuild.

    While america fought world communism…

    And while america fights communism v2 jewish destruction of western civlization from within.

    And while america fights communism v3 islamism

    And rebuild they did… ad america kept paying.

    And communism ended … and america kept paying.

    But The chinese have abandoned communism and returned to authoritarian national socialism —

    And the indians are rapidly returning to ethnonationalism.

    And Turkey has rapidly turned to ethnonationalism.

    And the Russians have abandoned communism and returned to authoritarian national socialism

    And eastern europe wants nothing to do with undermining by jewish hedonism.

    And as soon as the next global contraction hits the german car business – germany is gone and so is europe.

    +Canada must export to survive. It’s a competitor or enemy. +They can’t run a first world economy without robots. Japanese are automating – de-sourcesing.

    +Boomers have pushed down the rate of return, but they are gonna start pulling money out of the economy, quadruple cost of capitals. (millenials are a waste of skin) they do consume. stupid shit.

    + Brexit. Always going to be a hard crash. Never Ending Brextension.

    + The EU is dead. There is no way for eu to run an export economy without the USA. It’s a sweet spot. Non performing loans are ridiculous. They don’t do what we do.

    + I’m going to bet on chinese success at ruthless retention of their civilization. they are terribly dependent as is europe, that no matter what happens it will be catastrophic.

    ===

    + The developed world’s population has crashed and it’s not recoverable. There is nothing that can be done. the world financial and economic system MUST CRASH.

    + Productivity has flattened. (crashed). (economic downturn) Moving into a new period of needing something to invest in.

    + We don’t need anyone. We hardly import anything, yet we are responsible for paying for everything.

    + The USA is shifting from the greatest source of stability to the greatest risk of disruption.

    + Stability of the markets is no longer good for us. We profit from benefit from chaos in the world energy markets.

    + We control the global financial system and can deny entire countries, companies, or transactions access to the global market.

    + Our market can adapt to producing all goods other countries supply us with.

    + Germany is gone. China is gone. we can easily destroy the any country in the world economically, an we ares still the only people able project power.

    + Demise of London as a Financial Center – friendly biz environment, reliable, rules. EU, so the first stop on capital flight from euro zone. Sidney, NY, Aukland, Switzerland.

    ====

    So there is a lot of talent in this world that will want to come here. It hasn’t happened since the german civil wars – which is why we have so many germans.

    ===

    WHY HAS THE USA BEEN SUCCESSFUL

    – new continent

    – best arable land in the world

    – superior genetics, institutions, technology

    – immigration of pent up middle class genetics

    WHAT THE FUTURE LOOKS LIKE

    – end of the global order

    – restoration of the competition between civilizations

    – restoration of nationalism

    AND IN THE USA

    – energy, food, and market independence

    – draw for world IQ

    BUT

    – flight of talent to european peoples

    IF

    – we make it sustainable.

    SO

    – lets make it sustainable.

    – using japanese automation

    – japanese, russian, chinese, indian nationalism

    – containment of semitism jewish and muslim.

    – and our historical means of organization…..

    (why hire a millennial instead of an international)?Separate Noise from Signal – the Black Swans

    Work on the Signal – the Black Swans

    It’s all going straight to hell. (Really.)

    ===

    The walt disney small world ended.

    Immigration ended it.

    Trade is one thing.

    Internal conflict is another.

    My family, my friends, my nation, into a single entity.

    A very short period of globalization

    And now ‘ts returning to the way it always was.

    EU, wto, one world government, etc – that was the ‘oddity’

    Yes it does feel like the 1930’s … It feels 1910, 1930, 1850, Different nations pursing different ends.

    The nation state is dominant

    Economics no longer deciding factor

    Where tensions within nations more important.

    And where solutions between nations are solved like they have been in most of human history

    The natural process of conflict occurs.

    Declining nations: China. Russia. Struggle to keep their place.

    Rising: japan – Socially Stable. Turkey – Doing fine.

    Wars correct imbalance.It’s not an aberration. It’s how we adjust.

    The current USA is about close to the civil war. Or the depression. Not as much as 1960’s/70’s assassinations, conunter-culture was hated.

    ===

    USA is an empire, domestically which is ok, but globally, totally useless. we aren’t organized or designed to be an empire.

    So we have a choice. To end or expand the global empire. To end or retreat to the domestic empire.

    And that is what I want to envisino.

    Whwat will we do.

    What is possible

    Bcause only europeans can do it – or others would have.

    ===

    We had an age of empires, where each empire protected its own trade own colonies, and was relatively autarkic.

    We had a world war and blew it all up.

    Americans were the only ones left standing…

    American set up the rules for the new age…

    America would pay for the global transport commons completing the british empire’s objectives.

    And this would let everyone rebuild.

    While america fought world communism…

    And while america fights communism v2 jewish destruction of western civlization from within.

    And while america fights communism v3 islamism

    And rebuild they did… ad america kept paying.

    And communism ended … and america kept paying.

    But The chinese have abandoned communism and returned to authoritarian national socialism —

    And the indians are rapidly returning to ethnonationalism.

    And Turkey has rapidly turned to ethnonationalism.

    And the Russians have abandoned communism and returned to authoritarian national socialism

    And eastern europe wants nothing to do with undermining by jewish hedonism.

    And as soon as the next global contraction hits the german car business – germany is gone and so is europe.

    +Canada must export to survive. It’s a competitor or enemy. +They can’t run a first world economy without robots. Japanese are automating – de-sourcesing.

    +Boomers have pushed down the rate of return, but they are gonna start pulling money out of the economy, quadruple cost of capitals. (millenials are a waste of skin) they do consume. stupid shit.

    + Brexit. Always going to be a hard crash. Never Ending Brextension.

    + The EU is dead. There is no way for eu to run an export economy without the USA. It’s a sweet spot. Non performing loans are ridiculous. They don’t do what we do.

    + I’m going to bet on chinese success at ruthless retention of their civilization. they are terribly dependent as is europe, that no matter what happens it will be catastrophic.

    ===

    + The developed world’s population has crashed and it’s not recoverable. There is nothing that can be done. the world financial and economic system MUST CRASH.

    + Productivity has flattened. (crashed). (economic downturn) Moving into a new period of needing something to invest in.

    + We don’t need anyone. We hardly import anything, yet we are responsible for paying for everything.

    + The USA is shifting from the greatest source of stability to the greatest risk of disruption.

    + Stability of the markets is no longer good for us. We profit from benefit from chaos in the world energy markets.

    + We control the global financial system and can deny entire countries, companies, or transactions access to the global market.

    + Our market can adapt to producing all goods other countries supply us with.

    + Germany is gone. China is gone. we can easily destroy the any country in the world economically, an we ares still the only people able project power.

    + Demise of London as a Financial Center – friendly biz environment, reliable, rules. EU, so the first stop on capital flight from euro zone. Sidney, NY, Aukland, Switzerland.

    ====

    So there is a lot of talent in this world that will want to come here. It hasn’t happened since the german civil wars – which is why we have so many germans.

    ===

    WHY HAS THE USA BEEN SUCCESSFUL

    – new continent

    – best arable land in the world

    – superior genetics, institutions, technology

    – immigration of pent up middle class genetics

    WHAT THE FUTURE LOOKS LIKE

    – end of the global order

    – restoration of the competition between civilizations

    – restoration of nationalism

    AND IN THE USA

    – energy, food, and market independence

    – draw for world IQ

    BUT

    – flight of talent to european peoples

    IF

    – we make it sustainable.

    SO

    – lets make it sustainable.

    – using japanese automation

    – japanese, russian, chinese, indian nationalism

    – containment of semitism jewish and muslim.

    – and our historical means of organization…..

    (why hire a millennial instead of an international)?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-13 16:57:00 UTC

  • WHY ORTHODOXY IS SUPERIOR TO CATHOLICISM NET: Orthodoxy Remained A Faith, limite

    WHY ORTHODOXY IS SUPERIOR TO CATHOLICISM

    NET: Orthodoxy Remained A Faith, limited to the ambitions of faith. Catholicism Tried to reconcile science and reason, in order to govern europe.

    *Orthodoxy makes no false promise.*

    Catholic: 293M Total: 205M Europe, 75M USA, 13M Canada

    (The rest, almost all, are in non-european countries: ~.9B. IOW, the catholic church is a third world organization with third world interests, having abandoned europeans.)

    Orthodox: 250M Total

    Protestant 307M Total: 117M Europe 190M North America

    The Rest are in the developing world.

    850M Total Europeans

    DIFFERENCES

    1. Catholics believe that human reason can prove the existence of God, while the Orthodox believe that God’s knowledge is planted in human nature.

    2. Catholicism employs human reason in explaining the concept of faith. -vs- Orthodoxy doesn’t reconcile human reason with faith.

    3. The Catholic doctrine evolves with change in time, and needs to fit in with prevailing circumstances. -vs- Orthodoxy does not change it’s doctrine to fit with situational needs.

    4. Protestants Believe in all prophets of the Books from the Holy Bible -vs- Orthodox ????? -vs- Protestants Believe in all prophets of the Books from the Holy Bible, and that Muhammad is a false prophet.

    5. Other Religions: Christianity is the true religion. Judaism is a true religion, but they do not believe Jesus is the Messiah. Islam is a false religion, pagan religions are also false. -vs- Orthodox ?????????? -vs- Protestants: Judaism is a true religion, but they do not believe Jesus is the Messiah. Islam is a false religion. Pagan religions are also false.

    6. ALL: “Yeah, you gotta believe” (oops…)

    GOVERNANCE

    1. Catholic Church – The Church regards the Pope, seated on the Apostolic Throne of St. Peter, as the head of the church, -vs- The Orthodox Church believes that the head of the universal Church is Jesus Christ.

    2. The Catholic Churches are subservient to the Pope who is the one supreme authority. – vs – The various Orthodox churches are autocephalous, which means, they are independent of each other and their head bishops don’t report to any higher bishop.

    3. The other bishops are subordinates to the Pope, who is also called the Supreme Pontiff. – vs- the Patriarch of each church presides over its Synod. The Patriarch is the administrative head but is at par with the rest of the bishops in spiritual terms

    RELEVANT PRACTICES

    1. In matrimony, for Catholics, divorce is not permitted under any circumstances, while for Orthodox, it may be permitted when adultery is committed. -vs-protestant where divorce is permitted for adultery or abandonment.

    THE CROOKED CATHOLIC CHURCH

    1. Papal claims of Supremacy

    2. Papal Claims of Infallibility

    3. Claims of purgatory

    4. The Sale of Indulgences

    EUROPEAN………………………………..LOOSE COMPARISON

    Epicureanism ……………………………..(buddhism)

    … Heathenism………………………….(hinduism – yes, really)

    … … Paganism ………………………(zoroastrianism )

    … … … Protestantism……………(judaism)

    … … … … Orthodoxy………….(islam)

    … … … … … Christianity….(none)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-10 12:22:00 UTC

  • No more lies. No more excuses for Lies. The Abrahamic Dark Ages of Deceit, wheth

    No more lies. No more excuses for Lies. The Abrahamic Dark Ages of Deceit, whether jewish/christian/muslim Supernatural, or Marxist/Boasian/Freudian/Cantorian Pseudoscientific, or Postmodern-PC/Feminist/Denialist, are Over. The Century of Lies is Over. Welcome to The Renaissance.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 18:51:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193239819104722944

    Reply addressees: @aceoaces

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1193238980638232576

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @aceoaces I don’t hate. I do Jurisprudence (law). And you gave an example of using the abrahamic technique of undermining via pollution of the informational commons, rather than competing in the market under sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty of care to the commons: ie LYING.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1193238980638232576

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @aceoaces I don’t hate. I do Jurisprudence (law). And you gave an example of using the abrahamic technique of undermining via pollution of the informational commons, rather than competing in the market under sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty of care to the commons: ie LYING.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1193238980638232576

  • WHY DO WE LIVE IN DIFFERENT MENTAL EXPERIENCES? —“My working understanding of

    WHY DO WE LIVE IN DIFFERENT MENTAL EXPERIENCES?

    —“My working understanding of Truth is that which stands as a spiritual Reality, iterations of which show up in the manifest world as the vast array of imperfections with which we live in our daily lives.”—Marguerite McKenna @Nalo_Nei

    Spiritual combines (conflates) intuition and emotion.

    Human Cognitive Process:

    perceive stimuli

    … disambiguate,

    … … integrate(obj,space,scene),

    … … … auto-associate,

    … … … … auto-predict,

    … … … … … intuit relations,

    … … … … … … intuit valuations(emotion),

    … … … … … … … devote attention,

    … … … … … … … … Imagine(predict,model)

    … … … … … … … … … reason(permute),

    … … … … … … … … … … calculation(plan),

    … … … … … … … … … … … computation.

    Male bias Think / Female bias Feel.

    That’s what the brain does. Period. And all of us ‘live in’ some dominant experience between variation of the auto associative free-associative, imaginary-emotional(Aesthetic), and the (like me) completely Predictive-Analytical(Decidable). Division of labor cognitive so to speak.

    —“And which part is observing the interplay you speak of?”—Can’t Stump the Trump @DeplorableDJDJ

    Well, the question is, where do each of us specialize in performing auto association, prediction, valuation, focus, planning, and action? In other words, are we practicing consumption, exchange or production?

    Dorsal Sequence (hierarchy) of Labor:

    … Sensory, S-M,

    … … Motor(physical), M-E,

    … … … Executive, E-S,

    … … … … Social, S-F,

    … … … … … Focus, P-F,

    … … … … … … Plan,

    … … … … … … … Release Action

    … … … … … … … … > Recurse.

    Lateral: Prey(Perception-integration) vs Predator (Action-analysis).

    Diff Auto-Association

    … ->Diff in Prediction(imagination)

    … … -> Diff in Activity(value detection)

    … … … ->Diff in Attention

    … … … … -> Subjective(experience, conflate)

    … … … … vs

    … … … … -> Executive (Plan Act Recuse Disambiguate).

    Female and Male cognitive stereotypes (as always) are correct at the general and at the extreme. However, w/ heavily overlapping, so we find a few males with female cog bias, and opposite.

    And no it’s not a social construction.

    (a) brain structures vary (sometimes greatly) by gender

    (b) brain functions vary (sometimes greatly) by gender

    (c) in utero development failure produces ‘failures’.

    (d) early development, social development, trauma produce ‘failures’.

    So all of us can experience some or all of the spectrum but some of us bias the degree of agency (submission-experience(imagination)) vs (dominance-action) according one way or the other. As in all things we are very good at single dimension comprehension, and bad at multi.

    So for simple reduction:

    TABLE OF DIMENSIONS

    1.Self ………………………vs Others ….vs World;

    2.Sensory(aesthetes) .vs Empathy .vs Motor(athletes);

    3.Internal(experience) vs Others ….vs External(action);

    4.Consumption(Recreation,Submission)

    ……………………………..vs.Trade (Interaction, collaboration)

    ……………………………………………vs Production (Agency, Dominance);

    5.Short Term …………..vs Medium ..vs Long Term.

    In other words, we’re not only different, we evolved to specialize in collecting information across reproductive, productive, knowledge, and perception spectrums and cooperating and communicating to produce a market the equilibrium serving all Power, Pareto and Nash distributions.

    This means we not only parallel process vast amounts of information internally, but collectively through display word and deed.

    And as in ANY MARKET, the velocity of transformation (‘prosperity’) is determined by the degree of expression of various wants in competition with the degree of suppression of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictions, fraud and deceit.

    The Issue (Different Grammars of Expression) isn’t ‘just semantics’, but of our specializations, and the market of cooperation. My work requires greater suppression of falsehood, most people’s requires greater seizure of opportunity (with hope of no-falsehood)

    Because increases in precision placing increased burden on executive function, are cognitively and informational expensive.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-09 10:04:00 UTC

  • ONLY ONE PEOPLE, AND ONLY ONE OTHER PEOPLE Only European Peoples invented Truth

    ONLY ONE PEOPLE, AND ONLY ONE OTHER PEOPLE

    Only European Peoples invented Truth before face; Truth regardless of cost to the dominance hierarchy; Rule of Law by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Testimony and Jury; Resulting in Markets in Every aspect of Life: Continuous Adaptation – Faster Than The Rest.

    Only European Peoples have Dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, suffering, disease, child mortality, early death, freedom from heat and cold, and the vicissitudes of a nature hostile to life, and are the only people dragging us kicking and screaming once again to the stars, lest this earth decide once again to interrupt all life with catastrophe and death.

    Conversely, only one civilization has invented the opposite strategy: false promise of supernatural, pseudoscience, sophistry, deceit, & denial, to bait into hazard, defend by sophism and undermining, generating envy, causing recursive destruction of informational, social, & genetic capital.

    Only one civilization has been responsible for the intentional destruction of genetic, institutional informational, normative, cultural, artistic, capital, and only one responsible for 1B dead in previous centuries and 100M dead in the last, and how many ?? Billion in the this?

    Once you understand the science of undermining by lying and that it is a group strategy no different than Chinese of Insulation from Barbarians, Internal Harmony, Reason, Conformity, Hierarchy and Family; Or the Western strategy of Truth, Science,Technology, Law, and Markets.

    Then, you are, we are, able to enact laws by extending the commercial warranty of due diligence, and liability for fraud to all acts of false promise, baiting into hazard, advocation by supernatural, sophistry, pseudoscience, denial, or deceit, defended by pilpul and critique and claiming ignorance on the basis of plausible deniability given the victim’s voluntary choice.

    So, individual crimes require individual punishment, but for collective crimes of collective reward, reciprocity and restitution are only served by collective punishment.

    And it will be the entirety of mankind, in defense of ourselves, those that came before us, those that may come after us, and the vengeance of more than a billion dead, the lost civilizations, and the dark ages of ignorance and suffering that demand restitution and punishment.

    If you can name a thing. You can destroy a thing. And that thing is the Abrahamic method of genetic, cultural, and civilizational destruction, by the false promise of freedom from the laws of nature’s equilibrium, and the natural law of reciprocity that mirrors it to undermine the markets of cooperation between the genders, classes, generations, nations, races, who, if living in a host of nations, each under law, can produce commons preferable to themselves, with minimum power distance, and differences between ameliorated by trade.

    And anyone who advocates otherwise, promises otherwise, pursues otherwise, shall be prosecuted for crimes against humanity in honor of civilizations, ages, and the uncounted dead.

    All peoples can prosper equally if they reduce their underclasses so that: “A Power distribution of Law(truth), a Pareto distribution of Assets, a Nash equilibrium of Rewards while limiting the underclasses so that surpluses can be directed to commons and multiples therefrom.”

    This is a physical law of nature beyond which man is as incapable of treading as he is defying gravity by sheer force of will.

    Thus Endeth The Lesson.

    😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 20:55:00 UTC

  • ARISTOTELIAN TESTIMONY (DEBT TO EACH OTHER), PAGAN DEBT TO ANCESTORS, HEATHEN DE

    ARISTOTELIAN TESTIMONY (DEBT TO EACH OTHER), PAGAN DEBT TO ANCESTORS, HEATHEN DEBT TO NATURE – ARE ALL *TRUE*

    Christianity, like a woman, whose cognition it seduces with false promise of release from the burden of a reality requiring physical action to alter – and who can love, can resist, and can undermine, but cannot *innovate*; cannot innovate as we have seen with the evidence of jewish failure, christian failure, and islamic failure; failure that undeniable when compared to Aristotelian(Scientific), Pagan and Heathen European, and Rational, Pagan and Heathen Chinese.

    Even so, the Chinese, insulated from the informational-cancer, and dysgenic reproduction, of semitic monotheism by geographic distance, desert, mountain, and seas, could not achieve in millennia, what europeans achieved in a few centuries in the IE expansion, a few centuries in the Mediterranean, and a few centuries in the Modern world: to drag mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the chaos of a nature all but hostile to the continuation of human life – complaining, whining, kicking, and screaming all the while – Just as you do today.

    Because aristotelian description(testimony), pagan debt to ancestors, heathen debt to nature are all *TRUE* – meaning decidable independent of condition, ability, ignorance, or preference.

    So, learn something – and save yourselves, your people, your nation, your feminine religion, your civilization, and mankind, or wallow in your arrogant, overconfident, ignorant, cowardly lack of agency to function as other than the running with the herd.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-08 13:13:00 UTC