Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • There are literary archetypes in all fictions. There is no god other than fictio

    There are literary archetypes in all fictions. There is no god other than fictional. There is only men pretending such. And they pretend such because of their addiction. And they feed their addiction out of feeding narcissism, and narcissism out of their genetic undesirability.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-18 21:08:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196535703397638144

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196533657231642626

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196533657231642626

  • THE FOUR VICTORY CONDITIONS —“Curt; I am Christian because i have been shown m

    THE FOUR VICTORY CONDITIONS

    —“Curt; I am Christian because i have been shown much beyond mortal experiences. Your message falls in line with much of what God says and did in the old testament…… I have friends from every race and religion i fear one day i will have to call them enemy…. Even if they dont fight against us what will happen to them after our victory? What will happen to churches and religion? My God, my family, and my country and freedom are the things i will die for and fight for even against those on the right. How do i bring my faith into alignment with what seems like a great movement?”—

    OTHERS

    They are not your enemies as fellow followers of christ, but they are your enemies in every other regard – and christ has no influence upon material goods, man’s material demands, or Caesar’s law governing man’s material behavior.

    Christianity is an exceptional personal and interpersonal religion but it is a catastrophic failure as a political religion. Orthodoxy survived by NOT engaging reason and politics. Catholicism failed by engaging reason and politics. And protestantism has either transformed into secularism (like me) or a fundamentalism like the muslims – and will die.

    So you must love men as individuals as christ advises, but you may not confused the difference between the personal and interpersonal IMMATERIAL and the interpersonal and political MATERIAL.

    If they are not your kin, they are only tolerable through separation. Whether separate neighborhoods, cities, countries, or empires is determined by how much conflict there is over the material despite the immaterial (Spiritual).

    AFTER OUR VICTORY

    There are four victory conditions

    1. We conduct a politicide (eliminating all leftism from all of life), rule every under rule of (God’s-Natures) natural law and under Jesus’s (Natural) law, by nationalizing (our race) all military, political, and government jobs, and denying all others access to political power as we did under the monarchies (successfully) for millennia.

    2. We will restore voluntary disassociation, we will once again limit democratic participation, and devolve matters once again to states and localities, leaving the federal government for matters of property conflcit between the states, and we will repatriate the invaders and return to sorting ourselves into kin-group neighborhoods, and towns and live in peace despite our differences in ability productivity and culture.

    3. We separate and rule our states and they their states and some states will be homogenous and others will be heterogeneous and we will once again be like our ancestors in Europe.

    4. We fight house to house, end up with a hundred million or more dead and then whomever wins does genocide against the rest.

    OUR CHURCH

    Our church will be made into a state religion, including european ancestral heathen and pagan worship and all other religions prohibited, all other religious monuments buildings and symbols prohibited in public spaces – we cannot control what is in people’s heads but we can prohibit any practice and prosecute it ruthlessly until all others are gone.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-18 15:18:00 UTC

  • WOMEN RULE SEX AND CHILDREN BUT MEN THE POLITY —“is Briffaults law French pseu

    WOMEN RULE SEX AND CHILDREN BUT MEN THE POLITY

    —“is Briffaults law French pseudoscience?”–Erik Lukovsky

    It’s that the feminine french are more likely to recognize that the female (singular) is the center of the family, and the MEN (plural) are the center of the polity. So we all discover what we are biased to discover.

    —“The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place”—

    I agree with him. Hence why returning to single motherhood at the bottom and increasingly lower middle, and keeping marriage only at the top. As long as this hyperconsumption is possible and men are of limited value – they will have limited value to women. And as such we must once again find something to do with all the men who are not being used for economic resources in exchange for sex.

    NO WOMEN DON’T RULE

    He’s wrong that ‘women rule’. It’s that women rule the gender relationship as long as it’s tolerable for men.

    However, if we look throughout history if it is intolerable for men, they return to treating women as possessions – domesticated animals like any other – because there is nothing women can do about it if men choose to. The only reason women are not treated as property – domesticated animals – as they are in Africa is because fathers and brothers protect them under agrarianism and marriage that results from agrarianism.

    If there is no agrarianism or marriage under agrarianism, and men no longer have an interest in protecting sisters and daughters, then it’s just a matter of time before men rationally convert to treating women as assets. And as such we are in an interstitial period where we presume marriage and gender relations but are converting to pre-agrarian families for the majority.

    So ponder that one for a bit.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-18 12:28:00 UTC

  • MORALITY DOESN’T SCALE. The reason we need a Sun Tzu a Machiavelli, and a Doolit

    MORALITY DOESN’T SCALE.

    The reason we need a Sun Tzu a Machiavelli, and a Doolittle, is because we are civilized and moral people and do not grasp the limit beyond which the immoral is necessary for group success. Conversely the reason for Jewish and Muslim success in underming, weakening, conquest, destruction by consumption, and failure of creating a civilization of their own as a growing, going concern, is their immorality. In other words. Law may be a moral discipline, but war by genetic, informational, financial, economic, and military means is not a moral discipline.

    You cannot simply, like a pet, learn habits, without reason. Because other people do not learn moral habits. They learn immoral habits and call them ‘good’.

    We live in an era of SCALE. The world, the universe, the very large and the very small. Our minds evolved to habituate almost everything and reason only when necessary. But we live in an era where reason is always necessary.

    ANd this is why democracy fails. Not enough of us have knowledge. Not enough skill, and far too few of us reason, and fewer still who reason across time.

    Most of us are still semi-domesticated, well trained animals.

    That does not mean that like the herd we must tolerate being led to slaughter.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-18 10:23:00 UTC

  • PICK YOUR GOVERNMENT Think about that question for a moment. What protection did

    PICK YOUR GOVERNMENT

    Think about that question for a moment.

    What protection did our founders intend?

    What protection do we have now?

    What is the ultimate protection that we CAN have?

    Globalism

    or

    Nationalism

    … Ethnocentrism

    … … Homogeneity

    … … … Conformity

    … … … … Subject of Law

    … … … … … individual

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … individual and collective

    … … … … Subject of Policy

    … … … … … Extended Intergenerational Family

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … Nuclear Intergenerational Family;

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … Individual

    … … … … Subject of Polity

    … … … … … Consumption (dysgenia)

    … … … … … or;

    … … … … … Capitalization (eugenia)

    and (Limits)

    Rule by Priesthood (tradition? wisdom?) (Islam)

    … Rule by Justification (Supernatural)

    or

    Rule by Politicians (discretion)(europe)

    … Rule by Discretion (Sophistry)

    or

    Rule of Law (non-discretion)(old-usa)

    …Rule of Law (Technology)

    and Judiciary (Resolution of Disputes)

    … Constitution

    … … Supreme Court

    … … … Courts of Appeals

    … … … … Regional Courts

    … … … … … Specialty Courts

    … … … … … … Professional Judiciary (judges)

    … … … … … … … Professional Officers of Court (law)

    … … … … … … … … Prof.l Property Finance, Banking (title)

    … … … … … … … … … Prof Insurers

    and (Production of Commons)

    Government (Closure: final decision maker)

    … Dictator

    … or

    … Monarchy

    … or

    … President

    … or

    … Prime Minister

    and (selection of commons)

    … … … cabinet

    … … or

    … … … Jury (veto) of appropriations

    … … or (representation)

    … … … Senate-lords

    … … … or

    … … … Parliament and senate-lords

    … … … or

    … … … Lower house(families),

    … … … Middle house(parliament/business), and

    … … … … Upper house (senate-lords/territories)

    … … or (direct participation)

    … … … direct proportional democracy

    … … … or

    … … … direct economic democracy (by who pays)

    and Services (Assets)

    … … Military

    … … … Standing

    … … … … Warfighters

    … … … … Professional Technical

    … … … … Logistics and Supply

    … … … … Medical and Care

    … … … Regiments (Local Part time)

    … … … Reserves( those who have served )

    … … … Militia (every able bodied citizen)

    … … Infrastructure (assets)

    … … Insurer (emergency, disasters, etc)

    … … Treasury

    and Administration (Operations)

    … … … Bureaucracy

    … … … or

    … … … Bureaucracy – Private Partnership

    … … … or

    … … … Competing Private Contractors

    … … … or

    … … … Private Mandatory Public Service

    and Participation (participation)

    … … … … Maximally Earned Franchise

    … … … … Minimally Earned Franchise

    … … … … Citizenship Franchise

    … … … … Resident Franchise

    … … … … Genetic Franchise

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 19:25:00 UTC

  • The postwar science fiction movement consisted largely of rewriting the great he

    The postwar science fiction movement consisted largely of rewriting the great heroic mythos in the new technological context.

    Unfortunately no one wrote down the underlying social science behind the great heroic mythos.

    I got stuck with the job. God suckered me. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 16:50:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196108337882050561

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196105157232119808

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196105157232119808

  • I desire to be ruled by my betters. I’ve met my betters in the Nobily. I don’t c

    I desire to be ruled by my betters. I’ve met my betters in the Nobily. I don’t count myself among them. I simply claim to be correct in the science of rule. And so I prefer to maintain my role as engineer rather than craftsman. Rule like nobility is an art and a craft of family.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 15:34:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196089306114396160

    Reply addressees: @Quindel1plex

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196082338461032448

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196082338461032448

  • I’ve gone through the military families and it’s possible to find one. It’s almo

    I’ve gone through the military families and it’s possible to find one. It’s almost impossible to substitute the european monarchic tradition in a family. Just as entrepreneurs come from entrepreneurial families, monarchs come from monarchic families for good reasons:being raised.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 15:30:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196088294557261824

    Reply addressees: @QuestionMThings

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196077087297277953

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196077087297277953

  • Truth is what it is. Leaders do not shy from the truth when their group strategy

    Truth is what it is. Leaders do not shy from the truth when their group strategy and competitive advantage is The Truth. Restoring western civ requires restoring the constitutional monarchies for the purpose of judge of last resort. The fact that your head is full of as much bullshit about monarchies as the left is full of bullshit about white people, is because you’re just as much a victim of bullshit as they are.

    1) Hoppe is right on incentives of “Renters” in government.

    2) Michels is right about the iron law of oligarchy and the consequences of democracy.

    3) Schmidt is right about the need for the law to handle exceptions.

    4) Legions (exp Bagehot) are right that monarchies are the most successful form of government in history, and democracies always fail from hyperconsumption and competition over access to power, the violates the natural law, which is that we may have no power over one another other than denial of parasitism.

    4) I am right that (a) monarchy is necessary for the denial of power, (b) denial of influence, (b) limiting the fashions of the people – and far better record than any president. Monarchs and Prime ministers and allocation to parties, have always defeated presidents, speakers of the house, and the first past the post two-party system in every possible case.

    QUOTES

    Because a ceremony of men, kin, nation is far better than a ceremony of false gods, ideology, politicians – or consumption.

    The best Governments of the World have been composed of Monarchy, Aristocracy, and Democracy.

    The best reason why Monarchy is a strong government is, that it is an intelligible government. The mass of mankind understand it, and they hardly anywhere in the world understand any other.

    The Sovereign has, under a constitutional monarchy such as ours, three rights – the right to be consulted, the right to encourage, the right to warn. And a king of great sense and sagacity would want no others.

    Monarchy hardens into despotism. Aristocracy contracts into oligarchy. Democracy expands into the supremacy of numbers.

    They that are discontented under monarchy, call it tyranny; and they that are displeased with aristocracy, call it oligarchy: so also, they which find themselves grieved under a democracy, call it anarchy, which signifies the want of government; and yet I think no man believes, that want of government, is any new kind of government.

    The British monarchy has the political and constitutional task of subtracting from the government and governors of Britain the papal and kingly airs that in America, because we have no such institution, unfortunately adhere to the president.

    I believe that the visit of the Queen to the United States is an admirable occasion to produce an historical, truthful, sincere, genuine analysis of how the British Monarchy evolved into its present situation.

    Americans also seem to believe that the monarchy is a kind of mediaeval hangover, encumbered by premodern notions of decorum; the reality is that the British monarchy, for good or ill, is a modern political institution perhaps the first modern political institution.

    What royal families are very good at doing is surviving and reinventing themselves. That’s true whether it’s a constitutional monarchy in Britain or an authoritarian monarchy.

    If a nation does not want a monarchy, change the nations mind. If a nation does not need a monarchy, change the nations needs.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-17 09:38:00 UTC

  • Law

    JUSTICE VS MORALITY VS LAW? IT STUMPED SOCRATES, BUT SHOULDN’T – THE ERROR OF IDEAL TYPES OVER SPECTRA The terms Justice, Morality and Law refer to spectrums, not states, and that is why the subject is confusing to people when it should not be. Natural Law (logically necessary), customary law (evolved), legislation (commands), and regulations (insurance) —vs— Objective morality (logically necessary), customary morality (evolved), normative reality (practiced), moral theory (advocated) —vs— Objective Justice (logically extant), Evolved Justice (unintended), procedural Justice (intended), subjective justice (imagined) Humans evolved instincts for managing the extreme value of cooperation. Moral instincts prevent free-riding and therefore preserve the incentives to maintain cooperation. Justice instincts do the opposite: they tell us if our cooperation has been accounted for. Cooperate requires sacrifice (payment) and rewards (returns). Law is the means by which we resolve differences between positive moral action and individual perceptions of justice. That justice is simply an accounting system provided for by evolution so that we preserve the incentives to maintain the extraordinary benefits of cooperation is somehow… well, depressing. So morality is the positive and negative instinct. Justice is the sense of whether morality has been preserved in the face of violation and law is the logical means by which we resolve disputes. The reason that it’s confusing is that while necessary morality, justice, and law are logically decidable, as information becomes less visible and less ‘correct’ opinion differs. Some cultures solve this through authority. Westerners solve it through jury. But to solve it by jury requires a largely moral people. which is why some cultures have juries and other cultures have three judges to make bribery more difficult.

    Punishment

    —“The problem with the modern state is not that it uses the death penalty so much, but rather that it uses it far too little. Property in toto serves as a useful metric for what crimes merit the death penalty. if you use fraud, deceit, or some other non-reciprocal criminal means of enriching yourself at the expense of the commons above some arbitrary number, say 5x the average lifetime taxes paid by an average taxpayer, you should face execution. Under such a scheme, nearly every tech monopolist, the Walton family, Bezos, any of the financial elite, nearly every politician and most high ranking bureaucrats would be liable for death. NYT editors lie in the newspapers and it costs 5x the taxes paid of the average worker? Boom. no more problem with lying editors at the NYT. The whole West faces the double problem of a violent, dependent underclass and a parasitical, exploitative oligarchy controlling business and politics. Such measures might seem unduly harsh, but they are necessary. Brazil shows why they must be implemented, Singapore shows that they work.”—-