Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • The Pseudosciences

    Why is (was) Psychology a Pseudoscience

    —”You said Psychology is not a science. Can you explain this argument as you have done with Marxism? Thanks”—Jamie Watson PSEUDOSCIENCE (AND RELIGION – THE FEMININE) (a) based entirely upon projection – with no empirical content (meaning ‘no system of measurement’), (b) framed as authoritarian (monopoly) demand for homogeneity as its system of measurement (c) framed as deviation from a non-existent but feminine norm: (d) framed as guilt for deviation from the authoritarian, feminine, norm. (e) The scary one: Freud (using oppression into baseline) was trying to reverse Nietzsche (using freedom to exit baseline). Freud was just creating a pseudoscientific counter-revolution for the female mind(collectivism) against the restoration of the male mind(individualism) by Nietzsche. (Just as Marx and Boaz were creating a counter-revolution against Darwin. Just as Rousseau and Kant a counter-revolution against Locke/Smith/Hume/Newton.) SCIENCE (AND LAW – THE MASCULINE ) (a) all behavior is in pursuit of acquisitions (“man is acquisitive”) of every possible utility – “discounts on risk and calories”. (b) all emotions are reactions to changes in state of past, present, and future acquisitions – nothing more. Rewards for training a brain that can learn to acquire. (c) all emotions, personality traits, all cognition, and therefore all behavior are biased by the different reproductive strategies of males and females. (wolves(M-eugenic) vs deer(F-dysgenic)) (d) all acquisition-seeking is biased by class (familial, social, sexual, economic, political, and military market value) to others – in other words, the classes demonstrate biases that reflect the needs of their classes in competition-and-cooperation with the other classes. (e) We have a limited number of biological reward systems, and those reward systems appear to map to stages of the prey drive (our operational lifecycle) intersecting with our reproductive drives. We describe these variations in reward systems as personality factors and traits.

    Communism and Socialism

    “Why Won’t The Nightmare Dream Of Communism Die?” A century of Communism achieved four main results: poverty, oppression, war, and mass death. So why does anybody still think collectivism is ‘idealistic’? —“For the same reason Ponzi schemes won’t stop. It’s an effective con that zeroes in on human weaknesses. Ponzi schemes capitalize on greed. Communism capitalizes on envy, which is why it’s largely sustained by intellectuals, in whose personalities envy tends to be a particularly powerful component.”—Glenn Reynolds

  • The Pseudosciences

    Why is (was) Psychology a Pseudoscience

    —”You said Psychology is not a science. Can you explain this argument as you have done with Marxism? Thanks”—Jamie Watson PSEUDOSCIENCE (AND RELIGION – THE FEMININE) (a) based entirely upon projection – with no empirical content (meaning ‘no system of measurement’), (b) framed as authoritarian (monopoly) demand for homogeneity as its system of measurement (c) framed as deviation from a non-existent but feminine norm: (d) framed as guilt for deviation from the authoritarian, feminine, norm. (e) The scary one: Freud (using oppression into baseline) was trying to reverse Nietzsche (using freedom to exit baseline). Freud was just creating a pseudoscientific counter-revolution for the female mind(collectivism) against the restoration of the male mind(individualism) by Nietzsche. (Just as Marx and Boaz were creating a counter-revolution against Darwin. Just as Rousseau and Kant a counter-revolution against Locke/Smith/Hume/Newton.) SCIENCE (AND LAW – THE MASCULINE ) (a) all behavior is in pursuit of acquisitions (“man is acquisitive”) of every possible utility – “discounts on risk and calories”. (b) all emotions are reactions to changes in state of past, present, and future acquisitions – nothing more. Rewards for training a brain that can learn to acquire. (c) all emotions, personality traits, all cognition, and therefore all behavior are biased by the different reproductive strategies of males and females. (wolves(M-eugenic) vs deer(F-dysgenic)) (d) all acquisition-seeking is biased by class (familial, social, sexual, economic, political, and military market value) to others – in other words, the classes demonstrate biases that reflect the needs of their classes in competition-and-cooperation with the other classes. (e) We have a limited number of biological reward systems, and those reward systems appear to map to stages of the prey drive (our operational lifecycle) intersecting with our reproductive drives. We describe these variations in reward systems as personality factors and traits.

    Communism and Socialism

    “Why Won’t The Nightmare Dream Of Communism Die?” A century of Communism achieved four main results: poverty, oppression, war, and mass death. So why does anybody still think collectivism is ‘idealistic’? —“For the same reason Ponzi schemes won’t stop. It’s an effective con that zeroes in on human weaknesses. Ponzi schemes capitalize on greed. Communism capitalizes on envy, which is why it’s largely sustained by intellectuals, in whose personalities envy tends to be a particularly powerful component.”—Glenn Reynolds

  • Economic logic (markets) de-emphasizes (un-biases) ‘belief and agency’ and corre

    Economic logic (markets) de-emphasizes (un-biases) ‘belief and agency’ and correctly restores the hierarchy between ‘rider and elephant’. We would not require consciousness if not for negotiating cooperation. By economic logic we gain agency in psych/soc as we did w/physics.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-23 13:58:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198239294030258177

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198239292251934720

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    We (must) negotiate (offer, acquire). We imitate. We habituate negotiating strategies. We negotiate in a market. Markets evolve superior products as std’s weight and measure.
    Economic language is always superior for psychology and sociology because it unifies behavior w physics. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1198147553948246016

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1198239292251934720

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    We (must) negotiate (offer, acquire). We imitate. We habituate negotiating strategies. We negotiate in a market. Markets evolve superior products as std’s weight and measure.
    Economic language is always superior for psychology and sociology because it unifies behavior w physics. https://t.co/r5XLv5krV3

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1198239292251934720

  • THE ERROR OF WEALTH ENVY – FIXING THE REAL PROBLEM Let’s say you have 10m in ass

    THE ERROR OF WEALTH ENVY – FIXING THE REAL PROBLEM

    Let’s say you have 10m in assets. 1M in a home, 100k liquid 60k in cars. What do you suppose the rest of that money is doing?

    You see, that’s all the separates us by income. People with more money have more investments and spend a bit more on food, clothing, cars, home, and entertainment. It’s all status signaling.

    The rest of that money is out ‘working’ for them. But, what’s it doing?

    Organizing research, investment, financing, organizing, producing, distributing, and trading. The result of which is lower-priced goods, services, and information, so that the totality of what you consume is cheaper in costs of time and ‘body wear and tear’ than it was in the past.

    Now, what do you suppose separates poor countries from wealthy countries?

    It’s how much money is out there researching, investing, financing, organizing, producing, distributing, and trading.

    People don’t CONSUME much differently. It’s all status signaling. We have some pretty bad behavior (obesity, bad food, lack of exercise, lack of sufficient socialization).

    Wat’s the biggest problem?

    We can’t segregate by race, ethnicity, and class so that the average Christian with high investment children can have both a cheap house, a decent community, and a good school, without the ‘underclass riff-raff’ problem that is the unspoken falsehood of our age.

    Fix the forced integration problem and restore voluntary disassociation, and we will have cheap decent white neighborhoods free of the alien underclasses who are biologically and cognitively and therefore socially different.

    I can, we can, fix (a) the cost of housing in good neighborhoods and schools, and (b) the cost of education, and (c) the cost of money (credit, interest) very easily.

    Then high investment parents (whites) will separate from low investment parents (non-whites) and we will have far less conflict because we will have far fewer interactions.

    As a consequence, the less evolved (domesticated) peoples to put lower investment into their families and children (because it won’t matter anyway) will restore their drive to conformity in order to gain access to shared benefits.

    At present they simply destroy our incentive to produce shared benefits.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-22 12:20:00 UTC

  • OUR EUROPEAN NATURAL RELIGION We evolved technology (magic, pseudoscientific), a

    OUR EUROPEAN NATURAL RELIGION

    We evolved technology (magic, pseudoscientific), and not astrology(supernatural) and found ourselves with dominion over man (others) and nature (gods), so our natural religion is and always was philosophy(choics is ours to make), with sacrifice and ritual (debt payment) to gods (archetypal forces) as our ‘literature’. The problem we faced is that the church – like Judaism and Islam – closed down our stoic schools and epicurean communes (monasteries), and killed or outcast our philosophers, to DESTROY OUR NATURAL RELIGION of philosophy (vs theology), and archetypes (vs monotheism). There is no evil in this wold remaining other than Abrahamism – I am not sure there ever has been

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 08:56:00 UTC

  • We evolved technology(magic) and found ourselves with dominion over man (others)

    We evolved technology(magic) and found ourselves with dominion over man (others) and nature (gods), so our natural religion is and always was philosophy(dominion over mind), with sacrifice and ritual (debt payment) to gods (archetypal forces) our ‘literature’. The problem we faced is that the church – like judaism and islam – closed down our stoic schools and epicurean communes (monasteries), and killed or outcast our philosophers, to DESTROY OUR NATURAL RELIGION of philosophy (vs theology), and archetypes (vs monotheism). There is no evil in this wold remaining other than abrahamism – I am not sure there ever has been

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 08:54:00 UTC

  • OUR “ROSKOMNADZOR”: AMERICAN CENSORSHIP IS MERELY PRIVATELY FUNDED —“The West al

    OUR “ROSKOMNADZOR”: AMERICAN CENSORSHIP IS MERELY PRIVATELY FUNDED

    —“The West also has its Roskomnadzor (Ros’-ko-mnad’-zor / Роскомнадзор), but it’s private.”— Maxim V Filimonov

    Roskomnadzor: The Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media or Roskomnadzor is the Russian federal executive body responsible for censorship in media and telecommunications

    Founded: May 12, 2008

    Number of employees: 3,019 (2017)

    Headquarters: Moscow, Russia

    Parent agency: Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media of the Russian Federation

    —“If you want to know the correct opinion on anything relating to the internet – censorship, privacy, net neutrality, bluecheck privilege – it’s the opposite of what the NIGARFAGTs want: Netflix, Instagram, Gofundme, Amazon, Reddit, Facebook, Apple, Google, and Twitter.”—Michael Andrade

    (Via Steve Pender)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-20 15:17:00 UTC

  • Moreover I’ve come to understand that there is a demand for a form of stoicism (

    Moreover I’ve come to understand that there is a demand for a form of stoicism (cognitive behavioral training and therapy) to produce mindfulness in lieu of homogenous family, society, economy and polity and prayer/church – and that the ‘therapy’ community is harmful:Dark Ages 2.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-20 14:31:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197160570845356032

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197159788121133056

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @StefanMolyneux I have come to understand that like Peterson you are using reason to produce limited personal Agency by means of therapy and education like Buddhists. You are not using reason to produce unlimited personal, social, and political agency,as a means of Transcendence like Stoics.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1197159788121133056

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @StefanMolyneux I have come to understand that like Peterson you are using reason to produce limited personal Agency by means of therapy and education like Buddhists. You are not using reason to produce unlimited personal, social, and political agency,as a means of Transcendence like Stoics.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1197159788121133056

  • Virtue signaling no matter what reproductive (moral) bias one signals – whether

    Virtue signaling no matter what reproductive (moral) bias one signals – whether Masculine (Capitalizing), Emasculated (Facilitating), or Feminine (Consumption) is subject to VIRTUE SIGNAL SPIRALS and easily undermined by the Abrahamic Method of Undermining by inciting them.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-20 14:25:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197159019745611776

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196839626998202368

    IN REPLY TO:

    @StefanMolyneux

    I oppose making light of the Holocaust.

    I oppose arguments for ethnic cleansing.

    I oppose support for Nazism, fascism and communism.

    I oppose ALL aggression and violence, esp against kids.

    I stand for free speech, free will, private property and the non-aggression principle.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1196839626998202368

  • TO SAY USA IS ONLY A NATION OF IDEAS IS DISINGENUOUS AT BEST. DANGEROUS AND SUIC

    TO SAY USA IS ONLY A NATION OF IDEAS IS DISINGENUOUS AT BEST. DANGEROUS AND SUICIDAL AT WORST.

    by @natrolleon

    My thoughts on USA as proposition nation: USA for most of it’s history has been one where oppressed peoples of Europe migrated to, put their differences aside and worked together. For most of humanity, this is a hard thing to do. For ages peoples of Europe fought each other.

    In America, they did not. There were issues, yes – the wars with the natives and slavery. Demographics up until 1965 were predominately white. America was up until recently a place were all Europeans could come and work together and have freedoms. We became the envy of the world.

    So there is a good case for the “ethnic American” who is mostly a mix of various European stock. America is more than just an idea, it’s also a people and a land and a process shaped by history. We the historic majority demographic played a pivotal role in making USA great.

    Yes in the past non-whites in this country have not been treated well. But that has come to an end, yet the guilt continues so we have to bastardize the notion of our identity and let everyone in.

    Now we can treat others better, but this is a whole different story than handing over the country to whatever demographic just happens to recently immigrate the most and pump out the most babies. There are unique pillars that hold a country up, it’s foundations if you will.

    The foundations for a nation, a civilization are: Land, borders, culture, ideas and demographics. With the demographics being one of the main underlying basis for the other parts. Demographics would be the base of the foundation.

    To say USA is only a nation of ideas is disingenuous at best. Dangerous and suicidal at worst.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-19 20:13:00 UTC