Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE ORIGINS OF NATURAL RELIGION What’s the difference between the hunt and resul

    THE ORIGINS OF NATURAL RELIGION

    What’s the difference between the hunt and resulting feast, throwing a piece of meat on the fire to thank nature for her bounty, dancing around a fire that night to tell the story with moral heroic or tragic framing, with everyone drumming, chanting, singing, or reciting along – and religion?

    Absolutely nothing. That’s the purpose religion fulfills: the pack is happy together, and we are happy, calm, safe, ‘belonging’, within it: mindfulness.

    Then there are people who use religion for evil: and those are the fundamentalists who have lost the point, either out of insecurity or need for sense of agency – when they have none.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-01 08:55:00 UTC

  • Christians believe just as much silly nonsense as secular Jews. The difference i

    Christians believe just as much silly nonsense as secular Jews. The difference is Christianity’s obviously silly nonsense. And while Christians are beneficial to humanity selling false promises(psychological), secular Jews are harmful to humanity selling false promises(material).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 20:20:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200872226641391619

    Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199955421525446657

    IN REPLY TO:

    @BretWeinstein

    I have always regarded Christians as an overwhelming majority in the U.S. But I had incorrectly globalized from my own experience as a secular Jew in a world where secular Jews are common and are understood to be Jewish by most members of the community.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199955421525446657

  • Christians believe just as much silly nonsense as secular Jews. The difference i

    Christians believe just as much silly nonsense as secular Jews. The difference is Christianity’s obviously silly nonsense. And while Christians are beneficial to humanity selling false promises(psychological), secular Jews are harmful to humanity selling false promises(material).

    There is no escape from Darwin or the Red Queen other than Power distribution of law, Pareto distribution of assets, Nash distribution of returns, suppression of the reproduction of the unproductive, and capital punishment for the criminal.

    Neither genders, nor classes, nor nations, nor races are equal, and our only means of cooperation is market competition while reducing our underclasses as the principal means of ‘getting ahead’. After European Natural Law, Eugenics was the MOST moral program in history.

    Masculine Eugenic Europe vs Feminine Dysgenic Semitia.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 15:23:00 UTC

  • ALL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE IN A FEW LINES: All human behavior is reduc

    ALL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE IN A FEW LINES:

    All human behavior is reducible to one cause:

    (a)All human behavior serves the acquisition of capital.

    (b)All emotions reflect changes in the state of capital.

    (c)Cooperation is disproportionately rewarding for the acquisition of capital.

    (d)All speech is negotiation serving acquisition of capital

    (e)Capital is anything we seek to acquire.

    There are a limited number of dimensions of human differences :

    (a) Depth of neoteny, Rate of Maturity, Depth of Maturity.

    (asian shallow fast, european medium slow, semitic deep medium), and african (deep fast)

    (b) Degree, Direction of (sexual) Dimorphism

    (c) Degree of Agency (trait intelligence and conscientiousness)

    (d) Female(herd-consumptive-empathic-psychotic) vs Male(pack-conservative-analytic-autistic),

    (e) Size of the underclass (deadweight burden).

    The competitive advantage of any polity consists in

    (a) A Power-distribution of rule of law of reciprocity(prohibiting rents, forcing markets),

    (b) A Pareto-distribution of capital(voluntary organization of production), and

    (c) A Nash-distribution of Returns (distribution of income).

    (d) The degree of suppression of reproduction of the underclasses (dead weight).

    There are a limited number of dimensions of group competition:

    (a) Predation (Mongols, all of islam),

    (b) Parasitism (gypsies, jews, russia, south america),

    (c) Production and trade (germanic european),

    (d) Production and autarky (france, eastern europe, india, china, japan).

    If any statement in psychology, social science, law, ethics, politics, is incompatible or in conflict with those laws, then it’s false.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 13:37:00 UTC

  • THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD WARS AGAINST EUROPEAN PEOPLE Whites have dragged humani

    THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD WARS AGAINST EUROPEAN PEOPLE

    Whites have dragged humanity kicking and screaming at every turn out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, plagues, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe hostile to complex life.

    GENERATION ONE ~2000-1500 BC

    When we invented heroism we created AGENCY, they fought us with organized religion. (Yes really, that’s the origin of authoritarian religion – the resistance to west-indo europeans.)

    … The Bronze World (bronze)

    … The Sea People’s Dark Age

    GENERATION TWO 800BC-100 AD

    When we developed reason, and created enlightenment, they developed monotheism to resist us. In a very short time they destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world.

    … The Ancient World (Iron)

    … The First Semitic Dark Age

    GENERATION THREE 1540-1680 AD

    When we developed empiricism,

    … The European Restoration… Then… (Steel)

    … The English Revolution because of it.

    … THEN THE COUNTER REVOLUTION:

    The french, germans, russians and jews developed fundamentalism, french moralism, german rationalism, Russian literary counter-enlightenments and a tepid Jewish reformation of Jewish law. And they froze the re-enlightenment, gave birth to Napoleon, and destroyed the engine of european civilization’s resistance: the german princedoms.

    The continental enlightenment is a COUNTER REVOLUTION against the scientific revolution. (Yes, really. All of it.) Only the British remain empirical. Only the Americans created rule of law.

    -The French Counter Revolution because of it.

    -The German Counter Revolution (Unification) because of it.

    GENERATION FOUR 1850 – 1950

    The industrial revolution begins in England, where empiricism ruled because the origin of empiricism is the common law of tort among the germanic peoples. This further disrupts all civilizations. When we developed science to continue the scientific revolution, they developed marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and islamism. And invented Pseudoscience (Marx, Freud, Boaz, Cantor, Frankfurt). And we had our World Wars.

    -The Jewish Counter Revolution because of it

    …….- In Germany

    …….- In Russia and the Borderlands

    -The Indian Independence Revolution because of it

    -The Chinese Counter Revolution because of it.

    GENERATION FIVE 1950 – PRESENT

    Now that we have developed computer science and information technology, they are simply engaging in outright denial of every form of truth, trust, and merit. And we are very close to civil war.

    -The Jewish Counter Revolution because of it

    …….- In America

    -The French, Jewish, Fem. Counter Revolution because of it

    -The Islamic Hyper-Counter Revolution.

    We resist their barbarism at every turn, they are thankless children.

    THE CHOICE:

    1) OUR SECOND RENAISSANCE

    -The World Wide Revolution to Restore the Restoration (Now)

    -The Jewish, French, Russian, Chinese, South American Resistance to the Restoration (In Progress)

    –OR–

    2) THE SECOND SEMITIC DARK AGE?

    -Globalism, Islamism, Jewish Globalism, Decline, with east asia as an island?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 10:45:00 UTC

  • THE TRUTH ISN’T DESIRABLE IT’S JUST TRUE (DECIDABLE) Nature consists of constant

    THE TRUTH ISN’T DESIRABLE IT’S JUST TRUE (DECIDABLE)

    Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe those constant relations. Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible.

    So a) man creates descriptions of physical laws (applications of entropy), and b) man creates descriptions of natural laws (applications of reciprocity), c) judges discover those applications, and d) man issues command, legislation, and regulation, that is rarely if ever ‘law’.

    So, I mean, I sense your frustration, but Aristotle started the project, Descartes and the British restored it, Darwin advanced it, and I’m completing it: the scientific method is complete. And it’s completed because we have that method for ALL disciplines now, not just physical.

    And I don’t expect you to like it any more than the Semites liked Aristotle, the french and germans liked locke, smith, and Hume, or the Church liked Darwin, Menger, and Nietzsche. No one likes having their crimes (parasitisms) suppressed. We do it anyway. Returns are exceptional.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 13:59:00 UTC

  • HERE IS THE PROBLEM FOR THE ARTIST The artist cannot necessarily control his int

    HERE IS THE PROBLEM FOR THE ARTIST

    The artist cannot necessarily control his intuitions – the elephant is stronger than the rider, and the elephant gets stronger the lower the individual’s agency (class). But he produces a good in a market, like any other, he can be liable for. Criticism (or shaming, or even ridicule at times, and perhaps prosecution) are what all producers of goods risk.

    HERE. I’LL MAKE IT WORSE

    Art can EASILY be evaluated by triangulation (ordinal), as can all things not reducible to linear (cardinal) measures. Anything humans value can be evaluated by triangulation.

    Most of the time, in art, we are measuring ignorance, as in any other field.

    Likewise, people can be taught the basics of art criticism just as they can be taught the basics of fashion criticism, or of literary criticism, or of movie criticism …like any other system of weights and measures. The fact that they don’t know the method doesn’t mean it’s hard.

    What we find if we give people a basic education in art criticism (which I can probably do in the space of three hours or so)we find that they are quite good at identifying quality, and need only the language of demarcating decoration and context. What fits where, like ‘manners’.

    Your bath, bedroom, hallway, living room, office spaces, public buildings, museums, and monuments require different ‘manners’ of behavior, dress … and art. For the same reasons. And that’s what people do everywhere.

    ( The reason to do otherwise is to take attention by ‘theft’ from those environments. )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 12:34:00 UTC

  • ART AS EXAMPLE. DOES “ANGLO” JUST MEAN ELITIST? YES. (useful for the analysis of

    ART AS EXAMPLE. DOES “ANGLO” JUST MEAN ELITIST? YES.

    (useful for the analysis of art)

    —“Pseudoprofound bullshit titles made abstract art pieces appear more profound. “On this basis, one may expect the presence of bullshit to be widespread in the abstract art world.”—Rolf Degen @DegenRolf

    —“Oh, shocking, words can generate meaning! And meaning increases value: Wow! Who ever would have guessed?”—Jason Powell@KillerkattArt

    Actually, it’s not ‘meaning’ it’s ‘sentiment’. Not only can we use words communicate meaning (reason), but we can load (sentiments), and usually by means of suggestion (deception). The ‘big lies’ are all constructed by this method, and postmodernism institutionalized it.

    —“I feel like your comment highlights why strictly anglophone philosophers are poorly equipped to analyze art.”—Jason Powell @KillerkattArt

    I studied at one of the best theoretical art schools in America, and art theory and criticism was my first (and still best) work. One can make truthful (technical) claims. And one can make experiential claims. And one can make political claims. Or one can conflate them (lie).

    The optimum analysis of any work, set of works, movement’s work, or civilization’s work, is to produce all three analyses and put them in competition with truth(meaning), beauty (aesthetics), excellence (craft), to discover what influenced the artist (context-puppet).

    …………………..Truth(meaning)…………..

    ………………………/…………..\……….

    ..Beauty(experience) — Excellence(craft)

    And compare the set of influences and context-puppets to one another, to understand the total meaning of the work whether technological, emotional (self), political (political), or context (universal). I can state any and all of those analyses of any work. As should any student.

    ………….Political………..

    …………/………..\…………

    Emotional — Technological

    Past->……Universal…..<-Present

    Now the next step is to explore the difference between creators who understand their CRAFT as a set of those techniques, for evoking human experience (actors, directors, and editors the best current examples). And those who merely fantasize that they’re not self-pleasuring.

    playing > student > laborer > craftsman > artist > innovator.

    And the next is not to pander to them, or the pretense that postwar art is critique (undermining) is any different from the idiot in the meeting who reminds us of some obvious pedantry for attention and contributes nothing except friction to development of innovations.

    Subtractive <—– Current Condition —–> Addative

    It’s not that I’m Anglo, it’s that I’m ELITIST. If Elitism is synonymous with Anglo, Which I think it is, then that’s fine with me. I haven’t seen anything out of the continent that is anything other than simpering Rousseauian want for return of the lies of the church.

    —“I don’t mean to knock your style or education. I just feel that if you need to construct a box with predesignated specific language that requires others to get in your box to talk about something then the result is insular and alienating.”—Jason Powell @KillerkattArt

    You mean, like every single other discipline in the world? Like, literature? Scriptwriting? The play? What do you think they teach you in art school?

    Truth is insular and alienating – that’s why we have it. If it wasn’t we wouldn’t need it. Truth provides the DECIDABLE, not PREFERABLE.

    Here is what I was after: is it art (additive) or is it defecating in public for attention (subtractive)? What is the demarcation between additive and subtractive in art?

    I know you’re a good person. This is my job, and you just provided me with an opportunity to educate others.

    —“Are you sure that your personal categories of “additive” and “subtractive” tells us anything?”—“—Jason Powell @KillerkattArt

    Do you think I’m so absolutely exasperatingly, frustratingly, and annoyingly, (and arrogantly) persistent in driving to first causes without knowing the first causes? 😉

    If it isn’t decidable I say so.

    If it’s decidable I say so.

    Irritating. I know… lol

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 10:28:00 UTC

  • P IS CORE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM I make a lot of mistakes. We all do. I don’t ma

    P IS CORE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM

    I make a lot of mistakes. We all do. I don’t make many errors. (in business I’ve made two). In my thought-work, I don’t know of any … yet. And you needn’t either. P is very powerful. At least, it is very powerful if you are intellectually honest. Conversely, if we teach P like math, reading, grammar, and writing, we will end up with intellectually honest people because it will be so damned difficult to get away with intellectual dishonesty.

    P is the only known inoculation against Abrahamism, and the universal human pursuit of parasitism by ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit.

    Manners of non-imposition

    Ethics of non-imposition

    Morals of non-imposition

    Morality by Exchange.

    Positive Morality by Forbearance

    Extraordinary Morality by Investment

    Ultimate Morality by Sacrifice

    CURRICULUM

    Reading, Fairy Tales, Myths, Heroic Literature (criminal literature)

    Writing, Grammars(logics), Rhetoric (speech), Argument (persuasion), Debate, Acting (presenting),

    Manners, Ethics, Morals, the natural law, Common Law, Politics

    Geographic History, Human History, Civilizational History, Art history, Biographical history, Economic history, military and political history, (Criminal History)

    Operations, Algorithms, functional programming, object-oriented programming, services programming,

    Arithmetic, Mathematics, Algebra, Geometry, Trigonometry, Pre Calc, Calculus, Linear Algebra, Statistics.

    Money, Accounting, Banking, Credit, Finance, Micro Economics, Entrepreneurial Economics, National Economics

    Micro Physics, Physics, Macro Physics

    Every Boy a Prince, and Every Girl a Princess.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-26 10:26:00 UTC

  • HOW MANY OF THESE ARE OBTAINED BY BAITING INTO HAZARD? (Then, go thru the rest o

    HOW MANY OF THESE ARE OBTAINED BY BAITING INTO

    HAZARD?

    (Then, go thru the rest of the Forbes list, and discover how the white people made their money. )

    MERIT

    3 Lawrence Ellison 27,000 65 Redwood City Oracle (earned)

    13 Michael Dell 14,500 44 Austin Dell

    INGROUP MONEY RAISE ADVANTAGE W/MERIT

    11 Sergey Brin 15,300 36 Palo Alto Google

    11 Larry Page 15,300 36 San Francisco Google

    158 Mark Zuckerberg 2,000 25 Palo Alto Facebook

    WINDFALL VIA OTHERS’ EFFORTS – NO MERIT

    14 Steven Ballmer 13,300 53 Seattle Microsoft(Via Gates)

    326 Margaret Whitman 1,200 53 Atherton Ebay(Via Others)

    INGROUP MONEY RAISE – NO MERIT – RENT SEEKING

    123 Mitchell Rales 2,500 53 Washington Danaher Corp **

    123 Steven Rales 2,500 58 Washington Danaher Corp **

    296 Jeremy Jacobs Sr. 1,300 69 East Aurora sports concessions

    326 John E. Abele 1,200 72 Shelburne healthcare **

    8 Michael Bloomberg 17,500 67 New York Bloomberg

    15 George Soros 13,000 79 Westchester hedge funds

    16 Donald Bren 12,000 77 Newport Beach real estate

    22 Carl Icahn 10,500 73 New York leveraged buyouts

    23 Ronald Perelman 10,000 66 New York leveraged buyouts

    24 George B. Kaiser 9,500 67 Tulsa oil & gas, banking

    26 Sheldon Adelson 9,000 76 Las Vegas casinos, hotels

    29 James Simons 8,500 71 East Setauket hedge funds

    36 Steven Cohen 6,400 53 Greenwich hedge funds

    42 Eli Broad 5,400 76 Los Angeles investments

    44 Len Blavatnik 5,000 52 London Access Industries

    44 David Geffen 5,000 66 Malibu movies, music

    44 Ira Rennert 5,000 75 New York investments

    49 Charles Ergen 4,900 56 Denver EchoStar **

    50 Stephen Schwarzman 4,700 62 New York investments

    52 Samuel I. (Si) Newhouse Jr. 4,500 81 New York publishing

    56 Micky Arison 4,300 60 Bal Harbour Carnival Cruises

    61 Ralph Lauren 4,200 70 New York fashion

    65 Lester Crown & family 4,000 84 Wilmette investments

    65 Richard LeFrak & family 4,000 64 New York real estate

    65 Donald Newhouse 4,000 79 Somerset County publishing

    65 Daniel Ziff 4,000 37 New York inheritance, hedge funds

    65 Dirk Ziff 4,000 45 New York inheritance, hedge funds

    65 Robert Ziff 4,000 43 New York inheritance, hedge funds

    77 Henry Kravis 3,800 65 New York leveraged buyouts

    77 Paul Milstein & family 3,800 87 New York Emigrant, real estate

    77 Samuel Zell 3,800 68 Chicago real estate, private equity

    84 Leonard N. Stern 3,600 71 New York real estate

    85 Stanley Druckenmiller 3,500 56 Pittsburgh hedge funds

    85 Bruce Kovner 3,500 64 New York hedge funds

    85 George Roberts 3,500 66 San Francisco leveraged buyouts

    97 Riley P. Bechtel 3,000 57 San Francisco engineering, construction**

    97 Stephen D. Bechtel Jr. 3,000 84 San Francisco engineering, construction**

    97 Leonard Lauder 3,000 76 New York Estee Lauder

    97 Theodore Lerner 3,000 84 Washington real estate

    97 Steven Spielberg 3,000 62 Pacific Palisades movies

    97 Warren Stephens 3,000 52 Little Rock Stephens Inc. **

    97 David Tepper 3,000 52 Milburn hedge funds

    110 Stephen Ross 2,900 69 New York real estate

    113 Daniel Och 2,800 48 New York hedge funds

    113 Haim Saban 2,800 65 Beverly Hills television

    118 Joan Tisch 2,600 83 New York Loews

    123 Edgar M. Bronfman 2,500 80 New York liquor

    123 Ronald Lauder 2,500 65 New York Estee Lauder

    123 David Rubenstein 2,500 60 Bethesda leveraged buyouts

    139 Mark Cuban 2,400 51 Dallas Broadcast.com http://Broadcast.com

    139 Malcolm Glazer & family 2,400 81 Palm Beach sports teams, real estate

    141 Steve Wynn 2,300 67 Las Vegas casinos, hotels **

    147 Tom Gores 2,200 45 Beverly Hills leveraged buyouts

    147 Bruce Wasserstein 2,200 61 New York Wasserstein Perella, Lazard

    158 Nicolas Berggruen 2,000 48 New York Investments

    158 Leon Black 2,000 58 New York leveraged buyouts

    158 William Gross 2,000 65 Laguna Beach bonds **

    158 Michael Milken 2,000 63 Los Angeles investments

    158 Sumner Redstone 2,000 86 Beverly Hills Viacom

    158 Leslie Wexner 2,000 72 New Albany Limited Brands

    183 Stewart Rahr 1,950 63 New York Kinray

    193 Alan Casden 1,850 63 Beverly Hills real estate

    196 Thomas Pritzker 1,800 59 Chicago hotels, investments

    196 Jerry Speyer 1,800 69 New York real estate

    204 Israel Englander 1,700 61 New York hedge funds

    204 Penny Pritzker 1,700 50 Chicago hotels, investments

    204 Sheldon Solow 1,700 81 New York real estate

    212 Robert Friedland 1,650 59 Singapore mining

    212 Henry Samueli 1,650 55 Newport Beach Broadcom

    220 Thomas Friedkin 1,600 74 Houston Gulf States Toyota

    220 Alec Gores 1,600 56 Beverly Hills leveraged buyouts

    220 Irwin Jacobs 1,600 76 La Jolla Qualcomm

    220 Anthony Pritzker 1,600 48 Los Angeles hotels, investments

    220 Jay Robert Pritzker 1,600 44 Evanston hotels, investments

    230 John Morgridge 1,550 76 Portola Valley Cisco ** (NETA with Jewish Agency)

    230 Isaac Perlmutter 1,550 67 Palm Beach Marvel

    230 Wilma Tisch 1,550 82 New York Loews

    236 Neil Bluhm 1,500 71 Chicago real estate

    236 Robert Kraft 1,500 68 Brookline New England Patriots

    236 Stephen Mandel 1,500 53 Greenwich hedge funds

    236 Daniel Pritzker 1,500 50 Marin County hotels, investments

    236 James Pritzker 1,500 58 Chicago hotels, investments

    236 Jean (Gigi) Pritzker 1,500 47 Chicago hotels, investments

    236 John Pritzker 1,500 56 San Francisco hotels, investments

    236 Karen Pritzker 1,500 51 New Haven hotels, investments

    236 Linda Pritzker 1,500 55 St. Ignatius hotels, investments

    236 Marc Rich 1,500 74 Meggen commodities

    236 Lynn Schusterman 1,500 70 Tulsa oil & gas, investments

    236 John Sperling 1,500 88 Phoenix Apollo Group

    236 Mortimer Zuckerman 1,500 72 New York real estate, media

    272 George Lindemann & family 1,450 73 Palm Beach investments

    272 Bernard Marcus 1,450 80 Atlanta Home Depot

    277 S. Daniel Abraham 1,400 85 Palm Beach Slim-Fast

    277 John Arrillaga 1,400 72 Palo Alto real estate

    277 Alfred Mann 1,400 83 Los Angeles medical devices

    277 Michael Moritz 1,400 55 Mountain View venture capital

    277 Michael Price 1,400 57 Far Hills investments

    277 Tamir Sapir 1,400 62 New York real estate

    277 Alfred Taubman 1,400 85 Bloomfield Hills real estate

    289 Ken Fisher 1,350 58 Woodside Money management **

    289 David Gottesman 1,350 83 Rye investments

    289 Marc Lasry 1,350 49 New York hedge funds (92nd Street Y)

    296 Edmund Ansin 1,300 73 Miami Sunbeam Broadcasting

    296 Ron Baron 1,300 66 New York money management

    296 Leon Charney 1,300 68 New York Real estate

    296 Glenn Dubin 1,300 52 New York hedge funds

    296 Donald Fisher 1,300 81 San Francisco Gap

    296 Doris Fisher 1,300 78 San Francisco Gap

    296 Gary Michelson 1,300 60 Los Angeles medical patents

    317 Arthur Blank 1,250 67 Atlanta Home Depot

    317 Jeffrey Greene 1,250 54 Miami Beach real estate, investments

    317 Thomas H. Lee 1,250 65 New York leveraged buyouts

    317 Herbert Simon 1,250 74 Indianapolis real estate

    317 Peter Sperling 1,250 49 Phoenix Apollo Group

    326 Norman Braman 1,200 77 Miami art, car dealerships

    326 John Fisher 1,200 48 San Francisco Gap

    326 Nicholas Pritzker 1,200 65 Chicago hotels, investments

    326 Alexander Rovt 1,200 57 Brooklyn fertilizer

    341 Leon Cooperman 1,150 66 Short Hills hedge funds

    341 Barry Diller 1,150 67 New York IAC/InterActiveCorp

    341 Joseph Mansueto 1,150 53 Chicago Morningstar **

    347 Marc Benioff 1,100 45 San Francisco Salesforce.com http://Salesforce.com

    347 A. James Clark 1,100 81 Easton Construction **

    347 Robert Fisher 1,100 56 San Francisco Gap

    347 Alan Gerry 1,100 80 Liberty cable television**

    347 James Irsay 1,100 50 Carmel Indianapolis Colts (Father, Bob was Jewish)

    347 Michael Krasny 1,100 56 Highland Park CDW Corp 3

    347 Daniel Snyder 1,100 44 Potomac Washington Redskins

    347 Henry Swieca 1,100 52 New York hedge funds

    366 Peter Lewis 1,050 75 Coconut Grove Progressive Corp

    366 Nelson Peltz 1,050 67 Bedford Investments

    371 William Fisher 1,000 52 San Francisco Gap

    371 Pincus Green 1,000 74 Jerusalem commodities

    371 Jeffry Picower 1,000 67 Palm Beach investments

    371 Steven Schonfeld 1,000 50 Westbury Proprietary Trading

    371 Walter Shorenstein & family 1,000 94 San Francisco real estate

    371 Evgeny (Eugene) Shvidler 1,000 45 London Millhouse LLC

    371 Charles Zegar 1,000 61 New York Bloomberg LP

    394 Jeffrey Lurie 980 58 Haverford Philadelphia Eagles

    396 Nancy Lerner 960 49 Cleveland inheritance

    396 Norma Lerner 960 73 Cleveland inheritance

    396 Randolph Lerner 960 47 Cleveland inheritance

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 13:56:00 UTC