Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • PROPERTARIANISM NEEDS WISE WOMEN I need to find a dozen women on this same page

    PROPERTARIANISM NEEDS WISE WOMEN

    I need to find a dozen women on this same page who will write a post a day to other women answering questions with the same freaking answer every time. It’s not complicated.

    (Alice Knight etc)

    I tell men the same simple thing every time:

    a) Tell the truth when you have a conflict, the truth always wins.

    b) Learn to half listen and approve without judging. This is how she neutralizes feelings. It is care taking like she takes care of you. F–king reciprocate care taking.

    c) Say you can, cant, or will, wont, but do not disapprove of a woman’s wants. Instead walk through how to make them happen.

    d) Make a fucking decision when asked and once made don’t change it. Do what you say you will. Do not agree to what you will not do – ever. And show zero tolerance for nagging. Nagging is for children. Pillow talk is for mates.

    e) Stay fit. Stay Groomed. Join a team of any kind. Deliver the bacon (provide)

    f) Defend her always and everywhere no matter what.

    g) Make her look good to her friends.

    h) Make sure she knows you’re thinking of her every day.

    i) crazy chick behavior is always insecurity and fear. If you cannot fix it then leave. you can fix it if you don’t reward it. But you can’t fall for it or the tears. You must be the man. that means that we have drawers in our brains so we don’t have to deal with the chaos in a woman’s mind. Use it like she uses to to remind you to put your fking belt on. Reciprocate.

    j) Be a man for Chrissake. If you want a mother I hope she boots your lazy man-boy ass and you lose everything because you fkin deserve it.

    k) Stay in your tribe. Very rarely do cross tribe marriages work well. With white men and azn women being rare exceptions.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 14:56:00 UTC

  • There is only one testimony of Jesus of nazareth and it is summarized in his ser

    There is only one testimony of Jesus of nazareth and it is summarized in his sermon on the mount. There is only one gospel that I know of, and that is Mark, the rest are copies, and they are very likely fictions. It is likely that Mark’s is a fiction as well. It does not matter. Myths are made to serve a purpose and the authors of this myth like all other myths that survive, succeeded.

    As for gods, the only gods are the archetypical characters we imagine that represent our tribe, nation, or race’s warrior in the battle of our group’s competition against other tribes, nations, and races.

    There are however laws of the natural universe, and the natural law of man. Europeans chose a god that obeyed these laws. The Chinese came close second. Everyone else failed. And the semites institutionalized the art of lying instead – the most human, most harmful, and least divine of the religions developed by each civilization.

    All that matters is that a jew, exposed to the thought of the greeks, romans, and Persians, whose people were conquered by Rome, and who the romans were depriving of their money changing, and were using the scam on their own people, rebelled against all of them in order to find some sort of cohesion and solace for the third world ghetto (sh-t hole country) that was Israel. And by using him as a victim-hero others created a new religion of undermining not only the jewish establishment but the empires.

    Christianity does not matter – at all. the most we can argue is that if we fully secularize Jesus’ teaching, we end with exhaustive forgiveness as a means of maximizing the opportunity for peaceful cooperation, and forgiveness as incentives for those of weak temperament and negative experience, to slowly reciprocate that forgiveness and trust. That is all.

    Church matters. Religion is an excuse for the psychological returns on church service. Religion’s community, ritual, oath feast, and myth (history) matter.

    We have our history. Our Heroes. Our Saints. Our Civilization, our Cultures, our Literature, Law and our Science.

    There is no reason for lies any longer.

    Tell the Truth.

    We are Europeans

    We are the gods we imagined.

    We know the law of the gods:

    The laws of nature and the natural law of men.

    The rest are ours to make.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 12:33:00 UTC

  • HUMANE BEEF I will keep a cow or two in the yard and feed it well. I will kill t

    HUMANE BEEF

    I will keep a cow or two in the yard and feed it well. I will kill the cow by standard metod. It will never know it’s going to be harmed or experience anything. They are frequently manipulated by vets and others. I will have a butcher come to the yard with his truck and clean the cow, returning me the usual amount of about say, for cattle 58-62% , hogs 74% and market lambs 54%., and for cattle close to half as hamburger. doing so requires sunlight and grass, and maybe some agricultural feed. This does not require chemistry and energy or other man-made substitutes that are costly in energy to produce. This is the healthiest method of eating available to man. If we buy and raise two young cows at a time, and keep a large freezer, they will have company and be happy the whole time. They are cows.

    DATA

    The average american eats 200 lbs a year. (I eat more than that)

    With an average market (live or on hoof) weight of 1,150 lbs and the average yield of 62.2%, the typical steer will produce a 715 lb. (dressed weight) carcass.

    The dressed beef (or carcass) will yield approximately 569 lbs. (further details below) of red meat and trim (take home meat – which includes the average weight of 27 lbs of variety meat: liver, heart, tongue, tripe, sweetbreads and brains) and 146 lbs of fat, bone and loss. This is roughly a yield of 80% from the dressed or hanging weight – this is for a VERY LEAN Beef. A High Quality, USDA Choice Beef will yield approximately 70% of the Hanging or Dressed Weight. The yield on the take home meat weight from the live weight of the (VERY LEAN) steer is approximately 50%.

    Chuck – 209.5 lbs total, which is 29% of the dressed/hanging/carcass weight:

    Blade Roasts and Steaks 33.9 lbs.

    Ground Beef and Stew Meat 83.3 lbs.

    Arm Pot Roasts and Steaks 35.5 lbs.

    Cross Rib Pot Roast 25.4 lbs.

    Fat and Bones 31.4 lbs.

    Round – 155.8 lbs. total, which is 22% of the dressed/hanging/carcass weight:

    Top Round 34.6 lbs.

    Bottom Round 31.2 lbs.

    Tip 16.8 lbs.

    Rump 7.8 lbs.

    Ground Beef 33.4 lbs.

    Fat and Bones 32 lbs.

    Thin Cuts – 134.6 lbs. total, which is 19% of the dressed/hanging/carcass weight:

    Flank Steak 3.6 lbs.

    Pastrami Squares 2.9 lbs.

    Outside Skirt 2.2 lbs.

    Inside skirt 2.5 lbs.

    Boneless Brisket 16 lbs.

    Ground Beef and Stew Meat 87.3 lbs

    Fat and Bone 20.1 lbs.

    Short Loin – 115.7 lbs. total, which is 16% of the dressed/hanging/carcass weight:

    Porterhouse Steak 19.6 lbs.

    T-bone Steak 9.8 lbs.

    Strip Steak 15 lbs.

    Sirloin Steak 15.3 lbs.

    Tenderloin Steak 6.8 lbs.

    Ground Beef and Stew Meat 22.7 lbs.

    Fat and Bone 26.5 lbs.

    Rib – 66.6 lbs. total, which is 9% of the dressed/hanging/carcass weight:

    Rib Roast 23.9 lbs.

    Rib Steak 9.2 lbs.

    Short Ribs 8.6 lbs.

    Ground Beef and Stew Meat 16.5 lbs.

    Fat and Bone 8.4 lbs.

    Miscellaneous – 32.7 lbs. total, which is 5% of the dressed/hanging/carcass weight:

    Kidney and Hanging Tender 4.9 lbs.

    Fat, Suet and Cutting Loss 27.8 lbs.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 12:09:00 UTC

  • FIXING COURT AND STATE (important) –“Women are able to make false accusations (

    FIXING COURT AND STATE

    (important)

    –“Women are able to make false accusations (for example of domestic violence), and they can lie to the courts without repercussion. How would you deal with this?”—Will Peavy

    This is one of the examples of ‘female privilege’ that has gotten out of hand. In my divorce, Allora said I had threatened to burn the house down as a means of coercing the court to lock the house and seize the assets. This was a lie. We had discovered black mold in the house, and I had said that we would have to burn the house down to fix it. But we all know how that false accusation was drummed up. I said I wouldn’t settle without withdrawal of that accusation. My lawyer said they wouldn’t do so because it was admission of perjury. If I hadn’t been rapidly declining from cancer (which they also used to manipulate me) I would have pursued the matter on principle. So, this happens every day and women get away with it every day because lying and undermining is the female strategy of warfare.

    HOW DO YOU FIX IT?

    You fix this by restoring punishment for it with zero tolerance. You fix zero tolerance by punishing judges, prosecutors, and lawyers for tolerating it.

    And I am very close to preferring the British system of a three stage legal system (paralegal, lawyer, barrister, (plus specialized barristers) and specialized judges rather than this one size fits all american system.

    In general, the British system has survived far better than the american system in a number of ways.

    1. Our written “Transactional”, Natural Law” constitution is FAR better. Even if P-Law will take it further.

    2. Our supreme court is a far better solution.

    3. Our only failure was a process for returning undecidable propositions to the legislature, thereby preventing legislation from the bench.

    4. A territorial senate like the house of lords has been erroneously diluted in both systems.

    5. A Senate (house of lords) and Congress (parliament) like our roman and greek ancestors remains successful, but in both systems new houses should have been added for non-propertied (non-business owners), and another for women. In this way the classes could have continued trading instead of producing monopoly race to the bottom.

    6. A monarch and prime minister is a better system than president. Washington was wrong.

    7. The continental party system of proportional seating appears to have been more effective at producing coalitions(ideologies), and consistent policy, and the anglo system seems to have been better at producing classes(practicalities). So, in this sense

    8. My goal is to end the monopoly of majoritarianism, and instead restore the original intent of the parliament: a market for commons between the classes of those demonstrating competence and contributions the commons: monarchy, senate (territory), commons (business), and consumers (labor, women). This failure to understand the rise of the consumer class and to provide a house for consumers – especially women, who are the vast majority of dependents and consumers, and who consume the vast majority of common goods – is probably the primary failure of post medieval political thought.

    9. There is a good argument to be made that monarchy is without question the best form of government if mirrored by a militia and a constitution of natural law with universal standing – because there is no evidence that democratic governments are anywhere near as effective as monarchical. In western civilization – prior to napoleon – one ‘voted with one’s feet’ via negativa (right of exit). Something we do even more so today. The court provides individual defense via-negativa (right of juridical defense). And a parliament that must approve new law and new levies provides political defense via negativa (right of legislative dissent). With these three, we use POLITIES not parties or houses to compete. And this is the most effective market for political excellence, just as business is the most effective market for productive excellence.

    10. However, if by common consensus democracy (voting) we obtain better loyalty to one another and the state(territory, constitution, laws, culture) and polity, and we obtain a sense of belonging and harmony, then as long as the constitution prohibits even the mention of the irreciprocal (unconstitutional) then this is a trade off we can make. As such we can choose the following choices:

    a) Elected Representative Voters (vote initiatives up and down)[Works with multiple houses and creates a market]

    b) Direct Household Voting (vote initiatives up and down)[works with multiple houses]

    c) Direct Equalitarian Voting (vote initiatives up and down) [works with multiple houses]

    d) Direct Economic Voting (vote to fund initiatives, and what’s funded passes, and unfunded closes) [requires most informed public]

    e) Randomly Selected Jury (votes up and down – the original function of parliament) Parliament is an extension of the jury.

    That should provide you with a bit of understanding.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 08:58:00 UTC

  • A rather strange bias we see in archaeology tries to explain everything they don

    A rather strange bias we see in archaeology tries to explain everything they don’t undrestand as mystical or religous in origin.

    We watch horror movies and tell campfire stories, and we enthrall each other with suspension of belief and woo woo, but that does not mean we are not eminently practical in real life.

    While reading the ancients – even though it is very difficult – it’s very clear that they thought as rationally and practically as we do while still ‘going all woo woo’ over the same nonsense.

    In fact, most letters are pretty tedious and could have been written a century ago.

    It’s one thing to read the illiad today in translation and another to hear someone recite it in its rhyme and tempo. When you hear that tempo and rhyme you realize that homer whether one person or many, and shakespeare are the same man.

    The difference that we cannot imagine today is the pervasive violence in everyday life of the ancient world,and how dependent we were upon family structures for mere survival, and how terrifying it was to be left along without their support – ostracization was a death sentence.

    As for the general bicameral mind, this story has not played out well against the evidence. It’s true that each of us varies in cognitive agency, and we may even say that what differs most between us is agency (or ‘executive function’). It’s true that all language is a means of calculation and the more precise and non-false the terms and complete the linquistic transactions the more we are able to devote the processing power of our frontal cortex to yet another iteration of thought. So it’s more that language and knowledge increase the radius in time, space, population, and permutation of our thinking, just as prices assist us in imputing, and managing our resources and time.

    But my understanding is that the wooo wooo apparent in ancient myth is just a tool for holding attention under suspension of disblief so that the narrative is accompanied by sufficient emotional novelty that the story is remembered.

    That does not mean that a tribe of warriors conducting a raid or a set of 10k bc flint miners were doing or thinking any differently than we are.

    I am old enough to remember that class of our fellow white men that could not read. They did not think any differently. They simply had less accumulated knowledge, and less confidence in their knowledge.

    So you know, I don’t buy the whole thing because I see that there are woo woo people and empirical people in every generation across time.

    As far as I know language will eventually emerge in any creatture with sufficient cognitive capacity (neural density in relation to body weight), that has a body that can move through space (because that is the origin of consiousness – spatial modeling).

    Once you have langauge it is such a fucking competitive advantage every competitor is screwed.

    So the bicameral mind is the result of two hemispheres needing to time their movements using the cerebellum.

    But in our brains the corpus collosum especially in women ensures that the hemispheres are working on concert.

    The major difference is that men are more longitudinally connected (fast, limited info, and time) and women more horizontally (slow, lots of info, in present moment). And even as such these are only limited biass not complete differences.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 10:10:00 UTC

  • THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL ORDER The european social order is consistent from prehistor

    THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL ORDER

    The european social order is consistent from prehistory across all of europe with the variation caused by adaptation of the underlying social order (aristocratic egalitarianism, tripartism, sovereignty) to whatever economy was available.

    It’s these three civilizational strategies that make it so easy for a middle class, and middle class rule to emerge in european civilization and so hard in so many others.

    Read more history that’s not the “mythology of rebellion against the indo european aristocracy” because that’s the purpose of a christian > liberal > marxist > postmodernist education and it always has been – resistance.

    JP Mallory: In Search of Indo Europeans

    David W. Anthony: The Horse, the Wheel, and Language

    Eric H. Cline: 1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed

    Karen Armstrong : The Great Transformation

    John Keegan: A History Of Warfare

    Victor Davis Hanson: The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece

    Victor Davis Hanson: The Other Greeks – The Family Farm and the Agrarian Roots of Western Civilization.

    Victor Davis Hanson: The Western Way of War – Infantry Battle in Classical Greece

    Catherine Nixey : The Darkening Age: The Christian(Jewish) Destruction of the Classical World

    Ramsay MacMullen: Paganism and Christianity 100-425 C.E

    Ramsay MacMullen: Christianity and Paganism in the Fourth To Eighth Centuries

    Bryan Ward-Perkins: The Fall of Rome: And the End of Civilization

    James C. Russell: The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity

    Emmet Scott: Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited.

    Victor Davis Hanson: Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West

    Victor Davis Hanson: Why the West Has Won : Carnage and Culture from Salamis to Vietnam

    The Athenian Constitution

    Roman Law

    The Anglo Saxon Codes

    Milsom: Natural History of the Common Law.

    Plucknett: A Concise History Of The Common Law.

    Hayek’s: The Constitution of Liberty

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 09:25:00 UTC

  • NO SKIN IN THE GAME – NO COMPLAINT by Mathew Smith Hand wringing conservatives a

    NO SKIN IN THE GAME – NO COMPLAINT

    by Mathew Smith

    Hand wringing conservatives are Crypto-liberals, all of them. They all want someone to do the heavy lifting for them, and they won’t be satisfied until they’re instantly gratified.

    I would have been there in a heartbeat if I had the means, so I did the next best thing, sharing John’s videos in groups that may not have heard of him before. I plant seeds where opportunities arise (“Oh, you hate Politician X? Wouldn’t it be nice if they could be sued for lying?” <~~this is a great hook btw) and I’ve dedicated a couple livestreams going over the basics of P.

    I do what I can, although I’m not the most eloquent speaker. Bringing complaints without offering a solution is just a waste of everyone’s time.Keep up the good work, sir.

    (CD: Hugs Brother)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 05:55:00 UTC

  • BAITING INTO HAZARD WORKS BY SUGGESTION VS THE FOUNDERS ON INALIENABILTY UNDER N

    BAITING INTO HAZARD WORKS BY SUGGESTION VS THE FOUNDERS ON INALIENABILTY UNDER NATURAL LAW

    Inalienability means you can’t give up certain rights even ifyou want to, because by doing so you give up obligations to others. This means that the cowardly, weak, unable, and those lacking agency can defect and destroy ‘natural rights under natural law’.

    —“John Mark discusses lying to the public in his videos. but web search manipulation and subconscious/subliminal programming is much more vague. deceiving ppl by encouraging people to put themselves in harms way is discussed, like for example the message to give up your 2A rights, but what if that encouragement is subtle and subliminal? are you familiar with how it works in advertising?”—Brian Avran

    It’s called (a) false promise (b) baiting into hazard. And there is a reason why the tribe specializes in comedy, script writing, gossiping, and undermining, INSTEAD of offering a competitive solution.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 05:54:00 UTC

  • I”M DOING WHAT I SAID I WOULD DO – ALBEIT SLOWLY —“What is your Response to pe

    I”M DOING WHAT I SAID I WOULD DO – ALBEIT SLOWLY

    —“What is your Response to people now 24 who said they knew about you since they were 12 but you accomplished nothing? (not my opinion) What is your response to the same nihilists who say the Virginia rally accomplished nothing and the grassroots rights will sit around as their country gets overtaken by the left as their rally was meaningless?”—

    Well, let’s see. I started a site in 09. I went public in 12-13. Eli is the only person I know of that’s been with me that long. Hmm… So it’s possible I guess.

    What does accomplished nothing mean? What was I supposed to have accomplished?

    I set out to produce a value neutral language of ethics and politics; then to express the history of my people in those terms; then to create a constitution of natural law; and I promised a set of deliverables: (a) a moral license (b) a set of demands, (c) a plan of transition, and (d) a means of insurrection. And I said I would only take a leadership role if other leadership didnt emerge. I’m either doing or have done all those things.

    Just over a year ago we started the institute on one hand, and john’s videos on revolution on the other. We have about a dozen people capable of using or building upon P. if we double that we’ll have the number I was shooting for, and if we get to 100 we’ll have certainly achieved our goals.

    Conversely, what has anyone else done except bring us the catastrophe of c’ville, get deplatformed, and learned the painful lesson I warned them about in ’16 when they went down the identitarian message, rather than revolution and rights messages? Where are all those people now? Their toast.

    What did Hoppe or Rothbard or the Mises institute or CATO do? Absolutely nothing. What about the Conservatives? Nothing. Why? Thy had the wrong f—king answer. There is only one solution and that is war. And there is only one way of avoiding war, and that is to make the horror of it so certain that the other side prefers to separate rather than lose two thirds of its numbers.

    Y’all want to move mountains on impulse. You’re filled with rage and fear. You’re first movers like me. But you are not strategic planners like me. I am an engineer. I’m doing what I said. And the Overton window is moving at exactly the rate I predicted it would.

    We will get our revolution when there is the least resistance from our own. And that will be shortly.

    Go read about the IRA and about Mao, and then study what ISIS did to fund itself.

    I think shit thru. That’s why I take time.

    And if other leadership emerges that’s fine with me.

    Someone just has to do it.

    I don’t need it. I can be happy with one woman, a computer, a sports car, and a few friends.

    The only reason I do this is because I love my people, it needs doing, and everyone else is doing it even worse than I am.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-26 15:17:00 UTC

  • IT”S NOT CHRISTIANITY ITS HOW ITS ARGUED —“Has anyone ever noticed that it isn

    IT”S NOT CHRISTIANITY ITS HOW ITS ARGUED

    —“Has anyone ever noticed that it isn’t Christianity that is the problem? But the Marxist infection of X. It’s the cancer that high trust cultures are prone to. … Yeah, wrong subtopic. It’s hard to say, because Abrahamic religions seem to want to be, at least start out as high trust but quickly degenerated by something power hungry, and/or angry at a slight.”—Anne Summers

    —“Yes. the problem is xianity is conveyed by the same method so how can we get rid of the marxist axis without it affecting xianity unless we convert xianity to secular scientific terms?”—CurtD

    —“It’s hard to say whether Christianity is salvageable. God did not try to salvage either paganism or Judaism. There is no telling what the next covenant will be.

    It’s like trying to read the early parts of the “Voluspa” and trying to decide which gods will survive. Or reading the OT and trying to figure out what God has in store.

    The Owl of Minerva spreads its wings only at dusk.”—Don Miguel

    Neolithic European Farmers

    ……………> Pre-Germanic Nordic

    ……………> Megalithic Atlantic

    ……………> Central?

    Aryanism (Sky Father, Sun God)

    ………..> East

    ……………> Indo Iranian > Zoroastrianism >…

    ……………> Indo Indian > Hinduism > Buddhism

    ………..> West

    ……………> North: ?? > Germanic Thor > Germanic Odinism

    ……………> Central: Germanic Celtic

    ……………> South: Greco-Latin-Roman

    Judaism >

    ……………> Christianity > Protestantism > American Xianity

    ……………> Islam > Islamic Fundamentalism.

    ………….. > Marxism > cultural Marxism > Postmodernism > anti-western feminism > Political Correctness > Denialism

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-26 12:30:00 UTC