Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE POSITION HIGHER POWER: RELIGION, AND GODS (warning. this topic is challengin

    THE POSITION HIGHER POWER: RELIGION, AND GODS

    (warning. this topic is challenging. It touches on the direction I am working toward with religion)

    —” I appreciate and can support so much of what I understood about #propertarianism. Is their any room for a belief in a higher power? A creator? The final Judge?”–Thor @Sov3r3ignSoul

    In our civilization, despite the jewish attempt at forcing monopoly in each class, we have practiced a market of hierarchies we call Trifunctionalism /Tripartism which includes a Judicial material ‘priesthood’, AND a Religious spiritual priesthood. As always, render unto caesar the material world, and unto the gods the spiritual.

    The science says Physical law, Natural law, and Christian extension of kinship love, constitute the laws of the Universe. These Laws are the only evidence of god’s word, written in god’s hand. If any faith is incompatible with those laws, then it’s not god’s word but man’s lie.

    So there is plenty of room for faith, And you will find Aristotle and Jesus among his few prophets; and European man almost exclusively God’s translators – from his hand into the language of man: mathematics, science, and the Natural Law. And european man God’s only messenger.

    And that’s why European man has almost exclusively dragged mankind out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death by mastery of god’s word, written in god’s hand – against other’s false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies.

    And if European man did not drag a people out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, diseases, suffering and early death using god’s words, then those people are suffering because god punishes them for their false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies.

    Jesus asks us to work to drag those with false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies, out of longing, ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death. But if they resist, they must continue to suffer for their false gods failed translations and men’s lies.

    Europeans are the gods among men, and first among men. Not because we are yet gods ourselves. But because we think, speak, write, work, create, and spread the evidence of God’s words, his hands, and his will.

    In the language of gods words, hands, and will: Mathematics (geometry), Science, and Natural Law of Sovereign Men. For gods must be Sovereign, Omniscient and Omnipotent. And only Sovereign men may transcend into peerage with gods.

    And for all people, we are challenged to choose which god is the true god: an impersonal god who tests our ability to achieve sovereignty, omniscience and omniscience by learning his words, hands, and will; a god with whom we trade as allies; or a god who we obey as slaves.

    Will you transcend into gods, remain a client, or obey as slave?

    THERE IS NO QUESTION: ARISTOTLE IS GOD’S ONLY TRUTH PROPHET

    Democritus, and others culminated in Aristotle, and Aristotle caused a chain of reaction throughout time. But it is Aristotle who understood the language of the gods in their own hand. And the evidence of man’s transcendence by his translation, and the evidence of man’s stagnation or decline otherwise.

    CHANGING THE JESUS NARRATIVE TO FIT ORIGINAL INTENT

    To change the narrative requires only that we say Jesus – as some have hypothesized – is the son of a roman soldier and a jewish prostitute, who rebelled against both roman conquest of Judea and Jewish abuse of one another, with a message of love one another – surrender your frustration, anger, jealousy, to heaven in exchange for building the bond of trust. And for his rebelliousness against both jews and Rome, both Rome and jews killed him. And then the jews took his message of love and wrapped it in lies, to create a victim hero to replace the greco roman hero Achilles and the Epic Cycle of the aristocracy, and continue the jewish narrative of the underclasses (slaves, slave traders, money changers-usurers instead

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 14:08:00 UTC

  • THE CONSERVATIVE WANT OF CONTROL VS PROGRESSIVE WANT OF A HERD You are conservat

    THE CONSERVATIVE WANT OF CONTROL VS PROGRESSIVE WANT OF A HERD

    You are conservatives. You want to be in control. I understand. But there is only one kind of control you can have that is meaningful rather than purely psychological. And that is to be fit, armed, with food stored for your family, and ready to show up when and if the opportunity arises. Everything else you will collect along the way. And you will go home with ‘earnings’ so to speak, like our ancestors. … If you are incapable of this then say so. But you will not obtain control over anything if you run. You will just be delaying your destruction. Because you will deprive us of one more body we need to win. And we will curse you for it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 13:11:00 UTC

  • MOST COMMON LIE IN GENETICS: MORE SIMILAR THAN NOT —“More similar than differe

    MOST COMMON LIE IN GENETICS: MORE SIMILAR THAN NOT

    —“More similar than different can be said about us and chimps”–Göran Dahl

    When discussing genetics “more similar than different’ is a pseudoscientific, and pseudo-mathematical lie. There is even a name for it: “Lewontin’s Fallacy”. Or we can just call it postmodern denialism and igorance. Any of those labels will do.

    Very minor changes appear to have very vast consequences and some groups have accumulated better minor changes and others worse minor changes (genetic load).

    Same is true for rate of calculation of adaption. The rate of adaption depends largely on the number of life forms, the life span, the frequency of generations, the environmental pressures of a given locality, the available means of expressing fitness, the possibility of non local reproduction(travelled); the complexity of the life form(size of the information), the expressed population of the genome, whether it’s RNA(adaptive) or DNA(error checking), asexual or sexual, and the number of points in the replication process that errors can insert, delete, and survive, and some factors we don’t clearly understand yet, that facilitate or inhibit those changes and rates of change.

    DNA(RNA) is a supercomputer that works at chemical rather than electrical velocity.

    There are say, 5m SNP’s (blocks, instructions) and that is not all that can change – in an individuals genome, and 100m active SNPs worldwide.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 12:26:00 UTC

  • IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATIONS, OPTIONS AND OUTCOMES People who want status or attentio

    IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATIONS, OPTIONS AND OUTCOMES

    People who want status or attention because they are rejected by the groups they work, live, or associate with, seek some sort of means of feeling they are winning – so they find a single lever (libertarianism, leftism, a philosophical frame, or a religion) and double down on it because it is their only means of obtaining some sense of success in the world through the expression of their preferences by dominance rather than by cooperation. This is an understandable human behavior. We cannot expect people to not negotiate or advance (or bully) for obtaining resources, status, cooperation, in a world where all three are scarce. … However, regardless of our preferences and wants we can argue for reciprocity or we can argue for irreciprocity. Or we can simply act irreciprocally by conquest if negotiation does not succeed, and separation is not possible. So one can argue in concert with the physical world or not. One can argue in concert with the social world or not. One can act in concert with the social world or not. But the reverse of each of those statements cannot be said, without one being a fool, a liar, and a thief – and thereby abandoning your sovereignty and entering into a condition of war where all morality is off the table. P is a method. That method defines reciprocity. And it states the limit of that reciprocity. And beyond that reciprocity there is no moral question – only war.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 10:25:00 UTC

  • RUSSIAN LANGUAGE LIKE MANY CANT FULLY TRANSLATE ENGLISH IDEAS (context: how prop

    RUSSIAN LANGUAGE LIKE MANY CANT FULLY TRANSLATE ENGLISH IDEAS

    (context: how propertarianism is difficult to translate because the anglo saxon conversion of family bias to commons bias and common ownership never occurred elsehwere.)

    —“Has Russia always been that way? Or did they have a “golden age” so to speak where either the language was different, the ideas were different, or both?”—Bradley Morgan

    Every language retains embellishments and scars, every literature and culture embellishments and scars, and every people’s self imiage retains embellishments and scars.

    Russia emerged into modernity behind the rest of christendom simply because (a) distance from the core of commerce, (b) missing out on early adaptation to returns on atlantic trade, the renaissance, the british empirical revolution, the reformation, the continental enlightenment, and (c) having the legacy of mongol conquest, and (d) a long history of serfdom – the boyars were far worse than european feudal lords, and nothing close to west germanic (anglo-scandianvian) free men. In other words, they were just more removed from the center of the european restoration after the exit of the semitic dark ages.

    And Russian Literature was and remains the high point of literature in Christendom. And it occurred partly – as did germany – in response to the terrors of france (napoleon’s conquests).

    There was nothing wrong with Russia that the first world war did not create. It had nowhere near the problems of say Italy. And was closest to following the german unification. Germany at the time included most of what we consider Poland. And german influence was across the entire holy roman empire other than France and Spain. Russia had used her new freedoms to replace the mongols and conquer all of Eurasia from the borders of eastern Europe to Canada, and if they hadn’t been stopped (wrongly) by the British they would have retaken Constantinople from the turks and reversed all the costs of the dark ages.

    The problems of Russia, like the problems of germay, liek the present problem in america, is the result of the jewish bolshevik seizure of power in the unstable period at the end of WW1.

    The Russian language is part of the slavic family of languages that is indeed indo european but went through a strange phonetic rotation, which I am not skilled enough to explain but was the result of moving the glottal sounds backward and then due to that cost, losing the soft vowels, leading to counter- intuitive pairs of consonants without interstitial vowels we expect in wester civilization.

    The structure of Russian language (a category iv language – meaning hard to learn) does not require word order organization like english, and still relies on many (many) suffixes that can be overwhelming.

    However, this means there is as great an art in manipulating the russian language to all softs of parallels and suggestions and subtle meanings as there is an art of doing the same with our huge english vocabulary. And much of russian humor is dependent upon those who are cunning with their language in this form.

    It is also very… beautiful … in that it’s still a heroic language, a language of people on the farm, who are dependent upon community, who will suffer anything and survive, and are very proud of their heroism of endurance

    .

    So this is why Russian literature and culture is ‘deep’

    Because it is deep.

    As deep as americans are shallow.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 18:52:00 UTC

  • CHINA’S FASCISM SHOWS ITS ENDS Chin’s Response to disaster vs America’s: This is

    CHINA’S FASCISM SHOWS ITS ENDS

    Chin’s Response to disaster vs America’s: This is the value of a Fascist State (Where fascist means Ethnonationalist, Authoritarian, State Capitalist, Mandatory Conformist.)

    And people prefer it.

    China demonstrated that Fascism won the 20th. Heterogeneous Immigration demonstrated that Democracy lost the 20th.

    — REGARDING THIS ARTICLE FROM CHINA—-

    Huoshenshan Hospital has been completed in #Wuhan on Sunday. Only 10 days to build. 4,000+ workers. 1000s of equipment. days and nights of work. 34,000-square-meter. 1000 beds available on Monday.

    —-END—

    —“Fascism isn’t state capitalist. it doesn’t take sides on economics, it applies pressure on markets as the situation demands. If you want to read anything about Fascist Economics, I’d recommend, The Economic Foundations of Fascism by Paul Enzig And Hitler’s Revolution by R. Tedor”– A ( Intelligent and Informed) Friend

    Hitler wasn’t the only fascist – he was just the last. So yes, the state:

    (a) prevents contra-autarkic arbitrage for profit and exploitation of state resources (the same thing);

    (b) biases production to commons by use of state financing;

    (c) overrides market incentives when needed.

    So we can fuss around with terms. But the bias in private capitalism is non interference in markets except by treating the state as just another customer, while state capitalism places higher priority on state as a customer than the market – particularly international market.

    —“A fascist wouldn’t consider the state as anything as reductive as a customer. Or anything of the sort. The state is the arbiter of the people, it IS the people. “All within the state, Nothing outside the State, Nothing against the State” the state comes before all else.”—Hauptgefreitersiege @Hauptgefreiter1

    This is a secular theological, or philosophical, rather than scientific or operational description. I understand the “strange’ continental obsession with restoring the theology of the church with some secular theology – from Rousseau to Kant to Marx to present – Europe is ‘stuck’.

    But this point of view is one of an anglo who descends from the minor aristocracy, and the puritanical, empirical, common law tradition. We can understand the continent but the continent cannot understand us. We escaped even secular theology – I just don’t know if it was good.

    Hugs brother. Thanks for letting me riff on your comment. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 11:14:00 UTC

  • “Where do you stand on imperialism?”— I stand as always on empirical evidence

    —-“Where do you stand on imperialism?”—

    I stand as always on empirical evidence and operational possibility.

    Depends on what we define as imperial. The holy roman empire or the han chinese empire, or the roman empire or the middle eastern empires?

    DIMENSION ONE – HOMOGENEITY VS HETEROGENEITY

    The holy roman (german continental) was homogenous; the chinese made theirs homogenous through slow forcible integration; the roman empire failed when insufficiently homogenous; the greek empire never could consilidate becasue it was heterogeneous; and the middle eastern empires were pretty totalitarian and continuously in termoil because they existed to resist heterogeneity.

    Now what about an empire of rule of law over teh english speaking or germanic speaking peoples? Well that is just a federation with a judge of last resort between that resolves differences between the princes (monarchs) of different poliites.

    What about an empire of rule by degree over a forcibly integrated and relatively homogenous empire of limited mobility like china? Well, that is just a way to manage primitive people by bureaucratic corporatism and corporate accountability(via positiva) rather than european sovereignty and rule of law (via negativa).

    What about the roman empire under roman law? Well, that is a way of suppressing parasitism and facilitating trade so that the upper classes can profit and the lower classes live better than they would otherwise.

    What about the middle eastern empires? Well that is little more than preventing any of the other tribes from rising up and profiting at the expense of the suppressed tribes.

    DIMENSION TWO – RULE VS REPLACEMENT

    Now, let’s ask about conquest and rule (europe); vs conquest, colonization and rule (africa); vs conquest, colonization, and integration; vs conquest, colonization and replacement? (Americas).

    DIMENSION THREE – INCENTIVES

    And whether you’re doing so in defense or for assets or for taxation and plunder.

    ANSWER

    We can make a table of what works and does’t work.

    ………….Homogenous —–Limited—-> Heterogeneous

    Rule

    |…………….Yes…………………..No………………..No

    |…………….Yes…………………..Yes……………….No

    |…………….N/A…………………..Yes……………….Yes

    v

    Replacement

    And we can make a simple statement out of incentives.

    Defense : Yes regardless

    Markets : Yes and integrate

    Assets:….Yes and only if you Rule

    Plunder:…No … only to raid to conquer. malincentives build.

    So that is my answer on Imperialism.

    Homogeneous populations only.

    Rule only in exchange for returns.

    Exploit only to further replacement.

    Conquest and Genocide are the most consequential and successful entrepreneurial ventures in human history.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 10:49:00 UTC

  • YES, RACE IS NOT THE PROBLEM TO SOLVE – IT IS THE ASSET TO MANAGE. (important) i

    YES, RACE IS NOT THE PROBLEM TO SOLVE – IT IS THE ASSET TO MANAGE.

    (important)

    it is very unlikely that race can be overcome for anyone who must live in proximity to blacks and hispanics and sees the consequences. It is true that good people are in every group, and that our tribes (races) can work together to common ends if we do not force one another into continuing the demonstrated failure of integration – particularly in business, schools, and neighborhoods – and let people continue to naturally sort into communities. We have common commercial intersts. We have common defense intersts. But we do not have common social (normative) interests because of the harsh reality of our substantial differences in genetics, temperament, ability, culture, and history.

    Instead, while differences in demand for commons is the cause of our conflict – race is not the cause of our conflict but the political order in which races and mixed peoples cooperate.

    The current organization of the polity by winner takes all, and the possibility of obtaining political power to interfere in one another’s communities that is the problem.

    So, yes, the problem can be overcome. But it can only be overcome by grasping where we have common and uncommon interests.

    You cannot change sexual, social, economic, political, and military differences between the races and subraces, nor can you change the kinship advantage to association, residency, economic and political cooperation with people of those intersets.

    Our military and our markets don’t care about our color.

    every other aspect of life does.

    Hence my solution depriving us of possibility of power over one another – and the ability to determine our futures independent of what others think, by sorting into groups that are heterogeneous or homogenous.

    I want desperately to live in a northern european homogenous polity – and I want others of my people to do inherit that which I have inherited.

    I know what will happen to every other known political order and I am happy if they want to do so – that does not mean it is good or will end up as anything other than a small number of wealthy elites surrounded by urban rings of poverty, favellas and ghettos. It won’t.

    But these are our choices to make.

    They are not others’ choices to make.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 10:24:00 UTC

  • POST “JOY DAY”: A RANT AGAINST OUR BRITISH KIN’S DECLINE INTO CONTINENTAL MARXIS

    POST “JOY DAY”: A RANT AGAINST OUR BRITISH KIN’S DECLINE INTO CONTINENTAL MARXIST SERFS

    (doh!) (ouch!)

    —“How would P be applied to the current monarch of the UK and her father in not keeping their subjects safe? ei well everything that has happened to the British and or ethnic English man in the last 80years.”—Joseph Williams

    First, P-constitution improves the american written constitution into a formal logic of our ancestral natural law, which is an improvement on the unwritten British constitution.

    Second, This constitution is entirely applicable to the UK as well as the US (or Canada, or Australia, or NZ). The only hard sell is getting Americans back on the monarchy train – although they’re getting closer at the moment. Washington turned it down unfortunately so we built an anti monarchical public mythos thats false. otherwise we would have just duplicated the British system.

    Third, if the monarch abandoned his or her duties to protect the people there is only one solution to that problem and only one solution we want – and that is the militia.

    Third, you British folks really piss me off with what I consider pretty stupid questions on this Monarchy. Why? You take the power away from the monarchy and then ask why it doesn’t protect you? You took away its power to protect you!

    (a) The British were wrong to contain Germany in both wars, (a Germany that stated repeatedly that Europe needed the British empire to survive) and paid the price for it with the loss of pretty much everything – including the status of reserve currency which made financing the empire possible. The people, beaten, turned (whimpering like pussies) to socialism like the germans rather than ‘manning up’ and keeping the empire as have the French and as did the Russians.

    (b) The monarchy was in the position because of this ‘socialism’ of being eradicated so has held on for dear life to survive the postwar period.

    (c) the english constitution(unwritten) is unlike the american (written), and the parliament has the ability (unlike the american) to alter the constitution. The parliament removed the ability of the monarchy to function as a judge of last resort and placed too much power in parliament – ending the long history of rule of law by traditional anglo saxon, germanic, proto germanic, western indo european law.

    (d) It’s not the monarchy’s fault, it’s the people’s fault – for not having the man-balls to protect the monarchy, and being too stupidly susceptible to marxist and french and jewish bullsh-t (false promise of freedom from physical and natural law) and full of their own arrogance that a parliament of the people without the constraint of rule of law, supreme court, and monarchy, could resist the attempt of the french to colonize Britain and drag her down with the rest of Europe.

    (e) so man up, saddle up, rally up, and

    … 1) get your constitution in written form

    … 2) limit the parliament to the constitutional constraints

    … 3) get your monarchy back in place as judge of last resort able to veto legislation, and dismiss parliaments that ever again act against the intersets of the people – people easily sold false promises – and to preserve the sovereignty that they have inherited from thousands of years of better men, and the prohibition on alienating themselves, the parliament, and the monarchy from those rights as a hierarchy of sovereigns.

    Man up. Show up. Fight to make your people great again. Otherwise the few of us Anglos on this side of the pond will have to come over there and teach you what the fuck a man is again. 😉

    We can reverse the catastrophe of the world wars and restore the benefits of the empire to our entire civilization, and all it’s defenses and values for all of us even if it’s only under the commonwealth.

    But we gotta man up like our ancestors to do it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 17:06:00 UTC

  • ORDINARY FLU DEATHS EACH YEAR ARE LIMITED (compiled) According to the World Heal

    ORDINARY FLU DEATHS EACH YEAR ARE LIMITED

    (compiled)

    According to the World Health Organization (WHO), flu globally attacks 5%–10% adults and 20%–30% children annually.

    According to the CDC, during the year when the influenza A (H3N2) viruses are prominent, death rates are typically more than double as compared to seasons when the influenza A (H1N1) or influenza B viruses dominate. This is because the influenza A (H3N2) virus is far more potent and contagious than the H1N1 influenza virus.

    Hospitalizations and flu season deaths occur mainly among the high-risk groups such as young children below the age of 5 years, the elderly above the age of 65 years, and those with chronic medical illnesses.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), experts say the flu season is in full swing with an estimated 4.6 million flu illnesses, 39,000 hospitalizations and 2,100 deaths from flu so far this season.

    The rate of outpatient visits for influenza-like illnesses (ILI) spiked in the week ending on Dec 21, from 3.9% to 5.1% — a trend typically seen during winter holidays. Rates of ILI have been above the national baseline of 2.4% for 7 weeks.

    Twenty-five states and the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and New York City reported high levels of ILI. Flu activity was described as widespread in 39 states.

    The CDC said hospitalization rates rose to 6.6 per 100,000 population, up from 5.5 per 100,000 population during the second week of December. The highest rate of hospitalization was among adults aged older than 65 (14.4 per 100,000 population), followed by children ages 0 to 4 (12.5 per 100,000 population) and adults ages 50 to 64 (7.0 per 100,000 population). All age groups have seen a significant increase in the last week.

    The CDC said hospitalization rates mirror previous seasons.

    Influenza A has been detected in 52.9% of hospitalized cases, and 46.4% were associated with influenza B.

    In testing at public health labs, influenza B accounts for 58.8% of positive flu samples collected from across the country, 98.7% of which are Victoria lineage. Influenza A was detected in 41.2% of specimens, with most of those (94.8%) subtyped as the H1N1 strain first seen in 2009.

    “Activity is being caused mostly by influenza B/Victoria viruses, which is unusual for this time of year. A(H1N1) viruses are the next most common and are increasing in proportion relative to other influenza viruses in some regions,” the CDC said.

    Three pediatric deaths were also recorded in the last week, raising the season’s total to 22. All three recent deaths were associated with influenza B viruses; only six deaths in total this season have been associated with influenza A.

    In the 2018-2019 flu season, the CDC confirmed 143 pediatric deaths.

    The CDC encouraged all who have not yet done so to receive a seasonal influenza vaccine, as the season is set to last for several more weeks.

    DEATHS DUE DO EPIDEMICS

    The world has seen five pandemics during the last century, which took a large number of lives. Here are the figures of deaths that occurred in the United States and Worldwide during those years.

    1. 1889 Russian Flu Pandemic – about 1 million flu deaths

    2. “Spanish flu” A of 1918-19 caused the highest number of influenza-related deaths: approximately 500,000 deaths occurred in the U.S. and 20 million worldwide. That figure is more than the total number of deaths caused by the World War one — 16 million. As a matter of fact, during that year, the flu had killed more people than any other illness in recorded history.

    3. “Asian flu” A of 1957-58 caused 70,000 deaths in the United States and about one million to two million deaths worldwide

    4. “Hong-Kong flu” A of 1968-69 resulted in 34,000 deaths in the United States and an estimated one million to three million people died worldwide.

    5. 2009 H1N1 Flu Pandemic – about 18,300 deaths in the United States and up to 203,000 deaths worldwide

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 11:35:00 UTC