Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE FUNCTION OF GODS Gods are just characters we use for kings, or pack leaders

    THE FUNCTION OF GODS

    Gods are just characters we use for kings, or pack leaders that circumvent the need for pack-leaders across families, clans, tribes, and nations, that allow us to express loyalty independent of family clan, tribe and nation. Religions are just a means of embodying rules of temporal and intergenerational behavior between families, clans, tribes, nations in ignorant, pre-literate, verbally transmitted form. False promise is a means of addicting us to following those rules despite our increase in powerlessness as the scale of our social and political orders increases – thereby alienating us. Judaism was and remains a means of constructing a mobile networked, organized crime family under the pretense of a religion. Islam is a means of constructing a universal army that conducts warfare against civilization by undermining from within and continuous raiding and attrition. Christianity was just a means of constructing a universal rebellion against civilization – but one that never managed to be able to govern because the military aristocracy and the enfranchisement of men in the military, and continuous warfare prevented it. Although were it not for the restoration of paganism via the vikings it’s not clear that we would have been able to resist islam or conduct the crusades. Christianity is just another untestifiable, unwarrantable, abrahamic false promise, to keep you ignorant and submissive and open to conquest by jews at the top and muslims at the bottom, and now, marxism, postmodernism, feminism use the same technique of false promise in the REAL world (future) instead of in the UNREAL world (after death).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 08:36:00 UTC

  • CHURCHIANITY VS CHRISTIANITY VS THE PHILOSOPHY OF JESUS. You now, I follow the r

    CHURCHIANITY VS CHRISTIANITY VS THE PHILOSOPHY OF JESUS.

    You now, I follow the religion of my ancestors (Excellence, heroism, sovereignty, and debts that are ‘true’) and the philosophy of Jesus (purchase of cooperation through exhaustion of love, forgiveness, charity), and the philosophy of my civilization (falsification by realism, naturalism, materialism, operationalism, empiricism, sovereignty-volition, reciprocity, and testimonial truth).

    I use the philosophy of Jesus, Aristotle, and our ancestors long lost to history (European Aryanism). I understand that those that lack agency need christianity in exclusivity (monopoly) even if the rest of us use different archetypes for different purposes given that we have more agency (markets).

    So it depends upon the portfolio of control you have over your life.

    Modern life would suggest that the monopoly of the abrahamic deceits is harmful. And that we can see jesus as a philosopher of the personal and social if not the material, economic, political, military, and strategic. This is why I will always and everywhere recommend Markets (our group strategy) and criticize christianity (monpoly), as harmful. We need many saints, demigods, or gods (role models), but each of us may or must, choose the hierarchy of those gods that we will spend most of our time imitating.

    I know who I use: Aristotle, Alexander, Caesar, Arthur, Jefferson and Hayek. And when

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 21:50:00 UTC

  • YOU MUST GIVE UP SENSE OF CONTROL TO OBTAIN CONTROL Impatience is not a virtue.

    YOU MUST GIVE UP SENSE OF CONTROL TO OBTAIN CONTROL

    Impatience is not a virtue.

    Seeking a simple clear solution is not a virtue.

    Seeking a feeling of control and a plan is not a virtue.

    The virtue is in seizing every possible opportunity.

    We now can blame ANTIFA for any violence that occurs.

    We can now organize a number of 2A rallies.

    We can add self determination to 2A rallies.

    We can add guns necessary to preserve our self determination.

    We can offer a compromise solution

    We can hold the moral high ground with that solution.

    And if they resist then we have both created the organization, the militia, the solution, the plan, and the moral high ground.

    I think sh-t thru. The only thing that screwed us up was C’vill catastrophe. it took us 30 months to recover from that screw up. We just recovered. Now we move forward.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 19:39:00 UTC

  • YOU ARE NOT IN CONTROL OF TERMS OF THE SOCIAL ORDER Libertarianism SUGGESTS to y

    YOU ARE NOT IN CONTROL OF TERMS OF THE SOCIAL ORDER

    Libertarianism SUGGESTS to you (falsely, by abrahamic false promise) that you are in control of the terms by which people will tolerate your existence (proximity, participation, survival) – you are not in control of it. They control it. Because the network of promises (habits norms etc) that they cooperate by are what they depend upon for survival, risk mitigation, consumption, comfort, and joy. You are only in control of which polity you choose to participate in on their terms.

    Now, this is a male attempt to adopt a female means of persuasion. But a female is intrinsically valuable and a man is not. So your participation isn’t desirable. In fact, the maximum female, minimum male participation is desirable.

    So no libertarianism is (a) an attempt to claim you have intrinsic value by threat of withdrawal from cooperation (b) except that if you don’t want to cooperate on the groups terms then we don’t want you, and frankly you’re not only dead weight but better off gone or d–d. Ans so if you don’t want to cooperate on those terms the question is why do we let you live?

    Worse, since aryan reciprocity and christian forgiveness are the optimum social economic political and strategic orders – and the only reason you can disagree with them is to parasitically live off the aryan-christian commons, then you are stuck with not only explaining why you should be tolerated, but why anyone living anywhere on earth should tolerate you.

    You don’t have to do anything except NOT impose costs upon others.

    (Again, (((They’re all cognitively Female))) so it makes perfect sense that they would develop libertarianism as if they were intrinsically valuable when they’re intrinsically parasitic.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 13:38:00 UTC

  • OUR PROGRESSIVES VS THE ENEMY’S “PROGRESSIVES” Christians (Europeans) Use “Love”

    OUR PROGRESSIVES VS THE ENEMY’S “PROGRESSIVES”

    Christians (Europeans) Use “Love”. That’s what ‘progressive’ meant. They continued the work of the church in secular prose. This allowed us to slowly decide if we could a given charity or not, and then ‘feel christian’ in that we had accomplished a good.

    But It was the ENEMY that used ‘Undermining”, divisiveness. Marxism to create a monopoly of power to undermine the classes. Postmodernism to create a monopoly of power by undermining truth, reason, and cooperation. Feminism to undermining the ‘Militia of Everyone’ and our militarized society where one could have respect regardless of class simply by doing his or her duty.

    Denialism to create a monopoly herd of conformity to the lowest common denominator. Feminism to create a female monopoly of power over men in order to destroy the compromise between the genders in the only society ever to give women freedoms.

    Behold europa, maker of heavens. Behold semitia, maker of hells.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-21 16:37:00 UTC

  • Sorry all. Mathiness, and mathematical fiction in physics is definitely a proble

    Sorry all. Mathiness, and mathematical fiction in physics is definitely a problem, and attention whoring among mathematical physicists by selling those fictions is ridiculous.

    But this is because they have no classical model (geometric) to explain their probabilism at the subatomic level. Even the most mathy idea – string theory – is likely very close to the explanation of how change moves through the underlying geometry – whatever it is.

    Electric universe theory is simply a material theory and therefore easier to grasp without the mathiness. That said, it’s absolutely positively pseudoscientific nonsense. Same for plasma.

    The reason all of these problems exist, whether mainstream mathy or fringe material, is that we simply haven’t figured out the underlying (and in my expectation, classical, structure of the universe at the sub-particle (wave) level.)

    There is an elegance to P because it operationalizes the psychological, social, political world of thought. But human action is at human scale. That elegance isn’t available to use in physics at the sub-particle level because we can’t yet operationalize it.

    So please don’t associate woo woo with my work because you RIGHTLY PREFER and TRUST a classical, geometric, material, operational description of reality instead of a mathy-probabalistic one. Realize this about YOURSELF and YOUR thought.

    Just because P solves a problem and mathy-physics doesn’t, doesn’t mean mathy physics is wrong. It means it’s incomplete – but yes, when it is complete, I don’t doubt it will be expressible in operational and material terms.

    Woo woo pseudoscience is what I say it is: nonsense.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 07:56:00 UTC

  • YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND TRUMP, DO YOU? You don’t really understand Trump at all do

    YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND TRUMP, DO YOU?

    You don’t really understand Trump at all do you?

    He says you aren’t worthy of respect. That you’re the deserving subject of ridicule.

    Your social and political weapon of influence is the female strategy of undermining from within: gossip, rallying, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, and false promise of freedom from the reality of universal competition.

    Trump turns that weapon against you.

    That’s what the alt right did. That’s what Trump did. They gave up the moral high ground and imitated you and your multitude of variations on the Alinsky method.

    Ridicule.

    The left’s Agenda is to avoid the content of the opposition’s argument (you have to, you’re wrong) and personalize and attack people one at a time. In this case it’s Trump. But he’s just the ‘general’ of our hierarchy, and we are, by our nature, hierarchical. You’re a herd and hate the hierarchy. But we love it.

    And we love him. Because we love that he shows you for what you are: Powerless if we simply don’t care what you think, feel, or want.

    We gave up on you. We gave up on hoping you would integrate into western civilization, the natural law our constitution was built upon, the third way that this country promised – a universal middle class – absent the either the priestly (you, media, public intellectuals, the academy), or aristocratic (financial, propertied) classes.

    And that is why, maybe this week, maybe next. We will have a civil war.

    Because Trump is right, and every geostrategist, every general in the world knows it, most heads of state know it: the european age is over; the last vestige of the british empire is over (american sea power); and the world is returning to historical norms, of a balance of powers between civilizations, each run by core states, and the USA alone is in a geographic position to survive the coming collapse of the patterns of world alliance, finance and trade that the British then the USA built up. And in ten years there will be no unified china, no unified europe, and shortly thereafter no unified Russia, and we will all fall into traditional civilizational patterns of trade, protected, by and financed by each civilization.

    Trump is ending the managed decline of western civilization and reorganizing the government for the future that has no choice but to come. And good luck finding a geostrategist that disagrees with me.

    And what did you do in your folly? You made it certain by vast underclass immigration, and indoctrination rather than education, that the USA will not survive the next decade either.

    And we will damn you for all history because of it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 16:37:00 UTC

  • THE PROBLEM OF THE ABSOLUTE NUCLEAR FAMILY (ANF) …(James Brittingham Says:) Un

    THE PROBLEM OF THE ABSOLUTE NUCLEAR FAMILY (ANF)

    …(James Brittingham Says:)

    Under the nuclear family individuals are asked to forgo the comfort, protection of large familiar networks, and women face the crucible of spending all day at home alone with infants, in order to pay our surplus production into a national, civilizational or global commons.

    Sorry but this is oppression.

    Mestizoes, Hassids, bourgeois Muslims, and the Amish all live much better than “legacy Americans”, and our interlopers can hardly be blamed for noticing this.

    …(Curt Doolittle Says:)

    Nuclear families in northern europe just meant that you needed to afford a home before having children.

    So houses were nearby and communities swapped children to help each other all the time. So the entire community was an extended family.

    But your criticism is correct. Extended families, particularly

    three generation families are optimum .

    To do that we must move capital to people not people to capital.

    …(Bill Joslin Says:)

    The break in the continuity of absolute nuclear families to their extended families results from urban planners and bankers in the 1920’s which closed the door on multifamily mortgages.

    The “anglo failure” of absolute nuclear families isn’t intrinsic to the the ANF familial strategy but rather due to an extension of the strategy that inadvertently created it in the first place: i.e. usurping intergenerational transfer of wealth for those below the upper middle class.

    The Anglo reaction to the influx in Irish and Italian migrants, both of which were accustomed to multigenerational homes, urban planners and banks removed the possibility of a multigenerational home.

    Urban planners via design and zoning permits (i.e. zoning rental buildings as “single family dwellings” and banks refusing mortgages issued that had more than a single nuclear family on the application. This prevented these migrants from pooling resources and labour to make a stake and establish themselves quickly to American life. It insured the municipalities and landlords capitalized on the new population growth. every generation would pay their rent and live separately as a result.

    Similarly, the church outlawing cousin marriages, a few centuries before, pertained to land and estate grabs by the church. inheritance that would be handed to the next generation now went to the church.

    In both cases the multigenerational home was dismantled in an effort to break them apart as single economic units in order to extract more wealth from them.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 10:19:00 UTC

  • You know what I learned in Ukraine that applies? 1. The minute they fire on you

    You know what I learned in Ukraine that applies?

    1. The minute they fire on you they lose – and teh whole american empire and it’s entire world ‘brand’ and influence collapses. You want them to fire on you. You just want to minimize losses even if you generate heroes whose names end up on monuments.

    2. Fire is more effective than firearms, and doesn’t need courage or risk to do it’s job, like the energizer bunny it keeps on going.

    3. It takes a few hundred men to fight – the rest of the crowd serves as human shields the government can’t act against.

    4. Occupying Govt Buildings is more effective than fighting

    5. Controlling roads in and out is more effective than defending buildings.

    6. A city is full of cars with tires that make berms, burn, and generate smoke, and gasoline for use as weaponry. Anything on fire makes dramatic photos and footage.

    7. The government runs on water pressure, electricity, gasoline, both of which are in short supply, and without which there is little command and control.

    8. Politicians, Bureaucrats, Military and Police are People Too – and have families they care for more than their jobs.

    9. If you make clear reasonable demands, people don’t imagine the worst possible out come, and have incentive to settle.

    10. Every single day you siege, you learn.

    All I want out of the next few ‘attempts’ is to learn from the opposition. Because all that’s going to happen going forward is a continuous stream of escalation.

    Antifa(Black Hats) and the Right(Red Hats) have the same enemy, and if we separate into blue cities and red territories, we have the same goals.

    The enemy is the state and financial sector.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 10:00:00 UTC

  • SYMMETRIES: THE ANNA KARENINA PRINCIPLE APPLIED TO CIVILIZATIONS (core) importan

    SYMMETRIES: THE ANNA KARENINA PRINCIPLE APPLIED TO CIVILIZATIONS

    (core) important

    —“It is possible to fail in many ways, while to succeed is possible only in one way; then, excess and defect are characteristic of vice, and the mean of virtue; For men are good in but one way, but bad in many.”— Aristotle

    —“This is a manifestation of a general principle stating that all good things (e.g. stability) are more fragile than bad things. It seems that in good situations a number of requirements must hold simultaneously, while to call a situation bad even one failure suffices.”—Vladimir Arnold (mathematics)

    —“All well-adapted systems are alike, all non-adapted systems experience maladaptation in their own way,… But in the chaos of maladaptation, there is an order.”— Alexander Gorban, Mathematics, Physics

    –“All domesticable animals are alike. All undomesticatable animals are different.”— Diamond, Guns Germs and Steel, Anthropology

    “They cannot be picky eaters; reach maturity quickly; willing to breed in captivity; docile by nature; cannot have a strong tendency to panic and flee; conform to a social hierarchy.”

    –“All happy families are the same, all unhappy families are different”– Tolstoy, Anna Karenina

    —“All high trust civilizations are the same. All less trusting civilizations are different” — Doolittle, “P”.

    A High Trust Civilization Must:

    1. Universal Militia (egalitarian, meritocracy, entrepreneurial warfare), 2. Heroism (truth before face, duty before self), 3. Sovereignty (reciprocity, rule of law, jury), 4. Markets in All Aspects of Life (cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities), 5. Excellence (competition, innovation, beauty). 6. Limiting the reproduction of the (dependent) underclasses.

    All Truthful Speech Must:

    1. Categorically, 2. Logically, 3. Operationally, 4. Empirically, 5. Rationally, and 6. Reciprocally consistent, 7. Fully Accounted, within 8. Stated Limits, 9. Restitutable within the means available, and 10. Warrantied as such.

    All Morality (Reciprocity) Must:

    1. Productive, 2. Fully Informed, 3. Warrantied, 4. Voluntary Transfer of demonstrated interests, 5. Free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated intersets of others, 6. whether body, kin, physical things, normative things, institutional things, cultural things, civilizational things.

    The Law Must

    1. State the via-negativa irreciprocity to resolve, or via-positiva opportunity for cooperation.

    2. State the intentions of the signatories

    3. State the operations (process of construction)

    4. State the limits

    5. State how it will terminate, and under what conditions it will terminate.

    6. State how it is constructed from reciprocity, including what prior acts it depends upon, and would falsify (invalidate) it as a consequence.

    7. State how it is warrantied by the signatories.

    8. State the signatories.

    THE MEANING OF SYMMETRIES

    A “symmetry” consists of a set of inputs, states, or outputs that must remain constant in order to maintain the survival (state) of a system regardless of transformation (change).

    In mathematics a Symmetry refers to an intrinsic property of a mathematical object which causes it to remain invariant under certain classes of transformations (such as rotation , reflection, inversion , or more abstract operations).

    There is no alternative to the symmetry in western civilization.

    It’s perfect.

    If we restore it.

    If not, only one thing must fail, for it to fail.

    UNDERSTAND THIS.

    Dimensions (sets of causality)

    Symmetry (necessity for equilibrium of the system)

    Only europe did this. Only Japan could have equalled us. Only china came close. Only india was otherwise on the path.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 08:43:00 UTC