Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • PRE AND POSTWAR EUROPE – AND THE WORLD ORDER THAT IS COMING BACK INTO NATURAL ST

    PRE AND POSTWAR EUROPE – AND THE WORLD ORDER THAT IS COMING BACK INTO NATURAL STATE

    –“Anglos were against germans”–

    I disagree entirely. America prewar was 50% ethnically german and the heartland still is. America was on the german side in both wars until it couldn’t afford to be. Before 1914, Germany (manufacturing) and England (navy, market) had the same economic interdependency as china(manufacturing) and America (navy, market).

    The British empire wanted, as America until Trump has wanted, to restore the balance of powers – including the Russians and the ottomans. Otherwise they would not have prohibited the Russian reconquest of Istanbul, or the restoration of the german empire post napoleonic conquest. This is the problem with ‘overdoing’ capitalism (middle class government): we seek profits and stability of profits because of the expansion of economic risk under middle class government, when we should always seek the natural self interest of the great powers, and only interfere once the outcome is far enough along that we can choose sides – as we did by going after the communists.

    I would argue that yes, the British were swayed to jewish extractive financialism instead of Christian profiting from domestication under white mans burden, after ending the prohibition on jews in the state, and the rise of Disraeli’s government. The British problem with Germany was that in response to napoleon’s terrors in Europe, Germany unified, and began to defend her (huge) continental interests.

    Had we sided with Germany the empires would all still exist and the world would not have experienced communism, the failure to Complete the colonial program of world-modernization, loss of european confidence in the european program post war, jewish undermining of european, British, and american civilization post war, the immigration crisis that has almost achieved jewish cosmopolitan ends, and the coming civil war – and islam could have been transformed, because tribal boundaries would have been possible to install.

    The mistake was our misunderstanding of the heart of german civilization being in the north and particularly Prussian – but the french post-war wanted to ‘de-Prussify’ Germany by manipulating american morality (we’re wrong), and making it possible for France to conquer and rule the continent (as they are trying to do with the EU).

    Unfortunately, France chose more socialism and agrarianism than Germany, and Germany chose her traditional excellence in manufacturing, so between the german mark and german industry and german education and german culture, Germany economically rules by demonstrated superiority …. until …. there is a decline in auto sales … and germans revolt at a loss of (everything) and she re-asserts herself in defense, and they are stuck with France having confidence and the will to rule Europe, and Germans needing to restore their will to rule themselves and Europe.

    Yet it is France that maintains colonies in Africa, and is the origin of Jewish intellectual influence, and Muslim immigration and invasion into Europe.

    France has always been the enemy of Europe since she was more latinized and retained imperial ambitions and catholic church dominance, including her long standing attempt to relocate the papacy to France.

    It’s the Germanics that have tried to complete the transition back to SOVEREIGNTY while France continues the jewish christian (catholic) pursuit of monopoly authority.

    The countryside may be germanic. but France is Paris, and Paris might as well be Constantinople trying to conquer the western empire.

    Russia is, as I had hoped, taking over her natural position as the leader in the middle eastern sphere of influence.

    France is, as I had warned, still attempting her conquest of Europe and the destruction of germanic civilization – out of overconfidence and arrogance (both unwarranted).

    Germany is still indoctrinated by what they call their (special history) except they were in the right and need a generation to unlearn blaming themselves for what was a french, anglo, and Russian attack on their attempt to unify the germanic peoples and the lands which germanic excellence had influenced.

    If Germany gains independence and restores herself, then the slavic and baltic peoples will strategically, economically, align with them.

    The Anglosphere has time to unify again, draw ‘the rest’ of Canada into it’s sphere, and prevent the conquest of Australia by Chinese interests, thereby creating *enough* of a population to not be the victim of a hostile china, a powerful Russia-Islam, an islam, and a hostile french conquest of Europe.

    The balkans are screwed until the Russians or united eastern european Intermarium can save them by completing the removal of islam from old europe as thoroughly as the spanish have from iberia.

    These are not simple moral choices. They are choices necessary for western survival.

    All of this is made possible (a) by Brexit and (b) by american Red-Exit … or re-conquest. The latter I hope we will begin this year.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 09:23:00 UTC

  • A SIMPLE PRESCRIPTION FOR A POLITICAL SOLUTION Whether libertarian, conservative

    A SIMPLE PRESCRIPTION FOR A POLITICAL SOLUTION

    Whether libertarian, conservative, right, or hard right you should follow me even if you don’t always get what I’m on about. Traditionalists and Christians too – just grit your teeth when I go all ‘Yes, Christianity but no to Abrahamic Theology’. ‘Cause together we will win. 😉

    The American Revolution for Independence from the crown had less support than the conservatives currently do – even those conservatives that are willing to fight. The only thing preventing conservatives from acting is a prescription for a solution that is possible to implement.

    So, end the presidency; house of representatives; restore appointment to the senate by each state legislature; convert the (blue) liberal immigrant cities to states; articulate the 10th demarcating federal and state powers; all but military, treasury, benefits revert to states.

    The Senate can hire a cabinet. States can be formed with 300k population; and any group anywhere can secede and re-associate at the county, district, and neighborhood level taking their debts with them. And the federal courts can mediate conflicts across borders.

    This restores the original intent of the constitution which is a continental military and trade organization, and treasury and insurer of last resort, with norms, policy, and laws serving the interests of polites as the british empire; a weak federal government as was the church.

    This restores the european pattern of history as a competing network of states producing various commons suitable to their demographics; reduces power distance in producing those commons; allows people to migrate to or prevent migration to social and political order of preference.

    The rest is the explicit statement that the constitution is a description of the natural law sovereignty and reciprocity; the terms by which the law is conducted; and detail of the law that enumerates the powers, and processes.

    This rough solution solves the problem of preserving the value of scale of both traditional european weak federal unity providing monetary, economic, and military security while allowing the separation of traditional peoples from immigrant and urban peoples.

    I have not addressed the most important reformation of the Monetary, Treasury, banking, financial, consumer credit, and debt sectors which will be the greatest reallocation of economic advantage in centuries – and the opposite of marxist folly. That’s for elsewhere.

    -cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 11:37:00 UTC

  • CAN YOU EXPLAIN EPRIME TO A NEWBIE? —“Curt Doolittle, Can you help explain e p

    http://www.nobeliefs.com/eprime.htmCURT CAN YOU EXPLAIN EPRIME TO A NEWBIE?

    —“Curt Doolittle, Can you help explain e prime for a newbie? (E prime is a the language taught in Propertarian circles – to reduce every statement down to an operational level – to test it for truth.)”—Rae Liera

    I don’t think it’s that hard:

    E-PRIME

    E-Prime (short for English-Prime or English Prime, sometimes denoted É or E′) is a version of the English language that excludes all forms of the verb to be, including all conjugations, contractions and archaic forms. Some scholars advocate using E-Prime as a device to clarify thinking and strengthen writing.

    PRETENSE OF KNOWLEDGE

    Kellogg and Bourland describe misuse of the verb to be as creating a “deity mode of speech”, allowing “even the most ignorant to transform their opinions magically into god-like pronouncements on the nature of things”. Use of E-Prime reduces the possibility of deception, suggestion, misunderstanding or conflict.

    Korzybski observed improvement “of one full letter grade” by “students who did not generalize by using that infinitive”. In other words, you will dramatically improve your own understanding and ability to communicate by writing in eprime.

    PROPERTARIAN CONTEXT

    So, P uses Disambiguation by serialization and operationaliztion, and ePrime, written in complete sentences (transactions), where complete sentences or sets of sentences (full accounting) describe changes in state of demonstrated interests (investments). This produces a value neutral financial or economic language of psychology, ethics, sociology, and politics. It is also, like accounting, very difficult to ‘fudge’ (lie).

    DIFFERENT FUNCTIONS OF THE VERB TO-BE

    In the English language, the verb ‘to be’ (also known as the copula) has several distinct functions, all of which are reducible to “testimony on the terms of existence”.

    1. identity, of the form “noun copula definite-noun” [The cat is my only pet]; [The cat is Garfield]

    2. class membership, of the form “definite-noun copula noun” [Garfield is a cat]

    3. class inclusion, of the form “noun copula noun” [A cat is an animal]

    4. predication, of the form “noun copula adjective” [The cat is furry]

    5. auxiliary, of the form “noun copula verb” [The cat is sleeping]; [The cat is being bitten by the dog]. The examples illustrate two different uses of ‘be’ as an auxiliary. In the first, ‘be’ is part of the progressive aspect, used with “-ing” on the verb; in the second, it is part of the passive, as indicated by the perfect participle of a transitive verb.

    6. existence, of the form “there copula noun” [There is a cat]

    location, of the form “noun copula place-phrase” [The cat is on the mat]; [The cat is here]

    Bourland sees specifically the “identity” and “predication” functions as pernicious, but advocates eliminating all forms for the sake of simplicity. In the case of the “existence” form (and less idiomatically, the “location” form), one might (for example) simply substitute the verb “exists”. Other copula-substitutes in English include taste, feel, smell, sound, grow, remain, stay, and turn, among others a user of E-prime might use instead of to be.

    Examples

    Words not used in E-prime include: be, being, been, am, is, isn’t, are, aren’t, was, wasn’t, were, and weren’t.

    Contractions formed from a pronoun and a form of to be are also not used, including: I’m, you’re, we’re, they’re, he’s, she’s, it’s, there’s, here’s, where’s, how’s, what’s, who’s, and that’s. E-Prime also prohibits contractions of to be found in nonstandard dialects of English, such as “ain’t”.

    GENERAL SEMANTICS

    General semantics was a self improvement movement that (roughly) suggested that if you improve the use of your language so that it is more correspondent to reality (or something at least) that you will train yourself (similar to stoic rituals in list making) to have greater understanding and mindfulness of the world.

    I would state this differently in that P logic using the above techniques seeks to create a value neutral standard of weights and measures by which we interpret the world, that is the most parsimonious system of weights and measure that is possible – and – is most correspondent consistent and coherent with the world. (this is the aristotelian project).

    P IS THE OPPOSITE OF POSTMODERNISM

    The opposite proposition of P is that of Theology, Postmodernism, and Generative Anthropology, all of which attempt social construction that is non-correspondent, inconsistent, non-coherent with reality in order to use deception to coerce people into submission to some narrative of desirable or undesirable deceit.

    In other words, there is leftist postmodernism (social construction) and rightist postmodernism (social construction) and both are means of deceit in order to compensate for lack of military and economic power. In other words, this is the purvey of pseudoscientists, financialists, mystics and priests: deception.

    And yes, I realize, people have a hard time with reality and want comforting deceits. But there are three other choices: physical ritual, buddhist and stoic-epicurean self discipline (emotional), and the scientific truth (intellectual). All three produce mindfulness without ‘the big lies of social constructions.’

    ORIGINS OF EPRIME

    D. David Bourland Jr., studied under Alfred Korzybski, and devised E-Prime as an addition to Korzybski’s general semantics in the late 1940s.

    BOOKS

    Bourland published the concept in a 1965 essay entitled “A Linguistic Note: Writing in E-Prime”

    Bourland collected and published three volumes of essays in support of his innovation.

    – To Be or Not: An E-Prime Anthology (1991)

    – More E-Prime: To Be or Not II (1994)

    – E-Prime III: a third anthology, published (1997).

    LINKS TO PAPERS ONLINE

    https://web.archive.org/web/20130204204954/http://www.generalsemantics.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/articles/etc/46-3-bourland.pdf

    http://www.generalsemantics.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/articles/etc/44-2-kellogg.pdf

    http://www.hilgart.org/papers_html/091S196.B07.html

    http://www.nobeliefs.com/eprime.htm

    http://www.textjournal.com.au/april16/frazer.htm

    https://web.archive.org/web/20061221093237/http://learn-gs.org/library/elaine-eprime.htm

    ( FYI: @[655376421:2048:Bill Joslin] @[11019687:2048:Brandon Hayes] )Updated Jan 31, 2020, 9:14 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 08:59:00 UTC

  • CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERNCES IN SUPREMACY Its easy to be a European Supremacist on

    CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERNCES IN SUPREMACY

    Its easy to be a European Supremacist on the evidence – but european supremacy is due to thousands of years of the european group strategy of entrepreneurial warfare, heroism, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, rule of law, jury, tripartism, and the commons of markets, reason, empiricism, science, medicine, technology, history, literature, and arts that results from it. But Superiority among europeans has taught us that trying to domesticate others directly doesn’t work. We can only do it by export. Our cost of conquest and rule is too high. (Even if conquest and eradication isn’t)

    Superiority among Ashkenazi hasn’t taught them much at all – hence the lack of heroism, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, rule of law, jury, tripartism, and all the commons that result from it. Instead we have the Abrahamic method of false promise, baiting into hazard, justified by pilpul defended by critique and GSRRM, unwarrantied, and obfuscated by claims of plausible deniability under the claim of the victim’s volition, and the worlds most harmful lies created using that Abrahamic method of deceit: judaism, christianity, and islam in the ancient world, and marxism, cultural marxism, feminism, postmodernism, political correctness, propaganda, and financialism and denialism in the modern world.

    However, history has a long record of Chinese supremacy in no small part because of the luxury of their fertile river valleys and geographic isolation, by mountains, desert, arctic, and oceans, and relatively homogeneous genetics prohibiting the conflicts of un-isolated fertile crescent peoples. They were able to organize and create a bureaucracy early, and continuously progress – albeit much more slowly that the west. And they are demonstrating once again that national and civilizational self interest will defeat semitic religious monopoly universalism, and european market universalism.

    The future is determined by whether the anglosphere can re-unite, and the indians, chinese, are successful in reversing islamic conquest, and the europeans, north and south americans and africans prevent it.

    China is a fascist (nationalist) state and it has set the tempo for the 21st and 22nd centuries because it is the most competitive strategy a political order can adopt – and none can defeat that strategy over time.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 08:33:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83835053_195657848499043_25885891459

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83835053_195657848499043_2588589145920110592_o_195657838499044.jpg On Spirituality (Try to grok it)

    Hmm. Spirituality isn’t magic. Nor is love, nor Consciousness. These are biological processes that serve biological functions, for evolutionary reasons. The “Church” Fireside feast experience is necessary in post-

    tribal world but false religion is a drug that isn’t good for you.

    So, yes science can explain spirituality, but that explanation differs from the experience just as the science of colors differs from the experience of colors. We evolved a biological demand for ‘mindfulness’ across a spectrum of conditions. The question is how we satisfy demand.

    An historical religion, a dramatic religion, even a mythical religion where we pay the same debts to the past satisfy demand. But just as heroin is a substitute for sexual addiction to a partner, theological religion is a

    substitute for addiction to the polity – to very bad ends.

    And I use that analogy for very specific reasons. Because that is the closest analogy. Membership, Friendship, Joh, Sex, Love, Spirituality, Mindfulness, are causally related. 50 how can we produce mindfulness in all those conditions without the externalities of false religions?

    And conversely, why did the christians resist, suppress, and violently eradicate the joyous religion of the ancient world, and the secular evolution of philosophy (libertarian), stoicism (masculine), epicureanism(feminine) – to drag everyone like islam to equality at the bottom.On Spirituality (Try to grok it)

    Hmm. Spirituality isn’t magic. Nor is love, nor Consciousness. These are biological processes that serve biological functions, for evolutionary reasons. The “Church” Fireside feast experience is necessary in post-

    tribal world but false religion is a drug that isn’t good for you.

    So, yes science can explain spirituality, but that explanation differs from the experience just as the science of colors differs from the experience of colors. We evolved a biological demand for ‘mindfulness’ across a spectrum of conditions. The question is how we satisfy demand.

    An historical religion, a dramatic religion, even a mythical religion where we pay the same debts to the past satisfy demand. But just as heroin is a substitute for sexual addiction to a partner, theological religion is a

    substitute for addiction to the polity – to very bad ends.

    And I use that analogy for very specific reasons. Because that is the closest analogy. Membership, Friendship, Joh, Sex, Love, Spirituality, Mindfulness, are causally related. 50 how can we produce mindfulness in all those conditions without the externalities of false religions?

    And conversely, why did the christians resist, suppress, and violently eradicate the joyous religion of the ancient world, and the secular evolution of philosophy (libertarian), stoicism (masculine), epicureanism(feminine) – to drag everyone like islam to equality at the bottom.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 06:36:00 UTC

  • FIRST STEP IN LEARNING THE PROPERTARIAN METHOD This is one of those surprisingly

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copula_(linguistics)THE FIRST STEP IN LEARNING THE PROPERTARIAN METHOD

    This is one of those surprisingly difficult concepts.

    We avoid the verb to be in operational language becuase it allows you the pretense of knowledge (promising what you can’t promise) without articulating a causal relationship. The simple example being the difference between ‘the book is on the table’ and ‘I promise i recall seeing a book on the table in the hallway’ or ‘I promise i see a book on the table and if you observe the table in the hall you will see a book on it also.” While this is a simple example, this operationalizing of language into testimonial speech makes almost all sophistry and deceit impossible to construct (really). In fact, most sophomoric philosophically ‘profound’ questions cannot be constructed in operational and testimonial terms.

    If you want to know more, spend thirty minutes reading four wiki articles:

    THE COPULA (VERB TO BE)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copula_(linguistics)

    EPRIME (ELIMINATING THE COPULA)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-Prime

    PERFORMATIVE (EXISTENTIAL) TRUTH

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#Performative

    (then read the rest of the article)

    OPERATIONALISM

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/operationalism

    FALSIFIABILITY

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability#Falsificationism

    By the use of performative statements, in ePrime, in Operational Vocabulary, we can falsify almost any claim to knowledge, understanding, consistency, coherence, and truth claims simply by the fact that it is almost impossible to state a falsehood in such gramamtical constraints, just as it is almost impossible to make well formed mathematical or programming statements in the grammatical constraints of mathematics in programming.

    DISAMBIGUATION BY SERIALIZATION AND OPERATIONALISM

    Most of P-Logic invovles learning how to disambiguate at term by creating an ordered list of terms (serialization) restating them in operational language, and adjusting their definitions so that they are each unique in meaning, yet represent a point on the spectrum of whatever constant relation you are making use of.

    THis is the first step in learning propertarian methods.Updated Jan 30, 2020, 12:36 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 12:36:00 UTC

  • TRI-PARTISM AND THE TRI-FUNCTIONAL HYPOTHESIS OF OUR NATURAL GODS, AND OUR NATUR

    TRI-PARTISM AND THE TRI-FUNCTIONAL HYPOTHESIS OF OUR NATURAL GODS, AND OUR NATURAL RELIGION

    (mandatory understanding on IE origins of Market Gods) (compare with the Monopoly of semitic underclass gods)

    The Trifunctional Hypothesis of prehistoric Proto-Indo-European society postulates a tripartite ideology (“idéologie tripartite”) reflected in the existence of three classes or castes—priests, warriors, and commoners (farmers or tradesmen)—corresponding to the three functions of the sacral, the martial and the economic, respectively.

    The trifunctional thesis is primarily associated with the French mythographer Georges Dumézil, who proposed it in 1929 in the book Flamen-Brahman, and later in Mitra-Varuna.

    According to Dumézil (1898–1986), Proto-Indo-European society comprised three main groups corresponding to three distinct functions:

    1. Sovereignty, which fell into two distinct and complementary sub-parts:

    … 1.1 one formal, juridical and priestly but worldly;

    … 1.2 the other powerful, unpredictable, and also priestly but rooted in the supernatural world.

    2. Military, connected with force, the military and war.

    3. Productivity, herding, farming and crafts; ruled by the other two.

    In the Proto-Indo-European mythology each social group had its own god or family of gods to represent it and the function of the god or gods matched the function of the group. Many such divisions occur in the history of Indo-European societies:

    Southern Russia: Bernard Sergent associates the Indo-European language family with certain archaeological cultures in Southern Russia and reconstructs an Indo-European religion based upon the tripartite functions.

    Early Germanic society: The supposed division between the king, nobility and regular freemen in early Germanic society.

    Norse mythology: Odin (sovereignty), Týr (law and justice), the Vanir (fertility). Odin is assigned one of the core functions in the Indo-European pantheon as a representative of the first function (sovereignty) corresponding to the Hindu Varuṇa (fury and magic) as opposed to Týr, who corresponds to the Hindu Mitrá (law and justice); while the Vanir represent the third function (fertility). Odin has been also been interpreted as a death-god (“Psychopomp”: transporting us to the afterlife) and connected to cremations, and has also been associated with ecstatic practices.

    Classic Greece: The three divisions of the ideal society as described by Socrates in Plato’s The Republic. Bernard Sergent examined the trifunctional hypothesis in Greek epic, lyric and dramatic poetry.

    India: The three Hindu castes, the Brahmins or priests; the Kshatriya, the warriors and military; and the Vaishya, the agriculturalists, cattle rearers and traders. The Shudra, a fourth Indian caste, is a peasant or serf. A 2001 study found that the genetic affinity of Indians to Europeans is proportionate to caste rank, the upper castes being most similar to Europeans whereas lower castes are more like Asians. The researchers believe that the Indo-European speakers entered India from the Northwest, mixing with or displacing proto-Dravidian speakers, and may have established a caste system with themselves primarily in higher castes.

    TRIPLE (TRIPARTITE) DIETIES

    A triple deity (sometimes referred to as threefold, tripled, triplicate, tripartite, triune or triadic, or as a trinity) is three deities that are worshipped as one. Such deities are common throughout world mythology; the number three has a long history of mythical associations. Carl Jung considered the arrangement of deities into triplets an archetype in the history of religion.

    In classical religious iconography or mythological art, three separate beings may represent either a triad who always appear as a group (Greek Moirai, Charites, Erinyes; Norse Norns; or the Irish Morrígan) or a single deity known from literary sources as having three aspects (Greek Hecate, Roman Diana).

    THE INDO EUROPEAN ORIGINS OF TRIPARTISM, TRIFUNCTIONALISM, TRIPLE GODS, AND TERNARY LOGIC

    Georges Dumézil’s trifunctional hypothesis proposed that ancient Indo-European society conceived itself as structured around three activities: worship, war, and toil. In later times, when slave labor became common, the three functions came to be seen as separate “classes”, represented each by its own god. Dumézil understood this mythology as reflecting and validating social structures in its content: such a tripartite class system is found in ancient Indian, Iranian, Greek and Celtic texts. In 1970, Dumézil proposed that some goddesses represented these three qualities as different aspects or epithets and identified examples in his interpretation of various deities including the Iranian Anāhitā, the Vedic Sarasvatī and the Roman Juno.

    Vesna Petreska posits that myths including trinities of female mythical beings from Central and Eastern European cultures may be evidence for an Indo-European belief in trimutive female “spinners” of destiny. But according to the linguist M. L. West, various female deities and mythological figures in Europe show the influence of pre-Indo-European goddess-worship, and triple female fate divinities, typically “spinners” of destiny, are attested all over Europe and in Bronze Age Anatolia.

    POST BRONZE AGE COLLAPSE CULTURES

    Ancient Celtic cultures

    The Matres or Matronae are usually represented as a group of three but sometimes with as many as 27 (3 × 3 × 3) inscriptions. They were associated with motherhood and fertility. Inscriptions to these deities have been found in Gaul, Spain, Italy, the Rhineland and Britain, as their worship was carried by Roman soldiery dating from the mid 1st century to the 3rd century AD.[24] Miranda Green observes that “triplism” reflects a way of “expressing the divine rather than presentation of specific god-types. Triads or triple beings are ubiquitous in the Welsh and Irish mythic imagery” (she gives examples including the Irish battle-furies, Macha, and Brigit). “The religious iconographic repertoire of Gaul and Britain during the Roman period includes a wide range of triple forms: the most common triadic depiction is that of the triple mother goddess” (she lists numerous examples).[25]

    In the case of the Irish Brigid it can be ambiguous whether she is a single goddess or three sisters, all named Brigid.[26] The Morrígan also appears sometimes as one being, and at other times as three sisters,[27][28][29][30] as do the three Irish goddesses of sovereignty, Ériu, Fódla and Banba.[31]

    Hinduism

    In Hinduism, the supreme divinity Para Brahman can take the form of the Trimurti, in which the cosmic functions of creation, preservation, and destruction of the universe are performed by the three deities of Brahma (the creator), Vishnu (the preserver), and Shiva (the destroyer), who are at the same time three forms of the one Para Brahman.[32] The divine being Dattatreya is a representation of all three of these deities incarnated as a single being.[33]

    Christianity (the trinity)

    Christians profess “one God in three divine persons” (God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost). This is not to be understood as a belief in (or worship of) three Gods, nor as a belief that there are three subjectively-perceived “aspects” in one God, both of which the Catholic Church condemns as heresy. The Catholic Church also rejects the notions that God is “composed” of its three persons and that “God” is a genus containing the three persons.

    The Gnostic text Trimorphic Protennoia presents a threefold discourse of the three forms of Divine Thought: the Father, the Son, and the Mother (Sophia).

    Many Christian saints, especially martyrs, are trios who share a feast day or other remembrance. (See Category:Saints trios.) Whether they are subject to actual veneration and prayed to for supernatural aid, or simply honored, varies by Christian denomination.

    ESTATES OF THE REALM

    A 13th-century French representation of the tripartite social order of the Middle Ages – Oratores (“those who pray”), Bellatores (“those who fight”), and Laboratores (“those who work”).

    The estates of the realm, or three estates, were the broad orders of social hierarchy used in Christendom (Christian Europe) from the medieval period to early modern Europe. Different systems for dividing society members into estates developed and evolved over time.

    The best known system is the French Ancien Régime (Old Regime), a three-estate system used until the French Revolution (1789–1799). Monarchy was for the king and the queen and this system was made up of clergy (the First Estate), nobles (the Second Estate), and peasants and bourgeoisie (the Third Estate). In some regions, notably Scandinavia and Russia, burghers (the urban merchant class) and rural commoners were split into separate estates, creating a four-estate system with rural commoners ranking the lowest as the Fourth Estate. Furthermore, the non-landowning poor could be left outside the estates, leaving them without political rights. In England, a two-estate system evolved that combined nobility and clergy into one lordly estate with “commons” as the second estate. This system produced the two houses of parliament, the House of Commons and the House of Lords. In southern Germany, a three-estate system of nobility (princes and high clergy), knights, and burghers was used. In Scotland, the Three Estates were the Clergy (First Estate), Nobility (Second Estate), and Shire Commissioners, or “burghers” (Third Estate), representing the bourgeois, middle class, and lower class. The Estates made up a Scottish Parliament.

    TRIPARTISM (COOPERATIONISM, MARKETS) IN PROPERTARIANISM

    In P we begin with the three means of coercion: Force-Defense, Remuneration-Deprivation, and Inclusion-Undermining (ostracization) in a market preserved by the judiciary. We argue that the three classes developed three ‘market competitions’ for elites; martial-judicial, priestly-educational, and productive-labor and trade. These three sets of elites we recognize as Conservative-Capitalizing (force), Progressive-consuming(Undermining), and Libertarian-Productive (Trade).

    In P we restore the “cooperation between the compatible but unequal classes”: The Monarchy as judge of last resort, The Judiciary as preservation of sovereignty, the Senate (nobility) as territorial (tribal) interests, the Upper House as the Commercial Interests, and the Lower House as Family and Labor Interests.

    Under this interpretation, christianity is migrating to its natural place as the feminine (forgiveness, love), while we are restoring our traditional gods as we try to restore our civlization after the abrahamic dark ages of death and decline.

    LEARN MORE

    This info is collected from wikipedia, but read Dumezil or at least the spartk notes version. 😉 If you undestand Dumizel’s description of, Campbell’s Monomyth, and the nordic myths you can begin to reconstruct our natural religions in both northern second generation and southern european first generation forms.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 11:36:00 UTC

  • CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN STRATEGY AND CONFLICT (very important) (summary) (

    CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN STRATEGY AND CONFLICT

    (very important) (summary)

    (Warning: This is the most important subject of our age, but it might trigger (offend) you so please move on if having your sacred cows slaughtered by science is unacceptable.)

    Pre-marine-trade Europeans like all other peoples didn’t have writing – few people did. Writing requires the evolution of debt-trade and taxation. The population density of territorial regions, the rate of production of territorial areas, and the cost of political control, all inhibit it, which is why the river valleys and the coasts developed writing.

    The europeans like all people, had oral history. Although it is most interesting that the europeans seem to have invented history as we understand it. The Atlantics, the Mediterraneans, the indo europeans, the beaker people, the Germanics, and certainly the Celts had oral history and had an industry for training their priesthood.

    The jews had history, and didn’t write it down, because of the prestige of memorizing it (just like europeans), and only wrote it down under advice, question, or command of the greeks. Like the dictionary froze english spelling, writing froze jewish, then christian, then islamic dogma. This isn’t the same for european, Indian, or Chines thought which was advice (wisdom literature) not command (authoritarian literature).

    Besides the universal lying and face before truth of the semitic tribal peoples, and this authoritarian literature, the middle east developed jewish pilpul and critique (lying) and muslim recitation and stagnation (avoidance of adaptation).

    The Chinese pursued harmony of their wisdom literature which limited their adaptation, and they followed sun tzu in war by delay and deceit, and their culture followed.

    The Iranic branch in India (Hindus) could not (as is happening to Americans) rule such a vast population of lower classes, and so chose a corporeal organization of class roles – a military organization familiar to the iranics, replicating the class structure of warriors, priests, and workers, each with different responsibilities.

    The Chinese had chosen hierarchical family, and europeans had chosen a hierarchical military.

    The Jewish-Palestinian-Arab semites chose universal resistance to all forms of aristocracy including the Egyptian by the adoption of universal slave resistance as a strategy.

    This failure to produce a durable military still plagues the jewish- Palestinian and less so Arab (raiding) peoples today. The jews in particular because they have neither the ethical tradition of land holders (and cant hold land) nor the ethical tradition of a working class (who fight) or an ethical tradition of a market between the elites. Which is why we wanted to move all jews to Israel, making a Netherlands of the middle east that may drag the primitive peoples out of authoritarian monopoly slave-resistance into market modernity – AND insulate us from jewish and muslim undermining at the same time.

    The Chinese strategy of course is to eradicate islam by incremental domestication of the muslim people and prohibiting entry of the jewish people. There is no force in Asia that can compete with Chinese domestication of other peoples. They have been doing it for thousands of years.

    The Europeans, having conquered the continent by military and technological means, had the pressure of a small population using maneuver, adaptation, technology, and a universal voluntary and therefore entrepreneurial military to produce a hierarchy – and produced as a consequence an entrepreneurial wisdom literature of markets including technology(science), law, philosophy, theology that competed with one another under their only immutable strategy – the sovereignty of the entrepreneurial warrior.

    Europeans maneuver, adapt, and invent with small number , Chinese resist and defeat by delay and deceive using numbers, semites deceive seduce with false promise and undermine and weaken – and the muslims consume and destroy, and Indians ignore because they are unconquerable by other than a cancer like islam – and get temporarily conquered by every passing malcontent even if they have the most beautiful of cultures and religions for the average person (except for the filth and irresponsibility for the commons).

    So as usual, when comparing civilizations we don’t disambiguate the truth-telling-empirical races, from the delay and deceive races, from the lying races – which is the entire purpose of my work.

    Ending abrahamic method of lying by jewish, christian, muslim generation-one theology, and marxism, cultural marxism, postmodern, feminism, denialism, by abrahamic generation-two pseudoscience and sophism.

    Because lying – especially baiting into hazard and undermining, are (empirically) easier and more profitable, as we can see from financial, insurance, gambling, advertising, media, entertainment, pornography, ad education – all of which allow undermining host peoples by false promise, absent warranty, under claims of plausible deniability of innocence.

    Which is where the Ashkenazi Jews have specialized: in every single form of profiting by false promise, baiting into hazard, – because that is the group strategy, just like every other group strategy I’ve mentioned above.

    And this is why the Ashkenazi were the most literate people in Europe but contributed absolutely nothing to thought, politics, law, technology, medicine, science, or arts until baited into the franchise in exchange for adopting european Aristotelian if not christian ethics – and failed.

    And its why they were kicked out of Egypt and every other host civilization; why they lost their territory and were dispersed, and why they have been systematically removed from every host population once they become intolerable by achieving critical mass of influence on the people and can no longer deny their strategy.

    This is the scientific basis of the conflict of civilizations including the conflict between jewish and muslim civilizations and EVERY OTHER civlization on this earth.

    Yet no matter what opportunity every people give the jews and muslims the outcome is the same – neither jews nor muslims adapt. Because that is the nature of their authoritarian monopoly parasitic group strategy: slave resistance that preys on the social and economic orders of aristocratic meritocratic people until they are reduced to genetic, institutional, political, cultural, normative, economic and military ruin – it is the strategy of uncontrolled dysgenic growth used by cancers. And the only ‘cure’ for this method of deceit is the light of truth and the law to punish it in a via-negativa market for the continuous suppression of profit by plausible deniability of accountability.

    The worst you can say about europeans is that we dragged humanity out of tyranny, rent seeking, free riding, deceit, ignorance, superstition, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of an uncaring nature – but could have done it better.

    That’s the worst you can say. That is not the worst we can say for the semitic dark ages and 1billion dead in the ancient world, and 100M dead in just this past century and a half, and we still are not ‘cured’ of this second attempt at another semitic dark age.

    We have domesticated and Germanicized Christianity – but we must make it impossible for the Jews and Muslims to create another dark age for mankind.

    My hope is that we cure both physical and informational cancers in this century. And I’m doing my part for the latter by extending the law to prohibit these forms of crime. That is the sole purpose of my work. To prohibit, reverse, and perform restitution for the crimes against civilization by the use of abrahamic methods of deceit- so that we may continue mankind’s transcendence into the gods we imagined.

    People have very little agency. We are trial and error gene computers with firmware that imitates others, evolving software for no purpose other than negotiation with others – and what little agency we have is determined by the limits of whatever it is we learn by imitation and negotiation.

    Very, very, few of us transcend the animal from semi-consciousness to consciousness. The result of doing so – is love for man like we love our domesticated animals, pets, and children. “all we can do is help them. we are too few to do much else.”

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 09:10:00 UTC

  • CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGE

    CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGENIC EQUALITARIAN AND STATIC

    For my followers: The P-constitution provides MATERIAL REWARDS at the cost of the media, financial, and political (unaccountable) sectors that have industrialized rent-seeking and baiting-into-hazard in the 20th century. It ALSO provides status – what Reactionaries really desire.

    Propaganda, pseudoscience, philo-sophism, and religion can all make people aware of opportunity for gain and provide(moral) justification for seizing it. But people seek to acquire: experience, consumption, capital, associations, status – and so political action requires rewards.

    Our difference: the Right seeks to produce goods, services, information, behavior, human capital, and commons in a majority middle class meritocracy (aristocracy), while the left seeks to extract from the middle to empower the top to redistribute to the bottom (priesthood).

    What is the unspoken Truth that is the purpose of the entire anti-western postwar movement, as well as the jewish pseudoscientific prewar movement (marx, freud, boas, cantor-bohr, trotsky)? That he right is eugenic and left dysgenic and that democracy is incompatible both.

    All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in meritocratic market aristocracy under rule of law of heroism, and dysgenic individuals in equalitarian ant-market pseudoscientific and sophomoric priesthood and discretionary rule of victimhood.

    The end of the agrarian period also is an end to the agrarian economic, social, political, and military order. The europeans re-united the world and (unfortunately) the races and civilizations while still under the agrarian order. And we no longer have common interests we had under agrarianism. And everything is up for grabs.

    So we see market demand for re-speciation. And the only way to solve it is to once again, separate and continue to speciate – reversing the promise of the one world order the female, semitic, authoritarian mind seems to desire.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 10:43:00 UTC

  • CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGE

    CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGENIC EQUALITARIAN AND STATIC

    For my followers: The P-constitution provides MATERIAL REWARDS at the cost of the media, financial, and political (unaccountable) sectors that have industrialized rent-seeking and baiting-into-hazard in the 20th century. It ALSO provides status – what Reactionaries really desire.

    Propaganda, pseudoscience, philo-sophism, and religion can all make people aware of opportunity for gain and provide(moral) justification for seizing it. But people seek to acquire:experience, consumption, capital, associations, status – and so political action requires rewards.

    Our difference: the Right seeks to produce goods, services, information, behavior, human capital, and commons in a majority middle class meritocracy (aristocracy), while the left seeks to extract from the middle to empower the top to redistribute to the bottom (priesthood).

    What is the unspoken Truth that is the purpose of the entire anti-western postwar movement, as well as the jewish pseudoscientific prewar movement (marx, freud, boas, cantor-bohr, trotsky)? That he right is eugenic and left dysgenic and that democracy is incompatible both.

    All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in meritocratic market aristocracy under rule of law of heroism, and dysgenic individuals in equalitarian ant-market pseudoscientific and sophomoric priesthood and discretionary rule of victimhood.

    The end of the agrarian period also is an end to the agrarian economic,social, political, and military order. The europeans re-united the world and (unfortunately) the races and civilizations while still under the agrarian order. And we no longer have common interests we had under agrarianism. And everything is up for grabs.

    So we see market demand for re-speciation. And the only way to solve it is to once again, separate and continue to speciate – reversing the promise of the one world order the female, semitic, authoritarian mind seems to desire.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 10:42:00 UTC