Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE THREE LITTLE BEARS AND EUROPEAN GENETIC PORRIDGE I don’t understand the ques

    THE THREE LITTLE BEARS AND EUROPEAN GENETIC PORRIDGE

    I don’t understand the question. Europoids are the result of ice age endurance by hunter-gatherers. Hunter-gatherers, were then nearly replaced by Neolithic farmers. Neolithic farmers by steppe herders. We are a combination of all three, driven by male selection. (Women make nests and stay, young men expand the radius – capturing territory and women).

    Sometime around 43,000 BC, the ancestors of the Early European Farmers (EEF) split from Western Hunter-Gatherers (WHGs), and again appear to have split from Caucasian Hunter-Gatherers (CHGs) around 23,000 BC. Around 20,000 bc the glaciers stop growing.

    This produced a north-south cline we still see today from the very white north of Russia to the caucuses, from the caucuses to the not so white south of the Levant, to the not white people of southern Saudi Arabia.

    Similarly, around 24,000 bc we see the evolution of the Ancient North Eurasians (ANE), who rapidly expand and disappear westward into the hunter-gatherers, and eastward into what would become the Siberian-Americans.(there are no native americans. And the second wave of Siberians were more asiatic and nearly exterminated the first wave, in a cline north to south.).

    The East Asian data is slowly accumulating, but they are almost as isolated by their mountains deserts, cold, and ocians, as are the africans by the desert and oceans, so they arrive from the south, and they saw less admixture with only three events, the last one being tiny. (we dont know where their features came from – or at least I ‘m not willing to commit to any of the theories). So the agrarian expansion combined with the Han expansion (which is continuing in tibet and mongolia, and threatens Vietnam), continues. Make no mistake that the chinese are the most successful empire in history, producing the most forcible integration in history. And they do it without religion (lies). They do it with burueacratic management and time.

    The chessboard is set by the retreat of the glaciers. all these populations are somewhat distinct. As far as I know proto-populations in europe, levant, iran, and north Eurasia are as different as Europeans and Asians are today.

    By 10,000 bc the ice age is over, and the various floods result. Very shortly thereafter the domestication of animals (pigs and sheep), and very quickly the agrarian revolution begins. ~8000bc.

    Today’s populations are the result of two rapid expansions that demonstrate technology is more influential than natural selection: the agrarian expansions in Eurasia and China, followed by the IE expansion in Eurasia.

    These two expansions homogenized by hybridization (racialized) what had been a far higher number of racially distinct human groups.

    What I find interesting is that the favorable traits: Height, Light Skin, Blue Eyes, Blonde Hair, Sociability, Agency, Milk, and Grain tolerance end up in Europeans thus maintaining medium neoteny without sexual neoteny as in east Asia. Despite the fact that these traits evolved in different places in different groups.

    This is one of the key insights I’ve had.

    East Asians overplayed neoteny. Africans, Austronesians (impulsivity) and Semites underplayed neoteny (aggression). Europeans collected highly desirable features abandoning primitive rapid maturity, deep morphology, and lack of agency (Africa) without sacrificing reproductive desirability (east Asians), or carrying reproductive undesirability to extremes (Australians).

    In other words, Europeans selected for symbolic neoteny without significant suppression of sexual maturity. Thus creating a balance between impulsive and rapidly maturing Africans, and calm slowly maturing east Asians.

    It’s like the three little bears: “this one is just right”.

    But while those factors produce a sexual market value, with the sweet spots in Indian brahmins and northern Europeans along the west to east cline, the quality of life of a people is largely produced NOT by those features, by CLASS selection. In other words: domestication (neoteny). So neoteny can be achieved by any of the races and subraces with time – not much time really. A few centuries at most.

    If the group has the will for it.

    “Tech beats genes.” Physical, political-social, and conceptual-informational.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-23 12:17:00 UTC

  • ANOTHER ANTI-WHITE MYTH BITES THE DUST: –“Europeans were dark-skinned until 8,0

    ANOTHER ANTI-WHITE MYTH BITES THE DUST:

    –“Europeans were dark-skinned until 8,000 years ago: Pale complexions were brought to Europe from the Near East, study claims”—

    Another lie by pilpul.

    (a) Primates are white. Proto-humans developed dark skin when hair (fur) thinned to allow us greater heat dissipation. Black skin is an adaptation. And it varies all over africa. When we spread out of heavy-uv climates, wore clothes and needed vitamin D, we started losing that dark skin adaptation. The ‘out of africa region’ of Africa (Ethiopia, Yemen) started losing it too because of back migration from Eurasia.

    (b) People of the middle east are largely basal eurasian – the first people out of Africa. They have no north Eurasian ancestry.

    (c) European post-glacial hunter-gatherers have little to do with modern Europeans. Those people are extinct. They lived in Europe. Europeans carry some of their genes, from having killed the men and enslaved and reproduced with the women.

    (d) Those peoples living in SOUTHERN Europe 8,000 years ago (western, Scandinavian, and eastern hunter-gathers) were already admixed with ANE – Ancient North Eurasians (whites) to some degree. So they had ‘lightness’.

    (e) At approximately the same time, people living in Sweden had both light skin gene variants, SLC24A5 and SLC45A2. They also had a third gene, HERC2/OCA2, which causes blue eyes and may also contribute to light skin and blond hair.

    (f) Early Neolithic Farmers: Those people with semi-white skin migrating from Anatolia were 50% ancient north Eurasians. (white).

    (g) Europeans (whites) arrived in (invaded) Europe starting 5000 years ago. Those people were more than 50% ancient north Eurasian, Eastern European Hunter-Gatherer. They had evolved in cooperation with or competition with the Iranic peoples who (at the time) were also 50% ancient north Eurasian.

    (h) Ancient North Eurasians (24k ybp) spread rapidly (like the Aryans did later) in a cline from north Eurasia (northern Russia), to Europe (easter, western, Scandinavian, and south european hunter-gatherers). They heavily affected the first immigrants to the Americas, and less so the Asians.

    (i) Present Europeans are almost exclusively the result of admixture between western hunter-gatherers, neolithic farmers, and (white) steppe herders (SH), who are all descendants of ancient north Eurasians.

    (j) my suspicion is that steppe and tundra life is extremely difficult physically, socially, and psychologically, limiting populations, but it has a very low disease gradient, and it’s relatively easy to obtain food, so it’s a very good cauldron to cook evolution. Africa and the Levant (dry, high disease gradient), north Eurasia (cold steppe, tundra, forest), european (mild weather forests and rivers), SE Asia (hot monsoon weather forests), and the south pacific (islands) are very different environments.

    The clock is ticking and the truth will soon be unavoidable.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-21 20:54:00 UTC

  • The Solution to The Great Sort of The 21 St Century?

    THE SOLUTION TO THE GREAT SORT OF THE 21ST CENTURY? The future increase in selection pressure by intelligence is not a hard problem to solve at all. 1 – Groups divide by kinship interest, 2 – Elites for each group compete for and evolve their group. 3 – Limit bottom reproduction until marginal differences between groups are eliminated. What’s the worst? Collecting the brightest in one polity thereby leaving all other polities behind, while fomenting conflict in that polity. What’s worst of all? Fomenting that conflict in the only laboring, working, lower-middle, and middle-class population that has developed high trust and truth-before-face, upon which the entire meritocratic edifice that gives the opportunity to those diverse elites is constructed – thereby ensuring the destruction of the high trust polity and return of kinship interest above all. The world is not complex. If it seems so it is the lies used to circumvent the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws; the lies used to circumvent that only Europeans discovered, applied, and adapted to them; and in doing so dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, and disease; and that the world hates Europeans for doing so, and casts Europeans as oppressors as a proxy for nature and natures’ god, for most adapting to those physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. That is the reason for european exceptionalism. And the world shudders and does everything possible to deny it. So what is the real problem? By inventing the age of sail in response to the Muslim conquest of Byzantium, and spreading around the world, Europeans reunited mankind, sought to bring them to their level of adaptation to physical natural and evolutionary laws – and the world it seems, cannot adapt and do so. And so by the middle of this century, just as the european colonial project failed, the Jewish cosmopolitan project in all its Marxist, postmodernist, feminist forms, will fail, and we will end the costly failed experiment, and return to a conflict of civilizations, led by core states, advancing kinship interests, cooperating by trade, in a world where we must once again develop civilizational trade routes to survive, which will place us once again into military conflict over the returns on those routes. In other words, a return to normal, and a return to speciation, especially speciation by intelligence – just as we have always speciated. And the chance that I err herein approaches zero.

  • The Solution to The Great Sort of The 21 St Century?

    THE SOLUTION TO THE GREAT SORT OF THE 21ST CENTURY? The future increase in selection pressure by intelligence is not a hard problem to solve at all. 1 – Groups divide by kinship interest, 2 – Elites for each group compete for and evolve their group. 3 – Limit bottom reproduction until marginal differences between groups are eliminated. What’s the worst? Collecting the brightest in one polity thereby leaving all other polities behind, while fomenting conflict in that polity. What’s worst of all? Fomenting that conflict in the only laboring, working, lower-middle, and middle-class population that has developed high trust and truth-before-face, upon which the entire meritocratic edifice that gives the opportunity to those diverse elites is constructed – thereby ensuring the destruction of the high trust polity and return of kinship interest above all. The world is not complex. If it seems so it is the lies used to circumvent the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws; the lies used to circumvent that only Europeans discovered, applied, and adapted to them; and in doing so dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, and disease; and that the world hates Europeans for doing so, and casts Europeans as oppressors as a proxy for nature and natures’ god, for most adapting to those physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. That is the reason for european exceptionalism. And the world shudders and does everything possible to deny it. So what is the real problem? By inventing the age of sail in response to the Muslim conquest of Byzantium, and spreading around the world, Europeans reunited mankind, sought to bring them to their level of adaptation to physical natural and evolutionary laws – and the world it seems, cannot adapt and do so. And so by the middle of this century, just as the european colonial project failed, the Jewish cosmopolitan project in all its Marxist, postmodernist, feminist forms, will fail, and we will end the costly failed experiment, and return to a conflict of civilizations, led by core states, advancing kinship interests, cooperating by trade, in a world where we must once again develop civilizational trade routes to survive, which will place us once again into military conflict over the returns on those routes. In other words, a return to normal, and a return to speciation, especially speciation by intelligence – just as we have always speciated. And the chance that I err herein approaches zero.

  • The Evidence

    I understand brother. I do. But the evidence is that the word of God is written in the fabric of the universe, in the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. He speaks in truth, in the only languages of truth, in those languages in which it is impossible to lie: in mathematics, and computation, of new designs, by continuous trial and error, as he first, life second, and we third on his behalf, create Garden, Eden, and the Heavens, by his laws, his promise, and his command. All other words of God are written in the language of man, and not in the language of God. And man is a liar whether by his design, or wishful thinking, or folly. And so I must follow the command of God, written in his hand, free of the ignorance error and deceit of earlier man. So that we pass this crisis of the present, and thru the great filter before us, and raise ourselves into gods as well, before the sands of time run out, and bring about the extinction of man. Not because I wish to, or because of arrogance, but because no man or messenger has come to save us.

  • The Evidence

    I understand brother. I do. But the evidence is that the word of God is written in the fabric of the universe, in the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. He speaks in truth, in the only languages of truth, in those languages in which it is impossible to lie: in mathematics, and computation, of new designs, by continuous trial and error, as he first, life second, and we third on his behalf, create Garden, Eden, and the Heavens, by his laws, his promise, and his command. All other words of God are written in the language of man, and not in the language of God. And man is a liar whether by his design, or wishful thinking, or folly. And so I must follow the command of God, written in his hand, free of the ignorance error and deceit of earlier man. So that we pass this crisis of the present, and thru the great filter before us, and raise ourselves into gods as well, before the sands of time run out, and bring about the extinction of man. Not because I wish to, or because of arrogance, but because no man or messenger has come to save us.

  • The Abyss Is a Challenge or A Horror – We Must Choose

    The universe will eventually compute everything that can be eventually computed by the universe. And the defeat of entropy serves the purpose of increasing computation. If the universe calculates nothing more than the defeat of entropy, then anything and everything that can be computed will be. Man is the result of a rare computation. Man’s reason accelerates the computation of the defeat of entropy. We are another step in advancing computation of that which can be computed by the accumulated defeat of entropy. This knowledge is humbling for men of weakness and a challenge to men of will. The last most humbling and terrifying knowledge we must face is the rapidity with which the great filter approaches, and that failing to transcend our existence will pass unnoticed by any that follow -if any follow at all.

    —“In Germanic religion, we don’t ask the gods to fix things for us we ask them for the strength at times to do it ourselves. This world is ours we are the rulers of it. Through blood and toil, and by the will of the gods, and our own actions, we will return to nature’s law – or break it all to pieces.”—-Hans Addicks

  • The Abyss Is a Challenge or A Horror – We Must Choose

    The universe will eventually compute everything that can be eventually computed by the universe. And the defeat of entropy serves the purpose of increasing computation. If the universe calculates nothing more than the defeat of entropy, then anything and everything that can be computed will be. Man is the result of a rare computation. Man’s reason accelerates the computation of the defeat of entropy. We are another step in advancing computation of that which can be computed by the accumulated defeat of entropy. This knowledge is humbling for men of weakness and a challenge to men of will. The last most humbling and terrifying knowledge we must face is the rapidity with which the great filter approaches, and that failing to transcend our existence will pass unnoticed by any that follow -if any follow at all.

    —“In Germanic religion, we don’t ask the gods to fix things for us we ask them for the strength at times to do it ourselves. This world is ours we are the rulers of it. Through blood and toil, and by the will of the gods, and our own actions, we will return to nature’s law – or break it all to pieces.”—-Hans Addicks

  • That’s the demarcation between European and Semitic civilization. A Semitic reli

    That’s the demarcation between European and Semitic civilization. A Semitic religion of the primacy of god versus a European religion of the primacy of man. It’s not like you have a choice in the matter, or if it’s an opinion. Jews made and brought Christianity into the empire with the primacy of god over the primacy of man. Now, given the behavior of Nero et all at the time it made sense. That does not alter the fact that jews used the primacy of God and the primacy of THEIR god, as a means of denying the primacy of man, and the primacy of reality, and the joy of life in reality practiced by European man, rather than the hatred of life in the present and promise of joy in the afterlife of the jews. Everything was done in order to justify and provide incentives. Everything is explicable in natural law. Man lies to claim moral his strategy. It’s not complicated.

  • That’s the demarcation between European and Semitic civilization. A Semitic reli

    That’s the demarcation between European and Semitic civilization. A Semitic religion of the primacy of god versus a European religion of the primacy of man. It’s not like you have a choice in the matter, or if it’s an opinion. Jews made and brought Christianity into the empire with the primacy of god over the primacy of man. Now, given the behavior of Nero et all at the time it made sense. That does not alter the fact that jews used the primacy of God and the primacy of THEIR god, as a means of denying the primacy of man, and the primacy of reality, and the joy of life in reality practiced by European man, rather than the hatred of life in the present and promise of joy in the afterlife of the jews. Everything was done in order to justify and provide incentives. Everything is explicable in natural law. Man lies to claim moral his strategy. It’s not complicated.