ANOTHER ANTI-WHITE MYTH BITES THE DUST: –“Europeans were dark-skinned until 8,0

ANOTHER ANTI-WHITE MYTH BITES THE DUST:

–“Europeans were dark-skinned until 8,000 years ago: Pale complexions were brought to Europe from the Near East, study claims”—

Another lie by pilpul.

(a) Primates are white. Proto-humans developed dark skin when hair (fur) thinned to allow us greater heat dissipation. Black skin is an adaptation. And it varies all over africa. When we spread out of heavy-uv climates, wore clothes and needed vitamin D, we started losing that dark skin adaptation. The ‘out of africa region’ of Africa (Ethiopia, Yemen) started losing it too because of back migration from Eurasia.

(b) People of the middle east are largely basal eurasian – the first people out of Africa. They have no north Eurasian ancestry.

(c) European post-glacial hunter-gatherers have little to do with modern Europeans. Those people are extinct. They lived in Europe. Europeans carry some of their genes, from having killed the men and enslaved and reproduced with the women.

(d) Those peoples living in SOUTHERN Europe 8,000 years ago (western, Scandinavian, and eastern hunter-gathers) were already admixed with ANE – Ancient North Eurasians (whites) to some degree. So they had ‘lightness’.

(e) At approximately the same time, people living in Sweden had both light skin gene variants, SLC24A5 and SLC45A2. They also had a third gene, HERC2/OCA2, which causes blue eyes and may also contribute to light skin and blond hair.

(f) Early Neolithic Farmers: Those people with semi-white skin migrating from Anatolia were 50% ancient north Eurasians. (white).

(g) Europeans (whites) arrived in (invaded) Europe starting 5000 years ago. Those people were more than 50% ancient north Eurasian, Eastern European Hunter-Gatherer. They had evolved in cooperation with or competition with the Iranic peoples who (at the time) were also 50% ancient north Eurasian.

(h) Ancient North Eurasians (24k ybp) spread rapidly (like the Aryans did later) in a cline from north Eurasia (northern Russia), to Europe (easter, western, Scandinavian, and south european hunter-gatherers). They heavily affected the first immigrants to the Americas, and less so the Asians.

(i) Present Europeans are almost exclusively the result of admixture between western hunter-gatherers, neolithic farmers, and (white) steppe herders (SH), who are all descendants of ancient north Eurasians.

(j) my suspicion is that steppe and tundra life is extremely difficult physically, socially, and psychologically, limiting populations, but it has a very low disease gradient, and it’s relatively easy to obtain food, so it’s a very good cauldron to cook evolution. Africa and the Levant (dry, high disease gradient), north Eurasia (cold steppe, tundra, forest), european (mild weather forests and rivers), SE Asia (hot monsoon weather forests), and the south pacific (islands) are very different environments.

The clock is ticking and the truth will soon be unavoidable.