Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • The Comforting False Promise: —”Curt: Why do many people still believe in communism even though it has been proven throughout history that it does not work?”—

    THE CORRECT ANSWER – AND A COMPLETE ONE

    —”Why do many people still believe in communism even though it has been proven throughout history that it does not work?”—

    Short answer? Why do people believe in judaism, christianity, islam, hinduism, buddhism, new age occultism, rather than practice philosophy, stoicism, and epicureanism all of which are true?

    The cheap, easy, false promises, that use empathic communities as a means of sedation.

    Why do people believe in communism, socialism, democracy, libertarianism, or anarchism?

    The cheap easy false promise of freedom from whatever scarcity that they face, where that scarcity is self-determination (power), by the eradication of competitors.

    The only successful method of eliminating competitors is Islam and it comes at the cost of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, dysgenia, disease, suffering, and victimization by the vicissitudes of nature. We are only equal in poverty and powerlessness (slavery).

    The Complete Answer

    Cooperation is more productive than any and all alternatives, and the greater the division of labor the more so. Any life form that cooperates (using volition) must maintain consistency with physical laws if it will not go extinct, or lose the incentive to cooperate:

    (a) Acquisitiveness (all life forms). We evolved to acquire. The greatest returns in the shortest time, at the least cost, with the lowest risk, and greatest certainty. All human behavior can be restated as acquisition. This is why economics has evolved into the language of social science as well as psychology – and why the left avoids it at all costs.

    (b) Judgements choices of returns on cooperation (judging opportunity costs)

    (c) Reciprocity: whether we both benefit or lose, or whether benefits and losses are asymmetrical – according to each individual’s measure.

    (d) Accounting of Debts (what we owe others) and Credits (what others owe us).

    (e) Punishment by Killing of, Ostracization of, Punishment of, and even costly altruistic punishment of predators, parasites, deceivers, cheaters, discounters (laziness), free riders, frauds, those who privatize commons or socialize losses, those who engage in conspiracy, sedition, or treason.

    (f) Within the limits of Proportionality – Incentive to Defect. This maintains the equilibrium of the cooperative and physical worlds.

    (g) Mediated by the value of Kin Selection (Tolerance for cost-bearing decreases with genetic distance).

    All our moral intuitions are governed by those rules of cooperation. They have to be because **those rules are necessary for evolutionary survival of any cooperative species in competition with others -** especially one with a large brain that is eleven times as costly as muscle of the same weight.

    And likewise, just as those natural laws of cooperation are dependent upon the physical (material) laws of the universe, they are also dependent upon the evolutionary laws of the universe: accumulation of **genetic load, regression to the mean, the red queen of superior competitors, and the window of time** available for a costly species to evolve. Those factors lead to what we consider the classes, which constitute a range of sexually, socially, productively, politically, and militarily low to high market (evolutionary) values, in which some are born with every advantage and some with every disadvantage and everyone in between. As the division of labor increases along with the population, ( … ) 


    The Abrahamic Method of Deceit, whether:

    … (a) in **Supernatural** form (Judaism, Christianity, or Islam), or
    … (b) in a **pseudoscientific** form (Marxism, Boasianism, Freudianism ), or
    … (c) as Social construction of **Undermining** (the Frankfurt neo-Marxist school), or
    … (d) as **Sophistry** (Postmodernism), or
    … (e) as Science **Denial** (HBD denial, Genetic Determinism Denial, Sex Difference Denial, IQ **Denial**, Personality Trait Denial, or, and yes, class, subrace, and race difference denial)

    All rely on three **false promises**:

    (a) the false promise of freedom from **scarcity** (violation of physical law),
    (b) the false promise of freedom from **reciprocity** (the natural law of cooperation),
    (c) the false promise of freedom from **evolution** (dysgenia, genetic load, regression to the mean, and and therefore class (sexual, social, economic, political, military, and strategic market value);

    Using one or more of the possible methods of human deception:

    (a) the fictionalism of **magic**->pseudoscience->pseudomathmatics
    (b) the fictionalism of **sophistry**->idealism->supernormalism
    (c) the fictionalism of **occult**->supernatural->theological
    (d) the fiction **loading**, framing, suggestin, obscuring -> fictionalizing -> lying.
    (e) critique(undermining) -> Avoidance (GSRRM) -> **Denial**

    In order to achieve **POWER**. In order to reverse the Darwinian Revolution and the 4500 years of european and Chinese (Han, Korean, Japanese) Eugenics as the explanation for vast differences in civilizational progress. Where priests, politicians, financiers, and others can parasitically depend upon revenue of a permanent ignorant, subservient underclass (think medieval and ancient world peasants).

    So people want what they want, in particular what they want is freedom from the reality of the genetic status and the consequences of it. And they hope or want the false promise that it is possible to defeat scarcity (physical laws), incentives (natural laws), and reproductive competition (evolutionary pressure) in this world rather than an afterlife.

    And why is it possible for them to hold these false beliefs when we control the education system and we are capable of teaching basic contract law (ethics of cooperation), basic micro economics (ethics of cooperation), basic macro economics (world equilibration of prices and trade), and eugenics (why europeans alone discovered the sciences, and why europeans and east asians alone discovered reason, and even if the east asians fell behind after 1000ad. (not 1400)

    THREE GENERATIONS OF LIES, IN TWO GREAT EPISODES OF CIVILIZATIONAL DESTRUCTION

    In other words, the left thought leadership used three generations of lies in the ancient world, and three generations of lies in the modern world, to destroy civilizations that practiced eugenics, by selling the promise of freedom from being ‘left behind’ in the ancient world with the promise of life after death, and promise of freedom from being ‘left behind’ in the modern world with the promise of equality after the revolution.

    All leftism is predicated on three false promises (lies), which cannot deliver such freedom but whose purpose it is to destroy advanced civilizations.

    This is how Islam has reduced everything it touches to ignorance, poverty, disease, suffering, and dysgenia, while destroying the arts, letters, culture, knowledge, of each great civilization it reduces to ashes.

    Marxism, Neomarxism, Postmodernism, and “Denialism” are just revolts against the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe and leftists cast Europeans (and Chinese if they can) as oppressors who invented these rules, rather than liberators who discover them, adapt to them, and apply them, thereby dragging mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, disease, and early mortality at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of the bottom third.
    The fact that both Europeans and Chinese practiced manorialism (systemic, institutionalized eugenics) accounts for the vast difference in european and east Asian neoteny, lower violence, lower impulsivity, superior distribution of primary personality traits (IQ, Consietiousness), and Agency(self-regulation).

    Any people can copy this group strategy. The Marxists do the opposite. They applaud and encourage decivilzation and dysgenia with the myth of oppression rather than continuous human domestication.

  • The Comforting False Promise: —”Curt: Why do many people still believe in communism even though it has been proven throughout history that it does not work?”—

    THE CORRECT ANSWER – AND A COMPLETE ONE

    —”Why do many people still believe in communism even though it has been proven throughout history that it does not work?”—

    Short answer? Why do people believe in judaism, christianity, islam, hinduism, buddhism, new age occultism, rather than practice philosophy, stoicism, and epicureanism all of which are true?

    The cheap, easy, false promises, that use empathic communities as a means of sedation.

    Why do people believe in communism, socialism, democracy, libertarianism, or anarchism?

    The cheap easy false promise of freedom from whatever scarcity that they face, where that scarcity is self-determination (power), by the eradication of competitors.

    The only successful method of eliminating competitors is Islam and it comes at the cost of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, dysgenia, disease, suffering, and victimization by the vicissitudes of nature. We are only equal in poverty and powerlessness (slavery).

    The Complete Answer

    Cooperation is more productive than any and all alternatives, and the greater the division of labor the more so. Any life form that cooperates (using volition) must maintain consistency with physical laws if it will not go extinct, or lose the incentive to cooperate:

    (a) Acquisitiveness (all life forms). We evolved to acquire. The greatest returns in the shortest time, at the least cost, with the lowest risk, and greatest certainty. All human behavior can be restated as acquisition. This is why economics has evolved into the language of social science as well as psychology – and why the left avoids it at all costs.

    (b) Judgements choices of returns on cooperation (judging opportunity costs)

    (c) Reciprocity: whether we both benefit or lose, or whether benefits and losses are asymmetrical – according to each individual’s measure.

    (d) Accounting of Debts (what we owe others) and Credits (what others owe us).

    (e) Punishment by Killing of, Ostracization of, Punishment of, and even costly altruistic punishment of predators, parasites, deceivers, cheaters, discounters (laziness), free riders, frauds, those who privatize commons or socialize losses, those who engage in conspiracy, sedition, or treason.

    (f) Within the limits of Proportionality – Incentive to Defect. This maintains the equilibrium of the cooperative and physical worlds.

    (g) Mediated by the value of Kin Selection (Tolerance for cost-bearing decreases with genetic distance).

    All our moral intuitions are governed by those rules of cooperation. They have to be because **those rules are necessary for evolutionary survival of any cooperative species in competition with others -** especially one with a large brain that is eleven times as costly as muscle of the same weight.

    And likewise, just as those natural laws of cooperation are dependent upon the physical (material) laws of the universe, they are also dependent upon the evolutionary laws of the universe: accumulation of **genetic load, regression to the mean, the red queen of superior competitors, and the window of time** available for a costly species to evolve. Those factors lead to what we consider the classes, which constitute a range of sexually, socially, productively, politically, and militarily low to high market (evolutionary) values, in which some are born with every advantage and some with every disadvantage and everyone in between. As the division of labor increases along with the population, ( … ) 


    The Abrahamic Method of Deceit, whether:

    … (a) in **Supernatural** form (Judaism, Christianity, or Islam), or
    … (b) in a **pseudoscientific** form (Marxism, Boasianism, Freudianism ), or
    … (c) as Social construction of **Undermining** (the Frankfurt neo-Marxist school), or
    … (d) as **Sophistry** (Postmodernism), or
    … (e) as Science **Denial** (HBD denial, Genetic Determinism Denial, Sex Difference Denial, IQ **Denial**, Personality Trait Denial, or, and yes, class, subrace, and race difference denial)

    All rely on three **false promises**:

    (a) the false promise of freedom from **scarcity** (violation of physical law),
    (b) the false promise of freedom from **reciprocity** (the natural law of cooperation),
    (c) the false promise of freedom from **evolution** (dysgenia, genetic load, regression to the mean, and and therefore class (sexual, social, economic, political, military, and strategic market value);

    Using one or more of the possible methods of human deception:

    (a) the fictionalism of **magic**->pseudoscience->pseudomathmatics
    (b) the fictionalism of **sophistry**->idealism->supernormalism
    (c) the fictionalism of **occult**->supernatural->theological
    (d) the fiction **loading**, framing, suggestin, obscuring -> fictionalizing -> lying.
    (e) critique(undermining) -> Avoidance (GSRRM) -> **Denial**

    In order to achieve **POWER**. In order to reverse the Darwinian Revolution and the 4500 years of european and Chinese (Han, Korean, Japanese) Eugenics as the explanation for vast differences in civilizational progress. Where priests, politicians, financiers, and others can parasitically depend upon revenue of a permanent ignorant, subservient underclass (think medieval and ancient world peasants).

    So people want what they want, in particular what they want is freedom from the reality of the genetic status and the consequences of it. And they hope or want the false promise that it is possible to defeat scarcity (physical laws), incentives (natural laws), and reproductive competition (evolutionary pressure) in this world rather than an afterlife.

    And why is it possible for them to hold these false beliefs when we control the education system and we are capable of teaching basic contract law (ethics of cooperation), basic micro economics (ethics of cooperation), basic macro economics (world equilibration of prices and trade), and eugenics (why europeans alone discovered the sciences, and why europeans and east asians alone discovered reason, and even if the east asians fell behind after 1000ad. (not 1400)

    THREE GENERATIONS OF LIES, IN TWO GREAT EPISODES OF CIVILIZATIONAL DESTRUCTION

    In other words, the left thought leadership used three generations of lies in the ancient world, and three generations of lies in the modern world, to destroy civilizations that practiced eugenics, by selling the promise of freedom from being ‘left behind’ in the ancient world with the promise of life after death, and promise of freedom from being ‘left behind’ in the modern world with the promise of equality after the revolution.

    All leftism is predicated on three false promises (lies), which cannot deliver such freedom but whose purpose it is to destroy advanced civilizations.

    This is how Islam has reduced everything it touches to ignorance, poverty, disease, suffering, and dysgenia, while destroying the arts, letters, culture, knowledge, of each great civilization it reduces to ashes.

    Marxism, Neomarxism, Postmodernism, and “Denialism” are just revolts against the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe and leftists cast Europeans (and Chinese if they can) as oppressors who invented these rules, rather than liberators who discover them, adapt to them, and apply them, thereby dragging mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, disease, and early mortality at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of the bottom third.
    The fact that both Europeans and Chinese practiced manorialism (systemic, institutionalized eugenics) accounts for the vast difference in european and east Asian neoteny, lower violence, lower impulsivity, superior distribution of primary personality traits (IQ, Consietiousness), and Agency(self-regulation).

    Any people can copy this group strategy. The Marxists do the opposite. They applaud and encourage decivilzation and dysgenia with the myth of oppression rather than continuous human domestication.

  • —-“Curt: Were The Hittites White?”—-

    —-“CURT: Were The Hittites White?”—-

    Despite a century of controversy, there exist only three major surviving races (subspecies), with the proposed fourth: the Pacific islands consisting of a mixture of all three races, and Austronesians a mix of African and Caucasian.
    The term Caucasian was not a misnomer, but geneticists today refer to West Eurasians as a group separated into bands from Iberia (Spain) to Mongolia (the Turkic peoples).

    WHITE
    “White” refers to:

    (a) descendants of the Indo European conquest of Europe,
    (b) who speak the indo-european language family,
    (c) who practice the indo european metaphysical and legal traditions, and
    (d) during the dark ages, converted from indo european derived religion to its antithesis: the Semitic derived Christian religion.

    The outlier property is the metaphysical and legal tradition that is what causes european civilizational uniqueness and is the reason for european excellence in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – with a thousand years of a superstitious dark age in between. It’s this uniqueness that demarcates ‘whites’ from other peoples more so than any other, and unfortunately, it is the least understood (until now, which is the focus of my work).

    “WHITENESS”

    “Whiteness” as used pejoratively is a group strategy. It is a group strategy of northern Europeans (protestants). That group strategy is extremely costly. While we may be aware of the high cost of truth before face, the high cost of market meritocracy, and the high cost of high trust norms, it’s unspoken cost is that it is aggressively eugenic. This aggressive eugenics is as much or more important than any other cultural trait. Only the Chinese and the Europeans were able to institutionalize eugenic reproduction via manorialism, which accounts for the elevated intelligence of East Asians and Western Europeans: the underclasses were dramatically reduced through natural cold weather farming, reproductive suppression, and criminal prosecution.

    The world other than Korea japan and china who are equally the products of eugenic evolution (human self-domestication) despises western civilization because it is expensive, it is counter-intuitive, and it is antithetical to them – but most importantly – because they cannot compete because they cannot repeat the eugenic processes themselves. Islam is perhaps the ultimate anti-civilization in history and is not a primitive group strategy. It produces de-civilization and dysgenia by justifying the avoidance of all adaptive costs. The same is true for the current war by the left against western civilization – they seek to eliminate the payment of eugenic costs.

    THE SPECTRUM

    1 – Most narrowly: Germanic Northern Europeans above the Hajnal Line (North Sea Civ), who were not under catholicism long enough to lose their ancestral legal and traditional habits – especially those who escaped the long term corruption of the church. The north sea group began separating from the rest of the world rapidly and the great divergence of the greeks was repeated in the north sea beginning in 1000 ad (not 1400).

    2 – Commonly: Christian European whether Germanic Scandinavian, Baltic, Slavic, or Finnic. (Continental Civ). This includes the three groups of Christianized european people: orthodox(greek), catholic(Latin), and protestant (Germanic)

    3 – Less Commonly: Many be extended to include the descendants of early Neolithic farmers of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, Sicily, and Sardinia because they are Christian and in the european territorial and cultural sphere of influence. (European Peninsular Civ)

    4 – Uncommonly: May be extended to include the Iranic people of the caucuses: Georgians, Armenians. (European Extant Civ thru the Urals )

    5 – Rarely: May be extended to include the south-central West Eurasians – the Iranic peoples – but generally not.

    6 – More rarely: May be extended to the Turkic peoples – but almost certainly not – because they don’t speak an IE language.

    7 – Not including outbred peoples of the Indian subcontinent (who are a mixture of negrito hunter-gatherer, middle eastern hunter-gatherer (Dravidian), and Indo european steppe herders.

    8 – Not including the Afro Asiatic Languages – Middle eastern Peoples.

    9 – Never including African or East Asian Peoples, or Siberian Peoples (Amerindians).

    10 – Never including admixture peoples (along the out-of-Africa route from Yemen, to India, to SE Asia, to Australia.

    HITTITES

    The Hittites were West Eurasians. They Were Indo Europeans (“Aryans”). And we do not know whether they traveled from the steppe (Ukraine, Russia) via the clockwise route across the caucuses mountains, or the counter-clockwise route through the Balkans, or whether they originated on the Anatolian shores of the Black Sea. Consensus favors counter-clockwise.

    This means that Hittites share common ancestors with today’s ‘Whites’, and are not of either East Asian (Mongoloid) or African (Negroid) races.

    Attempts to de-racialize human groups are part of the anti-Darwinian pseudoscience movement of the Marxist-postmodern program of science denial, which in turn is a continuation of the ancient middle eastern program of spreading Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, to reverse the unpleasant fact that east Asian and western civilizations are eugenic.

  • —-“Curt: Were The Hittites White?”—-

    —-“CURT: Were The Hittites White?”—-

    Despite a century of controversy, there exist only three major surviving races (subspecies), with the proposed fourth: the Pacific islands consisting of a mixture of all three races, and Austronesians a mix of African and Caucasian.
    The term Caucasian was not a misnomer, but geneticists today refer to West Eurasians as a group separated into bands from Iberia (Spain) to Mongolia (the Turkic peoples).

    WHITE
    “White” refers to:

    (a) descendants of the Indo European conquest of Europe,
    (b) who speak the indo-european language family,
    (c) who practice the indo european metaphysical and legal traditions, and
    (d) during the dark ages, converted from indo european derived religion to its antithesis: the Semitic derived Christian religion.

    The outlier property is the metaphysical and legal tradition that is what causes european civilizational uniqueness and is the reason for european excellence in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – with a thousand years of a superstitious dark age in between. It’s this uniqueness that demarcates ‘whites’ from other peoples more so than any other, and unfortunately, it is the least understood (until now, which is the focus of my work).

    “WHITENESS”

    “Whiteness” as used pejoratively is a group strategy. It is a group strategy of northern Europeans (protestants). That group strategy is extremely costly. While we may be aware of the high cost of truth before face, the high cost of market meritocracy, and the high cost of high trust norms, it’s unspoken cost is that it is aggressively eugenic. This aggressive eugenics is as much or more important than any other cultural trait. Only the Chinese and the Europeans were able to institutionalize eugenic reproduction via manorialism, which accounts for the elevated intelligence of East Asians and Western Europeans: the underclasses were dramatically reduced through natural cold weather farming, reproductive suppression, and criminal prosecution.

    The world other than Korea japan and china who are equally the products of eugenic evolution (human self-domestication) despises western civilization because it is expensive, it is counter-intuitive, and it is antithetical to them – but most importantly – because they cannot compete because they cannot repeat the eugenic processes themselves. Islam is perhaps the ultimate anti-civilization in history and is not a primitive group strategy. It produces de-civilization and dysgenia by justifying the avoidance of all adaptive costs. The same is true for the current war by the left against western civilization – they seek to eliminate the payment of eugenic costs.

    THE SPECTRUM

    1 – Most narrowly: Germanic Northern Europeans above the Hajnal Line (North Sea Civ), who were not under catholicism long enough to lose their ancestral legal and traditional habits – especially those who escaped the long term corruption of the church. The north sea group began separating from the rest of the world rapidly and the great divergence of the greeks was repeated in the north sea beginning in 1000 ad (not 1400).

    2 – Commonly: Christian European whether Germanic Scandinavian, Baltic, Slavic, or Finnic. (Continental Civ). This includes the three groups of Christianized european people: orthodox(greek), catholic(Latin), and protestant (Germanic)

    3 – Less Commonly: Many be extended to include the descendants of early Neolithic farmers of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, Sicily, and Sardinia because they are Christian and in the european territorial and cultural sphere of influence. (European Peninsular Civ)

    4 – Uncommonly: May be extended to include the Iranic people of the caucuses: Georgians, Armenians. (European Extant Civ thru the Urals )

    5 – Rarely: May be extended to include the south-central West Eurasians – the Iranic peoples – but generally not.

    6 – More rarely: May be extended to the Turkic peoples – but almost certainly not – because they don’t speak an IE language.

    7 – Not including outbred peoples of the Indian subcontinent (who are a mixture of negrito hunter-gatherer, middle eastern hunter-gatherer (Dravidian), and Indo european steppe herders.

    8 – Not including the Afro Asiatic Languages – Middle eastern Peoples.

    9 – Never including African or East Asian Peoples, or Siberian Peoples (Amerindians).

    10 – Never including admixture peoples (along the out-of-Africa route from Yemen, to India, to SE Asia, to Australia.

    HITTITES

    The Hittites were West Eurasians. They Were Indo Europeans (“Aryans”). And we do not know whether they traveled from the steppe (Ukraine, Russia) via the clockwise route across the caucuses mountains, or the counter-clockwise route through the Balkans, or whether they originated on the Anatolian shores of the Black Sea. Consensus favors counter-clockwise.

    This means that Hittites share common ancestors with today’s ‘Whites’, and are not of either East Asian (Mongoloid) or African (Negroid) races.

    Attempts to de-racialize human groups are part of the anti-Darwinian pseudoscience movement of the Marxist-postmodern program of science denial, which in turn is a continuation of the ancient middle eastern program of spreading Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, to reverse the unpleasant fact that east Asian and western civilizations are eugenic.

  • —“Curt: Why is Donald Trump criticized so mercilessly? Is he really that bad?”—

     
    —“CURT: Why is Donald Trump criticized so mercilessly? Is he really that bad?”—
     
    THE FULL ANSWER
     
    Because he sees the academy, media, state, and deep state alliance (“The Cathedral Complex”) as a vast conspiracy of common interest, working against the interests of the middle, working, and laboring classes. Because he runs a vast hospitality business that employs middle, working and laboring classes. Because he correctly diagnosed (almost alone) the destruction of the American economy and American strategic influence (and the benefits to American consumers).
     
    Because he understood that the constitution that protected those middle, working, and laboring classes had been systematically undermined. Although it appears, he views this conspiracy of common interest one of incompetence (which we saw with the failure of WHO and the CDC to be prepared, the export of all our strategic healthcare production, the export of even our military production – where conservatives view it as an intentional program by the left to destroy western civilization. Because of the obvious failure to reform the financial sector after 2008. Because of the obvious failure to reform the military given our failures in combat, and our relative decline in power, and the impossibility of bringing rule of law and democracy to tribal peoples below the threshold of economic viability.
     
    Because he threatens the livelihood of all those generations in “The Cathedral” with loss of their ‘privilege’ (meaning rent-seeking, or ’parasitism’) upon the middle, working, and laboring, classes.
     
    Because he understood that the state had not, as Wilson had hoped, developed into a professional bureaucracy in the german model, that would execute policy empirically and without corruption, but instead, traded American clientelism (politically run bureaucracies) for bureaucratic sovereignty and self-determination regardless of executive direction, including selective and arbitrary enforcement of the law.
     
    Because he kept his promises to the extent he was able. He exposed the press as the enemy of the people and the country. The appointed judges that preserve rule of law. He forced Europe to carry their own weight. He demanded accountability from the global institutions we pay for. He didn’t start any wars, and despite military demands, he pulled us out of them. He radically restored employment. He started the repatriation of the industry. He reduced taxes that caused companies to flee overseas. He trie everything he could to stop immigration and the left resisted him at every opportunity. and he has survived a continuous onslaught from within the state and without.
     
    Because he is evidence of the end of the Globalist (Marxist-Postmodernist-Feminist) program that sought to use the vulnerability of American democracy, American constitutional law, and American court process, and the high trust of ethnic protestant Europeans (the eugenic produce of the Hajnal line) in combination with the use of a weakness in our financialization to capture the education, entertainment, media, and advertising sectors, to use the media like they used Judaism, Christianity, and Islam in the ancient world, to capture American economic, military, and political influence in the modern world.
     
    This is why Soros, Davos, the leftwing tech sector (that is comprised of 2/3 immigrants), the leftwing media that is dominated by the Jewish lobby, and the world financial sector are terrified by the combination of the decline of American military and economic power, the Election of Trump to restore American Rule of Law, industrial Capacity, and the working and middle classes, the miracle of Brexit, the end of the European Union Project, the rather surprising Chinese demonstration that “Fascism Won The Political Debate”: ethnocentric, nationalist, self-interest, and total war was the future, and worldwide, we were ending the European era, and returning to the historical norm of Ethno Nationalism, Nation States, Small homogenous (high trust) States with low power distance, organized by core states of civilizations and continuing the conflict of civilizations (Subraces).
     
    The left saw success on the horizon. The famous chart in the Southern Poverty Law Center tracking the replacement of Whites, and the tipping point where leftists could obtain power. Because the postwar program to move the center of the globalist movement from the failure in the soviet union to the united states, succeeded ONLY because of immigration, just as it temporarily succeeded in the soviet union only by mass murder, mass relocation, and just as it temporarily succeeded in china only by mass casualties, mass relocation.
     
    The left, whether Jewish, Christian, and Muslim in the ancient world, or Marxist-Feminist, Postmodernist-HBD-Denialist, and Islamist in the modern world, depended on a ‘pitch’: false promise (fraud) of freedom from physical (scarcity), natural (reciprocity, markets), and evolutionary (genetic classes, regression to the mean, market eugenics), by the supernatural promise of equality in ignorance and poverty in the real world in exchange for luxury in an unwarrantable afterlife – or pseudoscientific promise of economic equality and freedom from sex, class, and race differences in the modern world, in exchange for undermining truth, reciprocity, rule of law, the markets of merit in all aspects of life, and the natural eugenics that result from those markets as a continuation of natural selection.
     
    In other words, Europeans and european middle and upper classes alone, discovered, adapted to, and applied – despite the extraordinary cost to self – the physical natural and evolutionary laws of the universe, and dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of a nature hostile to human life, in a brief period of global, solar, galactic peace in just a few centuries in the early bronze age, a few centuries in the ancient world, and a few centuries in the modern world. With only the bronze age collapse and the Semitic dark ages of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam stopping their elevation of man from a victim of nature to the administrator of it.
     
    But the masses are want of false promises of discounts on reality and will use avoidance of responsibility, petty self stimuli or sex, drugs and alcohol, cults, mysticism, religions, philosophy, ideology, to demand the universe provide for them like their parents did (or they wish they did) rather than struggle against the dark forces of time, ignorance, competitors, and the red queen of evolutionary pressures.
     
    And membership in, and the benefits of, European civilization come at a cost that democratic mythology can’t bear: Europeans have been practicing eugenics for 5000 years. And most aggressively between 700 and 1880 under bipartite manorialism, monogamy, and aggressive prosecution of criminals, and aggressive suppression of immigrants and heretics.
     
    As such, the ‘Conservative’ (meaning traditional Europeans practicing the high cost civilization) have ‘nothing to sell’ other than the evidence of the consequences of paying the high costs of western civilization. And ‘conservative’ (Europeans) can’t even touch the subject of eugenics – which is why the left suppressed all eugenic research and even mention of it postwar: because western civilization’s excellence is predicated on it: because reducing the size of your dependent classes, so that you can direct proceeds to quality over quantity, and thereby produce physical, normative, informational, and institutional commons instead. And to obtain the repeated returns on those investments generation after generation.
     
    Where paying that high cost is entirely antithetical and counter-intuitive to human experience – and is not practiced elsewhere in the world for that reason: truth before face regardless of cost, individual property (meritocracy), normative property ( Protecting the commons as a shareholder regardless of cost) and collective commons(forgoing all opportunities that are not merit). When the rest of humanity does the opposite. European civilization produces the highest genetic, material, informational, cultural, institutional returns (choices), because it is the most expensive civilization to produce and to live in. For this reason: other than our only near neighbor the east Asians, who while escaping mysticism, and discovering ‘reasonable’ philosophy, themselves did not discover the truth before face, rule of law, reason (as in rationalism) or the sciences (as we understand them).
     
    But while the traditional Europeans sought to wait out the left’s failure as we did the communists, the Jewish Postwar Immigrant Movement to force through the Hart Cellar immigration act, that reversed the institutionalized eugenic limitations on immigration, achieved what past failures, and bad ideas, could not: demographic replacement by those peoples who had NOT undergone five thousand years of eugenic evolution (self-domestication), or developed a normative tradition of paying the extraordinarily high costs of producing that civilization, and its returns.
     
    So what is Donald Trump? He is evidence of what is happening around the world, with the Chinese suppression of Islam, the Hindu reversal and suppression of Islam, and the european civilizational suppression of secular Judaism (marxism, socialism, postmodernism, anti-western, anti-male feminism, human biodiversity science denial, economic pseudoscience, financial pseudoscience, and the industrialization of lying using the media, just like the industrialization of lying using roman roads, greek writing, and the openness and tolerance of the Roman empire.)
     
    Trump is evidence of history returning to normal after the failure of the european civilization, and in particular the British empire, due to the conflicting attempts of the Europeans to contain Jewish marxism which was able to seize the Russian empire by its bolshevism (today’s BLM and Antifa, and full-time protest movements), and since migrating to new york (Columbia University) from Germany, has repeated the process they used in Europe, in the Russian empire, in the roman empire, of undermining a people from within by the false promise of freedom from physical natural and evolutionary laws.

  • —“Curt: Why is Donald Trump criticized so mercilessly? Is he really that bad?”—

     
    —“CURT: Why is Donald Trump criticized so mercilessly? Is he really that bad?”—
     
    THE FULL ANSWER
     
    Because he sees the academy, media, state, and deep state alliance (“The Cathedral Complex”) as a vast conspiracy of common interest, working against the interests of the middle, working, and laboring classes. Because he runs a vast hospitality business that employs middle, working and laboring classes. Because he correctly diagnosed (almost alone) the destruction of the American economy and American strategic influence (and the benefits to American consumers).
     
    Because he understood that the constitution that protected those middle, working, and laboring classes had been systematically undermined. Although it appears, he views this conspiracy of common interest one of incompetence (which we saw with the failure of WHO and the CDC to be prepared, the export of all our strategic healthcare production, the export of even our military production – where conservatives view it as an intentional program by the left to destroy western civilization. Because of the obvious failure to reform the financial sector after 2008. Because of the obvious failure to reform the military given our failures in combat, and our relative decline in power, and the impossibility of bringing rule of law and democracy to tribal peoples below the threshold of economic viability.
     
    Because he threatens the livelihood of all those generations in “The Cathedral” with loss of their ‘privilege’ (meaning rent-seeking, or ’parasitism’) upon the middle, working, and laboring, classes.
     
    Because he understood that the state had not, as Wilson had hoped, developed into a professional bureaucracy in the german model, that would execute policy empirically and without corruption, but instead, traded American clientelism (politically run bureaucracies) for bureaucratic sovereignty and self-determination regardless of executive direction, including selective and arbitrary enforcement of the law.
     
    Because he kept his promises to the extent he was able. He exposed the press as the enemy of the people and the country. The appointed judges that preserve rule of law. He forced Europe to carry their own weight. He demanded accountability from the global institutions we pay for. He didn’t start any wars, and despite military demands, he pulled us out of them. He radically restored employment. He started the repatriation of the industry. He reduced taxes that caused companies to flee overseas. He trie everything he could to stop immigration and the left resisted him at every opportunity. and he has survived a continuous onslaught from within the state and without.
     
    Because he is evidence of the end of the Globalist (Marxist-Postmodernist-Feminist) program that sought to use the vulnerability of American democracy, American constitutional law, and American court process, and the high trust of ethnic protestant Europeans (the eugenic produce of the Hajnal line) in combination with the use of a weakness in our financialization to capture the education, entertainment, media, and advertising sectors, to use the media like they used Judaism, Christianity, and Islam in the ancient world, to capture American economic, military, and political influence in the modern world.
     
    This is why Soros, Davos, the leftwing tech sector (that is comprised of 2/3 immigrants), the leftwing media that is dominated by the Jewish lobby, and the world financial sector are terrified by the combination of the decline of American military and economic power, the Election of Trump to restore American Rule of Law, industrial Capacity, and the working and middle classes, the miracle of Brexit, the end of the European Union Project, the rather surprising Chinese demonstration that “Fascism Won The Political Debate”: ethnocentric, nationalist, self-interest, and total war was the future, and worldwide, we were ending the European era, and returning to the historical norm of Ethno Nationalism, Nation States, Small homogenous (high trust) States with low power distance, organized by core states of civilizations and continuing the conflict of civilizations (Subraces).
     
    The left saw success on the horizon. The famous chart in the Southern Poverty Law Center tracking the replacement of Whites, and the tipping point where leftists could obtain power. Because the postwar program to move the center of the globalist movement from the failure in the soviet union to the united states, succeeded ONLY because of immigration, just as it temporarily succeeded in the soviet union only by mass murder, mass relocation, and just as it temporarily succeeded in china only by mass casualties, mass relocation.
     
    The left, whether Jewish, Christian, and Muslim in the ancient world, or Marxist-Feminist, Postmodernist-HBD-Denialist, and Islamist in the modern world, depended on a ‘pitch’: false promise (fraud) of freedom from physical (scarcity), natural (reciprocity, markets), and evolutionary (genetic classes, regression to the mean, market eugenics), by the supernatural promise of equality in ignorance and poverty in the real world in exchange for luxury in an unwarrantable afterlife – or pseudoscientific promise of economic equality and freedom from sex, class, and race differences in the modern world, in exchange for undermining truth, reciprocity, rule of law, the markets of merit in all aspects of life, and the natural eugenics that result from those markets as a continuation of natural selection.
     
    In other words, Europeans and european middle and upper classes alone, discovered, adapted to, and applied – despite the extraordinary cost to self – the physical natural and evolutionary laws of the universe, and dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of a nature hostile to human life, in a brief period of global, solar, galactic peace in just a few centuries in the early bronze age, a few centuries in the ancient world, and a few centuries in the modern world. With only the bronze age collapse and the Semitic dark ages of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam stopping their elevation of man from a victim of nature to the administrator of it.
     
    But the masses are want of false promises of discounts on reality and will use avoidance of responsibility, petty self stimuli or sex, drugs and alcohol, cults, mysticism, religions, philosophy, ideology, to demand the universe provide for them like their parents did (or they wish they did) rather than struggle against the dark forces of time, ignorance, competitors, and the red queen of evolutionary pressures.
     
    And membership in, and the benefits of, European civilization come at a cost that democratic mythology can’t bear: Europeans have been practicing eugenics for 5000 years. And most aggressively between 700 and 1880 under bipartite manorialism, monogamy, and aggressive prosecution of criminals, and aggressive suppression of immigrants and heretics.
     
    As such, the ‘Conservative’ (meaning traditional Europeans practicing the high cost civilization) have ‘nothing to sell’ other than the evidence of the consequences of paying the high costs of western civilization. And ‘conservative’ (Europeans) can’t even touch the subject of eugenics – which is why the left suppressed all eugenic research and even mention of it postwar: because western civilization’s excellence is predicated on it: because reducing the size of your dependent classes, so that you can direct proceeds to quality over quantity, and thereby produce physical, normative, informational, and institutional commons instead. And to obtain the repeated returns on those investments generation after generation.
     
    Where paying that high cost is entirely antithetical and counter-intuitive to human experience – and is not practiced elsewhere in the world for that reason: truth before face regardless of cost, individual property (meritocracy), normative property ( Protecting the commons as a shareholder regardless of cost) and collective commons(forgoing all opportunities that are not merit). When the rest of humanity does the opposite. European civilization produces the highest genetic, material, informational, cultural, institutional returns (choices), because it is the most expensive civilization to produce and to live in. For this reason: other than our only near neighbor the east Asians, who while escaping mysticism, and discovering ‘reasonable’ philosophy, themselves did not discover the truth before face, rule of law, reason (as in rationalism) or the sciences (as we understand them).
     
    But while the traditional Europeans sought to wait out the left’s failure as we did the communists, the Jewish Postwar Immigrant Movement to force through the Hart Cellar immigration act, that reversed the institutionalized eugenic limitations on immigration, achieved what past failures, and bad ideas, could not: demographic replacement by those peoples who had NOT undergone five thousand years of eugenic evolution (self-domestication), or developed a normative tradition of paying the extraordinarily high costs of producing that civilization, and its returns.
     
    So what is Donald Trump? He is evidence of what is happening around the world, with the Chinese suppression of Islam, the Hindu reversal and suppression of Islam, and the european civilizational suppression of secular Judaism (marxism, socialism, postmodernism, anti-western, anti-male feminism, human biodiversity science denial, economic pseudoscience, financial pseudoscience, and the industrialization of lying using the media, just like the industrialization of lying using roman roads, greek writing, and the openness and tolerance of the Roman empire.)
     
    Trump is evidence of history returning to normal after the failure of the european civilization, and in particular the British empire, due to the conflicting attempts of the Europeans to contain Jewish marxism which was able to seize the Russian empire by its bolshevism (today’s BLM and Antifa, and full-time protest movements), and since migrating to new york (Columbia University) from Germany, has repeated the process they used in Europe, in the Russian empire, in the roman empire, of undermining a people from within by the false promise of freedom from physical natural and evolutionary laws.

  • —-”CURT: Were The Hittites White?”—- Despite a century of controversy, there exi

    —-”CURT: Were The Hittites White?”—-

    Despite a century of controversy, there exist only three major surviving races (subspecies), with the proposed fourth: the Pacific islands consisting of a mixture of all three races, and Austronesians a mix of African and Caucasian.

    The term Caucasian was not a misnomer, but geneticists today refer to West Eurasians as a group separated into bands from Iberia (Spain) to Mongolia (the Turkic peoples).

    WHITE

    “White” refers to:

    (a) descendants of the Indo European conquest of Europe,

    (b) who speak the indo-european language family,

    (c) who practice the indo european metaphysical and legal traditions, and

    (d) during the dark ages, converted from indo european derived religion to its antithesis: the Semitic derived Christian religion.

    The outlier property is the metaphysical and legal tradition that is what causes european civilizational uniqueness and is the reason for european excellence in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – with a thousand years of a superstitious dark age in between. It’s this uniqueness that demarcates ‘whites’ from other peoples more so than any other, and unfortunately, it is the least understood (until now, which is the focus of my work).

    WHITENESS

    “Whiteness” as used pejoratively is a group strategy. It is a group strategy of northern Europeans (protestants). That group strategy is extremely costly. While we may be aware of the high cost of truth before face, the high cost of market meritocracy, and the high cost of high trust norms, it’s unspoken cost is that it is aggressively eugenic. This aggressive eugenics is as much or more important than any other cultural trait. Only the Chinese and the Europeans were able to institutionalize eugenic reproduction via manorialism, which accounts for the elevated intelligence of East Asians and Western Europeans: the underclasses were dramatically reduced through natural cold weather farming, reproductive suppression, and criminal prosecution.

    The world other than Korea japan and china who are equally the products of eugenic evolution (human self domestication) despies western civlization becuase it is expensive, it is counter-intuitive, and it is antithetical to them – but most importantly – because they cannot compete because they cannot repeat the eugenic processes themselves. Islam is perhaps the ultimate anti-civilization in history and is not a primitive group strategy. It produces decivilization and dysgenia by justifying the avoidance of all adaptive costs. The same is true for the current war by the left against western civlization – they seek to eliminate the payment of eugenic costs.

    THE SPECTRUM

    1 – Most narrowly: Northern Europeans above the Hajnal Line (North Sea Civ), who were not under catholicism long enough to lose their ancestral legal and traditional habits – especially those who escaped the long term corruption of the church. The north sea group began separating from the rest of the world rapidly and the great divergence of the greeks was repeated in the north sea beginning in 1000 ad (not 1400).

    2 – Commonly: Christian European whether Germanic Scandinavian, Baltic, Slavic, or Finnic. (Continental Civ). This includes the three groups of Christianized european people: orthodox(greek), catholic(Latin), and protestant (Germanic)

    3 – Less Commonly: Many be extended to include the descendants of early Neolithic farmers of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, Sicily, and Sardinia because they are Christian and in the european territorial and cultural sphere of influence. (European Peninsular Civ)

    4 – Uncommonly: May be extended to include the Iranic people of the caucuses: Georgians, Armenians. (European Extant Civ thru the Urals )

    5 – Rarely: May be extended to include the south-central West Eurasians – the Iranic peoples – but generally not.

    6 – More rarely: May be extended to the Turkic peoples – but almost certainly not – because they don’t speak an IE language.

    7 – Not including outbred peoples of the Indian subcontinent (who are a mixture of negrito hunter-gatherer, middle eastern hunter-gatherer (Dravidian), and Indo european steppe herders.

    8 – Not including the Afro Asiatic Languages – Middle eastern Peoples.

    9 – Never including African or East Asian Peoples, or Siberian Peoples (Amerindians).

    10 – Never including admixture peoples (along the out-of-Africa route from Yemen, to India, to SE Asia, to Australia.

    HITTITES

    The Hittites were West Eurasians. They Were Indo Europeans (“Aryans”). And we do not know whether they traveled from the steppe (Ukraine, Russia) via the clockwise route across the caucuses mountains, or the counter-clockwise route through the Balkans, or whether they originated on the Anatolian shores of the Black Sea. Consensus favors counter-clockwise.

    This means that Hittites share common ancestors with today’s ‘Whites’, and are not of either East Asian (Mongoloid) or African (Negroid) races.

    Attempts to de-racialize human groups are part of the anti-Darwinian pseudoscience movement of the Marxist-postmodern program of science denial, which in turn is a continuation of the ancient middle eastern program of spreading Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, to reverse the unpleasant fact that east Asian and western civilizations are eugenic.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 00:50:00 UTC

  • PILPUL(SOPHISTRY) VS TESTIMONY (SCIENCE): THE LEGAL DEBATE OF THE 20th CENTURY (

    PILPUL(SOPHISTRY) VS TESTIMONY (SCIENCE): THE LEGAL DEBATE OF THE 20th CENTURY (SOON TO BE ASHES)

    LAW MUST BE …

    1 – Existent, not ad-hoc (not made up at the moment)

    2 – Prospective (non-retroactive)

    3 – Applicable to all, identically to all. (CD)

    4 – Clearly Stated and Comprehensible (in and of itself and in the broader context – internally consistent)

    5 – The aspects of the law must be consistent with each other -(externally consistent)

    6 – Possible to be obeyed

    7 – Possible to enforce (CD)

    8 – Constant and Long Lasting.

    9 – Promulgated (widely known)

    10 – Applied and administered as stated. (rules must be consistent with the acts)(Externally Demonstrated)

    Hart, Kelsen, Fuller, Dworkin

    HART: AUTHORITARIAN LEGAL POSITIVISM (Pilpul)

    His father was a Jewish tailor of German and Polish origin; his mother, of Polish origin, daughter of successful retailers in the clothing trade, handled customer relations and the finances of their firm. Hart was, by his own account, a ‘suppressed homosexual’ Hart married Jenifer Fischer Williams, a civil servant, later a senior civil servant, in the Home Office and, still later, Oxford historian at St Anne’s College (specializing in the history of the police).[8] Jenifer Hart was, for some years in the mid-1930s and fading out totally by decade’s end, a ‘sleeper’ member of the Communist Party of Great Britain.. Jenifer Hart was believed by her contemporaries to have had an affair of long duration with Isaiah Berlin, a close friend of Hart’s. Hart strongly influenced the application of methods in his version of Anglo-American positive law to jurisprudence and the philosophy of law in the English-speaking world. Influenced by John Austin, Ludwig Wittgenstein and Hans Kelsen, Hart brought the tools of analytic, and especially linguistic, philosophy to bear on the central problems of legal theory.Hart’s method combined the careful analysis of twentieth-century analytic philosophy with the jurisprudential tradition of Jeremy Bentham, the great English legal, political, and moral philosopher. Hart’s conception of law had parallels to the Pure Theory of Law formulated by Austrian legal philosopher Hans Kelsen, though Hart rejected several distinctive features of Kelsen’s theory.

    KELSEN (Pilpul)

    Hans Kelsen was an Austrian jurist, legal philosopher and political philosopher. He was the author of the 1920 Austrian Constitution, which to a very large degree is still valid today. Due to the rise of totalitarianism in Austria (and a 1929 constitutional change), Kelsen left for Germany in 1930 but was forced to leave this university post after Hitler’s seizure of power in 1933 because of his Jewish ancestry. While in Vienna, Kelsen met Sigmund Freud and his circle, and wrote on the subject of social psychology and sociology. Kelsen’s contributions to legal theory of the Nuremberg trials was supported and contested by various authors including Dinstein at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. Kelsen’s neo-Kantian defense of continental legal positivism was supported by H. L. A. Hart in its contrasting form of Anglo-American legal positivism, which was debated in its Anglo-American form by scholars such as Ronald Dworkin and Jeremy Waldron.

    DWORKIN (Pilpul)

    Ronald Dworkin was born in 1931 in Providence, Rhode Island, United States, the son of Madeline (Talamo) and David Dworkin. His family was Jewish. Ronald Dworkin as a leading defender of the “compatibility of judicial review with the very principles of democracy.” Baume identified John Hart Ely alongside Dworkin as the foremost defenders of this principle in recent years, while the opposition to this principle of “compatibility” was identified as Bruce Ackerman and Jeremy Waldron. Dworkin has been a long-time advocate of the principle of the moral reading of the Constitution whose lines of support he sees as strongly associated with enhanced versions of judicial review in the federal government. This theory combines two key ideas. Broadly speaking, the first is that human beings are responsible for the life choices they make. The second is that natural endowments of intelligence and talent are morally arbitrary and ought not to affect the distribution of resources in society. Like the rest of Dworkin’s work, his theory of equality is underpinned by the core principle that every person is entitled to equal concern and respect in the design of the structure of society. Dworkin’s theory of equality is said to be one variety of so-called luck egalitarianism, but he rejects this statement. Dworkin, as positivism’s most significant critic, rejects the positivist theory on every conceivable level. Dworkin denies that there can be any general theory of the existence and content of law; he denies that local theories of particular legal systems can identify law without recourse to its moral merits, and he rejects the whole institutional focus of positivism. A theory of law is for Dworkin a theory of how cases ought to be decided and it begins, not with an account of the political organization of a legal system, but with an abstract ideal regulating the conditions under which governments may use coercive force over their subjects. Dworkin’s metaphor of judge Hercules bears some resemblance to Rawls’ veil of ignorance and Habermas’ ideal speech situation, in that they all suggest idealized methods of arriving at somehow valid normative propositions. The key difference with respect to the former is that Rawls’ veil of ignorance translates almost seamlessly from the purely ideal to the practical. In relation to politics in a democratic society, for example, it is a way of saying that those in power should treat the political opposition consistently with how they would like to be treated when in opposition, because their present position offers no guarantee as to what their position will be in the political landscape of the future (i.e. they will inevitably form the opposition at some point). Dworkin’s Judge Hercules, on the other hand, is a purely idealized construct, that is if such a figure existed, he would arrive at a right answer in every moral dilemma. For a critique along these lines see Lorenzo Zucca’s Constitutional Dilemmas.

    Dworkin’s right answer thesis turns on the success of his attack on the skeptical argument that right answers in legal-moral dilemmas cannot be determined. Dworkin’s anti-skeptical argument is essentially that the properties of the skeptic’s claim are analogous to those of substantive moral claims, that is, in asserting that the truth or falsity of “legal-moral” dilemmas cannot be determined, the skeptic makes not a metaphysical claim about the way things are, but a moral claim to the effect that it is, in the face of epistemic uncertainty, unjust to determine legal-moral issues to the detriment of any given individua

    FULLER (Operational):

    Notice the rules this post begins with a list of Fuller’s eight testable rules (i”ve added two to make it ten).

    Lon Luvois Fuller was an American legal philosopher, who criticized legal positivism and defended a secular and procedural form of natural law theory. In his widely discussed 1964 book, The Morality of Law, Fuller argues that all systems of law contain an “internal morality” that imposes on individuals a presumptive obligation of obedience. “Fuller was one of the four most important American legal theorists of the last hundred years”.

    Fuller denied the core claim of legal positivism that there is no necessary connection between law and morality. According to Fuller, certain moral standards, which he calls “principles of legality,” are built into the very concept of law, so that nothing counts as genuine law that fails to meet these standards. In virtue of these principles of legality, there is an inner morality to the law that imposes a minimal morality of fairness. Some laws, he admits, may be so wicked or unjust that they should not be obeyed. But even in these cases, he argues, there are positive features of the law that impose a defensible moral duty to obey them.

    Now the key part:

    In a review of The Morality of Law, Hart criticizes Fuller’s work, saying that these principles are merely ones of means-ends efficiency; it is inappropriate, he says, to call them a morality. Employing Fuller’s eight principles of legality, one could just as well have an inner morality of poisoning as an inner morality of law, which Hart claims is absurd. Other critics have challenged Fuller’s claim that there is a prima facie obligation to obey all laws. Some laws, it is claimed, are so unjust and oppressive that there is not even a presumptive moral duty to obey them. In this phase of the argument, the positions of the combatants are transposed. Fuller proposes principles that would easily fit into a positivistic account of law and Hart points out that Fuller’s principles could easily accommodate an immoral morality.

    In other words, Hart acknowledges internal amorality and denies self-determination and individual sovereignty.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-14 19:45:00 UTC

  • COMPARATIVE CIVILIZATIONS AND HOW WE ENDED UP HERE: MINDFULNESS AS ALGORITHMIC C

    COMPARATIVE CIVILIZATIONS AND HOW WE ENDED UP HERE: MINDFULNESS AS ALGORITHMIC COMPUTATION

    (context: human groups and computation)

    You don’t learn about religion – particularly your own – by studying it. You learn by studying all religions past and present, and the consequences of their practice.

    Likewise, you don’t learn about economic, law, or state without comparative study. And most of all you don’t learn about civilizational differences without studying civilizational strategies.

    Let’s do a few comparisons:

    The division of labor produces a commensurability of prejudices (“pre-judgments”), a commensurability of norms, a commensurability of paradigms, that result in a concentration of efforts producing common beneficial ends.

    So, just as the change from particular knowledge (many different incompatible processes) to scientific knowledge (general rules of general application) created a convergence in understanding and convergence in all formal knowledge to a universal paradigm, the same is true for informal knowledge – not just science. And this convergence to general rules accounts for a substantial difference in the increase in demonstrated intelligence (crystalized intelligence) across all peoples (if not fluid or biological intelligence). So via negativa, we remove frictions of not only ignorance but incommensurability concentrate our thinking (efficiency) on producing greater returns as a result.

    We emphasize the most obvious benefit of the division of labor: the increase in productivity from the division of labor. But not the more influential increase in productivity, and a decrease in incommensurability.

    If we understand the (virtuous) self-reinforcing cycle between the division of labor and optimal norms: it produces commensurability interest, norm, and paradigm. It produces the same returns in normative thought in informal knowledge as it science does in formal knowledge.

    And then we see how economic reality, together with the law that prohibits resistance to it, also explain the evolution of religion in primitive societies with primitive production: in those societies, their adaptation is slow and innovation all but suppressed, but the production of norm and paradigm are heavily reinforced, in return for the continuous expansion of those who could not compete otherwise. And with trade and law, the evolution of tort (property), and the continuous suppression of irreciprocity(parasitism), increases at the expense of the reproduction of the uncompetitive.

    So we are faced with a problem of misapplication of childhood indoctrination to group strategy, and adult adaptation of the economy within that strategy. And we can also understand as a consequence why religiosity creates ignorance, dysgenia, poverty, and resists innovation, adaptation and change.

    As such we can judge not only group strategies, but religions that reinforce them, by tests of dysgenia, poverty, ignorance, superstition(Recitationism), and maladaptation, versus eugenic, wealth, knowledge, empiricism (Testimonialism), and adaptation.

    From this, we can understand the benefit of truthful religions and false religions: Universe (perhaps anthropomorphized as a god or gods), Nature (the world we are part of), Ancestors (whose investments made us possible), Archetypal Heroes(whose investments made successful adaptation possible), Kin (those who mutually invest in our shared genetic interests, and State (the corporealization of our people as an organization acting in our interests.)

    And so it is not that religion (indoctrination -long term) is less necessary than law, or law less so than science, or science, less than military prowess, less so than strategy. It is that this hierarchy provides a developmental hierarchy from the child to the adult, to the intellectual, to the strategic and political. And likewise, this hierarchy provides graceful failure in the absence of sufficient knowledge to make a judgment.

    However, this hierarchy can only fulfill its function under certain conditions: and that is when the religious have no economic and political power, the economic have no political and strategic power, and the political and strategic have no economic power.

    But under universal democracy we have granted equal power to unequal knowledge, and unequal cognitive development, thus replicating the dysgenics of religious civilizations within our legal and martial civilization. When throughout our history we had separate ‘houses’ for the monarchy (the military), the senate (the economic elites), and the commoners (the house in pre-Semitic, or the church in Semitic eras)

    So by the victorian period, we had restored the losses of the fall of the roman empire and largely recovered from the semiticism (Judaic Christianity) that prevented its restoration, and we’d produced rule of law by natural law, a monarchy for its function, a senate(upper house) for the macro-nobility having demonstrated interests in the preservation of the polity, the lower house, having demonstrated interests in the economy and productivity, and the church representing the demonstrated interests of families, women, children, the poor and the incompetent. And in doing so created houses for all classes rather than just the upper middle and upper classes.

    And upon the dissolution of the church by the combination of darwin, industrialization, literacy, and the evolution of Semitic religion from superstition to pseudoscientific) yes – anti-civilizational marxism, socialism, boazianism, Freudianism etc), we failed to rename the house of commons (lower house) as the house of common market participants, and create a new house as the house of labor, family, children, and the poor. Or even two houses: one for Labor, and one for women children, and the poor.

    So we are stuck as a consequence with the American system of two parties, the european system of multiple parties, and insufficient number of houses, and the tendencies of parties to replace houses, producing ideological rather than empirical judgments.

    Had we maintained our market for the production of commons, had we made this innovation instead of universal democracy, we would have preserved the market for competition between (a) the stages of development including the emotional, cognitive, knowledge, and responsibility, (b) demonstrated responsibility for self, productivity, family, business, industry, knowledge (science), polity. (c) our ability to use houses of government as yet another expansion of the jury (as we had for 5000 years), where in each class issued verdict on policy.

    The Jews and Muslims never solved the problem of politics, and christianity failed to repeat the egyptian and byzantine ambitions – religion is antithetical to it.

    The Hindus are relatively opaque but solved the problem of religion, state and law through an odd combination of mythology and philosophy – and the only reason they survived is a vast territory, a vast population, a vast underclass, and a peninsula that provided no strategic value.

    The Chinese solved the problem of ethno-state as culture and professional bureaucracy, but not politics or law.

    The Russians incrementally defeated the steppe warriors (Mongols), and decolonized Russia, then almost all of north Eurasia, producing a fully re-militarized society. Had the Jewish Bolsheviks not been successful in destroying Russian civilization (as they destroyed german, and now American) from within, Russia might have emerged as the Sparta of great powers, as Britain the Athens of great powers, and America the Rome.

    The French killed the middle class, then the aristocracy, then set out to destroy the heart of europe: the holy roman empire -then secularized the church, and achieved by secular means the church’s ambition of a conquest of europe by authoritarian socialist rule. This is the correct undrestanding of french ambitions: a feminist rule of Europe in opposition of a prussian masculinist rule of europe. In opposition to a russian mongolian or chinese rule of eurasia.

    The germans solved the problem of professional bureaucracy, but only afterward democracy, and abandoned european law in favor of Continental rule. The secret to german success however, is german culture which like hindu culture appears not a matter of state but of perpetuation of ancient tradition of “we must be best because we are surrounded”.

    The British solved law first by never abandoning it, then politics by multiple houses, then a professional bureaucracy that evolved out of the military. And it it is british civilization, least bound by historical geographic constraints in europe that restored the european tradition of germanic, roman, and greek civilizations. The British were more ‘free to evolve’ by experimentation than other nations of Europe – yet another virtue of island culture.

    The Americans solved law most thoroughly, unfortunately, took the advice of the french (the french are always wrong on everything), in an attempt to take the best of european civilization: european traditional law of individual sovereignty, British empirical rule of law, contract, and process; the political order of the holy roman empire (which was still intact at the time) as an alliance of states this time under a political rather than monarchical bureaucracy, and but utterly failed to create a professional bureaucracy and instead developed clientelism.

    Had we also completed Babbage’s innovation, and developed operationalism and computationalism before the postwar period, we might have defeated the pseudoscientific movement, and in particular, the evolution of pseudoscientific law we call positive law. We certainly would have avoided the total waste of a century in philosophy, and perhaps closed philosophy as we had closed theology – limiting it to the adaptation of current paradigms to new discoveries of truth (sciences) which is the only function it can provide.

    So in retrospect the industrial revolution came early; gave the false promise of escape from physical(scarcity), natural (amorality, reciprocity), and evolutionary (regression to the mean,dysgenia), governments adapted too slowly; the law failed to understand itself, and failed to increase its precision as a formal logic, and human cooperation as formal computation by trial and error, and the church collapsed, leaving the academy, which was taken over by a new pseudoscientific religion that continued to violate those physical, natural and evolutionary laws, under the false promise of freedom from scarcity, the inescapable amorality of human nature, the inescapable spectrum of adaptability in humans.

    There is no reason today that a complete understanding of man, history, economics, law, politics, and groups strategy is not taught every child – except that it would forever end the dysgenic and semitic religions and the false promise of this second religion: the pseudosciences that would bring about another dark age.

    Today’s lesson in Synthesis. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-14 11:54:00 UTC

  • THE BROWSER ECONOMY IS WELFARE FOR THE NERD CLASS How many billions (trillions)

    THE BROWSER ECONOMY IS WELFARE FOR THE NERD CLASS

    How many billions (trillions) of dollars will we waste on painful, tedious, useless, software development before javascript (livescript) fully transforms into Clojure (the ultimate programming language), and the JVM in the browser evolves into a closure virtual machine? Or why don’t we just legislate it and save those billions (trillions)?

    As far as I can tell the economy created by js and the browser are even more of a welfare system for the nerd class than copyright is for the creative class, and the military is to the middle and lower-middle class.

    There is no reason 1) Typing 2) Component Dependencies, 3) dom transactions, or a virtual dom store, 4) Compiling, can’t be conditionally, and 5) there isn’t any reason that there isn’t an equivalent standard UI for apps like there is for operating system shells (Desktop ui’s).

    What did Google do? They created Dart. What happened? They created Flutter for compiling cross-platform apps, and eliminated the need for a Dart virtual machine in the browser.

    Now if you’re Reality by Chanting, and you want Runcible to strike terror into the hearts of the big five, then you finally have a choice of rocking the world.

    The question is, whether it is possible to find programmers to convert a (huge) application like Runcible into Flutter(Dart), or whether we’re stuck with electron, react, and node.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-12 11:59:00 UTC