P-LAW IS FOR EVERYONE (from Twitter) OUR POSITION ON USA, RACE, AND GOVERNMENT While there are minor physical differences, the only material POLITICAL difference between the races is the historical geographic pressure on the group’s underclass and its resulting size relative to the middle class. This ratio determines the group’s success of pareto-organization (hierarchy) of an economy that can compete in the world market. But people demonstrate ingroup priority in politics and all life: marriage, neighborhood, generating different political demands. Whites and Asians demographic distributions are more successful in advanced market civilizations dependent on individual productivity using written communication, logic, calculation, protocols, machines, and technology. Therefore people with different demographic distributions require different economic structures and costs to those economic structures, and they can’t politically mix without conflict since the needs of a population 4–50% able to compete in market civ and one that 80-90% can, are polar opposites. And burning your own consumption and reproduction in favor of political competitors makes people angry (Very). Add to that the uncomfortable truth that sexual, social, economic, and political market value is determined by the degree of neoteny AND demographic distribution, and you end up with the predictable hierarchy of races and subraces that is evident across the world. Therefore while the USA is a continental empire, we are better off with the original design of the country, as an imitation of Historical Europe, with a lot of small states each customizing the production of state services for people with common needs and common interests, and cooperating by the markets rather than perpetual conflict in politics. We can still maintain the services of the federal (continental) government by in-state, military, treasury, benefits, and dispute between states, but devolve the federal government from creating a ‘globalist’ order here in the states with the same resulting conflict as worldwide. This will end the political conflict and drastically reduce power distance between the people and the government. It will generate harmony, It will allow every possible mixture of people and ever possible political model, and states will compete to sere people, but still live within their economic means.
Form: Mini Essay
-
Our Position on USA, Race, and Government
P-LAW IS FOR EVERYONE (from Twitter) OUR POSITION ON USA, RACE, AND GOVERNMENT While there are minor physical differences, the only material POLITICAL difference between the races is the historical geographic pressure on the group’s underclass and its resulting size relative to the middle class. This ratio determines the group’s success of pareto-organization (hierarchy) of an economy that can compete in the world market. But people demonstrate ingroup priority in politics and all life: marriage, neighborhood, generating different political demands. Whites and Asians demographic distributions are more successful in advanced market civilizations dependent on individual productivity using written communication, logic, calculation, protocols, machines, and technology. Therefore people with different demographic distributions require different economic structures and costs to those economic structures, and they can’t politically mix without conflict since the needs of a population 4–50% able to compete in market civ and one that 80-90% can, are polar opposites. And burning your own consumption and reproduction in favor of political competitors makes people angry (Very). Add to that the uncomfortable truth that sexual, social, economic, and political market value is determined by the degree of neoteny AND demographic distribution, and you end up with the predictable hierarchy of races and subraces that is evident across the world. Therefore while the USA is a continental empire, we are better off with the original design of the country, as an imitation of Historical Europe, with a lot of small states each customizing the production of state services for people with common needs and common interests, and cooperating by the markets rather than perpetual conflict in politics. We can still maintain the services of the federal (continental) government by in-state, military, treasury, benefits, and dispute between states, but devolve the federal government from creating a ‘globalist’ order here in the states with the same resulting conflict as worldwide. This will end the political conflict and drastically reduce power distance between the people and the government. It will generate harmony, It will allow every possible mixture of people and ever possible political model, and states will compete to sere people, but still live within their economic means.
-
The Revolutionary Spirit Is a Revolt Against Nature by “Undermining”
THE REVOLUTIONARY SPIRIT IS A REVOLT AGAINST NATURE BY “UNDERMINING”
E Michael Jones is perhaps the best Christian thinker working today. So he frames the Jewish revolt as against Christianity.
So change logos for laws of nature, and Christianity for indo-European discovery adaptation to, and application of laws of nature to accelerate our evolution, and that’s the difference in our positions.
Theological Christianity(Feminine, Submission) vs Scientific Aryanism (Masculine, Dominance).
The secret of European civilization, even above the Iranic and Indian, branches – both of which failed to transcend the superstitious, is the retention of the primacy of man (not god), the primacy of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws (not harmony, or peace, or dysgenics), and the primacy of the industrialization of agency at the cost of those who are unfit.
The difference between Christian and Aryan then is reducible to the Aryan treatment of the underclasses and aliens as another semi-domesticated animal to be used as necessary to transform man into gods – and the Christian treatment of the underclasses as docile workers who generate income for them and the aristocracy.
Christians don’t give up on the bottom.
Aryans do.
Both are right in their way.
The bottom has value to the transcendence of man.
The problem is Christian universalism(globalism) rather than nationalism (kin).The Jewish spirit isn’t revolutionary it’s devolutionary: the defeat of the Indo-European project to transcend man into gods – and instead to maintain and if possible reverse evolution, so that man is a domesticated animal that can be manipulated and extracted from by priests.
https://www.fidelitypress.org/book-products/the-jewish-revolutionary-spirit?
-
The Revolutionary Spirit Is a Revolt Against Nature by “Undermining”
THE REVOLUTIONARY SPIRIT IS A REVOLT AGAINST NATURE BY “UNDERMINING”
E Michael Jones is perhaps the best Christian thinker working today. So he frames the Jewish revolt as against Christianity.
So change logos for laws of nature, and Christianity for indo-European discovery adaptation to, and application of laws of nature to accelerate our evolution, and that’s the difference in our positions.
Theological Christianity(Feminine, Submission) vs Scientific Aryanism (Masculine, Dominance).
The secret of European civilization, even above the Iranic and Indian, branches – both of which failed to transcend the superstitious, is the retention of the primacy of man (not god), the primacy of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws (not harmony, or peace, or dysgenics), and the primacy of the industrialization of agency at the cost of those who are unfit.
The difference between Christian and Aryan then is reducible to the Aryan treatment of the underclasses and aliens as another semi-domesticated animal to be used as necessary to transform man into gods – and the Christian treatment of the underclasses as docile workers who generate income for them and the aristocracy.
Christians don’t give up on the bottom.
Aryans do.
Both are right in their way.
The bottom has value to the transcendence of man.
The problem is Christian universalism(globalism) rather than nationalism (kin).The Jewish spirit isn’t revolutionary it’s devolutionary: the defeat of the Indo-European project to transcend man into gods – and instead to maintain and if possible reverse evolution, so that man is a domesticated animal that can be manipulated and extracted from by priests.
https://www.fidelitypress.org/book-products/the-jewish-revolutionary-spirit?
-
—“Curt: Is there a connection between capitalism and religiosity?”—
“Q: Is there a connection between capitalism and religiosity?”
Great question.
There is a relationship between the military, empiricism, rule of law, and markets that tend to favor capitalism since once you have those influence capitalism is all that one can do. That’s why Europeans invented empiricism, rule of law, markets testimony in all walks of life, and high trust: european civilization was, at least, among the aristocracy, an “army of everyone” for 5000 years. And moving up the status economic and political hierarchy meant integration into that set of values – so much so that we practiced it until 1918 without ever even writing it down as our ‘bible’ of western civilization.
There is a relationship between empiricism and atheism – which is what you would expect. Whether you mean ‘capitalism’ in the ‘free trade’ regardless of local costs, or rule of law, which produces markets within the limits of local costs, determines your understanding of it. In other words, rule of law of reciprocity will produce a mixed economy. Weak (limited) rule of law with a capitalist bias will produce the bad effects of capitalism.
There is a relationship between Christianity and building a large middle class so that one can have a modern, self-organizing economy that will function by incentives – which is the more general name of capitalism. This is why Christian countries tend to become wealthy and Islamic countries tend to become poorer and poorer. Christianity treats everyone as family and customer and treats customers as necessary to keep in order to stay in business.
However, this behavior doesn’t require religiosity. Because post-theological peoples retain those ethics. It’s only been postwar immigrants from ‘less moral’ cultures that have undermined it.
So like many ‘skills’ (arithmetic > math > geometry > calculus > analysis) or (grammar> logic > rhetoric )(physics > chemistry > biology > sentience) or (stories > novels > biographies > histories ) christian ethics appears to be a ‘stage’ through which groups must pass in order to develop an equal to high trust western civlization.
Unfortunately, that very same Christianity and high trust creates a vulnerability because it normalizes trust to a degree that individuals polities, nations, and civilizations are vulnerable to false promises and seditious behavior, as we have seen over the past seventy years.
GIVEN:
Anarchism| < – Capitalism < -… Rule of Law … -> Socialism -> |Communism
………Individual Priority…………….Equilibrium……………..Group Priority…………….
Non-Coercion…Private Corruption……………..Public Corruption… Coercion.AND GIVEN:
Masculine Strategy: Capitalism requires adversarialism (market competition).
Science, law, economics, war require costly personal responsibility for physicality.-Versus-
Feminine Strategy: Communism requires submission (absence of competition)
Religion, philosophy, public popularity, politics are cheap and the absence of physical (material) responsibility.Religiosity is determined by the following factors:
EXPERIENCE
1 – Familial, Social, Institutional indoctrination
2 – Saturation of the environment with ‘falsehoods’ by social constructionENVIRONMENT
3 – The Utility of Religiosity in the local social-political economic environment.
4 – The Utility of Religion as an organization for political resistance or change.MINDFULNESS
5 – Mindfulness(self): (a) sedating powerlessness in the world, (b) evading responsibility for the world, ( c) imaging false power in the world.
6 – Mindfulness (others): (a) resisting influence of others, (b) common non-conflict protocol for interacting with others, ( c) method of expressing dominance against others.EMOTION
7 – Empathic vs Analytic: personality trait : those people who have a higher intuition, want, or neeed, for a conflict-free (relatively) framework with others
8 – Experiential(closed) vs Intellectual(openness): personality trait: those people for whom abiilty, desirability, and status find greater security in regularity than novelty whether mental, emotional, or social. -
—“Curt: Is there a connection between capitalism and religiosity?”—
“Q: Is there a connection between capitalism and religiosity?”
Great question.
There is a relationship between the military, empiricism, rule of law, and markets that tend to favor capitalism since once you have those influence capitalism is all that one can do. That’s why Europeans invented empiricism, rule of law, markets testimony in all walks of life, and high trust: european civilization was, at least, among the aristocracy, an “army of everyone” for 5000 years. And moving up the status economic and political hierarchy meant integration into that set of values – so much so that we practiced it until 1918 without ever even writing it down as our ‘bible’ of western civilization.
There is a relationship between empiricism and atheism – which is what you would expect. Whether you mean ‘capitalism’ in the ‘free trade’ regardless of local costs, or rule of law, which produces markets within the limits of local costs, determines your understanding of it. In other words, rule of law of reciprocity will produce a mixed economy. Weak (limited) rule of law with a capitalist bias will produce the bad effects of capitalism.
There is a relationship between Christianity and building a large middle class so that one can have a modern, self-organizing economy that will function by incentives – which is the more general name of capitalism. This is why Christian countries tend to become wealthy and Islamic countries tend to become poorer and poorer. Christianity treats everyone as family and customer and treats customers as necessary to keep in order to stay in business.
However, this behavior doesn’t require religiosity. Because post-theological peoples retain those ethics. It’s only been postwar immigrants from ‘less moral’ cultures that have undermined it.
So like many ‘skills’ (arithmetic > math > geometry > calculus > analysis) or (grammar> logic > rhetoric )(physics > chemistry > biology > sentience) or (stories > novels > biographies > histories ) christian ethics appears to be a ‘stage’ through which groups must pass in order to develop an equal to high trust western civlization.
Unfortunately, that very same Christianity and high trust creates a vulnerability because it normalizes trust to a degree that individuals polities, nations, and civilizations are vulnerable to false promises and seditious behavior, as we have seen over the past seventy years.
GIVEN:
Anarchism| < – Capitalism < -… Rule of Law … -> Socialism -> |Communism
………Individual Priority…………….Equilibrium……………..Group Priority…………….
Non-Coercion…Private Corruption……………..Public Corruption… Coercion.AND GIVEN:
Masculine Strategy: Capitalism requires adversarialism (market competition).
Science, law, economics, war require costly personal responsibility for physicality.-Versus-
Feminine Strategy: Communism requires submission (absence of competition)
Religion, philosophy, public popularity, politics are cheap and the absence of physical (material) responsibility.Religiosity is determined by the following factors:
EXPERIENCE
1 – Familial, Social, Institutional indoctrination
2 – Saturation of the environment with ‘falsehoods’ by social constructionENVIRONMENT
3 – The Utility of Religiosity in the local social-political economic environment.
4 – The Utility of Religion as an organization for political resistance or change.MINDFULNESS
5 – Mindfulness(self): (a) sedating powerlessness in the world, (b) evading responsibility for the world, ( c) imaging false power in the world.
6 – Mindfulness (others): (a) resisting influence of others, (b) common non-conflict protocol for interacting with others, ( c) method of expressing dominance against others.EMOTION
7 – Empathic vs Analytic: personality trait : those people who have a higher intuition, want, or neeed, for a conflict-free (relatively) framework with others
8 – Experiential(closed) vs Intellectual(openness): personality trait: those people for whom abiilty, desirability, and status find greater security in regularity than novelty whether mental, emotional, or social. -
There Is No Cavalry Coming
THERE IS NO CAVALRY COMING
Yet another stalker who threatened to come “teach me a lesson” (visit violence upon me), was a no-show today. My understanding is that Facebook policy prohibits identifying these lunatics, or I’d share the photos and information. So far, one individual came from new jersey without saying would in advance, and created a little video of his escapade. And every other tough-talking man hasn’t shown. Like I said. Men show up. Pretend-men talk. And not-men talk sh-t about better men. The loser-right uses the internet as a video game – not purposefully, but because they’re insufficiently able to disambiguate fantasy from reality.
Funny how many people came after me for saying (a) we’re going to have a civil war (b) we’re going to have an economic collapse ( c) they’re going to roughly coincide. (d) the state is not able to suppress insurrection on a national level without losing it’s legitimacy home and abroad. (e) the country’s infrastructure is the strategic vulnerability. (f) that the currency system is even more vulnerable than the grid (but I seem to be the only one that sees that weakness).
The state has again, this spring, issued a report that the primary vulnerability is the grid, and that they aren’t able to secure it. That the military has no (magic) weaponry. That we still cannot handle even the most trivial of emergencies. That it’s not ‘powerful’ except in combined arms against other combined arms armies. That we can’t even supply our own military or medical any longer because the supply chain is lost. but it’s worse than that: there is no ability to militarily mobilize the people (outside of the south). (I published a The Choice episode on WHY demilitarization (feminization) of the polity has these strategic impacts on rapid response to threats. And that analysis was correct.)
So, while the opportunity is there. I can’t see the left losing. Because they’re willing to fight. The right isn’t even willing to show up.
And the stalkers are a symptom of a greater nonsense – the ‘middle-easterning’ of men’s words, and men.
Before he was ‘disappeared’ I talked to a very frustrated Augustus who felt resigned that the right was, like little women, waiting for the men to save them. And they are waiting for each other in the greatest circle-j–k in human history.
There is no cavalry. They were the aristocracy. And in our democratic vanity – in selling our virtues of egalitarianism, we ended them without understanding that those few people – those few hundred thousand people were what made our civilization possible.
And while the rifle disempowered them as warriors, it did not disempower their tradition – until this century when we let the barbarians achieve what weapons could not.
-
The Dissident Alt Right is Obstacle To Victory
P-Law criminalizes behavior that every immigrant class (and our own) practice. P-constitutional amendments articulate our natural rights and our european strategy in purely scientific terms. Are you saying that you have a solution to this problem other than murdering people who don’t agree with you on whatever you’re complaining about? Are you saying that women have a choice in their biases? Are you saying that any given ethnic group as a choice in its biases, habits, traditions, culture, strategy? Are you saying you have a choice?No. You don’t, they don’t. They’re born that way and they were indoctrinated by family, religion, culture, and tradition to behave as they do. And we have stopped the forcible indoctrination into religion, culture, tradition, and institution that has made it possible or others to tolerate the HIGH COST to the self for participation in western civilization.
Why can’t we do that? Because our law does not include that requirement for participation in it, and law is the operating system by which all governments of any scale must operate. There is no other name for the rules that regulate the operation of large scale human organizations.
So, your ‘bitching and whining’ doesn’t change anything. it just means you’re a problem. Actionable solutions bring about change. And you’re preventing them. Because you and those like ‘defecate’ on any conversation that could bring about a solution to the problem that you see as simple, even if the solution is complicated.
You and people like you are the clear and present danger. Because you give false promise, false hope, and no solution, to what is a relatively easily solvable political problem. You are the greater enemy of your people. Because no one will tolerate political action by anyone who behaves like you. You are the enemy of the people.
You are a cancer that poisons everything you touch.
Work on spreading solutions not spreading resistance to solutions.
-
The Dissident Alt Right is Obstacle To Victory
P-Law criminalizes behavior that every immigrant class (and our own) practice. P-constitutional amendments articulate our natural rights and our european strategy in purely scientific terms. Are you saying that you have a solution to this problem other than murdering people who don’t agree with you on whatever you’re complaining about? Are you saying that women have a choice in their biases? Are you saying that any given ethnic group as a choice in its biases, habits, traditions, culture, strategy? Are you saying you have a choice?No. You don’t, they don’t. They’re born that way and they were indoctrinated by family, religion, culture, and tradition to behave as they do. And we have stopped the forcible indoctrination into religion, culture, tradition, and institution that has made it possible or others to tolerate the HIGH COST to the self for participation in western civilization.
Why can’t we do that? Because our law does not include that requirement for participation in it, and law is the operating system by which all governments of any scale must operate. There is no other name for the rules that regulate the operation of large scale human organizations.
So, your ‘bitching and whining’ doesn’t change anything. it just means you’re a problem. Actionable solutions bring about change. And you’re preventing them. Because you and those like ‘defecate’ on any conversation that could bring about a solution to the problem that you see as simple, even if the solution is complicated.
You and people like you are the clear and present danger. Because you give false promise, false hope, and no solution, to what is a relatively easily solvable political problem. You are the greater enemy of your people. Because no one will tolerate political action by anyone who behaves like you. You are the enemy of the people.
You are a cancer that poisons everything you touch.
Work on spreading solutions not spreading resistance to solutions.
-
We Don’t Have Infinite Time
BOTTLENECKS, SPEED, AND MULTIPLE FOUNDERS: REMINDER THAT WE DON”T HAVE INFINITE TIME TO COMPLETE THE ARYAN REVOLUTION OF MAN.
by Sean KaneAlthough recreational running can feel like a chore, our species is built for insane endurance. Plenty of land animals are faster in short distances, but nothing can move at a slow, easy run for longer than humans.
This allowed prehistoric humans to excel at hunting. We’d jog after large prey under the midday sun until they died from exhaustion.
Once our weapons got better and we learned to carry water in containers, our already impressive endurance only improved, readying humans to spread across the globe.
Our ability to regulate body temperature further helped our crazy endurance abilities. Humans can really take the heat.
Many animals sweat, but few use it for evaporative cooling, like humans (and horses) do. We’re also able to breath through our mouths when we run, taking in more oxygen as well as further dissipating heat.
Other animals dump heat by panting, which is impossible to do in a gallop. This meant hunters could chase animals at their slowest galloping speed until they overheated
Another huge evolutionary advantage came from our ability to stand upright — though creaky knees and back pain are certainly a tradeoff.
Standing on two legs kept more of our hairless skin out of the harsh savanna sun and, even more importantly, freed up our hands to wield tools and to throw weapons.
Though other primates have the ability to understand the trajectories of thrown objects (allowing them to dodge), no animals can aim and throw with the power and precision of a human.
We’ve also got better hearing than our other primate brethren, and we can hear a wider range of sounds, especially between 1.0-6.0 kHz — where most human speech occurs.
Around 70,000 years ago, humanity’s global population dropped down to only a few thousand individuals, and it had major effects on our species.
It’s called the Toba catastrophe. A massive supervolcano in Indonesia erupted, blackening the sky with ash, plunging earth into an ice age, and killing off all but the hardiest humans.
The enormous supervolcano eruption occurred around the same time as humanity’s biggest bottleneck. Research from the late 1990s and early 2000s suggested that this eruption, on Sumatra in Indonesia, blocked the sun across much of Asia, causing a harsh volcanic winter and a 1,000-year-long cooling period on earth.
But archaeological evidence shows that human hunter-gatherer settlements in India weren’t too affected by the eruption and quickly recovered. Temperature data embedded in the geology of Lake Malawi, in East Africa, also suggests that the region didn’t cool off that drastically.
But worldwide the population declined rapidly.
Almost getting wiped out put a lot more pressure on our ancestors and caused a genetic bottleneck, which greatly decreases the genetic variation in a population.
Small populations are much more susceptible to disease and environmental disasters, and unfavorable genetic traits can rapidly accumulate. Bottlenecks also slow evolutionary change, since fewer members of a species are around to pick up potentially favorable genetic mutations.However, any rare beneficial mutations that do occur get amplified: Genes get passed around quickly in a tiny community.
Genetic bottlenecks can cause what is known as the founder effect, where small, isolated populations drastically diverge from the original population.
As humans spread across the planet, our population experienced multiple bottlenecks and, as a result, a serial-founder effect kicked in to create the diversity we currently see in the human race today.
Scientists have mapped these events to geographic choke points around the world, based on decreasing genetic diversity as we migrated.
One bottleneck occurred when a small group of humans left Africa.
Another happened when this group split up in the Middle East, with some of us heading to Europe and others to Asia.
Others occurred when we left Southeast Asia for Austronesia, crossed the Beringia land bridge into Alaska, and spread into South America through what is now Panama.
This is why African populations tend to have far more genetic diversity in their DNA than populations native to the Americas.
It’s also why, when you compare humans to other species, human DNA is not very diverse when you consider our globe-spanning range.