Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • The Choice – Episode 0023 – The Prosecution. The Summary and Remedy

    Welcome to The Choice – Episode 0023 – The Prosecution. The Summary and Remedy –  I’m Curt Doolittle

    THE SUMMARY AND REMEDY conflict between masculine and feminine men physical and political super predators, and females verbal, emotional, and social super-predators. resolved in marriage resolved by church vs market let loose by the enfranchisement of women, destroying marriage and market driving all to politics and competition between interests in politics rather than maintaining equalitarian and egalitarian compromise within the family. We are the only civilization with alien hostile elites, with the Europeans practicing the masculine strategy and the jews practicing the feminine strategy. This would have been tolerable and possibly beneficial had we constructed our institutions for competing interests rather than for the married family, and we had adapted our laws to suppress female warfare as thoroughly as we had adapted it for suppression of male warfare. and instead of providing separate houses for men and women of opposing interest relied on majoritarianism between men of common interests therefore ending the use of the government as a market between competing interests. The obvious solution is to restore the division between the houses of the classes and to separate male and female votes as we do the classes. This restores the market for exchanges between the classes. The alternative is to limit the voting population to property-owning males or create an additional house for females. But regardless of the method of selecting the production of commons, the central problem of equally suppressing the female means of circumventing meritocratic markets by informational, psychological, and social superpredation must be as equally suppressed as male physical, political, and military superpredation. And to do this requires that we understand the female and semitic method of warfare; how it has been used in the roman ancient, and the modern european worlds to destroy our civilization from within – whether intentionally in some cases, out of common interest in other, and even instinctually in other. Explaining both the european masculine evolutionary and Jewish-semitic feminine devolutionary group strategies will help us avoid a bloody civil war in the west, it will end the destruction of the west by the use of minorities and females against european people and our civilization by the jews, and end both the second destruction of the west, and the dark ages that have already begun due to jewish expertise in the female method of undermining, and the strength of the western openness to ideas, but our failure to defend against the false promises of the abrahamic method of the jews. so we must both reform our laws, and demand reform from the jews, and muslims as well if they wish to live among us.

  • The Choice – Episode 0023 – The Prosecution. The Summary and Remedy

    Welcome to The Choice – Episode 0023 – The Prosecution. The Summary and Remedy –  I’m Curt Doolittle

    THE SUMMARY AND REMEDY conflict between masculine and feminine men physical and political super predators, and females verbal, emotional, and social super-predators. resolved in marriage resolved by church vs market let loose by the enfranchisement of women, destroying marriage and market driving all to politics and competition between interests in politics rather than maintaining equalitarian and egalitarian compromise within the family. We are the only civilization with alien hostile elites, with the Europeans practicing the masculine strategy and the jews practicing the feminine strategy. This would have been tolerable and possibly beneficial had we constructed our institutions for competing interests rather than for the married family, and we had adapted our laws to suppress female warfare as thoroughly as we had adapted it for suppression of male warfare. and instead of providing separate houses for men and women of opposing interest relied on majoritarianism between men of common interests therefore ending the use of the government as a market between competing interests. The obvious solution is to restore the division between the houses of the classes and to separate male and female votes as we do the classes. This restores the market for exchanges between the classes. The alternative is to limit the voting population to property-owning males or create an additional house for females. But regardless of the method of selecting the production of commons, the central problem of equally suppressing the female means of circumventing meritocratic markets by informational, psychological, and social superpredation must be as equally suppressed as male physical, political, and military superpredation. And to do this requires that we understand the female and semitic method of warfare; how it has been used in the roman ancient, and the modern european worlds to destroy our civilization from within – whether intentionally in some cases, out of common interest in other, and even instinctually in other. Explaining both the european masculine evolutionary and Jewish-semitic feminine devolutionary group strategies will help us avoid a bloody civil war in the west, it will end the destruction of the west by the use of minorities and females against european people and our civilization by the jews, and end both the second destruction of the west, and the dark ages that have already begun due to jewish expertise in the female method of undermining, and the strength of the western openness to ideas, but our failure to defend against the false promises of the abrahamic method of the jews. so we must both reform our laws, and demand reform from the jews, and muslims as well if they wish to live among us.

  • The average imbecile regardless of political preference, bias, and instinct, see

    The average imbecile regardless of political preference, bias, and instinct, seeks an authoritarian government, whether marxist or fascist anything in between under the presumption that ‘it hasn’t been tried enough’ as a proxy for ‘I would do it better my way’. …

    But No. Organizations require systemic rules for making decisions regardless of the temperaments, preferences, biases,and instincts of their members from the most competent to the least – and those rules mustn’t conflict with incentives – they must be possible and enforceable.

    The purpose of a parliament (parley, negotiate) is to serve as a jury for the initiatives of the state (monarchy, cabinet, bureaucracy). The division of labor between competency (the state) and market (parliament). It is not to operate the state – they lack competence.

    There is no reason any longer for any model other than rule of law under Natural Law by P-Law, monarchy, cabinet, and direct democratic assent or dissent for policies, and contracted services instead of bureaucracies. There is no reason for it at all. Why do we need politicians?

    Setting aside for the moment the criteria for voting, and presuming for a moment that representatives are more valuable than direct democracy (admittedly false) if representatives (jurors) in parliaments were to exist, what would we require for criteria for office?

    For all his understanding of political history, Francis Fukuyama has a very poor understanding of economics and he has an unhealthy obsession with democracy. An empowered government is proven more effective, yes, but when limited by monarchy and natural law – not by votes.

    Again, this is simply a problem of scale. Democracy functions as the means of selecting priorities among people with common interests. That means it’s for small heterogeneous polities.

    one can say that monarchies select better priorities and likely be correct. that does not distinguish the difference between monopoly, majority, and markets.

    Argue the right problem: we are heterogeneous and large and have no common interest

    Yes. My recommendation is to return to our original design as a continuation of the HRE, as a loose federation of states under a weak judicial government, that licenses ‘free cities’ within constraints.

    This requires educating the public for whom the present model is a religion

    Source date (UTC): 2020-12-29 21:16:16 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105465549651238841

  • THE COMING REFORMS NYC survives by credit expansion paid for by DC debt expansio

    THE COMING REFORMS

    NYC survives by credit expansion paid for by DC debt expansion and liquidity provision. in NYC 11 of the top 25 companies would vaporize with finance reform. SF would vaporize with labor reform. LA with immigration reform. DC with decentralization. (an Insight on US fragility)

    This merely states that the tax revenues of NYC are disproportionately dependent on the financial sector which is disproportionately dependent on DC, and that in the next severe correction, we will likely see financial reformation and a substantive impact on NYC.

    In other words, credit and consumption based growth in the financial sector is facing a difficult future, necessitating the search for more capital intensive longer-term returns, and minimizing capital from credit cards, mortgages, education loans, and all fields of insurance and especially pensions.

    So drastic reduction in institutional capital accumulated from consumer ‘rents’, combined with next year’s beginning drawdown on baby boomer investments, will reverse seventy years of trend.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-12-29 20:55:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105465467685887076

  • What if We ‘Re-Ran’ the Universe?

      Would Life Evolve?

    1. Any “grammar” given enough opportunity(scale and time) will calculate(randomly discover) every opportunity (possibility) to defeat entropy(capture energy). The sun, distance, temperature, water-vapor, iron-core, moon, duration combination is looking rarer than I’d expected.
    2. It is extremely unlikely that the universe can produce variations other than the one that we see around us.
    3. The theory of many universes (bubbles) is unequal to alternate universes.
    4. We apparently cannot deduce from the information available the geometry of the subatomic.
    5. It’s more likely that some variation on the constructivist method (Wolfram) will produce information that suggests the underlying geometry, and that we can solve for the differences.
    6. Why? Mathiness is a problem in physics, and most “silly ideas” reflect limits of math.
    7. none of these propositions claim knowledge of physics, they claim only that the many questionable hypotheses we see put forward in physics reflect human ignorance of the constitution of mathematics (description, sets, deduction) and computation (construction by operations).

  • What if We ‘Re-Ran’ the Universe?

      Would Life Evolve?

    1. Any “grammar” given enough opportunity(scale and time) will calculate(randomly discover) every opportunity (possibility) to defeat entropy(capture energy). The sun, distance, temperature, water-vapor, iron-core, moon, duration combination is looking rarer than I’d expected.
    2. It is extremely unlikely that the universe can produce variations other than the one that we see around us.
    3. The theory of many universes (bubbles) is unequal to alternate universes.
    4. We apparently cannot deduce from the information available the geometry of the subatomic.
    5. It’s more likely that some variation on the constructivist method (Wolfram) will produce information that suggests the underlying geometry, and that we can solve for the differences.
    6. Why? Mathiness is a problem in physics, and most “silly ideas” reflect limits of math.
    7. none of these propositions claim knowledge of physics, they claim only that the many questionable hypotheses we see put forward in physics reflect human ignorance of the constitution of mathematics (description, sets, deduction) and computation (construction by operations).

  • WHAT IF WE ‘RE-RAN’ THE UNIVERSE? Would Life Evolve? Any “grammar” given enough

    WHAT IF WE ‘RE-RAN’ THE UNIVERSE?

    Would Life Evolve?

    1. Any “grammar” given enough opportunity(scale and time) will calculate(randomly discover) every opportunity (possibility) to defeat entropy(capture energy). The sun, distance, temperature, water-vapor, iron-core, moon, duration combination is looking rarer than I’d expected.

    2. It is extremely unlikely that the universe can produce variations other than the one that we see around us.

    3. The theory of many universes (bubbles) is unequal to alternate universes.

    4. We apparently cannot deduce from the information available the geometry of the subatomic.

    5. It’s more likely that some variation on the constructivist method (Wolfram) will produce information that suggests the underlying geometry, and that we can solve for the differences.

    6. Why? Mathiness is a problem in physics, and most “silly ideas” reflect limits of math.

    7. none of these propositions claim knowledge of physics, they claim only that the many questionable hypotheses we see put forward in physics reflect human ignorance of the constitution of mathematics (description, sets, deduction) and computation (construction by operations).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-12-28 17:35:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105459017622892393

  • On Richard Dawkins vs Brett Weinstein

    FORMAL PROBLEM 1) A mathematical model is a general rule, necessarily statistical, and is not an operational (causally complete) model – we fail to understand the limits of mathematics as we increase precision. (mathematical descriptions are invariably generalizations, and at the point of marginal difference, algorithmic simulations must replace mathematical calculations) 2) Mathematical models rely on generalizations that discount causal influences that are marginally indifferent UNTIL they are no longer marginally indifferent. (models require more information at scale) 3) There must exist three dimensions (competitive axis) in order to form a competitive evolutionary equilibrium. (choice must exist) DISCUSSIONS 1) Peacock Tail. Why Is That? Because nature can’t calculate a maximum expression of fitness without a competing axis of fitness. Conditions must change. 2) Genes are modified by other genes, so that fitness in youth and death in age is likely to survive, so the rest is. This is offset by intergenerational caretaking and knowledge transfer, making grandparents the end value. 3) Weinstein’s “It’s not for me” and “selfish replicators” is, in fact, a genetic expression specifically because we see the masculine european evolutionary Dawkins and the feminine Semitic devolutionary in Weinstein – reflecting our group evolutionary strategies, and the european and Jewish specialization in male vs female reproductive strategies. This is why Europeans (masculine eugenic quality) and european jews (feminine dysgenic quantity) serve as the intellectual leadership in the world, at least under democracy where these differences are enabled, vs the rest of the world, particularly China, maintains the masculine competitive evolutionary demonstrating at the civilizational level why there are no feminine civilizations and why Abrahamic (Semitic) civilizations devolved. 4) Dawkins’ “this is not Darwinism, its not helpful to couch this in Darwinian terms”. Weinstein is using pilpul and critique (the Abrahamic method of deceit) to seek opportunity for weakness despite its devolutionary consequences. He’s not talking about evolution. He’s talking politics. And he’s advocating for a political wing (leftism) not for evolution. In fact he’s arguing for devolution. In other words, Dawkins is disambiguating in search for truth and Weinstein is conflating to create ambiguity, in order to advance a political bias (that’s actually bad). 5) Genocide: Genocide is the most effective and determinant evolutionary behavior in history. That’s an unpleasant truth. (Hybridization is also genocide.) it won’t go away. it will simply be necessary or not, or useful or not. 6) FWIW: european history is a battle between the Mediterranean > Christian > supernatural > feminine > Latin > french south and the continental > empirical > masculine > germanic north, and the french catholic Latin persistence of the feminine Semitic authoritarian strategy attempt to destroy the germanic rational-legal holy roman empire wherein the Prussians restored the european tradition. The jews and the french and the germanic and protestants continue an ancestral conflict and it’s rather obvious in retrospect that the enemy of human civilization is the feminine. 7) Eusocial upward redistribution (he’s referring to priesthood vs Jewish rabbinical method). These are differences in group use of capital. This is why I argue that economics is a better language than biology as soon as we hit the agrarian age. Catholics produce corruption. 8) Weinstein is trying to justify Judaism and Dawkins is trying to state science. Which is, in fact, the difference between european masculine aristocratic and Jewish feminine communist group strategies. (which is fascinating). 😉    

  • On Richard Dawkins vs Brett Weinstein

    FORMAL PROBLEM 1) A mathematical model is a general rule, necessarily statistical, and is not an operational (causally complete) model – we fail to understand the limits of mathematics as we increase precision. (mathematical descriptions are invariably generalizations, and at the point of marginal difference, algorithmic simulations must replace mathematical calculations) 2) Mathematical models rely on generalizations that discount causal influences that are marginally indifferent UNTIL they are no longer marginally indifferent. (models require more information at scale) 3) There must exist three dimensions (competitive axis) in order to form a competitive evolutionary equilibrium. (choice must exist) DISCUSSIONS 1) Peacock Tail. Why Is That? Because nature can’t calculate a maximum expression of fitness without a competing axis of fitness. Conditions must change. 2) Genes are modified by other genes, so that fitness in youth and death in age is likely to survive, so the rest is. This is offset by intergenerational caretaking and knowledge transfer, making grandparents the end value. 3) Weinstein’s “It’s not for me” and “selfish replicators” is, in fact, a genetic expression specifically because we see the masculine european evolutionary Dawkins and the feminine Semitic devolutionary in Weinstein – reflecting our group evolutionary strategies, and the european and Jewish specialization in male vs female reproductive strategies. This is why Europeans (masculine eugenic quality) and european jews (feminine dysgenic quantity) serve as the intellectual leadership in the world, at least under democracy where these differences are enabled, vs the rest of the world, particularly China, maintains the masculine competitive evolutionary demonstrating at the civilizational level why there are no feminine civilizations and why Abrahamic (Semitic) civilizations devolved. 4) Dawkins’ “this is not Darwinism, its not helpful to couch this in Darwinian terms”. Weinstein is using pilpul and critique (the Abrahamic method of deceit) to seek opportunity for weakness despite its devolutionary consequences. He’s not talking about evolution. He’s talking politics. And he’s advocating for a political wing (leftism) not for evolution. In fact he’s arguing for devolution. In other words, Dawkins is disambiguating in search for truth and Weinstein is conflating to create ambiguity, in order to advance a political bias (that’s actually bad). 5) Genocide: Genocide is the most effective and determinant evolutionary behavior in history. That’s an unpleasant truth. (Hybridization is also genocide.) it won’t go away. it will simply be necessary or not, or useful or not. 6) FWIW: european history is a battle between the Mediterranean > Christian > supernatural > feminine > Latin > french south and the continental > empirical > masculine > germanic north, and the french catholic Latin persistence of the feminine Semitic authoritarian strategy attempt to destroy the germanic rational-legal holy roman empire wherein the Prussians restored the european tradition. The jews and the french and the germanic and protestants continue an ancestral conflict and it’s rather obvious in retrospect that the enemy of human civilization is the feminine. 7) Eusocial upward redistribution (he’s referring to priesthood vs Jewish rabbinical method). These are differences in group use of capital. This is why I argue that economics is a better language than biology as soon as we hit the agrarian age. Catholics produce corruption. 8) Weinstein is trying to justify Judaism and Dawkins is trying to state science. Which is, in fact, the difference between european masculine aristocratic and Jewish feminine communist group strategies. (which is fascinating). 😉    

  • No Emmanuel Macron, the UK will not be a Small Weak Country after Brexit – She will restore her position as a great power.

    The UK, The USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand will form a block of cultural, legal, economic, integration because we share common culture, language, and values as dependent on distributed NAVAL interests rather than shared continental powers – effectively restoring the British empire. We will have the largest territories, with the most resources, with the largest time zone coverage, at the lowest population density. Anglosphere: UK 320M, UK 66M, CA40M, AU 25M, NZ 5M = 435M. Even if the EU unifies all of Europe that 550M, and much of it is POOR. Germany won’t survive the population decline, nor will her industry survive the automobile contraction. Eastern Europe isn’t willing to commit cultural suicide by Muslim immigration. And the entire continent is dependent upon the grace of Russia, and the coming Iranian success at the restoration of the caliphate with Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq, followed by the conquest of the Saudi North Gulf, and creation of an oil bourse and oil-backed currency. The reason you (the EU) failed was (a) French authoritarianism, (b) French interests in Africa, (c) german immigration of Turkish labor, (d) failing to grasp that Muslim immigration is repeating the Christian destruction of the roman institutions (e) cowardice in closing your borders and repatriation, (f) choosing immigration and integration over automation in a world where the value of labor, clerical labor, and shortly, managerial labor is approaching zero. Japan is the only country having made the right choice. And America, upon which european sovereignty depends, is as fragile as Europe before the thirty years war.