Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Why the thousands of years of lying originating in the middle east? Because the

    Why the thousands of years of lying originating in the middle east? Because the Indo Europeans discovered self-determination and agency in the formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, and the middle east, much older, had discovered lying to ignore them. This is the answer you know. The problem is Europeans cannot use this discovery, adaptation to, and application of the laws of the universe to expand. The lies of the middle east, and the untruths of the Chinese can. This is the great problem of history. Truth is UNDESIRABLE. Well, today’s ME are still low trust, face-before-truth tribal peoples. The question is how much is that dependent upon lower neoteny and a median IQ in the low 80’s – meaning more than half of the population is a horrific inescapable burden on any emergent middle-class norms. Well, you know, ‘race’ as we understand it is the result of the age of sail observation of the three or four common origins of most peoples. But in history, it meant closer to what we think of ethnicity – the combination of body and culture. Read what Aristotle said about Semites I mean, seriously. If you want to write the truth you can’t do it in europe, uk, canada or australia, and now you can’t do it in the USA. Why? Because woke is a religion less tolerant than Islam. It is judaism>chrsitianity>islam>Marxis+ Pomo + woke/pc. The evolution of lying Yeah, I couldn’t stay in canada because I felt the present oppression in the USA in canada a decade ago. I think it’s funny that I can tell the Ukraininan press that the revolution didn’t work because they didn’t hang any politicians and it’s just honesty. And here its heresy.  

  • Why the thousands of years of lying originating in the middle east? Because the

    Why the thousands of years of lying originating in the middle east? Because the Indo Europeans discovered self-determination and agency in the formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, and the middle east, much older, had discovered lying to ignore them. This is the answer you know. The problem is Europeans cannot use this discovery, adaptation to, and application of the laws of the universe to expand. The lies of the middle east, and the untruths of the Chinese can. This is the great problem of history. Truth is UNDESIRABLE. Well, today’s ME are still low trust, face-before-truth tribal peoples. The question is how much is that dependent upon lower neoteny and a median IQ in the low 80’s – meaning more than half of the population is a horrific inescapable burden on any emergent middle-class norms. Well, you know, ‘race’ as we understand it is the result of the age of sail observation of the three or four common origins of most peoples. But in history, it meant closer to what we think of ethnicity – the combination of body and culture. Read what Aristotle said about Semites I mean, seriously. If you want to write the truth you can’t do it in europe, uk, canada or australia, and now you can’t do it in the USA. Why? Because woke is a religion less tolerant than Islam. It is judaism>chrsitianity>islam>Marxis+ Pomo + woke/pc. The evolution of lying Yeah, I couldn’t stay in canada because I felt the present oppression in the USA in canada a decade ago. I think it’s funny that I can tell the Ukraininan press that the revolution didn’t work because they didn’t hang any politicians and it’s just honesty. And here its heresy.  

  • The Negative Value of Non STEM+EL Degrees

    Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in STEM fields- and eventually do 2) must ‘unlearn’ what they were taught was false – and eventually do 3) and the net difference is that non-STEM education cost was a LOSS, and STEM students earned it. There is never, ever a comparison between a conversation with a physicist, engineer, or economist that is vapid as someone in the humanities. It is however, more pleasant going through life in secular theology of the humanities, just as more blissful in supernatural theology. Very few people (relatively) get stem degrees. The disturbing reality is that despite the vast number of people put thru higher education the number of top talent, the marginal difference in theory, and innovations hasn’t increased since 63. Lower return on ed vs reproduction. So what’s ‘wrong’? The measure of any discipline is (a) reproducibility of research (b) survivability of claims and skills in time (c) demonstrated evidence of resulting productivity (d) improvement or decline in competency per person (e) non- substitutability by apprenticeship. So? How many disciplines dont fail? Better yet, what if Universities and professors had to warranty students for occupational fitness upon award of degree or return the educational funds to students? What would happen is that we would drop back to 10-12% of population. All of this is common knowledge in economics. All we have done is dumb down high school degrees, eliminate cheap vocational(manual) and junior(clerical-medical) training, in exchange for impoverishing parents in old age, delaying homeownership, and gutting reproduction. Gutting reproduction while causing declining productivity generates demand for immigration to pay for medical and retirement costs of people who were deprived of children and consequential consumption, causing a continuous reduction in the competitiveness of the economy. And that’s BEFORE we talk about the fact that colleges are teaching a secular religion of false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: marxism-postmodernism-pc/woke – that is marching through the institutions of cultural production and maintenance. Why? to feed higher ed. And if you were skilled in physics, economics, cognitive science, and not yourself indoctrinated into the social construction of false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe you would know this. But your keep perpetuating these lies like a priesthood justifying faith.

  • The Negative Value of Non STEM+EL Degrees

    Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in STEM fields- and eventually do 2) must ‘unlearn’ what they were taught was false – and eventually do 3) and the net difference is that non-STEM education cost was a LOSS, and STEM students earned it. There is never, ever a comparison between a conversation with a physicist, engineer, or economist that is vapid as someone in the humanities. It is however, more pleasant going through life in secular theology of the humanities, just as more blissful in supernatural theology. Very few people (relatively) get stem degrees. The disturbing reality is that despite the vast number of people put thru higher education the number of top talent, the marginal difference in theory, and innovations hasn’t increased since 63. Lower return on ed vs reproduction. So what’s ‘wrong’? The measure of any discipline is (a) reproducibility of research (b) survivability of claims and skills in time (c) demonstrated evidence of resulting productivity (d) improvement or decline in competency per person (e) non- substitutability by apprenticeship. So? How many disciplines dont fail? Better yet, what if Universities and professors had to warranty students for occupational fitness upon award of degree or return the educational funds to students? What would happen is that we would drop back to 10-12% of population. All of this is common knowledge in economics. All we have done is dumb down high school degrees, eliminate cheap vocational(manual) and junior(clerical-medical) training, in exchange for impoverishing parents in old age, delaying homeownership, and gutting reproduction. Gutting reproduction while causing declining productivity generates demand for immigration to pay for medical and retirement costs of people who were deprived of children and consequential consumption, causing a continuous reduction in the competitiveness of the economy. And that’s BEFORE we talk about the fact that colleges are teaching a secular religion of false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: marxism-postmodernism-pc/woke – that is marching through the institutions of cultural production and maintenance. Why? to feed higher ed. And if you were skilled in physics, economics, cognitive science, and not yourself indoctrinated into the social construction of false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe you would know this. But your keep perpetuating these lies like a priesthood justifying faith.

  • Universities Don’t Teach. They Sort by Work Capacity, Conscientiousness, and IQ.

    UNIVERSITIES DON’T TEACH. THEY SORT BY WORK CAPACITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, AND IQ. You pay 150k in debt, four years of earning, four years of life, one or two fewer children, delayed homeownership, on what’s nothing more than a class, personality, and IQ test. That’s all it is. There is no evidence you learn anything in university unless it’s math, comp-sci, or engineering, that can’t be taught part-time in two years or less. The rest is ‘recreation’ or ‘indoctrination’. Now, you will find that CEO’s tend to the 130 IQ range for deterministic reasons (I have an undergrad in art history and founded a dozen companies). And the demand for CEO talent varies dramatically by sector. Some are political (GM), some technical, some engineering, some finance. The difference is that they have 130 plus IQ’s, and have high conscientiousness, and can work harder than most people can imagine it’s possible to work, have extraordinary endurance, high pain tolerance – especially psychological. It’s equivalent to being a professional athlete. So your argument is well-intentioned but false: one’s chances of becoming a fortune X ceo have nothing at all to do with education. Just as almost everything in life has to do with one’s social and economic market value: determined by fitness, manners, conscientiousness, & IQ. If you study for example Harvard, Yale, Georgetown, and Stanford JD courses it’s postmodern drivel. It’s intellectually embarrassing. If you study at a state school or just read the literature, and apprentice (in the past) you’d do better. Universities don’t teach. They Sort. That’s all they do.

  • Universities Don’t Teach. They Sort by Work Capacity, Conscientiousness, and IQ.

    UNIVERSITIES DON’T TEACH. THEY SORT BY WORK CAPACITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, AND IQ. You pay 150k in debt, four years of earning, four years of life, one or two fewer children, delayed homeownership, on what’s nothing more than a class, personality, and IQ test. That’s all it is. There is no evidence you learn anything in university unless it’s math, comp-sci, or engineering, that can’t be taught part-time in two years or less. The rest is ‘recreation’ or ‘indoctrination’. Now, you will find that CEO’s tend to the 130 IQ range for deterministic reasons (I have an undergrad in art history and founded a dozen companies). And the demand for CEO talent varies dramatically by sector. Some are political (GM), some technical, some engineering, some finance. The difference is that they have 130 plus IQ’s, and have high conscientiousness, and can work harder than most people can imagine it’s possible to work, have extraordinary endurance, high pain tolerance – especially psychological. It’s equivalent to being a professional athlete. So your argument is well-intentioned but false: one’s chances of becoming a fortune X ceo have nothing at all to do with education. Just as almost everything in life has to do with one’s social and economic market value: determined by fitness, manners, conscientiousness, & IQ. If you study for example Harvard, Yale, Georgetown, and Stanford JD courses it’s postmodern drivel. It’s intellectually embarrassing. If you study at a state school or just read the literature, and apprentice (in the past) you’d do better. Universities don’t teach. They Sort. That’s all they do.

  • UNIVERSITIES DON’T TEACH. THEY SORT BY WORK CAPACITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, AND IQ.

    UNIVERSITIES DON’T TEACH. THEY SORT BY WORK CAPACITY, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, AND IQ.

    You pay 150k in debt, four years of earning, four years of life, one or two fewer children, delayed homeownership, on what’s nothing more than a class, personality, and IQ test. That’s all it is. There is no evidence you learn anything in university unless it’s math, comp-sci, or engineering, that can’t be taught part-time in two years or less. The rest is ‘recreation’ or ‘indoctrination’.

    Now, you will find that ceo’s tend to the 130 iq range for deterministic reasons (I have an undergrad in art history and founded a dozen companies). And demand for ceo talent varies dramatically by sector. Some are political (GM), some technical, some engineering, some finance.

    The difference is that they have 130 plus IQ’s, and have high conscientiousness, and can work harder than most people can imagine it’s possible to work, have extraordinary endurance, high pain tolerance – especially psychological. It’s equivalent to being a professional athlete.

    So your argument is well-intentioned but false: one’s chances of becoming a fortune X ceo have nothing at all to do with education. Just as almost everything in life has to do with one’s social and economic market value: determined by fitness, manners, conscientiousness, & IQ.

    If you study for example Harvard, Yale, Georgetown, and Stanford JD courses it’s postmodern drivel. It’s intellectually embarrassing. If you study at a state school or just read the literature, and apprentice (in the past) you’d do better.

    Universities don’t teach. They Sort. That’s all they do.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 16:49:08 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105685329373852063

  • Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in

    Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in STEM fields- and eventually do 2) must ‘unlearn’ what they were taught was false – and eventually do 3) and the net difference is that non-STEM education cost was a LOSS, and STEM students earned it.

    There is never, ever a comparison between a conversation with a physicist, engineer, or economist that is vapid as someone in the humanities. It is however, more pleasant going through life in secular theology of the humanities, just as more blissful in supernatural theology.

    Very few people (relatively) get stem degrees. The disturbing reality is that despite the vast number of people put thru higher education the number of top talent, the marginal difference in theory, and innovations hasn’t increased since 63. Lower return on ed vs reproduction. So what’s ‘wrong’?

    The measure of any discipline is (a) reproducibility of research (b) survivability of claims and skills in time (c) demonstrated evidence of resulting productivity (d) improvement or decline in competency per person (e) non- substitutability by apprenticeship.

    So? How many disciplines dont fail? Better yet, what if Universities and professors had to warranty students for occupational fitness upon award of degree or return the educational funds to students? What would happen is that we would drop back to 10-12% of population.

    All of this is common knowledge in economics. All we have done is dumb down high school degrees, eliminate cheap vocational(manual) and junior(clerical-medical) training, in exchange for impoverishing parents in old age, delaying homeownership, and gutting reproduction.

    Gutting reproduction while causing declining productivity generates demand for immigration to pay for medical and retirement costs of people who were deprived of children and consequential consumption, causing a continuous reduction in the competitiveness of the economy.

    And that’s BEFORE we talk about the fact that colleges are teaching a secular religion of false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: marxism-postmodernism-pc/woke – that is marching through the institutions of cultural production and maintenance. Why? to feed higher ed.

    And if you were skilled in physics, economics, cognitive science, and not yourself indoctrinated into the social construction of false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe you would know this. But your keep perpetuating these lies like a priesthood justifying faith.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 16:15:58 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105685198973302635

  • Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in

    Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in STEM fields- and eventually do 2) must ‘unlearn’ what they were taught was false – and eventually do 3) and the net difference is that non-STEM education cost was a LOSS, and STEM students earned it.

    There is never, ever a comparison between a conversation with an physicist, engineer, or economist that is vapid as someone in the humanities. It is however, more pleasant going through life in secular theology of the humanities, just as more blissful in supernatural theology.

    Humanities education is a very expensive method by which those insufficiently competent for the work force, pay the high cost of entry into the work force (paying university indulgences), by demonstrating that they can complete assignments – and nothing else.

    The fact of the matter is that we should pay for STEM education.

    This is spoken by someone who started in engineering, moved to law, graduated with art theory, and probably should have studied philosophy and economics first then law.

    I value my art education in my soul. And you cannot obtain an education in the high arts today that was possible until the end of the last century. But I built businesses in art, in law, and in technology.

    The present philosophy is a joke – read papers. It’s a clown world. The same is true for psychology, sociology, and most of applied economics. History is s either that of economics and technology or secular theology.

    Even law – that discipline in which we sought to add to the people who could help govern and rule that mass of human animals, now teaches sophistry by which to undermine the law that domesticates animal man, rther than that which helps to transcend him in to human.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 13:05:18 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105684449262578898

  • Another FBI Visit today. A “Fear and Intimidation” visit, threatening me with fe

    Another FBI Visit today. A “Fear and Intimidation” visit, threatening me with federal prison if I incite someone to violence.

    You know, I don’t consider myself important – I just assume no one understands what I’m talking about – but apparently, the people who matter do care.

    So if I’m influential at all I’ll use my influence to make it clear: Random violence just takes the bait and works against the right. The only solution is a mass organization and rational demands. Don’t take the bait.

    Note that the FBI didn’t track down the two BLM guys who tried to incite violence against us in Richmond, and they let violence go on all summer by Antifa and BLM. But because some people who follow me show up at the capitol they’re looking for an opportunity to arrest me.

    FBI’s Message: They’re looking for any excuse to pull me in. I didn’t do Cville or the Capitol. The only event I’ve done is Richmond and it was to state that we needed free political speech – in order to have an honest political discourse. So they want to make a ceremonial example of me. How quaint.

    Conservative (Right) violence is stupid. The Left works by baiting you into the hazard. So never ever take the bait. The State uses a double standard. There is no reciprocity. There is no rule of law. The constitution is gutted. There is no justice. There is no morality. This is arbitrary rule of destruction of our people, culture, institutions, and civilization.

    But don’t be food for the machine. If the Right acts, act as one, en masse, and make violence by either side unthinkable. Do not engage in violence.

    Revolution comes.
    But it comes from controlling the discourse.

    It doesn’t come from being ass clowns in c’ville or the Capitol, or from random violence – even if our people are subject to random violence, systemic violence, and institutional violence against us our families, our culture, our institutions, and our civilization, all day every day.

    We failed at making the dissident right into a political movement. We failed because (a) we didn’t tell you in advance not to take the bait, and (b) we didn’t spend time on the sequence of demands that were necessary. We didnt explain how to win.

    So Fine. My fault. Revolutionaries – even one’s trying to RESTORE law and order and the natural law of the constitution – make mistakes.

    But we have to move past our mistakes of acting as the enemy wants us to. We have to move past using the same violence they do. We have to move past using the same degeneration of public discourse that they do. Because the state is duplicitous.

    The State, like the left, will continue to use incremental escalation of suppression of you until you are defeated, gone, or dead.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-04 23:36:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105675606275790885