In the past, not today, there was enough endemic violence, and enough continuous warfare, and enough necessity of self-defense, familial defense, and local defense, that the Christian exhaustion of suppression of dominance expression mediated the presence of and incentive for violence. Yet today, what we see among Christians is not a conviction but convenience: escapism, cowardice, victimization, and eradication by a superior ancient religion (islam) and a superior modern religion (woke). It was not Christianity that made warrior saints. It was the search for booty under the permission of the church to violate the church’s ban on dominance expression. Until relatively recently war was pursued for booty because the returns on farming were barely sustainable. So whenever you say ‘warrior saints’ you’re appealing to the lie of ‘stolen valor’. You’re pretending you’re the same as those men. You aren’t. You’re just escapist little cowards like women creating a gossip circle to ameliorate your anxiety, powerlessness, and defeat. Because that’s what Abrahamic religions consist of: social construction of falsehoods that attempt to ameliorate the stress of being subject to gods logical, physical, cooperative, and evolutionary laws, which have determined, by your failure, that you’re unfit for God’s universe. Jesus taught us how to survive god’s laws – gods laws that only the Europeans and Persians had discovered, and used to conquer and rule the inferior peoples – including the Semites that had not. So Jesus told those who were ‘left behind by god’ how to tolerate gods leaving them behind – exhausting love for one another. Thus serving god by not doing harm against his laws. The jews (paulians, Christians) instead turned jesus’ teaching into another semitic system of lies. The abrahamic method of deceit is advanced a method of lying as european science is an advanced a method of speaking the truth: by aherence to the logical, physical, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe. Becuase why would god need to lie or teach men to lie? Why would god teach you to avoid his laws? Laws he had built the universe from by his own will?
Form: Mini Essay
-
Notes on Dyer and Thomas’ first video.
Jay’s argument should be ‘Logical’ only means internally consistent in the pursuit of an end, vs True, meaning testimonial, meaning testifiable, meaning non-conflationary, consistent, actionable, correspondent, coherent, limited, and complete under realism, naturalism and operationalism, free of loading, framing, suggestion and obscurantism. Ergo as wisdom literature, all faiths are some degree of logical in the sense of internally consistent and utilitarian. They are true in the lower standard of providing a paradigm of action that produces desird ends. They are not “true” in the sense that they are also testifiable.
The Christian faith is logical within the conflationary system of thought that is not limited by constraints of testimony under realism, naturalism, non-conflation (identity), operationalism (actionability) and correspondence. The fact that Christian theology as wisdom literature has produced the most complete system of non-aggression, tolerance, submission, non-adversarialism, and produces exceptional serfs, peasants, citizens, and to some degree sovereigns is simply a fact because it trains the intuition by continuous reinforcement of the suppression of dominance expression (at rather obvious costs).(I’ve come to agree with the criticism of Protestantism largely because it causes doubling down on occultism and sophistry rather than the nearly legalistic discipline of the catholic church. That said, as far as I can tell, the competition between romanticism – the restoration of natural religion – and Christianity, and marxism-secularism in the 1800’s in response to the scientific, industrial, and Darwinian evolution, meant a failure of romanticism was the great missed opportunity to restore our religion of the primacy of man and our transcendence through action INTO gods. The church failed to reform into natural law and science as evidence of our greater understanding of god’s will, and the success of marxism as a materialistic promise of reward in life after revolution in the modern world, like supernatural promise of reward in an afterlife in the ancient world. )The problem is that it teaches Christians to lie using the Abrahamic system of lying. Although again, there is a difference between an evolutionary one (science), a beneficial but stagnating wisdom literature (Christianity), a parasitic wisdom lit (Judaism), or a predatory and destructive one (Islam). (Dylan has gone from philosophy(justification) to sophistry (verbalism) to theology (occult). Some of us evolve from mythology to history to science producing testimony. Some of us evolve from mythology to theology to occultism. It depends on whether you were born with the feminine bias in empathic understanding or the masculine bias in analytic understanding. That’s why religiosity is heritable, and those of us who have a lesser NEED for empathy choose the sciences. It’s not complicated. Although we might have to separate just as the left and right must separate. Because as far as I can tell what I think we are seeing is a restoration of demand for speciation now that the agrarian age of homogenization is over. -
Notes on Dyer and Thomas’ first video.
Jay’s argument should be ‘Logical’ only means internally consistent in the pursuit of an end, vs True, meaning testimonial, meaning testifiable, meaning non-conflationary, consistent, actionable, correspondent, coherent, limited, and complete under realism, naturalism and operationalism, free of loading, framing, suggestion and obscurantism. Ergo as wisdom literature, all faiths are some degree of logical in the sense of internally consistent and utilitarian. They are true in the lower standard of providing a paradigm of action that produces desird ends. They are not “true” in the sense that they are also testifiable.
The Christian faith is logical within the conflationary system of thought that is not limited by constraints of testimony under realism, naturalism, non-conflation (identity), operationalism (actionability) and correspondence. The fact that Christian theology as wisdom literature has produced the most complete system of non-aggression, tolerance, submission, non-adversarialism, and produces exceptional serfs, peasants, citizens, and to some degree sovereigns is simply a fact because it trains the intuition by continuous reinforcement of the suppression of dominance expression (at rather obvious costs).(I’ve come to agree with the criticism of Protestantism largely because it causes doubling down on occultism and sophistry rather than the nearly legalistic discipline of the catholic church. That said, as far as I can tell, the competition between romanticism – the restoration of natural religion – and Christianity, and marxism-secularism in the 1800’s in response to the scientific, industrial, and Darwinian evolution, meant a failure of romanticism was the great missed opportunity to restore our religion of the primacy of man and our transcendence through action INTO gods. The church failed to reform into natural law and science as evidence of our greater understanding of god’s will, and the success of marxism as a materialistic promise of reward in life after revolution in the modern world, like supernatural promise of reward in an afterlife in the ancient world. )The problem is that it teaches Christians to lie using the Abrahamic system of lying. Although again, there is a difference between an evolutionary one (science), a beneficial but stagnating wisdom literature (Christianity), a parasitic wisdom lit (Judaism), or a predatory and destructive one (Islam). (Dylan has gone from philosophy(justification) to sophistry (verbalism) to theology (occult). Some of us evolve from mythology to history to science producing testimony. Some of us evolve from mythology to theology to occultism. It depends on whether you were born with the feminine bias in empathic understanding or the masculine bias in analytic understanding. That’s why religiosity is heritable, and those of us who have a lesser NEED for empathy choose the sciences. It’s not complicated. Although we might have to separate just as the left and right must separate. Because as far as I can tell what I think we are seeing is a restoration of demand for speciation now that the agrarian age of homogenization is over. -
THE MARXIST SOLUTION WILL ALWAYS FAIL BUT AS AN ALTERNATIVE… The Marxists insi
THE MARXIST SOLUTION WILL ALWAYS FAIL BUT AS AN ALTERNATIVE…
The Marxists insist on repeating an impossible solution dependent on employee participation in the firm under the presumption of employee interest and competency. Which even in the one unicorn firm they use as an example, we find the theory fails.
In part this is because any and all distortions of the economy by interference of the state in firms causes externalities that negate the benfits they seek to obtain. By capturing the financial sector (because the state is both the issuer and the insurer) the state, the firm, and the people have identical interests.
The present discord is because the state, the financial sector, the firms, and the people – especially the left – have conflicting interests. For example, immigration would directly reduce redistributions, and the financial sector would lose all political influence, restoring political influence to the competition between the people and the firms (industry).
So instead of tying employees to the profitability of non-durable firm we can tie citizens to the profitability of the durable polity – w/same consequences for the financial sector.
The firm isn’t profitable or stable enough, and employees never competent enough, and incentives not political enough to achieve redistribution via firm rather than as shareholders in the state. But capturing the parasitic financial sector for redistribution is trivially easy.
So I disagree slightly with the 1599 proposition and instead suggest that the problem was the failure of the British state to capture the banking industry given its role as insurer of last resort. There was no reason after fiat script to maintain the figure 8 financial sector.
Marxists are obsessed by and distracted by a world economy that no longer exists, positing a community that doesn’t and cant exist, and incentives and knowledge that doesn’t and can’t exist under a geostrategic order that ended twenty if not thirty years ago, and was squandered.
The only ‘firm’ of consequence is the polity, and without the empirical operation of that polity, and the least possible friction of its economy, the incentive of the workers is to reduce adaptability of firms vs decreasing the rent-seeking of both peers and state.
In this sense, citizens have a positive incentive if treating the state as a firm, but a negative incentive if treating firms as the state. We cannot ever limit the demand for human adaptability. We can only pay the cost of it. There are no regularities any longer.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-20 22:06:02 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105765847878570563
-
An Operational Explanation of Schizophrenia
On Schizophrenia: The brain (neurons, minicolumns, columns, modules, regions, hemispheres) functions by the adversarial (competitive) composition for coherence (overlapping, matching), resulting in the seizure of attention (victory) by the Thalamus (control of attention by the persistence of feedback across the neocortex), which causes recursion( persistence of context). Any sufficiently widespread degeneration of that consolidation into coherence (severely in the hippocampal region, generally across the neocortex), will cause the failure of that recursion. The brain functions by continuous iterations of recursive disambiguation held by the thalamus(auto-associative attention) and anterior (front) cingulate cortext (recursive attention) the prefrontal cortex(goal intention). That’s why language (grammar) is organized as continuous recursive disambiguation: pathfinding. So schizophrenia and all its symptoms in all their forms and severities are easily explicable as general degenerative disorder – most critically of the thalamus -> cingulate cortex -> prefrontal cortex. And even that sequence may simply be the most severe of a spectrum of disorders. So just as Alzheimer’s begins in the hippocampal region preventing the formation of memories, and resulting in the degeneration of memories (sort of top-down failure of the brain), schizophrenia affects the other end of the spectrum (the bottom-up failure of the brain) by the degeneration of control competition for coherence and therefore attention, causing degeneration in the hierarchy of recursion of associations. This is why the initial association formed in the neocortex appears to function but the recursion upon that association fails. I have no idea other than the apparent causal, hierarchical, sequence of depression to schizophrenia hints at some relation to immunological disorders, viral disorders, and developmental disorders – even that is just a suspicion, but the current research certainly takes that position. ( This exposition is a reason why you want to understand my work on the operational explanation of the function of the brain. )
-
An Operational Explanation of Schizophrenia
On Schizophrenia: The brain (neurons, minicolumns, columns, modules, regions, hemispheres) functions by the adversarial (competitive) composition for coherence (overlapping, matching), resulting in the seizure of attention (victory) by the Thalamus (control of attention by the persistence of feedback across the neocortex), which causes recursion( persistence of context). Any sufficiently widespread degeneration of that consolidation into coherence (severely in the hippocampal region, generally across the neocortex), will cause the failure of that recursion. The brain functions by continuous iterations of recursive disambiguation held by the thalamus(auto-associative attention) and anterior (front) cingulate cortext (recursive attention) the prefrontal cortex(goal intention). That’s why language (grammar) is organized as continuous recursive disambiguation: pathfinding. So schizophrenia and all its symptoms in all their forms and severities are easily explicable as general degenerative disorder – most critically of the thalamus -> cingulate cortex -> prefrontal cortex. And even that sequence may simply be the most severe of a spectrum of disorders. So just as Alzheimer’s begins in the hippocampal region preventing the formation of memories, and resulting in the degeneration of memories (sort of top-down failure of the brain), schizophrenia affects the other end of the spectrum (the bottom-up failure of the brain) by the degeneration of control competition for coherence and therefore attention, causing degeneration in the hierarchy of recursion of associations. This is why the initial association formed in the neocortex appears to function but the recursion upon that association fails. I have no idea other than the apparent causal, hierarchical, sequence of depression to schizophrenia hints at some relation to immunological disorders, viral disorders, and developmental disorders – even that is just a suspicion, but the current research certainly takes that position. ( This exposition is a reason why you want to understand my work on the operational explanation of the function of the brain. )
-
On Schizophrenia: The brain (neurons, minicolumns, columns, modules, regions, he
On Schizophrenia:
The brain (neurons, minicolumns, columns, modules, regions, hemispheres) functions by the adversarial (competitive) composition for coherence (overlapping, matching), resulting in the seizure of attention (victory) by the Thalamus (control of attention by the persistence of feedback across the neocortex), which causes recursion( persistence of context).
Any sufficiently widespread degeneration of that consolidation into coherence (severely in the hippocampal region, generally across the neocortex), will cause the failure of that recursion.
The brain functions by continuous iterations of recursive disambiguation held by the thalamus(auto-associative attention) and anterior (front) cingulate cortext (recursive attention) the prefrontal cortex(sequence intention).
That’s why language (grammar) is organized as continuous recursive disambiguation: pathfinding. So schizophrenia and all its symptoms in all their forms and severities are easily explicable as general degenerative disorder – most critically of the thalamus -> cingulate cortex -> prefontal cortex.
And even that sequence may simply be the most severe of a spectrum of disorders. So just as Alzheimers begins in the hippocampal region preventing the formation of memories, and resulting in the degeneration of memories (sort of top down failure of the brain), schizophenia affects the other end of the spectrum (the bottom up failure of the brain) by the degeneration of control competition for coherence and therefore attention, causing degeneration in the hieraarchy of recursion of associations. This is why the initial association formed in the neocorex appears to function but the recursion upon that association fails.
I have no idea other than the apparent causal, hierarchical, sequence of depression to schizophrenia hints at some relation to immunological disorders – even that is just a suspicion.
( This exposition is a reason why you want to understand my work on the operational explanation of the function of the brain. )
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-20 15:58:11 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105764401390897666
-
IS CHRISTIANITY SALVAGEABLE? (part 2) … More … Because if there is or are go
IS CHRISTIANITY SALVAGEABLE? (part 2)
… More …
Because if there is or are gods(the universe) and they speak to us at all (the laws of the universe), and have any plan for us at all (evolution into the hands of god) then only europeans have identified god(s), discovered their words, applied them, to transcend man for them.
The jews chose the devil(lies) and the strategy of women(stagnation), the Europeans chose the gods(truth) and the strategy of men(evolution), and the only struggle other than that is the slow Chinese or the fast European method. Or the failure of the Semites and their lies.
My objective is to outlaw the lies of the Semites without outlawing the gains of extension of kinship love to kith, but not to enemies. In this way we can preserve the original insight of jesus ,satisfy the devoted that they were in some way not ‘wrong’, and end semitic lying.
So I think your specialty is to fight theological fire with theological fire from a position of political weakness, and mine is to fight theological fire with scientific and legal Halon from a position of political strength. So my mission is to obtain that political power.
And instead of bribing people with false promises and lies I want to ‘pay’ people with the end of the conflict, the restoration of self-determination, economic reforms that end the parasitism upon them and restore them, and exposing and defunding the enemy in every dimension.
That requires a method of mandating a dialog which only the ‘threat’ seems possible to bring into being. And the right is a bunch of ignorant overconfident clown world man-boys lacking any possible empirical elite being crushed by the world’s best elite at parasitism.
So the question is whether (a-fast) that power is obtainable given the clown world of the right (b-medium) the sale can be made at political pace, or (c-slow) we require a new religion because that fking sophistry is all the nitwits can handle without elites to boss them.
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-20 14:49:15 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105764130329639643
-
IS CHRISTIANITY SALVAGEABLE? (Part 1) IMO, and I realize that this is an area of
IS CHRISTIANITY SALVAGEABLE? (Part 1)
IMO, and I realize that this is an area of your specialty, I don’t work in ideals but in necessities, and the failure to solve the problem of heterogeneous underclasses (vs india and china) was a substantive one. He looks to me to be solving that problem regardless of the church.
-“But is [jesus] really solving it? I understand that if you want somehow to operationalize Christianity, you would have to boil down his preaching of love to those 5 tenets and then strictly circumscribe it to the kindergarten. Is it feasible to do that today?”-Dan
Let’s try again. Did Aristotle/Epicurus solve empiricism? No.
- The west developed heroic, entrepreneurial, technological, war, law, polity, and economy at the cost of natural selection paid by the unfit.
- Their expanding economy demanded labor (slaves, women, peasants).
- They expanded rapidly exhausting their domestic HUMAN (Aryan) resources.
- This is the problem with the fast expansionary war and conquest model of growth (europe)- martial war vs the slow defensive technological warfare model of growth (china) – Total War
- So the problem of enfranchising (europe) is different from the problem of indoctrinating (china). Both models are possible as long as one doesn’t exhaust the originary human capital. IOW, the rate of expansion is limited by the equilibrium between aristocracy + kin, and alien.
- So my argument is that Jesus discovered the cheapest possible solution to solving the problem of being subject to the (European-discovered) laws of the universe, including natural selection which has ‘selected them for removal’ – by the process of extending kinship love.
- The consequence of rapid evolution (european aryans) exposing natural selection (underclasses, especially among south eurasians, ~80’s), generated demand for tragedy among heterogeneous people just as it did for the Greeks (the tragedy) among homogeneous people.
- Which is why I argue that the jews merely copied the bible of the west(epic cycle) and in particular the tragic hero of the aristocracy(Achilles), by combining south eurasian(low iq) ancient mythos(Horus) into a tragic figure of jesus that was virtuous for suffering tragedy.
- (Confirming that they never invent anything they just copy it by converting it into lies.).
- So again, I work by searching for first causes, and man’s innovation and adaptation by satisfaction of demand.
- And my purpose is to destroy the system of lying, and it’s lies.
… more …
Source date (UTC): 2021-02-20 14:48:49 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105764128639990622
- The west developed heroic, entrepreneurial, technological, war, law, polity, and economy at the cost of natural selection paid by the unfit.
-
Notes on Dutton’s “Why Rising Schizophrenia and Autism Means Academia Has Gone Literally Insane”
My Notes Dutton: 1) Yes. Fantastic. This is correct. (schizophrenia<- mutational load ->autism). Although I can’t discern the distribution of influence between load, the effect of those with load, and the effect of those creating ‘nonsense’ to justify their load, and the economic and political conditions that amplify the opportunity for expression of that load. 2) I usually don’t blame the present condition (reversing our historical market eugenics) on load but on the absence of regulatory institutions (a) manners, ethics, morals, norms, traditions, (b) marriage for ‘friendship’ not division of labor, (c) state insured single-parent reproduction vs intergenerational family, (d) mobile labor not provincial families (maintaining interfamilial relations within a territory), (e) Abrahamism v2 in marxism-postmodernism-anti-male-anti-white teaching female relativism, and the failure of Europeans to produce a rational and scientific competitor to Abrahamism v2 because the left was successful postwar in suppressing the eugenics movement, and the right can’t speak of natural selection or evolution in any terms. But increasing load would obviously make a lot of sense. 3) Postmodernism consists of the conversion of rage at natural selection to rage at whites for building a civilization that preserves natural selection via self-determination and markets, and conflating white preservation of natural selection and reaping the benefits, to claims that natural selection is an arbitrary or oppressive expression of power rather than the necessity adapting to the logical, physical, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe. 4) Interesting: so you are saying that midwits (“Island 120 wanna-be’s”) create a status-seeking spiral. So all of these are spirals due to ungoverned limits – the elimination of selection pressure on IDEAS, Behavior, Reproduction, and the social, economic, political, and evolutionary consequences of elimination of selection pressure. 5) (humor) Please help me with your system of measurement. Is it “Witless > Nitwits > Midwits > Wits.” Human vocabulary generally disambiguates dimensions of perception (measure) into three, five, or seven states, so given the fourth, I’m missing the rightmost ‘wit’. 😉 – Curt (controversial) Doolittle 😉