Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in

Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in STEM fields- and eventually do 2) must ‘unlearn’ what they were taught was false – and eventually do 3) and the net difference is that non-STEM education cost was a LOSS, and STEM students earned it.

There is never, ever a comparison between a conversation with an physicist, engineer, or economist that is vapid as someone in the humanities. It is however, more pleasant going through life in secular theology of the humanities, just as more blissful in supernatural theology.

Humanities education is a very expensive method by which those insufficiently competent for the work force, pay the high cost of entry into the work force (paying university indulgences), by demonstrating that they can complete assignments – and nothing else.

The fact of the matter is that we should pay for STEM education.

This is spoken by someone who started in engineering, moved to law, graduated with art theory, and probably should have studied philosophy and economics first then law.

I value my art education in my soul. And you cannot obtain an education in the high arts today that was possible until the end of the last century. But I built businesses in art, in law, and in technology.

The present philosophy is a joke – read papers. It’s a clown world. The same is true for psychology, sociology, and most of applied economics. History is s either that of economics and technology or secular theology.

Even law – that discipline in which we sought to add to the people who could help govern and rule that mass of human animals, now teaches sophistry by which to undermine the law that domesticates animal man, rther than that which helps to transcend him in to human.