Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Notes on Dutton’s “Why Rising Schizophrenia and Autism Means Academia Has Gone Literally Insane”

    My Notes Dutton: 1) Yes. Fantastic. This is correct. (schizophrenia<- mutational load ->autism). Although I can’t discern the distribution of influence between load, the effect of those with load, and the effect of those creating ‘nonsense’ to justify their load, and the economic and political conditions that amplify the opportunity for expression of that load. 2) I usually don’t blame the present condition (reversing our historical market eugenics) on load but on the absence of regulatory institutions (a) manners, ethics, morals, norms, traditions, (b) marriage for ‘friendship’ not division of labor, (c) state insured single-parent reproduction vs intergenerational family, (d) mobile labor not provincial families (maintaining interfamilial relations within a territory), (e) Abrahamism v2 in marxism-postmodernism-anti-male-anti-white teaching female relativism, and the failure of Europeans to produce a rational and scientific competitor to Abrahamism v2 because the left was successful postwar in suppressing the eugenics movement, and the right can’t speak of natural selection or evolution in any terms. But increasing load would obviously make a lot of sense. 3) Postmodernism consists of the conversion of rage at natural selection to rage at whites for building a civilization that preserves natural selection via self-determination and markets, and conflating white preservation of natural selection and reaping the benefits, to claims that natural selection is an arbitrary or oppressive expression of power rather than the necessity adapting to the logical, physical, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe. 4) Interesting: so you are saying that midwits (“Island 120 wanna-be’s”) create a status-seeking spiral. So all of these are spirals due to ungoverned limits – the elimination of selection pressure on IDEAS, Behavior, Reproduction, and the social, economic, political, and evolutionary consequences of elimination of selection pressure. 5) (humor) Please help me with your system of measurement. Is it “Witless > Nitwits > Midwits > Wits.” Human vocabulary generally disambiguates dimensions of perception (measure) into three, five, or seven states, so given the fourth, I’m missing the rightmost ‘wit’. 😉 – Curt (controversial) Doolittle 😉

  • SHRUNKEN HEADS: THE OPTIMUM FORM OF HARD CURRENCY? I would be happy to pick up o

    SHRUNKEN HEADS: THE OPTIMUM FORM OF HARD CURRENCY?

    I would be happy to pick up on the scalp, and shrunken head thing. In fact, now that I think about it, I’m not sure shrunken heads aren’t the best form of hard currency we could develop….

    SHRUNKEN HEAD MARKET VALUE

    In 1919 shrunken heads were worth around $4.00, the equivalent of $57.33. Then in the 1930’s victim heads were made to order for around $25.00, which is around $275.02 in today’s economy. By 1952 a head was advertised in The Times for $250, which would be $2,231.36 now.

    Shrunken heads are a light, high value, commodity money substitute.

    THE ECONOMICS OF SHRUNKEN HEADS.

    OK. Let’s pretend this is a serious question.

    Heads are heavy and expensive. (About ten pounds).
    Scalps are light and expensive, but easy to fake.
    Shrunken heads are costly to produce.
    Skull pyramids are costly to produce.

    Therefore shrunken heads make an exceptional substitute for a ‘gold standard’. So, buy-in for the franchise, (the number of shares you acquire) can best be paid in shrunken heads.

    The skull pyramids are just status symbols that demonstrate one’s contribution to the common good.

    QUIZ
    For an extra ten points please explain how Inflation can be affected by shrunken-head backed currency, and how inflation can be limited.

    HOW TO MAKE A SHRUNKEN HEAD.
    (humor)
    Optional: the candidate can be alive or dead – choose per taste.
    1 – Cut a large ‘bib’ into the flesh of chest to make a large flap to later close the bottom of the neck.
    2 – Cut around the back of the neck and a one or two inches of the shoulders and back, completing the ‘bib’.
    3 – Slit from the back to the base of the neck to the crest at the rear of the skull.
    4 – Pull forward, peeling the skin off the skull. (Note: if candidate is living, assistants will be needed to hold the candidate in place.)
    5 – Cook the head at a simmer for 90 minutes – any longer it will lose its hair. It should be 1/3 to 1/4 its original size.
    6 – Turn the head, inside out, and scrape off any remaining flesh that may later spoil.
    7 – Turn the head right side out, and sew up lips, eyes, back of skull.
    8 – Fill with hot rocks to shrink the head further.
    9 – Once rocks won’t fit, fill the head with hot sand to shrink it further. (Note: Some professionals only use repeated fillings of sand.)
    10 – Fill with lightweight such as sawdust or dry grass, then sew the flap (bib) across the base of the skull.

    That’s it. Have fun!!

    THE GAULS AND THEIR SHRUNKEN HEADS
    theguardian.com/science/2018/nov/07/the-gauls

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-18 18:35:04 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105753693667001467

  • ‘WHITE’ SUPERIORITY IS A FACT (Here Is Why) White superiority is a fact. White s

    ‘WHITE’ SUPERIORITY IS A FACT (Here Is Why)

    White superiority is a fact. White supremacy is a code word for dragging mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty starvation and disease. So we must separate so that dysgenic left and eugenic right can go our separate ways. 😉

    -“Curt, European civilization has contributed greatly. But did you know that other cultures have too?”-@factandrumor

    What kind of fallacy are you trying to make use of by asking that question?

    -“Which fallacy?”-

    So you don’t know which fallacy you’re making use of?

    -“Dude, if you can’t state your accusation clearly, then you don’t have one. So state it or move on.”-

    a) a variation on the false equivalency fallacy, suggesting that because other civilizations produced innovations that they are quantitatively or qualitatively competitively causal.
    b) variation on GSRRM fallacy of denial by implied ad hom.
    c) variation on NAXALT fallacy.

    The reason for the west’s disproportional success is the normative institutionalization of truth-before-face, martial reporting, testimonial speech under realism, naturalism, and operationalism. Combining sovereignty, reciprocity, and markets in law produced hyper adaptation.

    No other people solved, normalized, or institutionalized truth-before-face – let alone, realism, naturalism, operationalism, and adversarialism. Every other civilization sought not to discover and adapt to but to evade the formal, physical, behavioral, evolutionary laws.

    That’s why Europeans discovered all but one or two percent of all innovations in history.

    Other peoples can adopt ‘whiteness’ – meaning the european scientific civilizational order – if they (a) equally impose rule of law, (b) equally limit the reproduction of the underclasses until (c) they produce equivalent to a 100+ IQ (Neoteny) distribution and a majority genetic, cultural, and economic middle class.

    There is a reason they can’t or dont: the false promise of democracy prohibits it.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-18 13:26:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105752479910496127

  • ARE THERE ANY (WHITE) EUROPEAN MALES LEFT? The only thing that demarcates wester

    ARE THERE ANY (WHITE) EUROPEAN MALES LEFT?

    The only thing that demarcates western civ from all others is the militia – the Army of every single man – with the faith serving to limit their militarism to the political and isolating social and familial affairs.
    Faith is regulator not cause. The militia, the army, is cause.

    If they went to military school, and were taught military fitness, military, discipline, overcame their infantilism, and learned military history, basic economics, and war then they would be europeans.

    This is what I mean by purity spiraling. I don’t believe white males are european. They are wearing the identity of ‘stolen valor’ – as if they served in the military, when they are just children wearing identity-costumes of european aristocracy they have not earned.

    They aren’t european. Only the aristocracy ever was.

    So when Christians pretend they have value and like women should be courted I laugh at their ‘stolen valor’. If you need more than Kin, Country, Nation and Tradition, such that you put regulatory faith before competitive war then you’re the enemy’s acolyte – not European.

    -“Thought about this more today. Possibly the most blackpilled observation you’ve published.”-Tom Creo @tomfcreo

    Only by bringing imagination into correspondence with reality do we deprive the weak of the pretense of capability, conviction, morality, honor, or status that masks their cowardice, laziness, and absence of virtue such they are left with no choice but to earn them by action.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-17 13:45:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105746892780480027

  • Is Economics A Science? No. But it Can Be – By Converting from Via Positiva to Via Negativa.

    I could give a similar lecture that would reduce economics to a science, and my claims would be obvious, and obviously true, and they would terrify the audience. In large part, economics is a pseudoscience that tries to circumvent the laws of the universe just as do philosophy and religion, when the underlying science is rather simple: The demographic composition and distribution of a people, the institutional sequence and time necessary to produce rule of law of natural law, by the incremental suppression of irreciprocity, resulting in the highest trust, least friction in an economy at whatever of level of effort (work hours) the population prefers in exchange for its standard of living (consumption). What’s the problem? markets perform natural selection if they can suppress reproduction of the unfit for markets, and democratic politics suppress natural selection until the population’s abilty to maintain pace with competitors eliminates the possibility of redistributions by investments in commons. In other words, the only long-term variable that maintains competitive advantage is human capital and the single most important human capital is the combination of intelligence and conscientiousness both of which are the result of neotenic evolution by natural selection for cooperation in increasingly complex markets. Or in simple form: economic science is and always will be limited to the measurement of the success of institutions in producing human capital by adherence to the logical, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws of the universe by the implementation of rule of law, markets, and meritocratic reproduction. Now try to sell that inescapable scientific law of the universe under democracy, the entire function of which appears to be to use fiat credit to evade the laws of the universe, and return us to Malthusian limits. That’s the science. So like I said, what we call positive economics is an attempt to cheat mother nature and it’s just never going to happen. The only economic science is like the law, negative: eliminating what we should NOT do.

  • Is Economics A Science? No. But it Can Be – By Converting from Via Positiva to Via Negativa.

    I could give a similar lecture that would reduce economics to a science, and my claims would be obvious, and obviously true, and they would terrify the audience. In large part, economics is a pseudoscience that tries to circumvent the laws of the universe just as do philosophy and religion, when the underlying science is rather simple: The demographic composition and distribution of a people, the institutional sequence and time necessary to produce rule of law of natural law, by the incremental suppression of irreciprocity, resulting in the highest trust, least friction in an economy at whatever of level of effort (work hours) the population prefers in exchange for its standard of living (consumption). What’s the problem? markets perform natural selection if they can suppress reproduction of the unfit for markets, and democratic politics suppress natural selection until the population’s abilty to maintain pace with competitors eliminates the possibility of redistributions by investments in commons. In other words, the only long-term variable that maintains competitive advantage is human capital and the single most important human capital is the combination of intelligence and conscientiousness both of which are the result of neotenic evolution by natural selection for cooperation in increasingly complex markets. Or in simple form: economic science is and always will be limited to the measurement of the success of institutions in producing human capital by adherence to the logical, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws of the universe by the implementation of rule of law, markets, and meritocratic reproduction. Now try to sell that inescapable scientific law of the universe under democracy, the entire function of which appears to be to use fiat credit to evade the laws of the universe, and return us to Malthusian limits. That’s the science. So like I said, what we call positive economics is an attempt to cheat mother nature and it’s just never going to happen. The only economic science is like the law, negative: eliminating what we should NOT do.

  • @a (Andrew. We can’t run. We can’t hide. We can’t double down on failure. Our ho

    @a (Andrew. We can’t run. We can’t hide. We can’t double down on failure. Our hope is not a strategy. Our faith is not a tactic. We have nothing to sell the enemy. We have no way to persuade them. They will never let us go. So we can fight like every other x generations of anglo saxons, germans, and proto-europeans, for restoration ‘of our rights of self determination’ we can follow the Romans into another dark age of superstition, pseudosciejce, and servitude, to those who are infatuated by the devil’s false promise of what is nothing more than freedom from gods logical, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. We are at war. We are at non-european total war against our institutions of cultural production. We were christian. We were tolerant. We gave them love and hope. We opened our arms. They used it as our weakenss. They have captured our institutions. They are overwleming us with numbers. And we can either fight or die. Period. That’s it. They will always win just as islam always wins. Becuase the lie of escape from truth, logic, scarcity, reciprocity, natural selection, and the race with the red queen sells.)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-16 19:20:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105742547316954388

  • That democracy and universal suffrage are reliable tools of capitalism has been

    That democracy and universal suffrage are reliable tools of capitalism has been proved in all countries that have adopted these methods on the English model.

    While the liberal professor hails the Constitution of Weimar as the fulfilment of his dreams, the capitalist liberal welcomes it as the simplest and probably cheapest way to subject politics to the business office and the state to the grafters.

    All this characterises the hegemony of the Viking spirit over Western civilisation, which up to now has been largely English civilisation.

    —Oswald Spengler 1919

    Via: @Daily_Spengler

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-15 21:32:22 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105737403908363647

  • All this talk of religion and ideology is camouflage.

    I think it’s ironic that I can live in any former Soviet republic and write about anything to my heart’s content, but not in the USA because ‘woke’ religion protection of feelings takes precedence over truth, reciprocity, rule of law, sovereignty, and 5000 years of European civ.

    —“Any thoughts as to why Soviet Communism seems to have been destructive in the long run than this woke cult? Cultural and Ethnic identity seem to stay in place despite Soviet economic destruction whereas in the West is facing a far greater problem with even basic idea of itself.”— SepteusTwo @Septeus

    That’s a great question that I’ll answer in long-form another time. Short version: 1: Soviet communism was just greater militarization of the society, economy, and state than the fascists desired or achieved, thus vastly reducing labor costs, but producing continuous decay in labor productivity. 1.1 The Soviets took from three generations to fail, and three more to disintegrate. (Our fault, we could have helped them).  The woke has tried population replacement and three generations. And it will take a long time to fail. The difference is, what will be left when it fails? Another dark age? 2: Both communism and fascism were designed for TOTAL WAR against liberalism, w/ fascism against Judaism and communism. So the obvious sequence of Market Order -> liberalism > social democracy > fascism > communism <- Military Order. All the ‘talk’ of ideology is just propaganda. 3: Propaganda (lies) to justify obedience. The ‘slavery’ propaganda in the USA was no different from France’s catholic socialism against England’s Scandinavian protestant liberalism, or Italy and Germany’s fascism, or Russia’s communism, or Jewish Marxist-pomo-pc-woke-anti-white. 4: China is now organized for total war, Islam is organized for total war, and Judaism for total war, and we are not, nor is Russia or India though Russia is closest because they ‘understand’ the problem. India will likely get there. 5: The Jewish Marxist-neo-Marxist-pomo-pc-woke-anti-white machine controls propaganda and marched through the institutions just as they said they would – Hitler said what he would do, and the Jews said what they would do – and did it. “Usurp the means of cultural production.” 6:Movements must create propaganda and develop a clientele and implement clientelism to create a state within a state, and to destroy the state from within. They did it in Rome, Spain, Germany, Russia, now USA – and certainly Canada. In part because the french are co-conspirators.

  • All this talk of religion and ideology is camouflage.

    I think it’s ironic that I can live in any former Soviet republic and write about anything to my heart’s content, but not in the USA because ‘woke’ religion protection of feelings takes precedence over truth, reciprocity, rule of law, sovereignty, and 5000 years of European civ.

    —“Any thoughts as to why Soviet Communism seems to have been destructive in the long run than this woke cult? Cultural and Ethnic identity seem to stay in place despite Soviet economic destruction whereas in the West is facing a far greater problem with even basic idea of itself.”— SepteusTwo @Septeus

    That’s a great question that I’ll answer in long-form another time. Short version: 1: Soviet communism was just greater militarization of the society, economy, and state than the fascists desired or achieved, thus vastly reducing labor costs, but producing continuous decay in labor productivity. 1.1 The Soviets took from three generations to fail, and three more to disintegrate. (Our fault, we could have helped them).  The woke has tried population replacement and three generations. And it will take a long time to fail. The difference is, what will be left when it fails? Another dark age? 2: Both communism and fascism were designed for TOTAL WAR against liberalism, w/ fascism against Judaism and communism. So the obvious sequence of Market Order -> liberalism > social democracy > fascism > communism <- Military Order. All the ‘talk’ of ideology is just propaganda. 3: Propaganda (lies) to justify obedience. The ‘slavery’ propaganda in the USA was no different from France’s catholic socialism against England’s Scandinavian protestant liberalism, or Italy and Germany’s fascism, or Russia’s communism, or Jewish Marxist-pomo-pc-woke-anti-white. 4: China is now organized for total war, Islam is organized for total war, and Judaism for total war, and we are not, nor is Russia or India though Russia is closest because they ‘understand’ the problem. India will likely get there. 5: The Jewish Marxist-neo-Marxist-pomo-pc-woke-anti-white machine controls propaganda and marched through the institutions just as they said they would – Hitler said what he would do, and the Jews said what they would do – and did it. “Usurp the means of cultural production.” 6:Movements must create propaganda and develop a clientele and implement clientelism to create a state within a state, and to destroy the state from within. They did it in Rome, Spain, Germany, Russia, now USA – and certainly Canada. In part because the french are co-conspirators.