Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Conservative: pragmatic, empirical, meritocratic, defending from hazard. Progres

    Conservative: pragmatic, empirical, meritocratic, defending from hazard.
    Progressive: utopian, theoretical, anti-meritocratic, baiting into hazard.

    So why do we study theology, philosophy, ideology, or commentary? Because we feel justified in defense of our intuitions along the way – a constant addictive feedback loop of self-reinforcing falsehoods: incremental, progressive informational drug addition.

    The problem with science is that it appears abstract and uninutitive until it’s not – and the entire journey is a bit of a struggle.

    This is what we seek to solve with P-law. A complete, consistent, incremental logic of existence,that’s commensurable and explanatory across fields.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-06-13 23:35:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106406041736108314

  • Israel vs Palestine? Easy choice.

    What’s not complex is (a) yes they are conquering an ancestral homeland that the European’s ancestors displaced them from for their resistance movement against Roman law. that was the real reason. Roman law. (b) The Israelites are a superior people, with an advanced civilization, displacing an inferior people. (c) Islam has been at war with the rest of the world for 1400 years and has destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world it could reach. (d) We could not let communism spread to the middle east and into the oil regions during the cold war and so Israel functioned as our primary military base in the region – it would have undermined our ability to ‘bribe’ the rest of the world by access to our markets. (e) we are still stuck with a vast number of primitive backward people who are a threat to mankind. So no, it’s not a problem of equals. It’s a problem of paying various costs like Israeli expansion and warfare while we wait to see if the Muslims can reform or if we will have to join China and Now India to contain Islam as we contained communism, should have contained Christianity, judaism, and islam in the past. (f) the author is relying on Jewish relativism which is the source of the problem in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam – no man doesn’t have intrinsic value. We are either helping one another evolve, or causing one another to devolve, and the Abrahamic faiths, their method of moral sophistry, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience, culminating in the Muslim world has been a cancer for mankind for 1400 years. So no. It’s not complex. It’s just an unpopular purely empirical truth.

  • Israel vs Palestine? Easy choice.

    What’s not complex is (a) yes they are conquering an ancestral homeland that the European’s ancestors displaced them from for their resistance movement against Roman law. that was the real reason. Roman law. (b) The Israelites are a superior people, with an advanced civilization, displacing an inferior people. (c) Islam has been at war with the rest of the world for 1400 years and has destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world it could reach. (d) We could not let communism spread to the middle east and into the oil regions during the cold war and so Israel functioned as our primary military base in the region – it would have undermined our ability to ‘bribe’ the rest of the world by access to our markets. (e) we are still stuck with a vast number of primitive backward people who are a threat to mankind. So no, it’s not a problem of equals. It’s a problem of paying various costs like Israeli expansion and warfare while we wait to see if the Muslims can reform or if we will have to join China and Now India to contain Islam as we contained communism, should have contained Christianity, judaism, and islam in the past. (f) the author is relying on Jewish relativism which is the source of the problem in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam – no man doesn’t have intrinsic value. We are either helping one another evolve, or causing one another to devolve, and the Abrahamic faiths, their method of moral sophistry, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience, culminating in the Muslim world has been a cancer for mankind for 1400 years. So no. It’s not complex. It’s just an unpopular purely empirical truth.

  • WOKENESS(SUPERNORMAL) VS CHRISTIANITY (SUPERNATURAL) Majority religions teach si

    WOKENESS(SUPERNORMAL) VS CHRISTIANITY (SUPERNATURAL)

    Majority religions teach signaling non-aggression since this is the principle method by which we increase trust – especially among low trust peoples. It’s also the principle direction of human self domestication.

    In this sense the woke priestesses inverted non-aggression into aggression just as islam inverted christian non aggression into aggression…. by undermining

    But we haven’t constrained female aggression by undermining.

    It’s clear Christianity became dominant the same way wokeness does. Demand tolerance for your belief system until you gain sufficient numbers at which point you become intolerant of the other belief systems.

    There was a supernatural being behind Christianity ( the Christ) . What does “wokeness” have ?

    Given:

    1. Supernatural (Occult) with after-life reward
      … A messenger is required for an occult false promise

    -versus-

    1. Supernormal (Pseudoscientific) with after-revolution reward.
      … No ‘messenger’ required for a pseudoscientific false promise.

    See?

    Source date (UTC): 2021-05-28 20:57:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106314822579134103

  • To say that there is one set of laws of the universe is simply obvious. To say t

    To say that there is one set of laws of the universe is simply obvious. To say that gods are emergent is simply obvious. To say that they are emergent from the minds of any conscious social hierarchical creatures is obvious. To say that they must converge over time is uncertain.

    There is no battle between good and evil, but between great men and nature – a nature constructed of god’s laws – where the only reward is our transcendence into godhood by their mastery, domestication, and transformation for our use.

    The religions of the middle east – all religions of the south eurasians – appear to be submissive counter-revolutions against the indo-europeans that had conquered the old world. They took largely from egypt – the only substantive surviving pre-collapse civilization.

    Begging their gods to save them from the indo-europeans.

    Note that this does not occur in east asia where the ie expansion did not reach.

    Egyptian > [Collapse] > Judaism > Christianity > Islam > ?
    … … … … … Aryanism > Hinduism > Buddhism > ?
    … … … … … Aryanism > Germanic > Mediterranean > Stoicism > Fail.
    … … … … … … … … … … Synthesis: Augustine > Acquinas > Scholastics > Fail.
    … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … Restoration: Renaissance > ..to.. > Romanticism > Fail
    … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … Next???

    The majoritarian religions teach signaling non-aggression since this is the principle method by which we increase trust – especially among low trust peoples. It’s also the principle direction of human self-domestication.

    Signaling non aggression is the first state of the female method of seduction. But we haven’t constrained female aggression by undermining.

    In this sense the woke priestesses inverted non-aggression into aggression just as islam inverted christian non aggression into aggression…. by undermining

    It’s clear Christianity became dominant the same way wokeness does. Demand tolerance for your belief system until you gain sufficient numbers at which point you become intolerant of the other belief systems. -(Martin Štěpán)

    True. And it seems Communism, Fascism, and of course other religions are using the same system.-(Eric Liford)

    Worse, Islam is not a religion like Stoicism, Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism. Islam is an ideology, like Judaism, Communism, and Fascism

    I find amusing the irony that even national socialists were abrahamists. But it fits.-(Martin Stepan)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-05-28 13:58:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106313174947685793

  • A society needs to expend resources on providing education in group strategy, mo

    A society needs to expend resources on providing education in group strategy, moral mythology, wisdom literature, logic of arguing it, ritual, oath, festival to provide mindfulness. We spent lost on education(skill) but not mindfulness(discipline): religion.

    Some people need religion as a framework for associations, some need only friends and family,and some need a sequence of allies on their life’s mission and some have the agency to compete at great scale by individual fortitude. It’s just your neural economy at work. Nothing else.

    “Some, some, some, some = Vast majority, significant minority, small minority, almost no one.”

    FWIW “almost no one” is the permanent .1%. Look at the families that have been wealthy for eight hundred years – there are plenty of them. Very selective marriage, very selective inheritance, very selective in all aspects of life.

    The people who are dependent upon others for SOCIAL insurance, security, information, validation, and status because they cannot compete in ECONOMIC POLITICAL & MILITARY markets need a means of mindfulness. Alienation increases with the division of knowledge labor and hierarchy.

    Mindfulness is necessary whether personal, interpersonal, social, economic, or political. In the sense that religion provides one or more of those demands for mindfulness, we merely need a true and evolution rather than false and regressive or devolutionary religion.

    Given the individual’s ability to perceive, learn, calculate choices with the brain, emotional fortitude (or lack of it), relationships, knowledge, resources at his disposal, what external ‘confirmation’ does he need?

    We’re all just bots. Some of us have better memory, CPUs and software and some less. You either have agency in yourself or dependency on others. If you are empathic, not bright, need opinion, information, confirmation, and to share calculation with others you’ll need religion.

    God is an analogy – a character serving as an anthropomorphic and therefore simplistic system of imitative, sympathetic, and empathic pre-rational means of decidability within a group class sex and age survival strategy. God = Laws of the universe. Science=testifying with them.

    Science=Testimony. Testimony requires identity, consistency, operational constructability from first principles, correspondence, rational choice, reciprocity, adversarial parsimony, limits, completeness, and warrantability. Since I know those things I can do that. That’s science.

    The LDS and Amish reproductive arguments are true but constitute are a repetition of the same fallacy of the libertarians: they require a host state or empire to provide the (masculine political) commons that their (feminine familial) social order cannot.

    INCREASE IN COST:
    Religion -> Intuition
    Philosophy -> Reason
    Testimony -> Evidence
    Science and Law -> Decidability
    First Principles -> Causality

    Source date (UTC): 2021-05-26 22:18:15 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106303815358298690

  • The Cause of Divergence in The Anglosphere

    britain diverged from germanic civilization in the 1830’s and american culture diverged far less so. So that while we speak english, and practice english institutions, we have retained germanic culture because germans were so influential in our settlement – such that the constitution was written in both english and german versions so all germanic americans whether english speaking or german speaking could read it. Today’s british commoners are closer to the french (peasants) and american commoners (whites) closer to germans (citizen soldiers). And this was amplified by the germanic protesant founders, and the spread of fundamentalism even among the american scots irish (south). This is the analysis that explains the american(germanic), australian (prewar english), postwar british (mixed english aristocracy-french peasantry), and canadian (french peasant) cultural differences in the anglosphere. Is whether we are baised toward the peasant french the martial german, or the mixed british.

  • The Cause of Divergence in The Anglosphere

    britain diverged from germanic civilization in the 1830’s and american culture diverged far less so. So that while we speak english, and practice english institutions, we have retained germanic culture because germans were so influential in our settlement – such that the constitution was written in both english and german versions so all germanic americans whether english speaking or german speaking could read it. Today’s british commoners are closer to the french (peasants) and american commoners (whites) closer to germans (citizen soldiers). And this was amplified by the germanic protesant founders, and the spread of fundamentalism even among the american scots irish (south). This is the analysis that explains the american(germanic), australian (prewar english), postwar british (mixed english aristocracy-french peasantry), and canadian (french peasant) cultural differences in the anglosphere. Is whether we are baised toward the peasant french the martial german, or the mixed british.

  • THE EXPERIMENT WITH WOMEN IN POLITICS HAS BEEN A FAILURE Maturity results from t

    THE EXPERIMENT WITH WOMEN IN POLITICS HAS BEEN A FAILURE

    Maturity results from the awareness that we’re riders on gene machines. For example, females are readily identifiable by (a) personalizing a statement describing a distribution, and (b) NAXALT: the inability to conceive of a distributon. (c) failure to abstract or systematize.

    The female inability to systematize is universal from the sex differences in mathematical problem solving, to the various distribution intolerances, to the inability to conceive of polities or economies, and explains the lack of females in innovation, discovery, entrepreneurship.

    Like many false promises of the enlightenment and of the pseudoscientific counter-revolution against the Darwinian explanation, we failed to regulate against female cognitive incompetence and female means of conflict and war by undermining upon expanding the franchise

    Source date (UTC): 2021-05-18 09:48:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106255568140691936

  • Were the Founders Hypocrits? No.

    1) They weren’t hypocrites. In order to win the war against England they had to tolerate the demands of the south, and the south couldn’t economically afford to abandon slavery. The solution was to return them to Africa, and some were, but without Fiat Currency couldn’t do it. 2) So instead of the high cost of paying for the repatriation of the slaves, and borrowing to compensate the southern farms to convert to employment labor,we had a far more costly civil war of anti-secession when the north realized that the south would rule the western expansion. 3) Humans mask their economic incentives with moral claims, but as in all things ‘follow the money’. If we asked all the farmers today to go without immigrant labor, universities without foreigners, and services without minorities, prices would skyrocket, and bankruptcies ensue. 4) The great crime was the false promise of the possibility of integration of vastly different people, when Europe had already discovered the impossibility of integrating even (neolithic farmer) mediterranean and germanic (horse) peoples, and Ireland was a third world country. 5) And so blacks are screwed because they cannot form a polity producing norms, traditions, values, commons, and political systems given the distribution of their abilities (vastly larger lower class, deeper sexual maturity), and whites can’t tolerate the costs to THEIR commons. 6)The solution we find everywhere is we separate into neighborhoods, and watch every city turn into Johannesberg (Detroit, Baltimore) as the absolutely inevitable deterministic effects of natural differences take their course: productive whites, asians and jews flee civic plague. 7) the cosmopolitan project of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, political correctness designed repeat the attempt by judaism, christianity, and islam to deprive nations of self determination, sovereignty, and meritocracy, and reduce them to dark ages yet again is over. 8) We can only cooperate by trade, but we cannot cohabitate or share suffrage, since our group strategies due to genetic differences and genetic distributions. Only europeans can produce high trust commons with high investment parenting expressly for producing commons. Period. 9) No other people can come close to achieving it, except the Koreans and Japanese, and even then, they can’t produce commons only refrain from consuming them. 10) African Slavery, industrialized by islam, was a purely economic decision for purely rational reasons : resistance to malaria. Even so, at present rates, African Americans will have killed more of one another over a century than slaves were brought to America. (Yes, really). 11) African Americans have only one oppressor: the mirror. The only solution is (a) Separation so that their elites cannot defect, leaving 2/3 of their population incapable of social, economic, and politcal organization and (b) six generations of one child at for unemployables. 12) Why this is so obvious to my African audience (“There is nothing wrong with Africans that shrinking the bottom won’t fix”) and so intolerable to Americans? Because Americans like puritans, are shallow virtue-signaling moralizers masters of deceit without lying in the world.