NOTES: (General Criticisms, not of Prof Toombs, but in general, of the 20th-century social pseudosciences including that of economics and law. The interesting question is why did we begin pseudosciences in parallel with darwin and why did we evolve so many pseudosciences in the postwar period? ) 1. “Correctly Describe How The Engine Works” = Circular Argument(sophistry). “Why do we need an engine at all?” = Science (Decidability). 2. Natural Law = Cooperation = Self Determination, Sovereignty, Reciprocity (Law) – within the limits of Proportionality (Legislation). That’s science. Everything else requires the starting point where were are not sovereign, but some degree of slave or serf. 3. Natural Law = Science = Rule of Law, where each of us is sovereign and where legislation consists in, and is limited to, contracts between sovereigns: where sovereignty are the commons equivalent of private-sector shareholders: investors by demonstrated behavior. 4. Positive Law = Sophistry = Rule by Men, where each of us is serf, and legislation consists of command by others who are sovereign. It’s not complicated. 5. Rule of Law where we are sovereign and have the right to self-determination… if we choose. Otherwise, we must be freemen, serfs, or ‘slaves’. It’s not an opinion. It’s simply a fact. Versus Rule by Man, absence of sovereignty, and reciprocity. 6. The violation of our history of a hierarchy of man, family, serfdom > MANOR LAW. Freeman > Common Law. Sovereign > Court Law. 7. So there exists an enlightenment demand for the security of Manor Law (serfdom) in conflict with the demand for common law (freemen) and court law (citizens). The enlightenment ‘one class of everyone’ is as ridiculous as the Marxist, and libertarian and liberal ‘one class of everyone’. We need three economies, and three sets of laws, in a hierarchy if we are to have a diverse population no longer pacified by centuries of northern European or east Asian Manorialism and Credit Service both of which suppressed the reproduction of those unfit for markets. 8. Failure to understand why the west evolves so much faster than the rest of mankind leads to failure to understand that our law was the cause of that rapid adaptation – because it fosters maximum calculation by trial and error of means of advancement. 9. The western law is the most hyper-adaptive because it has the lowest friction and the least abstraction. 10. FWIW: Raz, Kelsen, Dworkin, and Hart are not culturally European but from a subculture that relies on POSITIVE LAW: Rule by Judges (Kritarchy). Not rule of Law (sovereignty). Smith+Locke > {Blackstone + Jefferson + Adams et al) > (Hayek + Epstein) VERSUS: Hobbes > { Anglo: Austin + Bentham } > { Germans: Schmidt et al } > Jews { Raz, Kelsen, Hartt, Dworkin etc} … maybe the Russians are next in the sequence of continuing the empirical spread of anglo empiricism and the culture-by-culture attempt to justify authority instead … thus repeating with democracy the continuous war against the usurpation of the natural law (traditional, common, germanic) by kings. It’s no different today than in the past.
Form: Mini Essay
-
IQ is just as scientific, just as accurate, and just as descriptive as high or speed of running.
IQ attempts to measure (g) which is your neurological response time. That’s it. It’s very simple. How much information does it take for you to identify a pattern and evolve a neurological connection before exhaustion of the pathways? It’s that simple. IQ is a predictor of not FAILING. Conscientiousness is more influential in success. We have this emphasis backwards. We have at least four faculties: Body, Intuition(Brain), Conscientiousness(Mind), and Intelligence(Reason), You can train body (fitness), brain (anti-neuroticism(mindfulness)), conscientiousness (discipline), and intelligence (education) – and we don’t – we pretend that people don’t need training in every one of those faculties. They don’t fudge the data. The bell curve is a the normal distribution (a natural limit due to biological ability). That’s what we see in the data. The psychometricians alter the sets of questions so that they each produce a normal distribution in a population. Otherwise, the test would accumulate bias. They don’t accumulate bias because they alter the questions so that they produce a normal distribution that describes people without bias. And no, there is no subjectivity in these tests, they are painfully objective and the very best measure in psychology. People just confuse the difference between general rate of learning (IQ) and time at a context (experience). IQ will always win over time, but only OVER time. The tests measure neurological response time (reaction time) in every single dimension we have been able to discover as a faculty in the brain. The brain is just a neural network. Some neural networks “have better road quality than others, so stimulation gets better mileage.”
So people of the same relative age tend to cluster by their neurological response time. As such IQ = Score of accumulated patterns averaged across verbal and spatial, and then divided by age, to accommodate for experience gained by age. It’s simple, it works, always. Period. The difference between the races is a fact, but that fact can be abused. We know why the races evolved different intelligence. The information has been ‘canceled’ since the second world war. And ‘woke’ is a continuation of that process of ‘canceling’ the truth. We know why the differences between races: Self Domestication > Domestication Syndrome > Noteny > Slower Development > Greater Head-body Ratio > Bigger Brain > Less impulsive behavior > higher metabolism. Science is done. The debate is over. Now we have to solve the problem.
IQ is not a social construct nor is race. IQ is the most scientific measure that we have. And the difference in the races is due to different degrees of self-domestication over the past 50 thousand years. Attached diagram Race diffs in underclasses unfit for market modernity.
There is no cure for the class difference between whites-asians vs blacks-browns. Unless blacks-browns return to producing their own elites,financial class, middle class, the community will remain a permanent underclass while the upper brown-black continues to ‘defect’ to whites.
-
IQ is just as scientific, just as accurate, and just as descriptive as high or speed of running.
IQ attempts to measure (g) which is your neurological response time. That’s it. It’s very simple. How much information does it take for you to identify a pattern and evolve a neurological connection before exhaustion of the pathways? It’s that simple. IQ is a predictor of not FAILING. Conscientiousness is more influential in success. We have this emphasis backwards. We have at least four faculties: Body, Intuition(Brain), Conscientiousness(Mind), and Intelligence(Reason), You can train body (fitness), brain (anti-neuroticism(mindfulness)), conscientiousness (discipline), and intelligence (education) – and we don’t – we pretend that people don’t need training in every one of those faculties. They don’t fudge the data. The bell curve is a the normal distribution (a natural limit due to biological ability). That’s what we see in the data. The psychometricians alter the sets of questions so that they each produce a normal distribution in a population. Otherwise, the test would accumulate bias. They don’t accumulate bias because they alter the questions so that they produce a normal distribution that describes people without bias. And no, there is no subjectivity in these tests, they are painfully objective and the very best measure in psychology. People just confuse the difference between general rate of learning (IQ) and time at a context (experience). IQ will always win over time, but only OVER time. The tests measure neurological response time (reaction time) in every single dimension we have been able to discover as a faculty in the brain. The brain is just a neural network. Some neural networks “have better road quality than others, so stimulation gets better mileage.”
So people of the same relative age tend to cluster by their neurological response time. As such IQ = Score of accumulated patterns averaged across verbal and spatial, and then divided by age, to accommodate for experience gained by age. It’s simple, it works, always. Period. The difference between the races is a fact, but that fact can be abused. We know why the races evolved different intelligence. The information has been ‘canceled’ since the second world war. And ‘woke’ is a continuation of that process of ‘canceling’ the truth. We know why the differences between races: Self Domestication > Domestication Syndrome > Noteny > Slower Development > Greater Head-body Ratio > Bigger Brain > Less impulsive behavior > higher metabolism. Science is done. The debate is over. Now we have to solve the problem.
IQ is not a social construct nor is race. IQ is the most scientific measure that we have. And the difference in the races is due to different degrees of self-domestication over the past 50 thousand years. Attached diagram Race diffs in underclasses unfit for market modernity.
There is no cure for the class difference between whites-asians vs blacks-browns. Unless blacks-browns return to producing their own elites,financial class, middle class, the community will remain a permanent underclass while the upper brown-black continues to ‘defect’ to whites.
-
The Difference Between Legal Theorists
Note to Jeffrey Kaplan – USC; Jeffrey – I doubt few people, whether in the audience or even in the discipline, understand how well you communicate this subject. We should note that these theorists: Bentham, Austin, Rez, Kelsen, Hart, Dworkin, and Rawls all justify (make excuses) for positive law (commands). While Blackstone Hayek, Epstein, and Scalia are all making scientific explanations of the law. And does the audience know the difference between the justificationary (sophistry) and the scientific (operational)? It’s that the scientific explanation (European) forces the population to use the legislature to ADAPT, and the law and court limit the legislature and thereby the people to ADAPTATION rather than accommodation (command). This is the difference between command and law: command (justification) is cumulatively devolutionary, and law (science) is cumulatively evolutionary. In this context, we see why western states remained small and never fell to empire as did the rest of the world into civilization states: the pressure to continuously evolve by continuous adversarial competition forcing continuous personal, social, and political adaptation. And legal positivism has been the reason for the collapse of western civilization in the industrial and especially postwar age: we are no longer forcing the population to adapt, but finding excuses for maladaptation and devolution.
-
The Difference Between Legal Theorists
Note to Jeffrey Kaplan – USC; Jeffrey – I doubt few people, whether in the audience or even in the discipline, understand how well you communicate this subject. We should note that these theorists: Bentham, Austin, Rez, Kelsen, Hart, Dworkin, and Rawls all justify (make excuses) for positive law (commands). While Blackstone Hayek, Epstein, and Scalia are all making scientific explanations of the law. And does the audience know the difference between the justificationary (sophistry) and the scientific (operational)? It’s that the scientific explanation (European) forces the population to use the legislature to ADAPT, and the law and court limit the legislature and thereby the people to ADAPTATION rather than accommodation (command). This is the difference between command and law: command (justification) is cumulatively devolutionary, and law (science) is cumulatively evolutionary. In this context, we see why western states remained small and never fell to empire as did the rest of the world into civilization states: the pressure to continuously evolve by continuous adversarial competition forcing continuous personal, social, and political adaptation. And legal positivism has been the reason for the collapse of western civilization in the industrial and especially postwar age: we are no longer forcing the population to adapt, but finding excuses for maladaptation and devolution.
-
Western morality is unique in that this ‘corporatism’ that we call puritanism wa
Western morality is unique in that this ‘corporatism’ that we call puritanism was and is just the optimum economic strategy for the production of a high trust redistributive society because we suppress all private hedonism in an effort to produce all public goods.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-17 15:01:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1405541181577056264
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1405540742001401863
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DegenRolf Anglo-Germanic (Puritanical) economics is redistributive into commons that can be shared but not consumed, thereby reducing the need for individual production and isolated consumption. This is why europeans aren’t individualistic, but self determinant, w/ status from the commons.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1405540742001401863
-
Anglo-Germanic (Puritanical) economics is redistributive into commons that can b
Anglo-Germanic (Puritanical) economics is redistributive into commons that can be shared but not consumed, thereby reducing the need for individual production and isolated consumption. This is why europeans aren’t individualistic, but self determinant, w/ status from the commons.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-17 15:00:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1405540742001401863
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1405540389348462608
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DegenRolf Rolph: a) all behavior can be expressed as acquisition, retention, or consumption. b) Puritanical behavior suppresses consumption, increases production, and directs the proceeds of production TO COMMONS. c) Commons reduce individual cost of consumption.
That’s Anglo Economics.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1405540389348462608
-
Curt: “Is Society Organized Fairly?” Well, Lets take a look…
1. Fairness consists of reciprocity (incentive to cooperation without retaliation) within the limits of proportionality (sufficient disincentive to defect). 2. Rule of law of self-determination by sovereignty, reciprocity, and proportionality (natural rights) leaves humans with only survival possible as markets for reciprocal cooperation. 3. As such rule of law, reciprocity, and markets, and market survival and success are not UNJUST. 4. However, some people are genetically unfit for markets, and as such their incentive to defect (crime, demand for political redistribution, demand for political rebellion, or demonstrated migration). In other words those who are unfit seek political privileges (lower class corruption) just as much as wealthy interests seek political privileges (upper-class corruption), just as much as people who seek political power seek to increase and maintain their political privileges (political-class corruption), leaving only the middle class (market success by not engaging in political corruption) as the only non-corrupt demographic. 5. Given that we cannot train intelligence but we can educate. Given that we can educate but that we vary greatly in intelligence and therefore the ability to be educated. Given that no matter what we do to attempt to improve education, nothing matters other than intelligence, because the effects of education dissipate rapidly in the workforce. Because the workforce consists of uncertainty and change and education trains for the opposite. 6. Given that we cannot alter the racial differences in rates of development and maturity, and therefore aggression and self-regulation, we can however, train people in discipline (conscientiousness) which was the job of the family the church and the military, and as such we can limit criminality, violence, and anti-social behavior. But we misdirect educational efforts away from training discipline (conscientiousness). 7. Given that we cannot alter sex differences in neuroticism, we can however train people in mindfulness, which was the job of fathers, and the church for women, the military for men. But we misdirect educational efforts away from mindfulness. 8. Given that people assortively mate, and given that the least fit for markets reproduce most, we are constantly in a situation where we are generating more people unfit for markets. We can however limit the reproduction of those unfit for markets as we did in all European and east asian history (not in the rest of the world). But we misdirect funds into providing assistance for those who are unfit for markets, unfit for self-regulation, unfit for mindfulness, and who reproduce by putting the cost of their reproduction on the productive middle class. 9. Civilizations collapse when the number of people unfit for markets, and the number of people engaging in lower-class corruption, upper-class corruption, political corruption, and religious, academic, intellectual, and media corruption, have exhausted the middle class’ ability to maintain financing of lower class, upper class, political, and intellectual corruptions, because either they lose the incentive to grant legitimacy to the state (now) or they lose the incentive to defend the state (now) or the lose the incentive to produce (now) or they lose the incentive to cooperate (now). 10. What this set of frictions occurs the society and polity experience overextension of their capabilities and all sectors (now) and world competitors seek to take advantage of weakness, and they fill the power vacuum in all markets (now), causing the tipping point of social economic and political collapse (now). 11. So is society fairly structured? It was the most fairly structured society in history until the late 1950s, when people sought to use the postwar economic windfall seek privileges by claiming oppression when they were just unwilling to pay the psychological, emotional, intellectual, and physical costs to sort into a place in the markets while limiting their consumption and corruption to that which wasn’t irreciprocal and disproportionate given their limited contribution. 12. So the problem we face is that a just society requires we limit the reproduction of the unfit to those who fail at participating in markets, despite our efforts at education and training in fitness, mindfulness, conscientiousness, and knowledge, such that everyone is employed because everyone is employable, and that we never abandon this dependency, because that’s what natural selection consists of for an advanced technological species. 13. There is no end of scarcity. There is a Malthusian limit. The leftist’s false promise (lie) of an end to scarcity(physical laws), the self interst, acquisitiveness, amorality, rationality, and limited malleability and adaptability of man (behavioral laws), and the never-ending accumulation of genetic load (Defects), the never-ending need for natural selection (eugenics), and the never-ending need to defeat the Red Queen of the natural world (Evolutionary Laws), was bait so that they could obtain power, because they envied and hated the successful productive people – not because they cared about the laboring, working, and middle classes. It was always their envy and their hate for their lower status as having high opinions of themselves and their self-worth, but not producing evidence of VALUE TO OTHERS in doing the basic work of increasing productivity thereby decreasing costs, increasing consumption, for all. 14. We can only limit injustice (corruption) we cannot limit the inequality of man without producing injustice (corruption) which will destroy our condition. This means we must always produce a Pareto distribution of competency and value, in order to produce a Nash distribution of quality of life, where a nash distribution of the quality of life is a normal hierarchy of value that we have to one another given our vast differences in abilities, drives, and desires.
-
Curt: “Is Society Organized Fairly?” Well, Lets take a look…
1. Fairness consists of reciprocity (incentive to cooperation without retaliation) within the limits of proportionality (sufficient disincentive to defect). 2. Rule of law of self-determination by sovereignty, reciprocity, and proportionality (natural rights) leaves humans with only survival possible as markets for reciprocal cooperation. 3. As such rule of law, reciprocity, and markets, and market survival and success are not UNJUST. 4. However, some people are genetically unfit for markets, and as such their incentive to defect (crime, demand for political redistribution, demand for political rebellion, or demonstrated migration). In other words those who are unfit seek political privileges (lower class corruption) just as much as wealthy interests seek political privileges (upper-class corruption), just as much as people who seek political power seek to increase and maintain their political privileges (political-class corruption), leaving only the middle class (market success by not engaging in political corruption) as the only non-corrupt demographic. 5. Given that we cannot train intelligence but we can educate. Given that we can educate but that we vary greatly in intelligence and therefore the ability to be educated. Given that no matter what we do to attempt to improve education, nothing matters other than intelligence, because the effects of education dissipate rapidly in the workforce. Because the workforce consists of uncertainty and change and education trains for the opposite. 6. Given that we cannot alter the racial differences in rates of development and maturity, and therefore aggression and self-regulation, we can however, train people in discipline (conscientiousness) which was the job of the family the church and the military, and as such we can limit criminality, violence, and anti-social behavior. But we misdirect educational efforts away from training discipline (conscientiousness). 7. Given that we cannot alter sex differences in neuroticism, we can however train people in mindfulness, which was the job of fathers, and the church for women, the military for men. But we misdirect educational efforts away from mindfulness. 8. Given that people assortively mate, and given that the least fit for markets reproduce most, we are constantly in a situation where we are generating more people unfit for markets. We can however limit the reproduction of those unfit for markets as we did in all European and east asian history (not in the rest of the world). But we misdirect funds into providing assistance for those who are unfit for markets, unfit for self-regulation, unfit for mindfulness, and who reproduce by putting the cost of their reproduction on the productive middle class. 9. Civilizations collapse when the number of people unfit for markets, and the number of people engaging in lower-class corruption, upper-class corruption, political corruption, and religious, academic, intellectual, and media corruption, have exhausted the middle class’ ability to maintain financing of lower class, upper class, political, and intellectual corruptions, because either they lose the incentive to grant legitimacy to the state (now) or they lose the incentive to defend the state (now) or the lose the incentive to produce (now) or they lose the incentive to cooperate (now). 10. What this set of frictions occurs the society and polity experience overextension of their capabilities and all sectors (now) and world competitors seek to take advantage of weakness, and they fill the power vacuum in all markets (now), causing the tipping point of social economic and political collapse (now). 11. So is society fairly structured? It was the most fairly structured society in history until the late 1950s, when people sought to use the postwar economic windfall seek privileges by claiming oppression when they were just unwilling to pay the psychological, emotional, intellectual, and physical costs to sort into a place in the markets while limiting their consumption and corruption to that which wasn’t irreciprocal and disproportionate given their limited contribution. 12. So the problem we face is that a just society requires we limit the reproduction of the unfit to those who fail at participating in markets, despite our efforts at education and training in fitness, mindfulness, conscientiousness, and knowledge, such that everyone is employed because everyone is employable, and that we never abandon this dependency, because that’s what natural selection consists of for an advanced technological species. 13. There is no end of scarcity. There is a Malthusian limit. The leftist’s false promise (lie) of an end to scarcity(physical laws), the self interst, acquisitiveness, amorality, rationality, and limited malleability and adaptability of man (behavioral laws), and the never-ending accumulation of genetic load (Defects), the never-ending need for natural selection (eugenics), and the never-ending need to defeat the Red Queen of the natural world (Evolutionary Laws), was bait so that they could obtain power, because they envied and hated the successful productive people – not because they cared about the laboring, working, and middle classes. It was always their envy and their hate for their lower status as having high opinions of themselves and their self-worth, but not producing evidence of VALUE TO OTHERS in doing the basic work of increasing productivity thereby decreasing costs, increasing consumption, for all. 14. We can only limit injustice (corruption) we cannot limit the inequality of man without producing injustice (corruption) which will destroy our condition. This means we must always produce a Pareto distribution of competency and value, in order to produce a Nash distribution of quality of life, where a nash distribution of the quality of life is a normal hierarchy of value that we have to one another given our vast differences in abilities, drives, and desires.
-
CRT IS AN ACT OF WAR European success is due to hyper adaptation which in turn i
CRT IS AN ACT OF WAR
European success is due to hyper adaptation which in turn is due to the high psychological, emotional, and physical cost of Self-determination. Sovereignty. Reciprocity. Truth Before Face. Adversarial Markets in everything. Reproductive limits on those unfit for those markets.
CRT consists of an indirect war on the fact that western man has MORE discovered, adapted to, and applied the logical, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws of the universe than all other civilizations combined at the cost of SOFT EUGENICS. That’s why far east and west won.
The Jewish, Christian, Muslim old world and marxist, neomarxist, pomo, feminist, pc, woke, anti-white cult repeats the Abrahamic false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe for the destruction of civilization that would force market meritocratic eugenic reproduction.
That’s it: Trading generation one’s cult of supernaturalism and sophistry for pseudoscience and sophistry then using informational propagandism to create social construction of falsehoods that deny the laws of the universe, in order to blame Europeans for acts of god. It’s an act of WAR.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-14 16:21:49 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106409997740633378