Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Answers to India’s Questions to Zeihan with My Adds.

    ANSWERS: INDIA CORE ISSUE: The idea of becoming a major power is gone. India is the dominant power in its region. It has the ability to regulate trade in the region. And india can take advantage of it. India is one of only six countries that is developed and not having a population collapse. India is one of a dozen countries that will not have to face an energy crisis. In other words, India is navally to Eurasia as Byzantium was to Europe and the middle east and asia. (CD: the question is whether india can convert from a ‘follower’ country(civilization) to a leader country(civilization). This inabilty to convert to a ‘leader’ civilization is the reason for the repeated historical conquests of india. So, in my opinion, it’s a cultural ‘habit’ or ‘tradition’ that must be overcome. In the institutional formation process, india chose unorganized religion, which of state and power, or law and commerce, is the weakest organizing principle. It’s in many ways beautiful. Harmonious. But it is also vulnerable, and cannot seize opportunities.) INDIA: ECONOMIC India is a loose empire, and must mirror the European tradition, of different states (regions) specializing in different production – that need only, like Germany, be unified by rail. WHY WOULD THE US LEAVE? Thanklessness of the world, and the maltreatment of ordinary americans. Enabling the EU and Canada to undermine the western culture by virtue-signaling that they’re superior, but making Americans pay for the cost of the international order. The cost of maintaining a world military. The trauma of soldiers returning from the middle east. The destruction of the white middle, working, and laboring classes by the offshoring of their labor, paid for the overexpansion of national debt. The American Government is more concerned with the international than the domestic. The left has succeeded in immigrating enough of the third world to create social, cultural, political, and economic breakdown. An empire only survives because it profits from creating an international order. The American world order was not created for the purpose of creating an empire from which it would profit. It was created for the purpose of paying countries to be on our side against marxism communism. Yet there is no reason to pay other countries, pay for the world order, without compensation, and there is no possible means of obtaining that compensation from the world.

  • Answers to India’s Questions to Zeihan with My Adds.

    ANSWERS: INDIA CORE ISSUE: The idea of becoming a major power is gone. India is the dominant power in its region. It has the ability to regulate trade in the region. And india can take advantage of it. India is one of only six countries that is developed and not having a population collapse. India is one of a dozen countries that will not have to face an energy crisis. In other words, India is navally to Eurasia as Byzantium was to Europe and the middle east and asia. (CD: the question is whether india can convert from a ‘follower’ country(civilization) to a leader country(civilization). This inabilty to convert to a ‘leader’ civilization is the reason for the repeated historical conquests of india. So, in my opinion, it’s a cultural ‘habit’ or ‘tradition’ that must be overcome. In the institutional formation process, india chose unorganized religion, which of state and power, or law and commerce, is the weakest organizing principle. It’s in many ways beautiful. Harmonious. But it is also vulnerable, and cannot seize opportunities.) INDIA: ECONOMIC India is a loose empire, and must mirror the European tradition, of different states (regions) specializing in different production – that need only, like Germany, be unified by rail. WHY WOULD THE US LEAVE? Thanklessness of the world, and the maltreatment of ordinary americans. Enabling the EU and Canada to undermine the western culture by virtue-signaling that they’re superior, but making Americans pay for the cost of the international order. The cost of maintaining a world military. The trauma of soldiers returning from the middle east. The destruction of the white middle, working, and laboring classes by the offshoring of their labor, paid for the overexpansion of national debt. The American Government is more concerned with the international than the domestic. The left has succeeded in immigrating enough of the third world to create social, cultural, political, and economic breakdown. An empire only survives because it profits from creating an international order. The American world order was not created for the purpose of creating an empire from which it would profit. It was created for the purpose of paying countries to be on our side against marxism communism. Yet there is no reason to pay other countries, pay for the world order, without compensation, and there is no possible means of obtaining that compensation from the world.

  • The Fate of Civilizations (really)

    Coercion (Organization): There are only three means of human coercion:

    1. Political: Force/Defense, 2. Remunerative: Bribe-Trade/Boycott-Deprivation, 3. Social: Insurance(Inclusion)/Ostracization(Canceling)Institutions(Scale): All civilizations develop those institutions in one order or another:

    1. Europe (Oligarchy and Law): Militia -> Empirical Law -> State -> (Philosophy, but Fail at underclass religion) 2. China (State and Bureaucracy):   Military(State) -> Philospophy(Religion) -> Fail At Empirical Law – Stagnation 4. India: (Caste and Culture) Military -> Informal Religion -> Fail At State Formation -> Fail at Empirical Law (Stagnation) 3. Middle East: (Tribes and Formal Religion) Religion -> Military(State) ->Fail at Law – Tribalism (Regression) (African empire formation and American continental empire formations were truncated – they were behind. )

    And each civilization naturally produced excellence in its original or core institutions.  The problem is the long-term consequences of those foundational institutions are extremely different. Because the rate of evolution depends on the rate of experimentation, and the possibility of retention of improvements because of the possibility of eliminating regression to the mean – continuing natural selection). You can reduce the difference in group evolutionary strategies, and choice of their first institution, between civilizations to their use of the underclasses:

    4. Exploitation(middle east) – reversing natural selection 3. Limiting their Damage(India) – castes for natural selection 2. Reducing their Number(China) – bureaucracy for natural selection 1. Or sifting them via merit, limiting the reproduction of the rest (Europe). – markets for natural selection So, yes. Ouch: That one hurt a bit. Because it’s so simple. Peasant “Domesticated Human Animal” treatment drives demand for institutions. You would naturally get bias to each culture’s institutions, by that choice alone. This means civilizational differences originate in how the military (ruling classes)  demarcated ‘humans’ and other domesticated animals:

    1. Law (Europe @100): Rational: Empiricism, Science, Law: Europeans (market) achieved it from a position of middle neoteny. 2. State (China @105 ): Reasonable: Wisdom and State: Chinese (bureaucracy) achieved it from a position of greater neoteny. 3. Culture(India @100/85), Allegorical: Myth and Culture (unorganized religion). The Indians used a caste system because of the sheer number of the underclass – which is why the Indian upper class has such startling IQ numbers despite national averages. 4. Religion (middle east @85 ): Fictional: Falsehood and Religion (organized religion). The middle east – from a position of lower neoteny – particularly Islam – went the opposite direction, of lionizing and creating a religious monopoly for the underclasses – that they can’t escape.

    5. ( ?? ) Africa (@75) Delayed formation because of west African geographic isolation. And in the face of lowest neoteny 6. ( ?? ) Americas (@85) Delayed formation because of geographic isolation. And (Get ready for another ouch) This appears to have been necessary given the homogeneity or heterogeneity of the regional populations, and the degree of evolutionary neoteny (we call IQ and aggression of the populations). Ergo, we the institutions evolved that needed to evolve for the degree of evolution of the regional population AND its means of production AND means of warfare.

    Africans: Africa = East African Urheimat and Coastal Dispersion (@75) South Eurasians: East Africa To Dry Persian Gulf Urheimat dispersion from north Africa to India (@85) East Asians: Persian gulf, to India to Tibet and Tibetan Plateau Urheimat – East Asia north to south (@105) Sout Eurasian hybridization (@90) Europeans: Europe to Urals, Europeans, Ancestral North Eurasian, Anatolian Farmer Hybridization)  (really to china) (@100) (aggressive selection pressure in Europe for 3000+ yrs) SiberianAmericans: East Asian and ancestral north Eurasian hybridization. (@85) (Eskimo peoples (@90) In other words, world choices and consequences were deterministic in the absence of knowledge of evolutionary pressures and the consequences. Now that we know, what’s our excuse? 😉    

  • The Fate of Civilizations (really)

    Coercion (Organization): There are only three means of human coercion:

    1. Political: Force/Defense, 2. Remunerative: Bribe-Trade/Boycott-Deprivation, 3. Social: Insurance(Inclusion)/Ostracization(Canceling)Institutions(Scale): All civilizations develop those institutions in one order or another:

    1. Europe (Oligarchy and Law): Militia -> Empirical Law -> State -> (Philosophy, but Fail at underclass religion) 2. China (State and Bureaucracy):   Military(State) -> Philospophy(Religion) -> Fail At Empirical Law – Stagnation 4. India: (Caste and Culture) Military -> Informal Religion -> Fail At State Formation -> Fail at Empirical Law (Stagnation) 3. Middle East: (Tribes and Formal Religion) Religion -> Military(State) ->Fail at Law – Tribalism (Regression) (African empire formation and American continental empire formations were truncated – they were behind. )

    And each civilization naturally produced excellence in its original or core institutions.  The problem is the long-term consequences of those foundational institutions are extremely different. Because the rate of evolution depends on the rate of experimentation, and the possibility of retention of improvements because of the possibility of eliminating regression to the mean – continuing natural selection). You can reduce the difference in group evolutionary strategies, and choice of their first institution, between civilizations to their use of the underclasses:

    4. Exploitation(middle east) – reversing natural selection 3. Limiting their Damage(India) – castes for natural selection 2. Reducing their Number(China) – bureaucracy for natural selection 1. Or sifting them via merit, limiting the reproduction of the rest (Europe). – markets for natural selection So, yes. Ouch: That one hurt a bit. Because it’s so simple. Peasant “Domesticated Human Animal” treatment drives demand for institutions. You would naturally get bias to each culture’s institutions, by that choice alone. This means civilizational differences originate in how the military (ruling classes)  demarcated ‘humans’ and other domesticated animals:

    1. Law (Europe @100): Rational: Empiricism, Science, Law: Europeans (market) achieved it from a position of middle neoteny. 2. State (China @105 ): Reasonable: Wisdom and State: Chinese (bureaucracy) achieved it from a position of greater neoteny. 3. Culture(India @100/85), Allegorical: Myth and Culture (unorganized religion). The Indians used a caste system because of the sheer number of the underclass – which is why the Indian upper class has such startling IQ numbers despite national averages. 4. Religion (middle east @85 ): Fictional: Falsehood and Religion (organized religion). The middle east – from a position of lower neoteny – particularly Islam – went the opposite direction, of lionizing and creating a religious monopoly for the underclasses – that they can’t escape.

    5. ( ?? ) Africa (@75) Delayed formation because of west African geographic isolation. And in the face of lowest neoteny 6. ( ?? ) Americas (@85) Delayed formation because of geographic isolation. And (Get ready for another ouch) This appears to have been necessary given the homogeneity or heterogeneity of the regional populations, and the degree of evolutionary neoteny (we call IQ and aggression of the populations). Ergo, we the institutions evolved that needed to evolve for the degree of evolution of the regional population AND its means of production AND means of warfare.

    Africans: Africa = East African Urheimat and Coastal Dispersion (@75) South Eurasians: East Africa To Dry Persian Gulf Urheimat dispersion from north Africa to India (@85) East Asians: Persian gulf, to India to Tibet and Tibetan Plateau Urheimat – East Asia north to south (@105) Sout Eurasian hybridization (@90) Europeans: Europe to Urals, Europeans, Ancestral North Eurasian, Anatolian Farmer Hybridization)  (really to china) (@100) (aggressive selection pressure in Europe for 3000+ yrs) SiberianAmericans: East Asian and ancestral north Eurasian hybridization. (@85) (Eskimo peoples (@90) In other words, world choices and consequences were deterministic in the absence of knowledge of evolutionary pressures and the consequences. Now that we know, what’s our excuse? 😉    

  • The Solution to The Liar’s Paradox is Simple. It’s a Lie. Here’s Why.

    Summary: The liar’s paradox, like all paradoxes, and most if not all philosophical claims of depth, complexity, or undecidability consists of nothing but malformed statements in the grammar of continuous recursive disambiguation that violate the contract of suggestion (truthful speech) and due diligence against error, bias, and deceit, between speaker and audience. Given the Liar’s Paradox (And all the historical equivalents):

    “[ everything in this box is false ]” 1. Langauge consists of “Incremental suggestion by Continuous Recursive Disambiguation”, and grammar the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation. 2. The liar’s paradox is grammatically incorrect because it calls for recursion without supplying additional(continuous) information – in algorithmic logic this is called an infinite loop: a malformed statement that violates the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation. 3. Human Cognition: Consists of the series: Sensation, Logic (constancy of relations in time frame), Predictive Memory (elements), Episodic Memory (location, place(space), direction, turn direction, head direction, eye direction, objects, landmarks, boundaries, exits), Auto-Association, Wayfinding (Recursion), Adversarial Prediction, Thalmic Awareness, Attention-Recursion, Choice, Action, Repeat (recurse). 4. Human Grammatical Capacity is just an application of the primitive hierarchy of movement: Continuous Recursive Disambiguation. 5. Human Speech consists of minor variations in phonetics and grammars of continuous recursive disambiguation. 6. Human Speech organized by Grammarof Continuous Recursive Disambiguation consists of Names(Referents), statements(transformations), sentences (transactions), narratives(ledgers), and consent/not(balances) in communication, with additional continuous recursive disambiguation as due diligence against error, bias, deceit both parties. 7. All Paradigms (disciplines) from logic and math to Ordinary Language to the fictionalisms (occult->theology, sophistry->idealism, magic-pseudoscience) consist of either deflationary elimination of dimensions of human perceptible constant relations or inflationary removal of constraints on observables open to human sense perception and increases in permissible dimensions of fictions. 8. Words don’t mean things people do. People fail to communicate, or we fail to interpret their failure of communication, or we err in interpretation. 9. The only intent (meaning) of a paradox is to deceive (or create an illusion) – because it was created by intent – just as are optical illusions. Humans find very few natural conditions that can ‘fool’ human sense perception for more than a few moments -including such complex imagery as zebras. 10. Success of these illusions that exploit human intuition is dependent on human ignorance of their construction. We can learn to detect and correct for them just as we can learn to detect and correct for mirages. 11. The example of the liar’s paradox illustrates operational (algorithmic) vs set logic and why the foundations of mathematics, philosophy, and the philosophy of language movements failed to produce the sciences they sought – and even physics to economics suffer from this continued failure. 12. I have been unable to discover any pretense of philosophical undecidability that isn’t a malformed statement (as in mathematical grammar), that violates a variation of the promise of continuous recursive disambiguation, producing a transaction for meaning plus due diligence. 13. We call this failure of the philosophical and logical movments ‘mathiness‘ or the failure to grasp the operational foundations of mathematics, vs the verbal, set, or symbolic reduction of mathematics for ease of human use. (In particular that the computational reducibility of mathematics is far smaller than the computational possibility of operations.) 14. The failure of thought leadership in western civilization in the 20th is due to the failure of Babbage (or his peers) to generalize his discovery of computation, allowing a century of innumeracy, sophistry, and pseudoscience, to crate what Hayek called ‘the new mysticism’. 15. It has taken the Turing revolution, the computational revolution, the neuroimaging revolution, and the AI revolution (and one simple insight of Chomsky’s application of Turning) to solve a problem that never should have occurred, and now we must reverse the better part of two centuries of sophistry and pseudoscience, producing a third scientific revolution that corrects them. [End of Document]

  • The Solution to The Liar’s Paradox is Simple. It’s a Lie. Here’s Why.

    Summary: The liar’s paradox, like all paradoxes, and most if not all philosophical claims of depth, complexity, or undecidability consists of nothing but malformed statements in the grammar of continuous recursive disambiguation that violate the contract of suggestion (truthful speech) and due diligence against error, bias, and deceit, between speaker and audience. Given the Liar’s Paradox (And all the historical equivalents):

    “[ everything in this box is false ]” 1. Langauge consists of “Incremental suggestion by Continuous Recursive Disambiguation”, and grammar the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation. 2. The liar’s paradox is grammatically incorrect because it calls for recursion without supplying additional(continuous) information – in algorithmic logic this is called an infinite loop: a malformed statement that violates the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation. 3. Human Cognition: Consists of the series: Sensation, Logic (constancy of relations in time frame), Predictive Memory (elements), Episodic Memory (location, place(space), direction, turn direction, head direction, eye direction, objects, landmarks, boundaries, exits), Auto-Association, Wayfinding (Recursion), Adversarial Prediction, Thalmic Awareness, Attention-Recursion, Choice, Action, Repeat (recurse). 4. Human Grammatical Capacity is just an application of the primitive hierarchy of movement: Continuous Recursive Disambiguation. 5. Human Speech consists of minor variations in phonetics and grammars of continuous recursive disambiguation. 6. Human Speech organized by Grammarof Continuous Recursive Disambiguation consists of Names(Referents), statements(transformations), sentences (transactions), narratives(ledgers), and consent/not(balances) in communication, with additional continuous recursive disambiguation as due diligence against error, bias, deceit both parties. 7. All Paradigms (disciplines) from logic and math to Ordinary Language to the fictionalisms (occult->theology, sophistry->idealism, magic-pseudoscience) consist of either deflationary elimination of dimensions of human perceptible constant relations or inflationary removal of constraints on observables open to human sense perception and increases in permissible dimensions of fictions. 8. Words don’t mean things people do. People fail to communicate, or we fail to interpret their failure of communication, or we err in interpretation. 9. The only intent (meaning) of a paradox is to deceive (or create an illusion) – because it was created by intent – just as are optical illusions. Humans find very few natural conditions that can ‘fool’ human sense perception for more than a few moments -including such complex imagery as zebras. 10. Success of these illusions that exploit human intuition is dependent on human ignorance of their construction. We can learn to detect and correct for them just as we can learn to detect and correct for mirages. 11. The example of the liar’s paradox illustrates operational (algorithmic) vs set logic and why the foundations of mathematics, philosophy, and the philosophy of language movements failed to produce the sciences they sought – and even physics to economics suffer from this continued failure. 12. I have been unable to discover any pretense of philosophical undecidability that isn’t a malformed statement (as in mathematical grammar), that violates a variation of the promise of continuous recursive disambiguation, producing a transaction for meaning plus due diligence. 13. We call this failure of the philosophical and logical movments ‘mathiness‘ or the failure to grasp the operational foundations of mathematics, vs the verbal, set, or symbolic reduction of mathematics for ease of human use. (In particular that the computational reducibility of mathematics is far smaller than the computational possibility of operations.) 14. The failure of thought leadership in western civilization in the 20th is due to the failure of Babbage (or his peers) to generalize his discovery of computation, allowing a century of innumeracy, sophistry, and pseudoscience, to crate what Hayek called ‘the new mysticism’. 15. It has taken the Turing revolution, the computational revolution, the neuroimaging revolution, and the AI revolution (and one simple insight of Chomsky’s application of Turning) to solve a problem that never should have occurred, and now we must reverse the better part of two centuries of sophistry and pseudoscience, producing a third scientific revolution that corrects them. [End of Document]

  • THE FUTURE OF GLOBALISM VS NATIONALISM In a post-agrarian world, all nations are

    THE FUTURE OF GLOBALISM VS NATIONALISM

    In a post-agrarian world, all nations are compatible, and all empires, and all civilizations, are incompatible. An explicitly nationalist China, Russia, Hungary, India are naturally resistant to two hostile movements: the spread of Islam that has destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world, and the spread of the spectrum of Jewish Cosmopolitanism that has destroyed much of the modern world, and now spreads more softly using Jewish-European liberalism and neo-conservatism, despite managed decline. That is what the world is reacting to in the postwar era. Only Islam and Judaism are globalists. Everyone else is nationalist. I expect this framing to emerge over the next 20 years. It is the natural result of optimum adaptability in the technological age. It is the only means of maintaining peace and prosperity in this age.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-17 03:36:13 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106078573282271462

  • The Final Word On Trump, The 6th, The Lie of Coup, and The Left’s Program of Deceit

    Regarding the propaganda play making use of the 6th.

    1. Look. In all Seriousness. I’m an activist. Of minor influence. There are plenty of us. Although I’m sort of ‘canceled’ by the hard right, the way most of the rest of the right has been ‘canceled by the hard left’.
    2. If Trump had wanted a coup, he could have just asked for one. Millions of us were prepared for it. Millions of us were waiting for it. He knew we would have delivered it. He even knew the ‘code phrase’ we were waiting for. I know this because I’m one of the people who kept promoting that code phrase.
    3. He didn’t. He wanted to govern. He wanted a legacy. A legacy of reforming America for the new world in which we are ‘weak’ and can no longer project military, economics, or cultural power. And where our people must be defended more than democratic socialist ideology promoted as a religion of globalism. He wanted the legacy of proving the left was wrong and he was right. And he felt (justly) that that the election was stolen (which about half of conservatives still agree with) by the Cathedral Complex (Left, Global Finance, Academy, Media, Entertainment, Advertising, the democratic party leadership and members) had achieved by destroying his most important achievement – the economy, and with it strategic reorganization – with a covid over-reaction and claiming he was responsible for it, and then saturating the airwaves with hate for him.
    4. What he expected was that the 6th people would protest sufficiently that he could say ‘see the people believe it was stolen’. And that he could run with it. And work on the supreme court. Or maybe a re-election. And that it would legitimize his claim that the election was stolen. But the clowns on the right – most of these ‘leaders’ are clowns, without a strategic bone in their bodies. Storming the capital and NOT making a speech was their catastrophic error (I had written the speech BTW, but didn’t attend once I understood who was ‘in charge’ and that it would be a catastrophe). It doesn’t matter that the left has stormed and burned the capital, bombed the capitol, and worse (I remember the leftist bombings were a weekly feature of the 60’s/70s.)
    5. So no the capitol even was a frat party by the right that got overexcited and the puppies didn’t know what to do once they got inside. It was clown world.
    6. I know perfectly well how a coup could have been carried out, and it wasn’t in Rrump’s interest, or his objective. Nor was it strategically necessary. What was necessary was to create a public dialog over the left’s war on western civilization and why. I know perfectly well how to create a revolution – i’ve been in one – which is why the FBI spends so much time with me making sure I don’t.
    7. Instead, I work on legal reforms to stop that war. I follow the founders. In creating a Suit against the State: Declaration (Service), and Constitution (Settlement). And in our system of government, what I do is legal, just, and moral. Just like what trump did was moral and legal.
    8. The left thas to lie because their entire edifice is predicated on the false promise that people were oppressed rather than incrementally domesticated (genetically pacified) in order to increase the quality of life by the increase in scope of markets, by the increase in the suppression of irreciprocity, by the increase in the scope of law and policing. The painful truth is that there are four to six living generations of humans, of different levels of domestication, leading to different rates of development, leading to differences in normative behavior, leading to conflicts between groups. This is fine within group but it’s not across groups in proximity. Because Domestication syndrome produces people more fit for markets, and failure of domestication syndrome produces people less fit for markets. We call these differences in fitness ‘class differences’. But the primary difference between the races is the size of their underclasses that have not experienced domestication syndrome because the climate wasn’t harsh enough (cold). So in an advanced, technological society, the problem is the shrinking of the unfit for markets at the same rates as shrinking our ignorance of the natural world through innovation adaptation and exploitation of that world.
    9. So what are the Left’s Lies? a) the false promise of the end of scarcity, b) the false promise of the nature of man (amoral superpredator), c) the false promise of the malleability of man (we can train some discipline and mindfulness but we can’t improve IQ and conscientiousness which are results of domestication syndrome: decrease in rates of development that increase cognitive development in exchange for a decrease in aggression – producing a virtuous cycle. Roughly speaking IQ is the universal measure of group success at self-domestication. d) and the constant problem of accumulating genetic load, regression the mean, and the problem of defeating the red queen in a narrow window of climatological, geological, stellar, and galatic opportunity.
    10. The left blames Europeans for oppression when European success was the result of placing progress over harmony, in exchange for a religion of tragedy (greco-roman-germanic and Christian), where we discovered adapted to and applied the laws of the universe to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality and early death. So the left blames Europeans as a proxy for blaming the universe (or theologically ‘hating god’).
    11. The movement of the frankfurt school to the USA in the postwar era was done with intent: having failed to use marxism and Leninism to turn the laboring classes against the middle classes – a class that with their rule of law of commerce (property) would suppress 2000 years of ‘huckstering’ (preying on the underclasses), they sought a new form of huckstering at industrial scale: marxism and Leninism.
    12. But capitalism had proven them wrong and provided benefit to the lower middle, working and laboring classes. So they had to move somewhere that capitalism couldn’t solve. They moved to America to weaponize the African population as they had tried to weaponize the laboring populations. They knew full well that the problem is genetic, and that capitalism couldn’t solve it. We know because they wrote it down, publicized it, and then did it. They stated that they would use the black population, western female sensitivity, democracy, to “…destroy the institutions of cultural production…” that if it continued to evolve, would prevent their continued parasitic existence by huckstering.
    13. For this ‘huckstering’ (lie) to succeed they had to demonize the eugenics movement. That required creating the sequence of anthropological, psychological, social, political, and economic pseudosciences. And they used nepotism and the university system, and the new need for education, given the post-war opportunity for upward class expansion due to the collapse of the world means of production during the wars and devoted every ounce of effort to promote this set of lies.
    14. And that’s where we are today. Although I might mention that this is a repetition of how the Christians destroyed the “institutions of cultural production” in the Roman world.

    Cheers.

  • The Final Word On Trump, The 6th, The Lie of Coup, and The Left’s Program of Deceit

    Regarding the propaganda play making use of the 6th.

    1. Look. In all Seriousness. I’m an activist. Of minor influence. There are plenty of us. Although I’m sort of ‘canceled’ by the hard right, the way most of the rest of the right has been ‘canceled by the hard left’.
    2. If Trump had wanted a coup, he could have just asked for one. Millions of us were prepared for it. Millions of us were waiting for it. He knew we would have delivered it. He even knew the ‘code phrase’ we were waiting for. I know this because I’m one of the people who kept promoting that code phrase.
    3. He didn’t. He wanted to govern. He wanted a legacy. A legacy of reforming America for the new world in which we are ‘weak’ and can no longer project military, economics, or cultural power. And where our people must be defended more than democratic socialist ideology promoted as a religion of globalism. He wanted the legacy of proving the left was wrong and he was right. And he felt (justly) that that the election was stolen (which about half of conservatives still agree with) by the Cathedral Complex (Left, Global Finance, Academy, Media, Entertainment, Advertising, the democratic party leadership and members) had achieved by destroying his most important achievement – the economy, and with it strategic reorganization – with a covid over-reaction and claiming he was responsible for it, and then saturating the airwaves with hate for him.
    4. What he expected was that the 6th people would protest sufficiently that he could say ‘see the people believe it was stolen’. And that he could run with it. And work on the supreme court. Or maybe a re-election. And that it would legitimize his claim that the election was stolen. But the clowns on the right – most of these ‘leaders’ are clowns, without a strategic bone in their bodies. Storming the capital and NOT making a speech was their catastrophic error (I had written the speech BTW, but didn’t attend once I understood who was ‘in charge’ and that it would be a catastrophe). It doesn’t matter that the left has stormed and burned the capital, bombed the capitol, and worse (I remember the leftist bombings were a weekly feature of the 60’s/70s.)
    5. So no the capitol even was a frat party by the right that got overexcited and the puppies didn’t know what to do once they got inside. It was clown world.
    6. I know perfectly well how a coup could have been carried out, and it wasn’t in Rrump’s interest, or his objective. Nor was it strategically necessary. What was necessary was to create a public dialog over the left’s war on western civilization and why. I know perfectly well how to create a revolution – i’ve been in one – which is why the FBI spends so much time with me making sure I don’t.
    7. Instead, I work on legal reforms to stop that war. I follow the founders. In creating a Suit against the State: Declaration (Service), and Constitution (Settlement). And in our system of government, what I do is legal, just, and moral. Just like what trump did was moral and legal.
    8. The left thas to lie because their entire edifice is predicated on the false promise that people were oppressed rather than incrementally domesticated (genetically pacified) in order to increase the quality of life by the increase in scope of markets, by the increase in the suppression of irreciprocity, by the increase in the scope of law and policing. The painful truth is that there are four to six living generations of humans, of different levels of domestication, leading to different rates of development, leading to differences in normative behavior, leading to conflicts between groups. This is fine within group but it’s not across groups in proximity. Because Domestication syndrome produces people more fit for markets, and failure of domestication syndrome produces people less fit for markets. We call these differences in fitness ‘class differences’. But the primary difference between the races is the size of their underclasses that have not experienced domestication syndrome because the climate wasn’t harsh enough (cold). So in an advanced, technological society, the problem is the shrinking of the unfit for markets at the same rates as shrinking our ignorance of the natural world through innovation adaptation and exploitation of that world.
    9. So what are the Left’s Lies? a) the false promise of the end of scarcity, b) the false promise of the nature of man (amoral superpredator), c) the false promise of the malleability of man (we can train some discipline and mindfulness but we can’t improve IQ and conscientiousness which are results of domestication syndrome: decrease in rates of development that increase cognitive development in exchange for a decrease in aggression – producing a virtuous cycle. Roughly speaking IQ is the universal measure of group success at self-domestication. d) and the constant problem of accumulating genetic load, regression the mean, and the problem of defeating the red queen in a narrow window of climatological, geological, stellar, and galatic opportunity.
    10. The left blames Europeans for oppression when European success was the result of placing progress over harmony, in exchange for a religion of tragedy (greco-roman-germanic and Christian), where we discovered adapted to and applied the laws of the universe to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality and early death. So the left blames Europeans as a proxy for blaming the universe (or theologically ‘hating god’).
    11. The movement of the frankfurt school to the USA in the postwar era was done with intent: having failed to use marxism and Leninism to turn the laboring classes against the middle classes – a class that with their rule of law of commerce (property) would suppress 2000 years of ‘huckstering’ (preying on the underclasses), they sought a new form of huckstering at industrial scale: marxism and Leninism.
    12. But capitalism had proven them wrong and provided benefit to the lower middle, working and laboring classes. So they had to move somewhere that capitalism couldn’t solve. They moved to America to weaponize the African population as they had tried to weaponize the laboring populations. They knew full well that the problem is genetic, and that capitalism couldn’t solve it. We know because they wrote it down, publicized it, and then did it. They stated that they would use the black population, western female sensitivity, democracy, to “…destroy the institutions of cultural production…” that if it continued to evolve, would prevent their continued parasitic existence by huckstering.
    13. For this ‘huckstering’ (lie) to succeed they had to demonize the eugenics movement. That required creating the sequence of anthropological, psychological, social, political, and economic pseudosciences. And they used nepotism and the university system, and the new need for education, given the post-war opportunity for upward class expansion due to the collapse of the world means of production during the wars and devoted every ounce of effort to promote this set of lies.
    14. And that’s where we are today. Although I might mention that this is a repetition of how the Christians destroyed the “institutions of cultural production” in the Roman world.

    Cheers.

  • This is most of the recipe for western civilization’s ‘commons-ism’ that we mist

    This is most of the recipe for western civilization’s ‘commons-ism’ that we mistake as individualism – because that feeds the false narrative. No other civ has been able to achieve this beause it’s the most costly normative model for man – and the most eugenic: the ultimate tax.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-07 22:57:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1379931344751443969

    Reply addressees: @JayMan471

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1379930802365067267

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JayMan471 REQUIRES: IQ+Conscientousness(Neoteny), Homogeneity(Indifference), Empirical Institutions(Rule of Law), Adversarialism(Competitive Meritocracy), Direction of Dominance Expression to the Production of Commons(Heroism), Commons-before-Self-or-Family(Duty), Truth-before-Face(Truth).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1379930802365067267