Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Were the Founders Hypocrits? No.

    1) They weren’t hypocrites. In order to win the war against England they had to tolerate the demands of the south, and the south couldn’t economically afford to abandon slavery. The solution was to return them to Africa, and some were, but without Fiat Currency couldn’t do it. 2) So instead of the high cost of paying for the repatriation of the slaves, and borrowing to compensate the southern farms to convert to employment labor,we had a far more costly civil war of anti-secession when the north realized that the south would rule the western expansion. 3) Humans mask their economic incentives with moral claims, but as in all things ‘follow the money’. If we asked all the farmers today to go without immigrant labor, universities without foreigners, and services without minorities, prices would skyrocket, and bankruptcies ensue. 4) The great crime was the false promise of the possibility of integration of vastly different people, when Europe had already discovered the impossibility of integrating even (neolithic farmer) mediterranean and germanic (horse) peoples, and Ireland was a third world country. 5) And so blacks are screwed because they cannot form a polity producing norms, traditions, values, commons, and political systems given the distribution of their abilities (vastly larger lower class, deeper sexual maturity), and whites can’t tolerate the costs to THEIR commons. 6)The solution we find everywhere is we separate into neighborhoods, and watch every city turn into Johannesberg (Detroit, Baltimore) as the absolutely inevitable deterministic effects of natural differences take their course: productive whites, asians and jews flee civic plague. 7) the cosmopolitan project of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, political correctness designed repeat the attempt by judaism, christianity, and islam to deprive nations of self determination, sovereignty, and meritocracy, and reduce them to dark ages yet again is over. 8) We can only cooperate by trade, but we cannot cohabitate or share suffrage, since our group strategies due to genetic differences and genetic distributions. Only europeans can produce high trust commons with high investment parenting expressly for producing commons. Period. 9) No other people can come close to achieving it, except the Koreans and Japanese, and even then, they can’t produce commons only refrain from consuming them. 10) African Slavery, industrialized by islam, was a purely economic decision for purely rational reasons : resistance to malaria. Even so, at present rates, African Americans will have killed more of one another over a century than slaves were brought to America. (Yes, really). 11) African Americans have only one oppressor: the mirror. The only solution is (a) Separation so that their elites cannot defect, leaving 2/3 of their population incapable of social, economic, and politcal organization and (b) six generations of one child at for unemployables. 12) Why this is so obvious to my African audience (“There is nothing wrong with Africans that shrinking the bottom won’t fix”) and so intolerable to Americans? Because Americans like puritans, are shallow virtue-signaling moralizers masters of deceit without lying in the world.

  • IMO all must exist: the common people’s wants of fashion, the aristocracy of int

    IMO all must exist: the common people’s wants of fashion, the aristocracy of intergenerational ambitions to accumulate capital, the law to limit them both, the military in matters of state, and the intergenerational monarchy to throw the lot out and start anew if they fail. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1393028217880072193

  • You are still trying to lose. To get symbolic wins. If you hadn’t taken their ba

    You are still trying to lose. To get symbolic wins. If you hadn’t taken their bait, taken the left’s videos edit of the video, let them lead you like sheep, then we would have been successful. Its you simpleton sheep that caused the damage. Not the govt, or press, or left. You.

    So again, I’m copying the founders. The founders put forth a common law suit against the state listing their grievances (declaration), with a set of remedies (constitution). And all you had to do was shut up and let us do the work of ‘being the adults in the room’. You didn’t.

    Instead, you merely confirmed what we all knew: you have been disenfranchised by every single elite, every single political movement, and every single person of character because you lack the self-reflection to fight the war on the terms that the enemy can’t win – the truth.

    You are under the illusion that you have political value. We were the only people that had any chance of giving you political value, political representation, and you were too stupid to even understand it. We took political responsibility for you and you failed us too.

    You’re just failing to address the central argument, and evading it like a pubescent teenage girl: you’ve failed. You always fail. You fail because you lack the knowledge, self reflection, agency, organization, skill, strategy, and intelligence to obtain ANY political power.

    So yes, you should listen to the ‘fabled intellectual mind’ because you haven’t and you keep losing because you haven’t.

    Your instincts are wrong.
    You must defeat an enemy on its terms of defeat.
    Not on your preferred terms of warfare.

    We thought we could do something with you. We can’t. Not because we don’t know how – we’re the only people who DO know how. The problem is you think you’re right and you’re too stupid to recognize the evidence that you’re just as much a tool of the left leadership as is BLM.

    And worse, your naive, childish sense of fortitude is just a moronic animal impulse absent any reason strategy or plan, that doesn’t differ from the mouse’s inability to resist taking the cheese. You’re just a monkey and they bait you into political failure every single time.

    I’ll expect your apology on your knees.
    Because that’s where you spend all your time.
    Losing. Begging. Whining. While claiming you’re manly.

    No shows. No brains. No strategy. No organization. No plan. No message. No victory. 😉

    The ‘butt-leakage’ of the political sphere.

    So no I’m generously donating my time to a lost cause in the hope that some day enough of you will realize that you’ve been played, played well, by superior forces, with superior leaders, with superior strategy, and superior dedication.

    I keep doing my job: repeat the strategy and process of the founders.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-05-07 01:01:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106191210262294731

  • I WAS RIGHT. I REMAIN RIGHT. HAVE YOU LEARNED ANYTHING YET? You need to deal wit

    I WAS RIGHT. I REMAIN RIGHT. HAVE YOU LEARNED ANYTHING YET?

    You need to deal with the fact that I was right. The left’s strategy is “baiting into hazard”. I didn’t take the bait. They were powerless. They failed. Our timing was right. Our strategy was right. Our demands were right. You idiots canceled us just like the left cancels you.

    You just can’t bear the fact that the left’s instincts are better, their organization is better, they fight better, their strategy is better, they achieve political ends better. Because you’re simple, impulsive, purity spiraling, boy-men.

    That’s why you’re angry: you lose.

    So … Man up, show up, shut up, don’t take the bait, take the heat of their empty words, of their posturing, use the attention to issue achievable, rational, political demands, and control the discourse.

    Demonstrate that they’re the ones who are violent, irresponsible, and unworthy of political attention discourse audience or TO GOVERN. And stop proving you are unworthy. … which is all that you’ve been doing.

    I’m the one guy the feds think can start and win a revolution that restores the constitution, rule of law, our natural rights, and the sovereignty of the people and the states.

    You’re just ‘the slow kids’. So grow up, and man up.

    We were right. You were wrong. Deal with it.

    I just had to let time show you I was right.

    And it has.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-05-07 00:24:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106191066562605398

  • THE WHITE LAW Science, as in the laws of nature, the natural law, and the evolut

    THE WHITE LAW

    Science, as in the laws of nature, the natural law, and the evolutionary law – well, that’s the “White Law”.

    We know the word of god – it’s written in the fabric of the universe. It says ‘evolve or die’. European people alone and almost exclusiely pursued the word of god ‘truth’ in the formal (logical), physical, behavioral (Natural), and evolutionary laws of the universe.

    With our Aryan religion’s primacy of man, heroism as a contribution to the commons, tragedy to celebrate our suffrage of it, and Christian love of one another, tolerate it all.

    The one true religion is debt to our ancestores, heroes, archetypes, nature, the laws ofthe universe and the god that made them.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-29 22:53:07 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106151070083556905

  • PHILOSOPHY IS NOW AN ARCHAIC RELIGION From atop our accumulated knowledge, the h

    PHILOSOPHY IS NOW AN ARCHAIC RELIGION

    From atop our accumulated knowledge, the history of thought is valuable b/c it explains how difficult it’s been, how often we failed, why almost everyone failed, how the pursuit of truthful testimony(science) succeeded despite those failures – but that otherwise, it’s nonsense.

    The study of philosophy is now, like the study of theology, just cultural anthropology – the study of an archaic and primitive literature stumbling in the dark as testimony (science) emerged from the imaginary, ideal, sophomoric, pseudoscientific, and occult.

    By and large, all but some few digits to the right of the decimal point are possess both agency and consciousness – and only after disciplined study and experience. Otherwise the degree to which humans are just another self domesticated animal is humiliating.

    Speech isn’t enough to demarcate human from beast.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-29 22:50:16 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106151058895636940

  • THE LEFT WANTS A RETURN TO SERFDOM? It is very hard to read anything about marxi

    THE LEFT WANTS A RETURN TO SERFDOM?

    It is very hard to read anything about marxism and come to the conclusion that it is another religion dependent upon ignorance of human nature, ignorance of human polities, ignorance of economies, and that it is nothing but another Jewish cult – of Feminine magical thinking.

    So when we say ‘socialism’ we say those who we granted freedom are unable or undesirous of its costs. When we say capitalism we say those granted liberty are unable and undesirous of its opposite costs. When we need three economies for three classes of polity.

    The logic of the left is that many are unfit for self-determination by self-determined means (freedom), unfit for self-rule(liberty), and who require a return to manorialism(serfdom) but without giving up the status afforded to those who pay the cost of liberty and freedom.

    The great lie is that we ever could abandon the hierarchy of manor and serfs, law and freemen, liberty and nobility, rule of law and monarchy. This lie existed in religion, in the enlightenment, in the industrial revolution,and persists today. Men want what conditions of success.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-29 22:49:01 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106151053992593094

  • (insult that men with high spatial IQ’s can’t figureout how to load the dishwash

    (insult that men with high spatial IQ’s can’t figureout how to load the dishwasher)

    Women will brag of their higher verbal IQ’s yet fail to produce the most basic abstract analogy, or an argument free of female cognitive bias for conflating truth and desirability, truth and “face”, individual and distribution, and an endless list of variations on those themes.

    (Insult that appeals to GSRRM that I”m somehow offended)

    Nope. Just spinning the humor for the male audience. Meanwhile, in response, you act like a woman whose flirtations were laughed at. 😉 Providing evidence confirming my statement.

    The irony is … well. Tedious really.

    (Another Insult that’s an adhominem not a denial.)

    “Woman” who demonstrates the female emotional bias to undermine rather than refute. 😉

    (Another Ad Hom)

    I dunno. I just do the science. I let the Twitterati amuse the peasantry with marxist bread and postmodern circus leaving them empty of mind and body, but distracted by the action at the show.

    This is an area of my expertise – the female method of conflict and deceit and the failure of law to suppress female ‘violence’ as much as male. So you know, I can do this all day long.

    I work in the Formal logic of decidability in science, economics, law and testimony. Writing proofs of construction from first causes in and across behavioral sciences. And no you wouldn’t understand. 🙂 It requires deep knowledge of multiple fields, not the least of which is cog sci.

    I don’t do humanities. I just do the data. 😉 there is consistency between physics, neurology, demonstrated behavior, evolution, their measurement in economics and in law. The first principles are consistent across all formal, physical, behavioral, evolutionary sciences.

    Cheers.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-26 00:46:28 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106128866562302604

  • RACE DIFFERENCES ARE IMPOSSIBLE TO EQUILIBRATE Brains grow individually just lik

    RACE DIFFERENCES ARE IMPOSSIBLE TO EQUILIBRATE

    Brains grow individually just like fingerprints, from whatever they’re connected to. There are around 50 brain regions, and around 15-18 are more influential than most, of those, and have more in and out connections than others, and the utmost are related to language.

    There are either four or five generations of man living today, each with about a 10% difference in average intelligence over the other. This means equality is impossible without natural selection by political means at the bottom of the earlier generations and their admixtures.

    Our difference in cognitive ability is the result of many things going right, and not going wrong (genetic load), and our personality due to these variations in regional influence, with the most influential factor our sex, that causes the greatest differences.

    Because we are adapting by rates of learning now, and resulting economic cooperation, leaving many behind – unfit for basic work. It may be possible for chemical means of increasing intelligence in utero or by genetic means over time. But it appears to require hundreds of genes.

    Man may be trained against racism, but we cannot train god, nature, and evolution against the fact that the races consist of four to five generations of man, due to isolation, speciation, and some later hybridization.

    To strike a little fear into the heart of many: the most obvious and urgent ‘great filter’ is not nuclear war, or climate, or geological, or astronomic crisis, but our inability to restore nature selection by continuing the ancient practice of limiting reproduction of the unfit.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-26 00:33:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106128816743987255

  • THE LAST QUESTION OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY The question isn’t how we get along, i

    THE LAST QUESTION OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY

    The question isn’t how we get along, it’s Genghis Khan’s question:

    “Why should the strong refrain from decimation, enslavement, enserfment, or rule for maximum profit?”

    The only incentive for the strong is whether cooperation is preferable to conquest. It is only preferable for conquest if it is sufficiently preferable to conquest to refrain from conquest.

    So, as the Great Khan said:

    “Given that cooperation is not preferable or possible, and serfdom and slavery are costly, that leaves decimation, or rule for the maximization of profit.”

    “We might prefer the former or the latter. However the enemy would undoubtedly prefer separation to decimation or rule under out maximization of profit. And this is the wise choice. Since we can still cooperate indirectly by trade while having no influence over one another within the same polity.”

    The problem the Khan faced is that he lacked the ability to produce institutions capable of sustained rule, just as expansionary aryans lacked the ability to produce institutions of sustained rule for maximum profit.

    The Indo-Aryans succeeded only under decimation and replacement in europe, not by any other means. The europeans killed the males and kept the females. The Persians stayed insular but were invaded by the Arabs, the indo-iranian’s are gone. The Anatolians are gone. The Caucasians are all but gone.

    So the Khan was wrong. Decimation was the right answer.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-23 14:47:13 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106115185623836504