Conservative: pragmatic, empirical, meritocratic, defending from hazard.
Progressive: utopian, theoretical, anti-meritocratic, baiting into hazard.
So why do we study theology, philosophy, ideology, or commentary? Because we feel justified in defense of our intuitions along the way – a constant addictive feedback loop of self-reinforcing falsehoods: incremental, progressive informational drug addition.
The problem with science is that it appears abstract and uninutitive until it’s not – and the entire journey is a bit of a struggle.
This is what we seek to solve with P-law. A complete, consistent, incremental logic of existence,that’s commensurable and explanatory across fields.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-13 23:35:45 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106406041736108314
Leave a Reply