Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • MARXISM PROVIDES PSEUDOSCIENCE FOR MORONS JUST AS CHRISTIANITY PROVIDED PSEUDO-P

    MARXISM PROVIDES PSEUDOSCIENCE FOR MORONS JUST AS CHRISTIANITY PROVIDED PSEUDO-PHILOSOPHY FOR MORONS

    Marxist economics is a pseudoscientific restatement of history that includes the fallacy of the labor theory of value, the fallacy that labor has value in relation to organization by the use of incentives, the fallacy of equality of value of individuals to mankind or to one another, the fallacy of oppression of the good rather than domestication of the bad, the fallacy of dunning kruger competence of the laboring and underclasses, and the predictive fallacy of both underclass revolution and capitalist failure. In fact, it is equality, democracy, socialism, and communism that has failed, and it is boazian anthropology, marxist economics and sociology, freudian psychology, frankfurt ethics, and cantorian mathematics that have proven pseudoscientific and false.

    Scientific morality: reciprocity and gentle eugenics by use meritocracy to suppress reproduction produces continuous increases in condition, prosperity, eugenics and agency.

    Everything else is both false, lying, and harmful.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 09:27:00 UTC

  • POSTMODERN TECHNIQUE When I say that all (((abrahamists))) are using the female

    POSTMODERN TECHNIQUE

    When I say that all (((abrahamists))) are using the female reproductive strategy, I mean that the female weapon of influence is gossip, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, deceit, and rallying (undermining), and that postmodernism seeks to destroy reason as a means of decidability leaving only intuition (feelings) as decidability, therefore leaving only individuals ( equality ) as a means of decidability, therefore leaving only communism (authoritarianism) as a means of political decidability.

    And when I say that the cycle of history is between military conquest by violence, bourgeoise civilization by trade, and slave+women conquest of civilization by undermining (creating weakness) so that outsiders can merely replace their betters with a new set of betters, I mean that it is a cyclical battle between aristocratic order by truth, bourgeois wealthy by pragmatic exchange, and underclass utopianism by gossip, undermining, falsehood, and theft.

    Women and the weak are always trying to recreate the herd and men and the powerful are always trying to recreate the pack. The reason being obvious: the distribution of resources for larger numbers and dysgenic stagnation giving best opportunity for bad genes, and the concentration of resources for small numbers and eugenic evolution giving best opportunity for good genes.

    What we should take away from the french and german works of philosophy is that they resisted the enlightenment with every fiber in them, and sought to replace the structures of power: the monarchies and the church.

    But they did not want truth if it meant restoration of hierarchy – and truth will always restore hierarchy, because our talents and abilities and therefore our value to one another is hierarchical.

    And the attempt to resist that hierarchy can only be achieved through lying about it, and stealing enough that the dominance hierarchy is not visible – or better yet, that the dominance hierarchy is female:he who takes and redistributes most, rather than male: he who produces most.

    Because in the end, we measure all as gains to our reproductive strategy. And we cannot do otherwise.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 07:44:00 UTC

  • “The influence of the clergy, in an age of superstition, might be usefully emplo

    —“The influence of the clergy, in an age of superstition, might be usefully employed to assert the rights of mankind; but so intimate is the connection between the throne and the altar, that the banner of the church has very seldom been seen on the side of the people”— Gibbon

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-06 17:01:00 UTC

  • “Pythagoras was a mystic who took his cues from Egypt and Heraclitus was a dissa

    —“Pythagoras was a mystic who took his cues from Egypt and Heraclitus was a dissatisfied Aristocrat who worshiped fire, just like Zoroastrian priesthood. I guess we can consider them odd ducks in this development.”—Domagoj Vaci

    (worth repeating)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-06 14:11:00 UTC

  • by Bill Joslin —“Curt equates a lack of due diligence to vet ones ideas agains

    by Bill Joslin

    —“Curt equates a lack of due diligence to vet ones ideas against error, bias, self deception, overloading etc as lying. Any primacy of consciousness or theism stands as arguing for a preference opposed to arguing a point in the commons.

    Theism and primacy of-conciousness are not verifiable in the commons – to proceed with them you must accept these premises.

    ***When we verify via our best empirical methods, our arguments gain credibility from reality. When we assert based on a priorisms which can not be found in reality we use logic to “steal credibility from reality” – we assert it as reality without consulting reality- a transfer of credibility from existence in reality, to the interpretive framework.***

    If an argument holds arbitrary assertions we can dismiss it off-hand. (If asserted without evidence it can be dismissed without evidence)”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-06 13:51:00 UTC

  • by Domagoj Vaci I suspect the evil behind Jehova (back then, the insignificant l

    by Domagoj Vaci

    I suspect the evil behind Jehova (back then, the insignificant local deity of insignificant Hebrews) is in fact the Persian devil Ahura Mazda.

    The entire naturalist pre-socratic philosophy came to be as an expression of a Ionian Greek resistance to this dualistic religionism of Persian imperial project.

    Alexander was a simple hick who was only good at breaking the military power of East while polluting the culture of Greek city-states under his yoke with eastern piety, petrifying Greek reason.

    Although, the “pre-Socratic” is a bit too wide definition. I should say Ionians, precisely Milesian school (Thales, Anaximander, Anaximenes) who invented philosophy to begin with and subjected their reasoning to crude empiricism.

    This development culminates with the Atomists Leucippus and Democritus who were also Ionian Greeks. Pythagoras was a mystic who took his cues from Egypt and Heraclitus was a dissatisfied Aristocrat who worshiped fire, just like Zoroastrian priesthood. I guess we can consider them odd ducks in this development.

    —

    (Curt: I would say that alexander was not a simple hick, especially from his letters to Aristotle. But that yes, in search of ending the persian menace, he sought power not just rule, and yes he infected the west with the persian disease.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-06 11:02:00 UTC

  • TO END ISLAM AND JUDAISM WE MUST END CHRISTIANITY Everything good in Christianit

    TO END ISLAM AND JUDAISM WE MUST END CHRISTIANITY

    Everything good in Christianity was there before Jesus was.

    The argument that the christians adopted the cult of the emperor and applied it to jesus is just as true as they adopted the cult of mithras and sol invictus.

    There is a big difference between the imperial cult, the cult of mithras, and the cult of sol invictus, and the cult of jesus. The others were martial and good, and the jesus cult was destructive as hell. Not as destructive as islam but nearly.

    There is no superior social technology than cult of the monarchy as embodiment of the people, cult of ancestors and heroes(masculine) and saints(feminine), cult of the militia, cult of the law as justice, cult of stoicism, cult of truth.

    Lies are not necessary. They are cheap. And they are effective. But their consequences are worse than their benefits.

    The old world lies of Islam, Christianity, and Judaism, as well as the new world lies of Islamism, Postmodernism, and Marxism, must be extinguished. They are semitic, babylonian inventions. They are the evolution of the Persian heresy of Zoroastrianism, turned against the circumpolar peoples in order to undermine our ancient military, technical, and civic social orders by the seduction of our women, our weak, and our ignorant.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-06 10:57:00 UTC

  • (response to a ‘jesus message’) I am not a follower of Jehova, Abraham, and Saul

    (response to a ‘jesus message’)

    I am not a follower of Jehova, Abraham, and Saul, but of Alexander, Aristotle, and Zeno, and Hume, Darwin, and Locke . My god says that Jehova is the Devil, Abraham is his prophet, and Paul and Muhammed are his disciples.

    And the evidence tells me my god speaks the truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-05 21:26:00 UTC

  • Language isn’t magic. People are too trusting and too suggestible. That’s why re

    Language isn’t magic. People are too trusting and too suggestible. That’s why religion works. That’s why postmodernism works.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-05 19:50:00 UTC

  • THE LITERATURE OF THE FEMININE vs. THE MASCULINE (I am gonna get in *big* troubl

    THE LITERATURE OF THE FEMININE vs. THE MASCULINE

    (I am gonna get in *big* trouble for this, but it’s true.)

    The Literature of the Feminine and the Effeminate: (Speech)

    1 -Abrahamism(Judaism > Christianity > Islam) >

    2 -Marxism ( Socialism > Libertarianism > Neo-Conservatism ) >

    3 -Postmodernism( Feminism > Secular Humanism > Alt-Right)

    The Literature of the Masculine: (Action)

    1 – Sovereignty > Law > Science > Technology > Economics > War.

    (Ancient Romans, Monarchists, Tories, Fascists, The New Right)

    (Not gonna defeat that. Not gonna happen.)

    (OMG, LET THE FLAME WARS START)

    (h/t: Ayelam)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-04 10:08:00 UTC