Theme: Religion

  • by James Augustus Religion & Ritual on the Spectrum of the Completeness of Infor

    by James Augustus

    Religion & Ritual on the Spectrum of the Completeness of Information: Cognition & Action Under Asymmetric/Incomplete Information

    The Spectrum:

    (+)<——–Information——–>(-)

    (*) (2) (1) (0) (-1) (-2)

    (+)

    Truth

    Empiricism

    Individualism

    Markets

    Sovereignty

    Eugenic

    (-)

    Lies

    Mysticism

    Collectivism

    Discretion

    Submission

    Dysgenic

    Religion and Ritual:

    *Ratio-empirical Consequentialism: human action under complete, operational, and deterministic information.

    (2) Stoicism: partial but actionable information. Action and cognition directed towards the immediately calculable, operational, actionable.

    (1) Shinto: position: partial (approaching random) information. Action and cognition directed towards the replicable: precise repetition of ritual in addition to ancestor and nature worship, respectively.

    (0) Buddhism: random, in-actionable information. In-actionable information creates a preference for avoidance/disassociation. Action directed towards escaping conceptualization, accounting and calculation: escapism via meditation.

    (-1) Christianity: partial construction of misinformation. Action and cognition directed towards group in attempt to extended kinship altruism, and create feelings of [physical] security + belonging (social security).

    (-2) Islam: near-complete construction of, and dependence upon, misinformation. Action and cognition directed towards demonstrating and enforcing submission through high-cost of ritual.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 01:48:00 UTC

  • the point I want to get across is *what are the social consequences of mass prod

    the point I want to get across is *what are the social consequences of mass production of mindfulness by each means?* And the answer will be not ‘kind’ to mysticism.

    each form of government produces order with different externalities. each form of ethics produces behavior with different externalities. each form of training for mindfulness produces behavior with different externalities.

    What are the consequences of obtaining mindfulness by the different methods advocated in each civilization?

    What does that tell you?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 01:18:00 UTC

  • “Would you agree: reciprocity provides the science of reciprocity, and the “reas

    —“Would you agree: reciprocity provides the science of reciprocity, and the “reason” to be moral absent religion is that it’s an effective strategy for group level survival/competition – and effective personally because of the social value of being reciprocal and cost of not being?”—Sean Lester

    Yes. the more moral, the lower friction, the greater risk tolerance, the higher velocity, the greater wealth.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 21:29:00 UTC

  • NIETZSCHE AND EVOLA Nietzsche and evola were trying to free us from christianity

    NIETZSCHE AND EVOLA

    Nietzsche and evola were trying to free us from christianity, but failed to escape abrahamism: the occult.

    Nietzche used personal emotional suffering as the person’s trial, rather than demonstrated competition in reality as did homer’s achilles.

    In this sense, Nietzche only managed to transition from abrahamic slave morality to platonist morality : the morality of the dream state – the imagination.

    So Nietzche and Evola are still supernatural (Occult) fantasies that seek only psychological achievement, not demonstrable achievement. Nietzche and evola create a heaven of the mind, not a heaven on this earth – created by and owned by and rule by men.

    If you come to understand this you will understand why I seek demonstration in reality not belief. And why I ridicule the occultists for hallucinations rather than demonstrations.

    There is no higher aristocracy than one that is made by action. And that is homer’s Achilles Ordeal, Odysseus’s Ordeal before the bronze age collapse, Alexander’s Ordeal and Fall after the bronze age restoration, and Aeneas ordeal in rome.

    The future will treat Napoleon, Stalin, and Hitler the same.

    And in the present it is our time. Our era. Our life times during which the next set of myths will be created – or a dark age will follow.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-01 09:59:00 UTC

  • OPEN LETTER TO THE COUNTER-REVOLUTION A beautiful movement. I have not seen it d

    OPEN LETTER TO THE COUNTER-REVOLUTION

    A beautiful movement. I have not seen it done better. I wish I could ‘fit into’ it. Because I am a committed monarchist.

    But the church has abandoned europe in favor of the revenues of the simple people of warmer regions it evolved to govern. And our people have abandoned the church in favor of its secular expression and democratic government.

    I see no evidence of possibility for a restoration of the church, if for no other reason than the church is unwilling to reform. But more importantly, western man has evolved to the point where he can control every aspect of nature that the church claimed god held providence over.

    So just as the cult of jesus was a heresy against the roman empire’s religion, and against the bible of the european ancient world: The Iliad: the tragedy of Achilles, and just as one of your authors has correctly stated, the American Revolution and its cult of individualism was a heresy driven only by the Colonist’s attempt to circumvent payment to the crown for the cost of the indian wars. The crown’s folly was in not adding the colonies to the houses of commons, or creating a separate house of the colonies. The colonists did not want to separate. (other than the foolishly overcommitted puritans from whom I am ashamedly descended).

    There exists a growing movement that has not yet self identified itself, that seeks to restore the myths and traditions of the church by combining christian mythos, stoic virtues and discipline, using what we have discovered from cognitive science and in particular personality traits, in combination with literary analysis and myth, including the Monomyth, the Archetypes, the Plots(Trials), and the Virtues. And instead submission to deity few believe in as other than a set of general rules of the universe, and submissive prayer an anthropomorphic character, these groups are reviving a combination the methods of the most scientific religion of the ancient world (stoicism), and the teachings of christianity, to produce an empowering rather than submissive ‘religion’.

    This technique would allow the presentation of christianity as science rather than superstition. And my estimation is that it is the most likely if not only method of providing the reformation of the catholic church that failed under Vatican II, and was never attempted by the protestant churches other than the development of american evangelical protestantism. The catholic church doubled down on ‘living as did christ’. Evangelical protestantism doubled down on fundamentalism. But while these churches are surviving in the third world among the poor and ignorant, for europeans these churches are both dead – and worse, they are poisoned for the many crimes of the church over the centuries.

    So I do not expect to achieve anything other than making you aware of what I see as a successful option that has begun to take on momentum. And for you to consider it an option to investigate. The man working on the process is Dr. Jordan Peterson. But no one is working on reforming christianity to make it transform from a superstiiton to a science. And if any group can do this it will restore the value of the church.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 21:54:00 UTC

  • SOVEREIGNTY AND DUTY Since today’s little spat with a libertarian was another ex

    SOVEREIGNTY AND DUTY

    Since today’s little spat with a libertarian was another example of how libertarians are using abrahamic pilpul to make excuses for their attempts to circumvent costs of commons I thought I would point out the obvious: that sovereignty cannot exist without duty of reciprocity.

    In other words, no rights are possible without corresponding obligations: reciprocity.

    In other words, you cannot possess sovereignty unless you are willing to fight for your own and that of others.

    Anarchists of any kind, seek precisely that escape.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:14:00 UTC

  • “First critical thought as a child sitting in a Roman Catholic church: Religion

    —“First critical thought as a child sitting in a Roman Catholic church: Religion is government for people in deserts where there aren’t any police or judges. I’m not kidding, best thought I had as a kid. I regret to say it was as late as 12 when I realized this about religion.”— Matt Nagy


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 14:51:00 UTC

  • RELIGION? HOW DO YOU KNOW (AS A HUMAN and MAN) – OR DO YOU JUST FEEL (AS AN ANIM

    RELIGION? HOW DO YOU KNOW (AS A HUMAN and MAN) – OR DO YOU JUST FEEL (AS AN ANIMAL or WOMAN)?

    What is the consequence of christianity vs the consequence of roman pagan festival, political law personal stoicism?

    Why do you think christianity contains “truths” rather than a strategy and tactics. And unless you know the different strategies and tactics, and how they map to the competitive evolutionary strategies of the groups that use them, then how do you know what you’re saying is true?

    I mean, what is the difference between the tragedy of achilles and the tragedy of jesus? You know, jesus’ tragedy was invented to undermine that of achilles – which was the ‘bible’ of the ancient world.

    Just as abrahamism was invented to destroy the persian, anatolian, greek aristocracy, jesus’ story was invented to destroy the persian, anatolian-byzantine, roman aristocracy. Just as marxist and postmodern abrahamism was invented to destroy the anglo-german aristocracy. It works the same way every time: rally the women and the underclass such that it affects the income of the middle class so that they threaten the upper class and destroy the civilization.

    How do you know that religion does what you say it does? What is the difference between good and true religion and bad and false religion?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 11:11:00 UTC

  • So, what you’re saying is, that religion is a form of government by selling a re

    So, what you’re saying is, that religion is a form of government by selling a really unhealthy self help program?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 10:27:00 UTC

  • OUR CHOICE: EUGENIC SCIENTIFIC TRUTH OR DYSGENIC ABRAHAMIC LIES Don’t be stupid.

    OUR CHOICE: EUGENIC SCIENTIFIC TRUTH OR DYSGENIC ABRAHAMIC LIES

    Don’t be stupid.

    We had the consequences of the anglo enlightenment 17th. then the french 18th. then the german 19th, then the jewish 20th. And we’re dealing with the muslim failure to adapt to it today.

    The question is whether the aristocratic scientific eugenic and progressive or the underclass abrahamic, dysgenic and regressive will succeed. It’s the choice between another age of innovation, or another dark age of abrahamic superstition and ignorance.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 09:37:00 UTC