Theme: Institution

  • Soft eugenics, by manorialism (land allocation), financialism (credit allocation

    Soft eugenics, by manorialism (land allocation), financialism (credit allocation), and hanging (europe) and beheading (east asia) are the reason for the success of our two civilizations – with european rule of law of property defeating chinese bureaucracy in adaptive velocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 17:22:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229093745401966593

    Reply addressees: @drjulie_b

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228951074981195777

  • Alexander Brown The March 06, 1957 independence of Ghana was the product of an a

    https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/482762-utah-senate-committee-unanimously-approves-bill-to-decriminalizeby Alexander Brown

    The March 06, 1957 independence of Ghana was the product of an act of parliament in England. The Ghana Independence Act 1957 was passed on February 07, 1957 to take effect on March 06, 1957. Were this law to be repealed today in England, Ghana may remain a sovereign and thanks to international recognition of it’s statehood.

    In 1896, the United States Congress extended statehood to Utah on condition that it would end POLYGAMY. Given that the State of Utah is in the process of decriminalising polygamy [ 1 ] in our times, could this constitute a violation of the congressional mandate of 1896? And if it does, would Utah revert to a territory and no longer a state? Or like Ghana’s recognition, US federal recognition may supersede the consequence of violating the 19th century congressional mandate?

    INSIGHT: There is a brewing right wing wave that aim to fracture and separate the United States into agreeable, homogenous states of all markets possible from the cosmopolitan, globalism – welcoming leftist states. Could happenings in Mitt Romney’s Utah illuminate the coming re – structuring of the United States?

    I do not know for certain. But, this could be very interesting overall.

    [ 1 ].Updated Feb 13, 2020, 9:47 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 09:47:00 UTC

  • No technical university. Three ex-tehological universities specializing in marxi

    No technical university. Three ex-tehological universities specializing in marxism, postmodernism, and multiculturalism.

    CT – at least within five miles of any of the interstates is just dysgenic multicultural collapsing wasteland.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 16:38:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227632969726205954

    Reply addressees: @vixcontango @PeterSchiff

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227632576027938816


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @vixcontango @PeterSchiff Danbury, Derby, Waterbury, Bridgeport, New Haven, North Haven, Meriden, Hartford, East Hartford, New Britain, Plainville, and thanks to puerto rican immigration, New London are in Detroit-levels of collapse. Hartford north end was a no go zone even back in the 70’s.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227632576027938816


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @vixcontango @PeterSchiff Danbury, Derby, Waterbury, Bridgeport, New Haven, North Haven, Meriden, Hartford, East Hartford, New Britain, Plainville, and thanks to puerto rican immigration, New London are in Detroit-levels of collapse. Hartford north end was a no go zone even back in the 70’s.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227632576027938816

  • There is no capitalism in connecticut. CT is poor because it most copied the sov

    There is no capitalism in connecticut. CT is poor because it most copied the soviet system, created an expensive public sector pension program, had leftist universities placed the state uni. in the countryside, created a conflcit between labor and biz and drove out the industry.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 16:32:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227631609593188352

    Reply addressees: @vixcontango @PeterSchiff

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227629542002642944


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227629542002642944

  • THE FINANCIAL SYSTEMS OF THE WORLD WILL RESIST US —“Accounting for changes in

    THE FINANCIAL SYSTEMS OF THE WORLD WILL RESIST US

    —“Accounting for changes in genetic, institutional, cultural and normative capital would not go over well with Capital (the societal force) as it is currently conceived of. Japan is a good example of where they DO take the balance sheet into consideration.”—Michael Churchill


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 11:11:00 UTC

  • THE AVAILABILITY OF VALUES by Luke Weinhagen The availability of values is a sha

    THE AVAILABILITY OF VALUES

    by Luke Weinhagen

    The availability of values is a shareholder dividend paid from the investment in the foundational rules. – – The character of the values is limited by the level of investment.

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle.personal/posts/127192502012245Updated Feb 10, 2020, 10:31 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-10 22:31:00 UTC

  • THE CHOICE OF VALUES IS A LUXURY GOOD PRODUCED BY YOUR POLITY When you say you h

    THE CHOICE OF VALUES IS A LUXURY GOOD PRODUCED BY YOUR POLITY

    When you say you hold X values:

    (a) What are you not accounting for and not accounting for?

    (b) How does your opinion hold up against the kantian imperative, ‘if everyone did that then’? (Which is just the same as the conservative intuition).

    (c) How does your opinion hold up against the kantian imperative in competition with hostile parties within your polity intent on depriving you of your choice or preference?

    (c) How does your opinion hold up against the kantian imperative in competition with hostile parties external to your polity intent on depriving you of your choice or preference?

    (d) So again, what are you accounting for, or failing to account for?

    Values only matter within the limits of the market for tolerance of them in the circumstance – in other words, values are a luxury good produced by reciprocity within the limits of proportionality within the limits of the available geography, ecology, political ecology, economy, location, and time and space.

    Demands (Necessities) vs Preferences (Values)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-10 20:36:00 UTC

  • 2) The three economies in Tripartism are Markets, Protected Markets(Guilds, Unio

    2) The three economies in Tripartism are Markets, Protected Markets(Guilds, Unions), Limited Markets, Non Market (Dependents). 3) Trust necessary to produce those markets requires ethnic homogeneity, 4) Ethnocentrism is the optimum military, political, economic,and social order.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-10 13:41:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226863749199540225

    Reply addressees: @NickJFuentes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226862268782194688


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @NickJFuentes Nick: 1) It was a false dichotomy: to replace rule of law(Local Capitalism) vs Discretionary Rule (International socialism). Individual Sovereignty requires Rule of Law (of Reciprocity) Jury, Thang(Council),Senate, King, Markets in Everything. Tripartism requires three economies.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1226862268782194688


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @NickJFuentes Nick: 1) It was a false dichotomy: to replace rule of law(Local Capitalism) vs Discretionary Rule (International socialism). Individual Sovereignty requires Rule of Law (of Reciprocity) Jury, Thang(Council),Senate, King, Markets in Everything. Tripartism requires three economies.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1226862268782194688

  • FUNCTIONALISM Monarchy (kinship priesthood) … Aristocracy( military priesthood

    FUNCTIONALISM

    Monarchy (kinship priesthood)

    … Aristocracy( military priesthood)

    … … Judiciary (legal priesthood)

    … … … Nobility (Familial Priesthood)

    … … … … Priesthood (Emotional Priesthood)

    … … … … … The People (production of generations, goods, services, and information)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-10 09:46:00 UTC

  • just send it. I never know. Most of the time if people have ideas, they run with

    just send it. I never know. Most of the time if people have ideas, they run with them and take charge. I dont control anything. We are a judicial militia. men form their regiments. I just do the law. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-09 14:41:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226516357237420032

    Reply addressees: @relocateromania @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226489564631621634


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226489564631621634