Theme: Institution

  • THE FULL CIRCLE OF CURRENCY – by Bill Joslin – From what i understand currency p

    THE FULL CIRCLE OF CURRENCY

    – by Bill Joslin –

    From what i understand currency pertained to debt tracking before it was used for trade. (in group tally of debts within small communities that distributed resources and only engaged in formal trade across groups)(greaber’s Debt)

    (oddly we’ve come full circle with currency created when debts are issued)

    -by Paul Franklin –

    Coinage, then, might have been an attempt to create professional armies to avoid paying them through plunder? Philanthropic.

    Paper money, according to Ezra Pound, was ‘philanthropic’ invention of a Chinese Emperor in a drought, issued to the starving illiterate peasants that they might buy enough of the grain they grew from the Barons who kept it, and not die.

    The barons redeem the paper for the promise of gold declared for their presentation before the Emperor.

    Promise? Is this the same post?

    One message I have for Christians, one thing that I can tell you with the same certainty I can predict tomorrow’s sunrise will occur – Christ is definitely not coming.

    No point in waiting for that promise to be fulfilled.

    Although the implication is therefore that he must already be here?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 10:49:00 UTC

  • Seriously how do so many people get that much that wrong for that long – unless

    Seriously how do so many people get that much that wrong for that long – unless your entire culture’s theology, mythology, history, law, logic, and means of economic survival depend on the same technique, just updated from supernatural sophistry to pseudoscientific sophistry?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 02:15:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231764554704728064

    Reply addressees: @tuckertonRR @NordvoldW @MalkuthSense @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231764042026569728


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @tuckertonRR @NordvoldW @MalkuthSense @StefanMolyneux I mean, you can’t do much worse than the jews. They industrialized the production pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial: Canto-Bohr, Boas-Freud, Marx-Trotsky, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida, Friedan, Rand-Rothbard, Strauss-Kristol. – I mean, thats a century of the modernization of lying.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1231764042026569728

  • It’s about every single nation resisting the anglo scientific enlightenment’s ru

    It’s about every single nation resisting the anglo scientific enlightenment’s rule of law market society: Rousseau’s French sophistry, Kant’s German secular sophistry, Jewish pseudoscientific sophistry, then chinese, and now we contend with Islam’s century of resistance.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 02:09:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231762986315980800

    Reply addressees: @tuckertonRR @NordvoldW @MalkuthSense @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231728700351287296

  • “Organization is the key. There are people everywhere that will feel refreshed a

    —“Organization is the key. There are people everywhere that will feel refreshed after learning this all and jump right on.”—Jeff Carlson

    We will create a political party as the means of organizing

    The other ‘organizations’ will follow.

    ( If we have time we take the IRA strategy of two wings, if we run out of time, we resort to Mao’s strategy of a single wing. In both cases we need a political organization since the world is currently organized to facilitate them and the publicity is free.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 22:23:00 UTC

  • WILL AMERICAN-STYLE CAPITALISM STILL EXIST 100 YEARS FROM NOW? by Curt Doolittle

    WILL AMERICAN-STYLE CAPITALISM STILL EXIST 100 YEARS FROM NOW?

    by Curt Doolittle, Philosopher of political economy and founder of the Propertarian Institute.

    America doesn’t practice capitalism it practices rule of law, and as a consequence of rule of law, people are limited to survival in markets. Because western civilization began entrepreneurially, developed promise and contract, tort law and property, testimony and jury, we have long standing institutions for enforcing contracts, and long standing tradition of high trust. So for these reasons we could develop large scale organizations using contracts. These large scale organizations using contracts could organize a lot of money behind entrepreneurial ventures. Because of a combination of rule of law of tort, contracts, and large organizations, we could create high production capacity using high capital investment in machines, without resorting to central government control, militarizing people, serfdom or slavery to organize people into large working groups. And using this combination of law, contract, jury, large organizations, and technological innovation, we could drag humanity – resisting us, kicking and screaming – out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the chaos of natural forces, at the cost of creating uncertainty. So people traded poverty and certainty for prosperity and uncertainty. And people continue to make the choice every day. The communists (jews) invented the terms capitalism as a criticism, and socialism and communism as a false promise, as a means of restoring certainty and control over their lives. But neither socialism or communism is possible because both suffer from the four big problems of lack of incentives, and therefore laziness, the inability to use prices to efficiently organize an economy, and endemic corruption by state managed industries and the government, and the tendency of the people to vote themselves or demand themselves into tragedies ofthe commons: consumption higher than production.

    What the future will bring?

    In advanced countries one child policies: Automation will continue to drive down human labor markets until only a third of people, or maybe a fifth of people, can find employment, nd those people who work will end democracy and rule the people that can’t. The end result will be eugenics that suppressed the reproduction and consumption of those people who are unable to participate in production distribution and trade. IN poor countries they will forgo automation and continue to use labor, which will produce subsistence level for the poor and a small wealthy class.

    Just Like the rest of history.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 20:13:00 UTC

  • “The sentiments about the education system you have shared lately, Curt, of said

    —“The sentiments about the education system you have shared lately, Curt, of said system being closer to a Church than a system of education, are similar to an analysis done by YouTuber Sargon of Akkad a few years ago. His analysis came during a major incursion of Progressivist ideology in the realm of Video Games (GamerGate), where he worked to identify the source of the incursion. While Sargon (Carl Benjamin) was not as concise as you, and hasn’t visited the subject for some time, your latest posts on the subject have rekindled a personal desire for him to grant you an interview.

    I’m not sure if you’re on his radar (or vise verse prior to my reply here), but his platform and politics would work in your favor and would give him some more content for his channel.

    Thoughts?”—Steven Kolpek

    Thinking….

    My analysis is that of Hilbert(1920s) Hayek (1970’s) and Thomas Sowell (1980’a) combined with Kevin Macdonald(1990’s) and Stephen Hicks (2010’s).

    Hicks explains the evolution of leftist (jewish) thought.

    Macdonald documents it in detail.

    I articulate the methodology of (abrahamic) leftist thought and how to expand our law to outlaw and suppress it.

    In doing so I was able to document western group strategy in precise economic and scientific terms.

    I think were people differ is whether (a) it is possible to make abrahamism illegal, (b) whether it is possible to reform the academy using that law (c) or whether people must be ostracized from the polity because they are irredeemable.

    I think that fixing the universities is rather easy. It’s a money problem and ending the money problem will fix the problem.

    I don’t feel the need to have help with publicity but I would of course talk to the man and enjoy it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 13:13:00 UTC

  • It’s because you don’t treat the royal family as a sacred institution and the sy

    It’s because you don’t treat the royal family as a sacred institution and the symbol and embodiment of the entire past present and future of your people.

    If you don’t, that’s fine, But don’t urinate on what’s sacred to those of us who do. And if you do, expect the consequences.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 12:41:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231559724530905088

    Reply addressees: @Kellyfree12 @piersmorgan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231331828868489217

  • I think it’s not obvious that the Oxford model of colleges was far closer to the

    I think it’s not obvious that the Oxford model of colleges was far closer to the guild model than today’s universities are – which are far closer to the church model.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 09:36:00 UTC

  • A sophistry without meaning. The Jews invented social construction by the instit

    A sophistry without meaning. The Jews invented social construction by the instit

    A sophistry without meaning. The Jews invented social construction by the institution of lying as a means of undermining from within. https://t.co/UTEjVsvuCw


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 20:50:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231320339239591942

    Reply addressees: @stack_dalton @razibkhan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231318762806292481

  • The secret of European and Sinic civilizations was soft eugenics using the natur

    The secret of European and Sinic civilizations was soft eugenics using the natural pressure of farming, with manorialism’s land access, natural credit access, and aggressive prosecution of criminals.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 20:46:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231319341100158980

    Reply addressees: @stack_dalton @razibkhan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231318598758604800


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @stack_dalton @razibkhan The only cancer on this earth is abrahamism: the systemic application of the female method of undermining as a means of civilizational warfare under pretense of religion sold to useful idiots using the false promise of freedom from natural laws of our differences.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1231318598758604800