Curt Doolittle

Theme: Institution

  • THE STATE The state is the only de-facto sovereign (organization) in competition

    THE STATE

    The state is the only de-facto sovereign (organization) in competition with other polities for territory, resources, trade routes, built capital, and population.

    The state maintains that sovereignty as an insurer of last resort, maintaining a monopoly of violence in its capacity of insurer of last resort. It obtains income to pay for its function as an insurer of last resort, through fees sufficient to provide insurance against all competitors.

    The state adds value by suppression of all competitors to it’s fees, using the judicial system – thereby freeing the population from many high friction transaction costs in exchange for one low friction transaction cost (taxes). This is why states are always wealthier than non states – economic velocity.

    The government produces commons in addition to the states in order to generate the returns from commons – organizing the production of non-consumables prohibiting privatization by consumption ‘abusus’, but by allowing “usus” (use), creating ‘fructus’ (fruits).

    The production of commons increases population, trade, and therefore revenues that can be distributed between the production of common when times are fair(good), and functioning as insurer of last resort when times are dear (hard).

    Since the cost of both sovereignty and commons is only determined by market competition, then we have no say about the construction of state, military, judiciary, government, and institutions. We have only say in how competitive we desire to be and the relative conditions we live under.

    To produce a relatively anarchic polity would require only the production of sufficient military capability to deny all competitors, and retaining population and production necessary to pay for it, with the commons necessary to retain that population.

    In other words you don’t get to choose very much if you want to survive as a polity.

    The only means of minimizing a government long term is to do what I’ve recommended, which is exhaustive application of the law of reciprocity limiting allr ents, and then a payment (tax) system that was as closests to operating a business as possible. And that would require, exactly what I’ve proposed.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-09 13:32:00 UTC

  • We will roll out ‘practical activities’ once we have 1) enough of the constituti

    We will roll out ‘practical activities’ once we have 1) enough of the constitution out, 2) and enough of a FAQ, and 3) a video for each market segment we’re addressing so that they know the features and benefits.Then we can start ‘organizing’ political party. Activists. Fighters.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-09 12:16:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226480026792710144

    Reply addressees: @relocateromania @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226398965463232512

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226398965463232512

  • VETS There are a lot of vets with issues – maybe most of them. They need organiz

    VETS

    There are a lot of vets with issues – maybe most of them. They need organization and purpose but the problem with the current military is that they have been put to imperial rather than national use, forced to fight 4gw in hostile territory, where everyone is some degree of foe, forced to fight in these conditions under absurd rules of engagement, forced to fight in those intolerable conditions for longer periods than is mentally tolerable for humans, had their reason for fighting destroyed, effectively lost every recent war, and under an upper bureaucracy that is in their view immoral and absent honor – so they come back having fought for broken policy, to save a broken civilization, into a society that is broken, when they are broken, and they lack leadership to un-break both society and themselves in the process. In this sense they are a market. They are however, a market that requires a different product. We have produced a revolution in thought that unites the sciences and makes possible the restoration of our traditional law and culture in scientific and legal terms. We have produced a constitution that we can use as a solution that I hope will animate people across the spectrum – other than immigrants, the state, financial, academy, and entertainment sectors. We are working slowly on producing a philosophy that applies it to personal life. But we have not produced a story of their place in that unbroken world, where they will be unbroken, and they are valued in ensuring it remains unbroken. So what we have learned from this challenging period is that we have a market that we can satisfy largely by giving it purpose.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 22:00:00 UTC

  • ANGLO COMMON “ADVERSARIAL” LAW PERSISTED FOR A REASON —“Depending on the legal

    ANGLO COMMON “ADVERSARIAL” LAW PERSISTED FOR A REASON

    —“Depending on the legal market and parties involved, the adversarial nature of law can actually be quite constructive. You come to learn quickly who the honest but zealous advocates are, as opposed to the slimy, deceitful guys trying to hide evidence, defend absurd positions, etc. Especially in small markets, the two groups quickly separate, as oil and water, and interactions between the honest group are beneficial to themselves and their clients. The deceitful scum generally cost themselves and their clients in the long run. They value face over truth, and that’s soon apparent to those who value truth more highly.”–Brad Lehman

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 21:15:00 UTC

  • PAY PEOPLE TO ACCELERATE THE BIG SORT AT THE COST OF THE STATE, ACADEMY, FINANCE

    PAY PEOPLE TO ACCELERATE THE BIG SORT AT THE COST OF THE STATE, ACADEMY, FINANCE, ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRIES

    I (we) hold the position that (a) we should be pursuing rights to self determination, and our way of life, and that requires arms just as others require faith. (b) We are tolerant of those that conform to our traditional group strategy, and are inclusive within that limit, but that integration on a scale of other than middle and upper middle class christians (Black, Hispanic, Asian) has failed, and that we will not leave a window open for repeating the failures of the 20th.

    Our strategy evolves. My strategy at present is to push rights. Move to the center on those rights, but be intolerant regarding policy and rights, which will drive our better people to us, and cause separation on demand for commons that will happen to be those preferred by our people.

    My understanding from the historical evidence everywhere is that if we create a separate union on our terms, then the best will depart leaving the blue cities ghettos with an elite that exploits them but cannot exploit the middle, and that new cities will replace the commercial them.

    As I’ve said, by merely emptying DC as a power center, and gutting new york as a financial center, and disemboweling the media’s income stream, we will achieve our goals.

    The reason this will work is that we are going to buy off left right and center middle with the returns on redistributing all that wealth.

    So to repeat the strategy for those that aren’t on board with it, we offer a deal that is full of desirable ideas and then turn the population against the real enemy. At that point they will double down like all humans and give us moral license to us both left and right activists and ‘divide the spoils’.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 14:56:00 UTC

  • BUILDING COMMUNITY I think you should imitate bill’s technique. We use my feed t

    BUILDING COMMUNITY

    I think you should imitate bill’s technique. We use my feed to identify candidates that you then recruit. After a while you will be able to recruit your own people without my feed. Then once you have ‘got the message down’ enough, make a few dozen videos (it takes that many) and recruit by video. This creates a community. We are building a network of communities of common interest. All built on P but addressing the needs or wants of people living lives with different contexts and therefore different demands from P.

    Video > Public Feed > Private Group that meets regularly to discuss a topic in the king of the hill(male) or socrates cafe(female) model > ‘a leadership team’ that keeps track of the development of the group and tries to move the group along > “A Mission” > Courseware.

    Do not try to make money. It doesn’t work.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 10:05:00 UTC

  • Under Social Tripartism and Elite Trifunctionalism, we find The Scientific and T

    Under Social Tripartism and Elite Trifunctionalism, we find

    The Scientific and Technical ‘Priesthood’ (The material Universe of those who work)

    The Juridical ‘Priesthood’ (Via Negativa – actions of Man) – Those who fight

    The Political ‘Priesthood” (via-positiva – organization of man) – Those who pray

    While these three forces of elites al compete with one another in an ever shifting equilibrium, the political priesthood is unsettleld on method:

    1. Material: History and Realism

    2. Mental: Philosophy and Idealism

    3. Emotional: Theology and Mythology

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-06 10:48:00 UTC

  • I am pretty sure we know what to do. we have to ‘escalate’ the message before we

    I am pretty sure we know what to do. we have to ‘escalate’ the message before we escalate the organization – but it will happen.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-06 00:01:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225207846947696641

    Reply addressees: @bashay4297 @JohnMarkSays @YouTube

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225207511084564480

    IN REPLY TO:

    @bashay4297

    @curtdoolittle @JohnMarkSays @YouTube I have one question one concern how do we get this civil war started someone needs to gather the troops and kick this off I’m ready to see the whites of there eyes enough is enough all these videos you tubers have of who will win and why we need it we need this party started

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225207511084564480

  • THE CONSTANCY OF THE WESTERN TRADITION OVER 3500 YEARS – REGARDLESS OF PROPAGAND

    THE CONSTANCY OF THE WESTERN TRADITION OVER 3500 YEARS – REGARDLESS OF PROPAGANDA

    —“Your reified medieval “associations” are products of anarcho-social — not state — covenants”—(((Gamhard McCoy)))

    Bronze age, mediterranean age, continental age, north sea age, atlantic age institutions are continuous products of customary law made necessary by military strategy, given geography, technology, numbers, and have been consistent for at least 3500 years.

    A sovereign man requires the self, a holding requires family, a manor adds employees, a princedom adds counsellors, a state adds bureaucracy, and empire unites states. But they are just names for the same process at increasing scales producing a homogenous hierarchy organized by the same simple rule: sovereignty.

    (I know what you are paraphrasing, but quoting others words says nothing about demonstrated behavior – which is the difference between myth/literature/propaganda and law/science/records. Notice how I only mention literary works in order to illustrate that they are almost universally wrong – which is why the history of thought is either a set of lies by the bottom(theology and mythology) or a set of lies by the middle ( philosophy and literature). Those in power just rule and leave evidence. They have no one to convince.)

    There were only three degrees available to our ancestors, reflecting the two priesthoods: Theology(Social), and Law(Political), and the practical: medicine(Physical).

    Tripartism in everything.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 12:03:00 UTC

  • WESTERN INSTITUTIONS AROUSE OUT OF DISTRIBUTED POWER —“all these [european] in

    WESTERN INSTITUTIONS AROUSE OUT OF DISTRIBUTED POWER

    —“all these [european] institutions arose out of the progressive rationalization of fear and terror — the true bases of the liberalistic *reciprocol state (which actually has no right of resistance, as herr Schmitt knew well)”— (((Gamhard McCoy)))

    THE INSTITUTIONS:

    Sovereignty, Duel, Court, Government, Monarchy.

    1. Constrain one another’s words with the duel.

    2. Constrain one another’s action with the court, having failed to constrain them with threat of the duel.

    3. Constrain a group, or industry with the court of commons for having failed to constrain one another with the court.

    4. Constrain a government with an election for having failed to constrain individuals, groups, or industries.

    5. Constrain a monarchy with a revolution for having failed to constrain the government.

    They did? Conquerors thought in terms of fear and terror when their gods and mythos put them equal to gods, and they conquered everything from Spain to the edge of china?

    Those institutions arose out of the necessity of a small number of professional warriors dependent upon expensive technology (horse, bronze, chariot) that could not pay for a standing army and were dependent upon raising voluntary militia due to the inability of western peoples (horses, cattle, grasslands) to concentrate capital as was possible in the flood river valley civilizations (grains) and pastoralist early neolithic farmers (sheep, grain).

    I don’t make errors. Because I don’t read literature (lies). I study Archaeology, Technology, Economics, Military and Legal records are evidence – literature is fiction and deceit. 😉

    You can’t do that because it would falsify your entire mythology, network of lies, and method of excuses making by lies.

    I know. It’s OK. You can’t help it. It’s genetic.

    ON SCHMITT(GERMANY) IN CONTEXT

    Schimtt btw was following the natural human bias expressed in intellectual tradition of trying to solve the problem of a stable state in a period of necessity of rapid adaptation, when the deliberative (adversarial) model of political (middle class) compromise was insufficiently responsive, and required extraordinary impositions on the investments of stakeholders.

    As is usual for continentals, who cannot manage to escape the dependence upon obedience as a means of avoiding interpersonal conflict, competition, and compromise, it never occurred to Schmidt that the anglo-saxon pre-napoleonic method of political decidability, or it’s roman and it’s greek predecessors, nor its proto-germanic predecessors, nor its western indo-european predecessors placed decisions with the family, the jury/thang, the warriors/nobles, or the chieftain/king depending upon the category of the question at hand. In times of war we give unto generals (dictators), in times of peace we give over to the middle class (republics) in times of windfall we give over to the people (democracy).

    So that the problem is that the pursuit of power by people, middle, nobility, and monarchy were unable to discover (as had the anglos) the means of transferring power dependent upon the condition – and that as warfare transitioned from purely territorial agrarian to trade and industrial economic and ideological warfare, that having failed to articulate their customs as formal law prohibited them from discovering rules for the distribution and concentration of power as context required.

    Schmidtt like all continentals since the french revolution, was another idiot trying to restore the hierarchy of church(political judiciary), judiciary(material judiciary), monarchy(military) burgher(middle class) and labor, without realizing that they were still trying to escape the church and restore traditional rule – but instead were still stuck on countering anglo empiricism and its continuous competition and trying to recreate secular theological harmony.

    The continent is a catastrophe with the french trying to recreate latin church authoritarianism, the germans lost in trying to work away guilt that they should not have for resisting russian jews and french authority with wishful thinking instead of monarchical and traditional restoration, with the slavs understanding completely, and the Russians waiting for revenge.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 11:44:00 UTC