Theme: Institution

  • Judicial material ‘priesthood’, Religious spiritual priesthood. As always, rende

    Judicial material ‘priesthood’, Religious spiritual priesthood. As always, render unto caesar the material world, and unto the gods the spiritual.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 18:10:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224757228051357697

    Reply addressees: @Sov3r3ignSoul @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224738096706510848


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224738096706510848

  • WHY WILL NEW LAWS WORK? —-“My point is how is a new set of laws going to chang

    WHY WILL NEW LAWS WORK?

    —-“My point is how is a new set of laws going to change human nature? We are a nation of many different peoples with many different religions , cultures and morals.

    What one group of people see as acceptable another group sees as unacceptable.

    I do agree that whatever laws we have , and few they should be, should apply equally to everyone regardless of any status.”—John Lafferty

    GOOD QUESTION

    1) Under the natural law, we are each sovereigns (kings of different countries). Our contract with one another is an alliance that insures one another’s sovereignty. That is our ‘social contact’- it’s not social at all. It’s military. As such we are all equal before the law, because the law is nothing more than reciprocal insurance of one another’s sovereignty, and therefor the requirement for reciprocity in all interactions; and that in any violation of reciprocity, they may request defense restitution and punishment from the allies. So we are unequal in ability, unequal in value to one another, equal under the law, and equally insured. But we are sovereign, autonomous mini-countries, with each man, woman, and children and their land the smallest possible nation.

    2) Natural law is a description of human nature. It is the MOST descriptive of human nature. Reciprocity is the same as the law of thermodynamics – but with our memory we can create credits(give help) and debts(receive help) with one another: But reciprocity is unavoidable because people demonstrably spend heavily on punishing irreciprocity – both interpersonally by retaliation, judicially by restitution, and socially by what we call altruistic punishment.

    3) No, while people WANT differently, people all see irreciprocity equally: bad. They see proportionality differently. In other words, the right sees capitalizing, meritocracy, hierarchy and reciprocity more important than proportionality, and the left sees consumption, equidistribution, equality, and proportionality more important than reciprocity.

    This is just an expression of cognitive differences in development since these reflect female consumptive short term dysgenic, and male capitalizing long term eugenic strategies.

    4) Given that we express different strategic demands, under the same natural law we can separate and pursue our different strategies (and the left will die off), or we can be eradicated by the left and all die off in another dark age, or we can eradicate the left and transcend man into the gods we imagine.

    The only solutions are separation to produce our commons, conquest, or failure.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 12:41:00 UTC

  • WESTERN ARISTOCRACY TESTIFIES Greg’s comment that GSRRM is witness intimidation

    WESTERN ARISTOCRACY TESTIFIES

    Greg’s comment that GSRRM is witness intimidation and his suggestion that we maintain a consistent western paradigm accessible to the people sparked an insight that I had to stew on overnight. But it consists of three parts: first that we have always used both positive religious and negative judicial priesthoods – even though we invented philosophy as a bridge. That westerners are always testifying as if before thang or court, or reporting as if before officers. That our piety is both judicial and aspirational. And that our commons of truth is the result of this compartmentalisation of ethics and our justification of action across the spectrum from intolerant law to forgiving religion thereby providing both maximal opportunity and graceful failure on one end and maximum decidability and intolerance exposing failure on the other.Updated Feb 4, 2020, 10:46 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 10:46:00 UTC

  • Boards, Executives, Shareholders, Employees, have limited liability for the Ward

    Boards, Executives, Shareholders, Employees, have limited liability for the Ward (corporation). That’s the purpose of corporations. I am kind of surprised that Platonism, against which legal education should protect, is something you cannot seem to avoid – or even comprehend.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 13:41:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224327002422943744

    Reply addressees: @EBryceLee @CorwinElder @FrostieCash @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224326106419015681


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EBryceLee @CorwinElder @FrostieCash @clairlemon Papers and Titles can’t act, so can’t agree. Only people can act.

    Corporations are not superior to people, they are WARDS of people (children). People can act on behalf of wards, wards cannot act. All corporations regardless of tax and decision constraint are operated by people.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224326106419015681


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EBryceLee @CorwinElder @FrostieCash @clairlemon Papers and Titles can’t act, so can’t agree. Only people can act.

    Corporations are not superior to people, they are WARDS of people (children). People can act on behalf of wards, wards cannot act. All corporations regardless of tax and decision constraint are operated by people.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224326106419015681

  • Papers and Titles can’t act, so can’t agree. Only people can act. Corporations a

    Papers and Titles can’t act, so can’t agree. Only people can act.

    Corporations are not superior to people, they are WARDS of people (children). People can act on behalf of wards, wards cannot act. All corporations regardless of tax and decision constraint are operated by people.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 13:37:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224326106419015681

    Reply addressees: @EBryceLee @CorwinElder @FrostieCash @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221873546571341824


    IN REPLY TO:

    @EBryceLee

    @CorwinElder @curtdoolittle @FrostieCash @clairlemon But the LLC can agree, through it’s representatives, to a contract, and be held accountable for violating the same.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221873546571341824

  • There is a difference between european people (a race), european culture (a trad

    There is a difference between european people (a race), european culture (a tradition), european civilization (a strategy), and the institutional TECHNOLOGY in science, language, myth, literature, philosophy, law, institutions. Any people can copy them if they are able – it appears no one else is able. And this is the ONLY remaining european technological advantage: genetics and civilization. And this remaining advantage is what the enemy seeks to destroy as they did Greece, Rome, and the continent.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 08:52:00 UTC

  • CURT WHY DO YOU USE “NORTH SEA PEOPLE” Above the Hajnal line. Where rule of law

    CURT WHY DO YOU USE “NORTH SEA PEOPLE”

    Above the Hajnal line. Where rule of law matured. And in parallel, I tend to separate eras into water areas: the mediterranean, north sea, and Atlantic instead of land areas.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 23:07:00 UTC

  • So we can fuss around with terms. But the bias in private capitalism is non inte

    So we can fuss around with terms. But the bias in private capitalism is non interference in forces except by treating the state as just another customer, while state capitalism places higher priority on state as a customer than the market – particularly international market.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 15:03:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223985274159497218

    Reply addressees: @Hauptgefreiter1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223984954746511361


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Hauptgefreiter1 Hitler wasn’t the only fascist – he was just the last. So yes, the state (a) prevents contra-autarkic arbitrage for profit and exploitation of state resources (the same thing), (b) biases production to commons by use of state financing,(c) overrides market incentives when needed.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223984954746511361


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Hauptgefreiter1 Hitler wasn’t the only fascist – he was just the last. So yes, the state (a) prevents contra-autarkic arbitrage for profit and exploitation of state resources (the same thing), (b) biases production to commons by use of state financing,(c) overrides market incentives when needed.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223984954746511361

  • This is the value of a Fascist State (Where fascist means Ethnonationalist, Auth

    This is the value of a Fascist State (Where fascist means Ethnonationalist, Authoritarian, State Capitalist, Mandatory Conformist.) And people prefer it.

    China demonstrated that Fascism won the 20th. Heterogeneous Immigration demonstrated that Democracy lost the 20th.
    #newright https://twitter.com/Tobeech/status/1223886335729115137

  • So, (Flo and those like you) each of us understands what we CAN understand. So y

    So, (Flo and those like you) each of us understands what we CAN understand. So you see a few green leaves on a pretty institutional tree, meanwhile, look at the use of language using google trends – obama let loose the end of democracy with the promise of socialist takeover.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 14:26:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223976072431181825

    Reply addressees: @FloraMaeBaker @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto @BarackObama @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223859849928245248


    IN REPLY TO:

    @MalaJustedOne

    @curtdoolittle @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto In 8 years @BarackObama instituted or improved regulations and programs to protect equal rights, insure health care and food for all, and preserve our environment for future generations. In only 3 years @realDonaldTrump has systematically walked those humane improvements back.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223859849928245248