Curt Doolittle

Theme: Grammar

  • EDUCATIONAL REFORM 1. Restore Grammar(imitating), Logic(understanding), Rhetoric

    EDUCATIONAL REFORM

    1. Restore Grammar(imitating), Logic(understanding), Rhetoric(Speaking) – Add Propertarianism (truth, ethics, morality) as well as the grammars and lying.

    2. Restore the Epic Cycle (the indo european expansion, the matter of Greece and Rome, the matter of Germanics),

    Add the and the Evolution of our Religions

    3. Restore Art History – Add scientific, Technological, and Economic, political, and military History (repeating)

    4. Add money, accounting, banking, interest, and investing, micro and macro economics as early as possible.

    5. Convert the teaching of math from symbolic an sets to operational so that far more people are able to grasp it. Restore high repetition work loads in mathematics (asian method)

    6. Restore competitive teaching and separate the boys and girls.

    7. Restore overlapping age groups so students are subject to repetition. (one room method)

    8. Restore divisions of classes into students of similar abilities learning at similar rates.

    9. Add teachers following students through the years (Finnish method)

    10. Restore the combination of physical, verbal, and recitation in groups as technique during the grammar years. (Simon says method)

    11. Restore competitive physical activity as a daily requirement.

    12. Restore military discipline and corporal punishment until high school (zero tolerance). Add parental punishment and parental classrooms. Add forcible sterilization for failure.

    13. Reform the dietary recommendations to limit carbohydrates and sugars to the absolute minimum.

    14. Privatize all schools under the ownership of teachers. Restore catholic and protestant schools.

    15. Develop standardized tests that measure progress in the above including personality, intelligence, and current state of knowledge.

    16. Restore the German method of apprenticeship throughout.

    17. Seek to reduce school hours, especially morning hours, beginning at age 14, and split between working (apprenticeship) and schooling.

    18. Eliminate homework wherever possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-26 11:54:00 UTC

  • “P-method disambiguates legal language by providing a single hermeneutic for int

    —“P-method disambiguates legal language by providing a single hermeneutic for interpretation; and rejecting all others.”–Andrew M Gilmour

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 08:56:00 UTC

  • MATH IS JUST A LANGUAGE WITH A VERY LIMITED VOCABULARY: POSITION AND OPERATION M

    MATH IS JUST A LANGUAGE WITH A VERY LIMITED VOCABULARY: POSITION AND OPERATION

    Math is just a language like every other, consisting of referents (arbitrary categories), nouns (referrers, names of each instance of that category) verbs (operations) and agreement (true/false), but it has only one subject: positional relations, with only one property of its names (position).

    Because of this singularity of content (name: position, action: operation) and scale independence (positional names), this ‘language’ we call mathematics, with which we produce statements (sentences), that we call well-formed (unambiguous), using the ‘grammar’ ( rule of continuous recursive disambiguation) of that language of positional names (math), and then modify (change) by operations (transactions) that preserve the constant relations (ratios), and therefore agreement (truth), we can describe any unambiguous set of constant relations humans can reference.

    As such if we cannot describe a given set of relations with some degree of mathematical precision, by some form of proxy, then we cannot claim to make truth (agreement, agreeable) statements about it.

    (Working on demarcation between pure mathematics and applied mathematics).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 08:50:00 UTC

  • Word of the day “Blame-storming”. (That’s a keeper.)

    Word of the day “Blame-storming”.

    (That’s a keeper.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 09:38:00 UTC

  • Word of the day: “Explainawaytions”

    Word of the day: “Explainawaytions”

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-10 13:28:00 UTC

  • Optimum (Best) vs Deterrimum (Worst) (vocabulary)

    Optimum (Best) vs Deterrimum (Worst)

    (vocabulary)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 09:12:00 UTC

  • Correct. Aristotelian, Platonist, Theologian. The three grammars of cognitive de

    Correct. Aristotelian, Platonist, Theologian. The three grammars of cognitive development. Empathic Theological > Rational Platonist > Empirical Aristotelian. The brain evolves in that order. It’s not a mystery why we preserve the use all three. But why don’t other civ’s? https://twitter.com/FullAccountant/status/1214633065097629697

  • THE GRAMMARS OF CIVILIZATIONS Europeans Develop Competition-law, Reason, Realism

    THE GRAMMARS OF CIVILIZATIONS

    Europeans Develop Competition-law, Reason, Realism, Naturalism, Empiricism, Technology-Science, Geometry.

    CALCULATION

    Chinese Develop Bureaucracy-rule, Reason-lite-Wisdom Literature, Realism, Naturalism, Technology but not science, and Arithmetic. They settle on Reason and Bureaucracy.

    REASON

    Indians Develop Class Roles, Political Reason, Supernaturalism, Mythicism, Pragmatism, limited technology, arithmetic and positional names. That this is the remnant of a military order is lost in time. The indians settle on “the Way” – wisdom literature.

    REASONABLENESS

    Iranians-Persians Develop the optimum human, Hierarchy instead of Castes and Roles. But are seduced by babylon and their own aryan religion. The are ruined by the muslims and despite, like the Germans, rising out of it, descend once again and they can’t get out of it now (similar to how the west is being brought down again by Judaism and islam).

    IDEALS

    The Egyptians Run with Animism and Archtetypes and Myth and it’s beautiful. They try a single dominant god but the priests wisely reverse it.

    MYTHS

    The Jews Invent the abrahamic method of deceit by combining

    DICTATORSHIP LAW OF PARASITISM

    The Arabs

    DICTATORSHIP WISDOM LIT OF PREDATION

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 16:52:00 UTC

  • We can, and do, falsify all human action in court. The question was, could we fa

    We can, and do, falsify all human action in court. The question was, could we falsify all human speech in court.

    The answer is yes.

    The usual problem is that someone wants an ideology(political) philosophy (secular theological), or theology (supernatural theological) solution – which is impossible. Because Science (truthful testimony) is falsificationary.

    As far as I know, P is complete. And there are no false or ir-reciprocal statements that can survive its falsification.

    That fact that people can’t get their noggins around the fact that all science (testimony) like markets (competition) is falsificationary is a common problem. But it stems from a failure to understand that science is falsificationary, then demanding P, like philosophy, ideology, or religion be justificationary. It’s not. So they criticize P for not being a science on the one hand by false presumption science is justificationary, and then complain P isn’t justificationary. Kind of silly really, but you can see where they get it from.

    Most people are stuck in the error of “Mathiness” because they don’t grasp the constitution of, or limits of, mathematics. Math breaks down in all three directions: the very small, the very large, and the very-human (cognitive): economics.

    If you need a positive theology, philosophy, ideology, sophism, or pseudoscience, then I understand the via-positiva is necessary for simple minds.

    But grownups are not afraid of via-negativa (skepticism), because we know all non trivial non tautological propositions are contingent, because we may always or nearly always, discover some novel parsimony that allows us to reorganize our paradigms for greater consistency, correspondence, coherence, completeness and parsimony than before.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 14:48:00 UTC

  • THE UNREASONABLE EFFECTIVENESS OF P-LOGIC(LAW) IN HUMAN SCIENCES: PARADIGMS(META

    THE UNREASONABLE EFFECTIVENESS OF P-LOGIC(LAW) IN HUMAN SCIENCES: PARADIGMS(METAPHYSICS), PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIOLOGY, ECON, LAW, AND POLITICS

    P-Logic (Law) is (a) universally commensurable (b) value neutral, ( c) operational logic, of (d) decidability.

    Read that a few times and make sure you undrestand it. Universally commensurable, value neutral, operational logic, of decidability.

    The profound depth of that set of properties isn’t at all obvious, but just as saying math has extraordinary explanatory power in the physical sciences of constant temporal relations: P-logic (law) has equally extraordinary explanatory power in the cognitive sciences: paradigms(metaphysics), psychology, sociology, politics, group competitive strategy, ethics, and law.

    Physical sciences are mathematically predictive because categories and relations at a given resolution are constant both in and across time. The physical world can’t choose.

    Economic sciences are mathematically un-predictive, and only mathematically descriptive, and only operationally explanatory because relations (categories, weights(values), and operations) are inconstant across time – the consequence of Humans scheming and choosing with fragmentary and asymmetric information.

    Social Sciences are only operationally explanatory, not mathematically descriptive, nor mathematically predictive because while operations and incentives are constant, subject categories and values are inconstant, and unpredictable because humans scheme and choose using fragmentary and asymmetric information.

    P-Logic(law) provides universal explanatory power across the disciplines. Predictive power decreases with the inconstancy of relations over time. Many can create arbitrary relations within the limits of his perception, cognition, incentives, negotiation, and action, to plot and scheme against the course of events such that by some action or inaction he captures more caloric gains or opportunity for those gains, or prevents losses of opportunity or gains, than he would by not acting or acting.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-04 12:01:00 UTC