Curt Doolittle

Theme: Grammar

  • “What’s a Grammar in Propertarianism?”

    “CURT, WHAT’S A GRAMMAR IN PROPERTARIANISM?” (important)(core) [A] grammar has traditionally referred to a book containing the rules of a language. But I had to put quite a bit of work into ‘disambiguating’ the terms we use in language. The human cognitive facility consists of identification of constant relations between stimuli in time resulting in categorization (identity). The human auto association facility consists of discovering relations between categories (identities). The human memory facility consists of repetition of stimuli or rehearsal from short term memory, to create, reinforce, change, and eliminate constant relation within and between categories (locations, places, barriers, models, identities) The human logical facility consist of tests of constant, inconstant, and unrecognized relations between states (categories, identities). The human grammar facility refers to our physical ability to perform continuous recursive disambiguation using a stream of signals, most commonly in the form of sounds. The human language facility refers to the use of patterns of symbols or sounds in sequence of continuously recursive attempts at disambiguation. A language consists of Phonemes (sounds), Morphemes(meaningful combination of sounds – roots), Vocabulary (words), Phrases (state), Sentences (changes in state – transactions), Stories (collections of transactions), Grammar (rules of organization making possible disambiguation by inference), and Syntax (further disambiguation – specifically when writing). A vocabulary consists of Names (Nouns, references to referents), Name Substitutes (pronouns), Properties (Adjective, state), Operations (verbs, actions, state of acting), Properties of Operations (Adverb). and Approval or Rejection (yes no true false agree disagree etc). Note that I’ve clarified some terms here a little differently than we traditionally do. However (this is the issue) the collections of permissible dimensions (paradigms) limit the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation: The logic of the paradigm. This is why…. Let’s use math because it’s the most simple language we have that all of us share. Mathematics consists of names of positions (numbers), variables (pronouns), names of operations ( mathematical operations, verbs), phrases (expressions), statements (functions), sentences (transactions), proofs (stories), and Approval or Rejection (true false). There are no adverbs or adjectives. What differs between ordinary language and mathematical language is that mathematics (the language of positional names) and ordinary language (the language of human experience) differ in ‘dimensions of permissible references’ to both Names (nouns) and Operations (verbs). And we can do the same analysis for every Grammar (system of rules) in the spectrum of: math, accounting, logics, programming, physics, chemistry, biochemistry, recipes, protocols, laws, testimony, descriptions, ordinary language, narration, storytelling, fictions, fictionalisms, and deceits – and everything in between. And we use the term “Deflationary grammar” for the narrowest grammars (math, logics), “ordinary grammar” for ordinary language, and “Inflationary grammar” for the widest grammars (story, fiction, fictionalism, deceits). Deflationary < —- Ordinary —-> Inflationary. So instead of the traditional hierarchy: Human Facilities -> language -> phoneme -> morpheme -> paradigms (metaphysics) -> vocabulary -> grammar -> syntax. Instead we have: Human Facilities (see above) -> vocabulary -> paradigms(dimensions) -> grammar of paradigm(rules of story, transaction, function, expression, operation, names: the LOGIC of the paradigm) -> permissible vocabulary -> necessary syntax. So a Grammar refers to the Paradigm (permissible dimensions of perception, cognition, and action), the Names, Operations, and Rules of Continuous Recursive Disambiguation (morpheme, word, phrase, sentence, story organization) and the LOGIC (constant relations) that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness. So in P we use a ‘grammar’ to refer to the Vocabulary, logic, syntax of a paradigm. And when we use the term “the Grammars’ we mean the spectrum And Operational Grammar or Testimony is a Deflationary Grammar: a Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limiting it to a single point of view, absent the verb to be, using complete promissory sentences, describing a series of operations (human actions), resulting in testable transactions (sentence), and sets of transactions (testimony). The paradigm of human actions.

  • “What’s a Grammar in Propertarianism?”

    “CURT, WHAT’S A GRAMMAR IN PROPERTARIANISM?” (important)(core) [A] grammar has traditionally referred to a book containing the rules of a language. But I had to put quite a bit of work into ‘disambiguating’ the terms we use in language. The human cognitive facility consists of identification of constant relations between stimuli in time resulting in categorization (identity). The human auto association facility consists of discovering relations between categories (identities). The human memory facility consists of repetition of stimuli or rehearsal from short term memory, to create, reinforce, change, and eliminate constant relation within and between categories (locations, places, barriers, models, identities) The human logical facility consist of tests of constant, inconstant, and unrecognized relations between states (categories, identities). The human grammar facility refers to our physical ability to perform continuous recursive disambiguation using a stream of signals, most commonly in the form of sounds. The human language facility refers to the use of patterns of symbols or sounds in sequence of continuously recursive attempts at disambiguation. A language consists of Phonemes (sounds), Morphemes(meaningful combination of sounds – roots), Vocabulary (words), Phrases (state), Sentences (changes in state – transactions), Stories (collections of transactions), Grammar (rules of organization making possible disambiguation by inference), and Syntax (further disambiguation – specifically when writing). A vocabulary consists of Names (Nouns, references to referents), Name Substitutes (pronouns), Properties (Adjective, state), Operations (verbs, actions, state of acting), Properties of Operations (Adverb). and Approval or Rejection (yes no true false agree disagree etc). Note that I’ve clarified some terms here a little differently than we traditionally do. However (this is the issue) the collections of permissible dimensions (paradigms) limit the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation: The logic of the paradigm. This is why…. Let’s use math because it’s the most simple language we have that all of us share. Mathematics consists of names of positions (numbers), variables (pronouns), names of operations ( mathematical operations, verbs), phrases (expressions), statements (functions), sentences (transactions), proofs (stories), and Approval or Rejection (true false). There are no adverbs or adjectives. What differs between ordinary language and mathematical language is that mathematics (the language of positional names) and ordinary language (the language of human experience) differ in ‘dimensions of permissible references’ to both Names (nouns) and Operations (verbs). And we can do the same analysis for every Grammar (system of rules) in the spectrum of: math, accounting, logics, programming, physics, chemistry, biochemistry, recipes, protocols, laws, testimony, descriptions, ordinary language, narration, storytelling, fictions, fictionalisms, and deceits – and everything in between. And we use the term “Deflationary grammar” for the narrowest grammars (math, logics), “ordinary grammar” for ordinary language, and “Inflationary grammar” for the widest grammars (story, fiction, fictionalism, deceits). Deflationary < —- Ordinary —-> Inflationary. So instead of the traditional hierarchy: Human Facilities -> language -> phoneme -> morpheme -> paradigms (metaphysics) -> vocabulary -> grammar -> syntax. Instead we have: Human Facilities (see above) -> vocabulary -> paradigms(dimensions) -> grammar of paradigm(rules of story, transaction, function, expression, operation, names: the LOGIC of the paradigm) -> permissible vocabulary -> necessary syntax. So a Grammar refers to the Paradigm (permissible dimensions of perception, cognition, and action), the Names, Operations, and Rules of Continuous Recursive Disambiguation (morpheme, word, phrase, sentence, story organization) and the LOGIC (constant relations) that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness. So in P we use a ‘grammar’ to refer to the Vocabulary, logic, syntax of a paradigm. And when we use the term “the Grammars’ we mean the spectrum And Operational Grammar or Testimony is a Deflationary Grammar: a Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limiting it to a single point of view, absent the verb to be, using complete promissory sentences, describing a series of operations (human actions), resulting in testable transactions (sentence), and sets of transactions (testimony). The paradigm of human actions.

  • “CURT, WHAT’S A GRAMMAR IN PROPERTARIANISM?” (important)(core) A grammar has tra

    “CURT, WHAT’S A GRAMMAR IN PROPERTARIANISM?”

    (important)(core)

    A grammar has traditionally referred to a book containing the rules of a language. But I had to but quite a bit of work into ‘disambiguating’ the terms we use in language.

    The human cognitive facility consists of identification of constant relations between stimuli in time resulting in categorization (identity).

    The human auto association facility consists of discovering relations between categories (identities).

    The human memory facility consists of repetition of stimuli or rehearsal from short term memory, to create, reinforce, change, and eliminate constant relation within and between categories (locations, places, barriers, models, identities)

    The human logical facility consist of tests of constant, inconstant, and unrecognized relations between states (categories, identities).

    The human grammar facility refers to our physical ability to perform continuous recursive disambiguation using a stream of signals, most commonly in the form of sounds.

    The human language facility refers to the use of patterns of symbols or sounds in sequence of continuously recursive attempts at disambiguation.

    A language consists of Phonemes (sounds), Morphemes(meaningful combination of sounds – roots), Vocabulary (words), Phrases (state), Sentences (changes in state – transactions), Stories (collections of transactions), Grammar (rules of organization making possible disambiguation by inference), and Syntax (further disambiguation – specifically when writing).

    A vocabulary consists of Names (Nouns, references to referents), Name Substitutes (pronouns), Properties (Adjective, state), Operations (verbs, actions, state of acting), Properties of Operations (Adverb). and Approval or Rejection (yes no true false agree disagree etc). Note that I’ve clarified some terms here a little differently than we traditionally do.

    However (this is the issue) the collections of permissible dimensions (paradigms) limit the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation: The logic of the paradigm.

    This is why…. Let’s use math because it’s the most simple language we have that all of us share.

    Mathematics consists of names of positions (numbers), variables (pronouns), names of operations ( mathematical operations, verbs), phrases (expressions), statements (functions), sentences (transactions), proofs (stories), and Approval or Rejection (true false). There are no adverbs or adjectives.

    What differs between ordinary language and mathematical language is that mathematics (the language of positional names) and ordinary language (the language of human experience) differ in ‘dimensions of permissible references’ to both Names (nouns) and Operations (verbs).

    And we can do the same analysis for every Grammar (system of rules) in the spectrum of: math, accounting, logics, programming, physics, chemistry, biochemistry, recipes, protocols, laws, testimony, descriptions, ordinary language, narration, storytelling, fictions, fictionalisms, and deceits – and everything in between.

    And we use the term “Deflationary grammar” for the narrowest grammars (math, logics), “ordinary grammar” for ordinary language, and “Inflationary grammar” for the widest grammars (story, fiction, fictionalism, deceits).

    Deflationary < —- Ordinary —-> Inflationary.

    So instead of the traditional hierarchy:

    Human Facilities -> language -> phoneme -> morpheme -> paradigms (metaphysics and resulting semantics) -> vocabulary -> grammar -> syntax.

    Instead we have:

    Human Facilities (see above) -> vocabulary -> paradigms(dimensions) -> grammar of paradigm(rules of story, transaction, function, expression, operation, names: the LOGIC of the paradigm) -> permissible vocabulary -> necessary syntax.

    So a Grammar refers to the Paradigm (permissible dimensions of perception, cognition, and action), the Names, Operations, and Rules of Continuous Recursive Disambiguation (morpheme, word, phrase, sentence, story organization) and the LOGIC (constant relations) that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness.

    So in P we use a ‘grammar’ to refer to the Vocabulary, logic, syntax of a paradigm. And when we use the term “the Grammars’ we mean the spectrum

    And Operational Grammar or Testimony is a Deflationary Grammar: a Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limiting it to a single point of view, absent the verb to be, using complete promissory sentences, describing a series of operations (human actions), resulting in testable transactions (sentence), and sets of transactions (testimony).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-31 12:54:00 UTC

  • “CURT, WHAT’S A GRAMMAR IN PROPERTARIANISM?” (important)(core) A grammar has tra

    “CURT, WHAT’S A GRAMMAR IN PROPERTARIANISM?”

    (important)(core)

    A grammar has traditionally referred to a book containing the rules of a language. But I had to put quite a bit of work into ‘disambiguating’ the terms we use in language.

    The human cognitive facility consists of identification of constant relations between stimuli in time resulting in categorization (identity).

    The human auto association facility consists of discovering relations between categories (identities).

    The human memory facility consists of repetition of stimuli or rehearsal from short term memory, to create, reinforce, change, and eliminate constant relation within and between categories (locations, places, barriers, models, identities)

    The human logical facility consist of tests of constant, inconstant, and unrecognized relations between states (categories, identities).

    The human grammar facility refers to our physical ability to perform continuous recursive disambiguation using a stream of signals, most commonly in the form of sounds.

    The human language facility refers to the use of patterns of symbols or sounds in sequence of continuously recursive attempts at disambiguation.

    A language consists of Phonemes (sounds), Morphemes(meaningful combination of sounds – roots), Vocabulary (words), Phrases (state), Sentences (changes in state – transactions), Stories (collections of transactions), Grammar (rules of organization making possible disambiguation by inference), and Syntax (further disambiguation – specifically when writing).

    A vocabulary consists of Names (Nouns, references to referents), Name Substitutes (pronouns), Properties (Adjective, state), Operations (verbs, actions, state of acting), Properties of Operations (Adverb). and Approval or Rejection (yes no true false agree disagree etc). Note that I’ve clarified some terms here a little differently than we traditionally do.

    However (this is the issue) the collections of permissible dimensions (paradigms) limit the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation: The logic of the paradigm.

    This is why…. Let’s use math because it’s the most simple language we have that all of us share.

    Mathematics consists of names of positions (numbers), variables (pronouns), names of operations ( mathematical operations, verbs), phrases (expressions), statements (functions), sentences (transactions), proofs (stories), and Approval or Rejection (true false). There are no adverbs or adjectives.

    What differs between ordinary language and mathematical language is that mathematics (the language of positional names) and ordinary language (the language of human experience) differ in ‘dimensions of permissible references’ to both Names (nouns) and Operations (verbs).

    And we can do the same analysis for every Grammar (system of rules) in the spectrum of: math, accounting, logics, programming, physics, chemistry, biochemistry, recipes, protocols, laws, testimony, descriptions, ordinary language, narration, storytelling, fictions, fictionalisms, and deceits – and everything in between.

    And we use the term “Deflationary grammar” for the narrowest grammars (math, logics), “ordinary grammar” for ordinary language, and “Inflationary grammar” for the widest grammars (story, fiction, fictionalism, deceits).

    Deflationary < —- Ordinary —-> Inflationary.

    So instead of the traditional hierarchy:

    Human Facilities -> language -> phoneme -> morpheme -> paradigms (metaphysics) -> vocabulary -> grammar -> syntax.

    Instead we have:

    Human Facilities (see above) -> vocabulary -> paradigms(dimensions) -> grammar of paradigm(rules of story, transaction, function, expression, operation, names: the LOGIC of the paradigm) -> permissible vocabulary -> necessary syntax.

    So a Grammar refers to the Paradigm (permissible dimensions of perception, cognition, and action), the Names, Operations, and Rules of Continuous Recursive Disambiguation (morpheme, word, phrase, sentence, story organization) and the LOGIC (constant relations) that limit consistency, correspondence, coherence, and completeness.

    So in P we use a ‘grammar’ to refer to the Vocabulary, logic, syntax of a paradigm. And when we use the term “the Grammars’ we mean the spectrum

    And Operational Grammar or Testimony is a Deflationary Grammar: a Deflation (constraint upon) ordinary language grammar, limiting it to a single point of view, absent the verb to be, using complete promissory sentences, describing a series of operations (human actions), resulting in testable transactions (sentence), and sets of transactions (testimony).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-31 12:54:00 UTC

  • It’s increasingly clear to me that the Grammars are as important an insight as i

    It’s increasingly clear to me that the Grammars are as important an insight as is Testimonial Truth, Propertarian Ethics, The Ternary Logic of Social Science.

    Why? Scientists, philosophers, logicians, mathematicians who don’t understand the foundations (grammars) of their disciplines.

    Scientists: It’s testimony on results after falsification of all available dimensions. The means of falsification are irrelevant.

    Philosophers: avoiding cost, actionability, informational asymmetry, and reciprocity creating unreality. Idealism is merely confession of ignorance. The majority of Philosophical terms and categories are dead because they were WRONG.

    Logicians: there is no closure, and logics are only falsificationary, you can’t prove anything without appeal to reality. Stop treating it as scriptural interpretation (hermeneutics).

    Mathematicians: it’s just a language of positional names limited by the grammar of ratios, meaning that positional names provide both perfect disambiguation by a single constant relation (position) and position can be used to generate endless names, so it is endlessly possible to describe constant relations, where the term pattern refers only to some set of constant relation. It’s not that math is unreasonably effective at describing constant relations it’s that it’s only possible for it to describe constant relations.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 11:35:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/80636130_541874773076084_87002777993

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/80636130_541874773076084_870027779939237888_o_541874769742751.jpg Laugh of the Day “Doolittle doesn’t consistently define his terms”.

    I mean. You gotta be kidding…. lolLaugh of the Day “Doolittle doesn’t consistently define his terms”.

    I mean. You gotta be kidding…. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 03:28:00 UTC

  • Legitimacy like Social Justice is a nonsense word

    Legitimacy like Social Justice is a nonsense word.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-29 21:36:00 UTC

  • TERNARY LOGIC OF SOCIAL SCIENCE We focus largely on the law but not on the other

    TERNARY LOGIC OF SOCIAL SCIENCE
    We focus largely on the law but not on the other innovations in the propertarian program:

    Yes, Propertarianism consists of a set of innovations
    1. Grammars… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=540749233188638&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 21:53:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1211042399495114752

  • TERNARY LOGIC OF SOCIAL SCIENCE We focus largely on the law but not on the other

    TERNARY LOGIC OF SOCIAL SCIENCE

    We focus largely on the law but not on the other innovations in the propertarian program:

    Yes, Propertarianism consists of a set of innovations

    1. Grammars (metaphysics)

    2. Testimonialism (epistemology)

    3. Acquisitionism and Propertarianism –

    Together making possible strictly constructed law (ethics)

    But we also have:

    4: Cooperationism, Compatibilism, Cognitive division of labor

    Which means that we specialize, largely along lines of gender cognition and age, in a division of perception, cognition, advocacy and negotiation. And then we ‘calculate’ by discovering opportunities to cooperate across the spectrum of population, time, and space. So we function as a neural network that discovers opportunities despite variations in our division of labor in perceiving and comprehending the world.

    And we also have:

    5. The Ternary Logic of Political Science.

    Let’s look at this a bit

    There are three states of logic, in order:

    1. False

    2. Truth candidate (actionable)

    3. Undecidable (In-actionable)

    There are three options to cooperation

    1. avoidance (ostracization)

    2. exchange (cooperation)

    3. predation-parasitism (conflict)

    There are three means of coercion

    1. Remuneration (deprivation of trade, or benefit from trade) Middle class – Libertarian Meritocratic

    2. Force (imposition of harm, defense from harm) Upper class – Conservative Eugenic

    3. Undermining (ostracizing/inhibiting opportunity, including/generating opportunity) Under Class – Progressive Dysgenic

    There are three axis of elites

    1. Scientific, Technical, Entrepreneurial, Financial, Treasury

    2. Military, juridical, Police, Sheriff, Militia

    3. Priests, Politicians, Public Intellectuals

    We can organize by three axis of elites (cooperate by)

    1. Production and Evolution (europe)

    2. Administration and Stagnation (strong:china, weak:india)

    3. Parasitism and Degeneration (semitia, gypsies)

    We can rule by three axis of decidability

    1. Science and Law (europe)

    2. Reason and Command (china india)

    3. Sophistry and Propaganda (semitia)

    We can govern by three axis

    1. Markets,Law,Courts, (europe) Middle Class

    2. Bureaucracy (china) Upper class

    3. Priesthood (semitia) Underclass

    The ranking assuming we eradicate the semitic dark ages:

    Europe, China, India, Iran-Assyria-Babylon, Egypt Mesoamerica, Semitia(jewish muslim), S-Pacific, E africa, W africa Africa, S Africa, Austronesia

    The only hard choice being iran vs india and that choice possible only because the Persians were not able to shake off islam and reassert Persian civlization despite efforts just as the germans can’t sake of Christianity despite their efforts and reassert germanic civilization.

    If something had not ‘gone wrong’ in India she would have produced the best culture with time. It may be climate and demographic curse. But I don’t quite understand what went wrong yet but I”ll figure it out. I think we undrestand what went wrong with persia and germania. And russia, germania, and china are our fault for not lettting russia retake orthodoxy, not letting germany retake europe, and not letting macarthur and patton finish the job of the second world war with russia and china.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 16:52:00 UTC

  • TERNARY LOGIC OF SOCIAL SCIENCE We focus largely on the law but not on the other

    TERNARY LOGIC OF SOCIAL SCIENCE

    We focus largely on the law but not on the other innovations in the propertarian program:

    Yes, Propertarianism consists of a set of innovations

    1. Grammars (metaphysics)

    2. Testimonialism (epistemology)

    3. Acquisitionism and Propertarianism –

    Together making possible strictly constructed law (ethics)

    But we also have:

    4: Cooperationism, Compatibilism, Cognitive division of labor

    Which means that we specialize, largely along lines of gender cognition and age, in a division of perception, cognition, advocacy and negotiation. And then we ‘calculate’ by discovering opportunities to cooperate across the spectrum of population, time, and space. So we function as a neural network that discovers opportunities despite variations in our division of labor in perceiving and comprehending the world.

    And we also have:

    5. The Ternary Logic of Political Science.

    Let’s look at this a bit

    There are three states of logic, in order:

    1. False

    2. Truth candidate (actionable)

    3. Undecidable (In-actionable)

    There are three options to cooperation

    1. avoidance (ostracization)

    2. exchange (cooperation)

    3. predation-parasitism (conflict)

    There are three means of coercion

    1. Remuneration (deprivation of trade, or benefit from trade) Middle class – Libertarian Meritocratic

    2. Force (imposition of harm, defense from harm) Upper class – Conservative Eugenic

    3. Undermining (ostracizing/inhibiting opportunity, including/generating opportunity) Under Class – Progressive Dysgenic

    There are three axis of elites

    1. Scientific, Technical, Entrepreneurial, Financial, Treasury

    2. Military, juridical, Police, Sheriff, Militia

    3. Priests, Politicians, Public Intellectuals

    We can organize by three axis of elites (cooperate by)

    1. Production and Evolution (europe)

    2. Administration and Stagnation (strong:china, weak:india)

    3. Parasitism and Degeneration (semitia, gypsies)

    We can rule by three axis of decidability

    1. Science and Law (europe)

    2. Reason and Command (china india)

    3. Sophistry and Propaganda (semitia)

    We can govern by three axis

    1. Markets,Law,Courts, (europe) Middle Class

    2. Bureaucracy (china) Upper class

    3. Priesthood (semitia) Underclass

    The ranking assuming we eradicate the semitic dark ages:

    Europe, China, India, Iran-Assyria-Babylon, Egypt Mesoamerica, Semitia(jewish muslim), S-Pacific, E africa, W africa Africa, S Africa, Austronesia

    The only hard choice being iran vs india and that choice possible only because the Persians were not able to shake off islam and reassert Persian civlization despite efforts just as the germans can’t sake of Christianity despite their efforts and reassert germanic civilization.

    If something had not ‘gone wrong’ in India she would have produced the best culture with time. It may be climate and demographic curse. But I don’t quite understand what went wrong yet but I”ll figure it out. I think we undrestand what went wrong with persia and germania. And russia, germania, and china are our fault for not lettting russia retake orthodoxy, not letting germany retake europe, and not letting macarthur and patton finish the job of the second world war with russia and china.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-28 16:39:00 UTC