Theme: Grammar

  • That doesn’t make sense. We use language all the time and overlap between langua

    That doesn’t make sense. We use language all the time and overlap between languages is huge with composition of experience and value attribution plus scope of vocabulary the only difference


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-27 19:31:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210644499229282306

    Reply addressees: @KalishJantzen @PaulEich11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210610609722679298


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210610609722679298

  • So again, let me repeat, that there is no difference between judaism-christianit

    So again, let me repeat, that there is no difference between judaism-christianity-islam and marxism-feminism-postmodernism other than the false promise made by each, and the grammar of deceit used to preach (propagandize) the lie: Freud, Boaz, Marx, Cantor, Frankfurt, Derrida.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-27 14:58:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210575792167673856

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210575791202934784


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    It’s obvious, but again, LOOK AT THE DAMAGE DONE by marxist, feminist, postmodern denialism, sophism, pseudoscience, and propaganda. Sex differences are settled and Group (species, subspecies, class) diffs are being solved at the moment. 20th C social ‘science’ was pseudoscience. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1210416035393933312

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1210575791202934784


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    It’s obvious, but again, LOOK AT THE DAMAGE DONE by marxist, feminist, postmodern denialism, sophism, pseudoscience, and propaganda. Sex differences are settled and Group (species, subspecies, class) diffs are being solved at the moment. 20th C social ‘science’ was pseudoscience. https://t.co/jWSfkkMe5Q

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1210575791202934784

  • DRAFT – WORK IN PROGRESS What is the difference between morals, ethics and manne

    DRAFT – WORK IN PROGRESS

    What is the difference between morals, ethics and manners?

    CORRECT ANSWER:

    It’s not complicated – if we explain it in **economic** rather than ‘moral’ language.

    Western civilization is a commercial civilization (middle class), and that is the reason for our wealth, cleanliness, orderliness, customer service, and tolerance. The west was more successful than all but the Japanese at suppression of selfish public behavior, and for this reason was able to produce commons that people did not impose costs upon, providing incentive (lacking disincentive) to produce commons, and therefore creating the high returns on the commons. (Effectively, westerners treat the commons – common spaces and everything in them – as sacred).

    Engage only in completely voluntary exchanges. That means do not impose costs upon others whether attention (mental), disgust(emotion), or action (body), on their demonstrated interests (things, family, business), and the “commons” anything the public may make use of.

    Instead, pay the cost of controlling yourself, by maintaining ‘situational awareness of others’ (consideration), especially by managing your children. The public space is not something you may make use of as you desire. it is not your home.

    * **Series: Hygiene > Dress > Manners > Ethics > Morals > Laws > Reciprocity**

    MANNERS

    **Manners** advertise fitness for reciprocity. The more costly the manners, the higher the suppression of impulse, the greater the demonstration of agency and training, the better the promise and better the predictor of fitness for reciprocity.

    **Respect** consists of using manners to demonstrate reciprocity and presumption of reciprocity regardless of differences between parties, including differences in the status spectrum, differences in wants and needs, differences in opinion, and differences in preferences.

    **Disrespect** consists of irreciprocity presumption of irreciprocity given differences between parties, including differences in the status spectrum, differences in wants and needs, differences in knowledge, habit, and opinion, and differences in preferences.

    **Insult** consists of (…)

    **Resistance** consist of (…)

    **Defection** consists of (…)

    || Spectrum: genetic > sexual > social > economic > political > military

    **Display**

    * **Hygiene**

    * **Dress**

    * **Movement**

    **Word**

    * **Speech**

    **Deed**

    * **Action**

    * **Space**

    Manners signal respect by paying cost of observance, and require reciprocity by equal payment of costs of observance.

    Respect refers to presumption of the spectrum of reciprocity to beneficence by your demonstration of respect for others interests, and the interest of the commons.

    Manners are your ‘advertising’ for worthiness of respect. Lack of manners are your ‘advertising’ for unworthiness of respect: meaning, not giving your attention, consideration, or resources (time, energy). And poor manners require others actively disrespect you (‘punish you’) for imposing costs upon others.

    ETHICS

    (…)

    MORALS

    (…)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-24 15:33:00 UTC

  • DOES METAPHYSICS EXIST? DEPENDS ON THE DEFINITION. The question is only whether

    DOES METAPHYSICS EXIST? DEPENDS ON THE DEFINITION.

    The question is only whether metaphysics = paradigm. As far as I know it does (must). So to say there is no such thing as metaphysics, is only to say that there is no such thing as relativism. In other words, there is either a most parsimonious paradigm for the description of reality or their isn’t.

    As far as I know there is always and everywhere one most parsimonious and most complete paradigm, and that discipline we call science slowly converges upon it. And that this most parsimonious paradigm always and everywhere will provide decidability between less coherent (complete and consistent) paradigms.

    And the current limitation on progress in physical science is our present failure (or challenge of) creating a language (mathematics or logic of) of geometric rather than point (positional) relations.

    The more obvious demands of protein modeling appear to be working toward a solution to that problem more so than physicists.

    As far as I know social science (cooperation, law, politics) is solved because it’s at human scale. As far as I know economics remains unsolved and is a harder problem than the transition from positional (curves) to geometric (shapes), if for no other reason than we simply can’t create consistent categories so are stuck with bayesian categorization, prediction, falsification, and adaptation, with symmetries (which are showing up in certain economic patterns) providing the intermediary measures that the original data itself cannot.

    So, I don’t see the meaning of a discipline of metaphysics other than the rather obvious demarcation between deflationary (logical, operational, empirical, science) and fictional (allegorical) grammars (vocabularies). And it certainly appears to do nothing more than that.

    The underlying conflict being that the most parsimonious language launders information present in experience. And as we have seen the empathic vs analytic difference in demand for priority on one hand, and a desire for psychological sedation (suppression, mindfulness,) on the other.

    And from my tests over the past two years in particular that (masculine vs feminine cognition ) appears to be impossible to resolve. Which as far as I know is the source of the conflict of the present age, and what’s driving the incentive to separate (or dominate).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-19 19:03:00 UTC

  • You can’t stop people from inventing words but you can stop people from lying by

    You can’t stop people from inventing words but you can stop people from lying by inventing words. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-18 20:54:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1207403727444959232

    Reply addressees: @JohnNune1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1207401977832857600


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1207401977832857600

  • I can’t help you son. If you knew what you were talking about you’d use language

    I can’t help you son. If you knew what you were talking about you’d use language that made it evident. Pls go back to reading literary philosophy while the adults stick with full accounting for all changes in states of all capital.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-17 16:31:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206975109312987136

    Reply addressees: @dallas101346 @PeterSchiff @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206974340346068998


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206974340346068998

  • Fixes US (anglo common law) constitutions by strict construction by formal opera

    Fixes US (anglo common law) constitutions by strict construction by formal operational logic, with strict definitions, of all terms currently flexible under common and continental law. Restores rule of law. Restores Defamation, Outlaws rent seeking, and Baiting into Hazard.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-17 15:35:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206961029206466561

    Reply addressees: @drownded @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206960523633463298


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @drownded @paulkrugman Easily. Extend requirement for due diligence in public, to public, in matters public, from commerce to all. Most differences in P’s proposed amendments to the constitution create this change. Will end all biz ,fin, econ, political, academic pseudoscience, sophism, lies of 20thc.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206960523633463298


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @drownded @paulkrugman Easily. Extend requirement for due diligence in public, to public, in matters public, from commerce to all. Most differences in P’s proposed amendments to the constitution create this change. Will end all biz ,fin, econ, political, academic pseudoscience, sophism, lies of 20thc.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206960523633463298

  • Becoming what. See? grammar trick. Incomplete sentence. I can act, I can grow, I

    Becoming what. See? grammar trick. Incomplete sentence. I can act, I can grow, I can evolve, I can change, I can experience. What the hell does ‘become’ mean? We prohibit the use of the verb to-be precisely becuase it means ‘i don’t know what I’m saying’.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 03:01:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206408989656961024

    Reply addressees: @YvesBurri

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206405967509889024


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206405967509889024

  • I understand certain cultures (genes?) poorly demarcate between existential and

    I understand certain cultures (genes?) poorly demarcate between existential and experiential, but True=True regardless of the individual. You are confusing consistent and meaningful with True – which is a form of Title Inflation (fallacies of Conflation and Appeal to Authority).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 02:03:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206394400823271425

    Reply addressees: @YvesBurri

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206391604296089600


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206391604296089600

  • it’s the most simple language possible for the desription of constant relations

    it’s the most simple language possible for the desription of constant relations.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-16 01:58:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206393092686983169

    Reply addressees: @YvesBurri

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1206392720333459457


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @YvesBurri We use the terms noun (name, disambiguates referents) adjective (disambiguates names) and verb (operation) and adverb (disambiguates verbs) for recursive disambiguation. Math uses a small number of verbs all of which are variations on addition: one change in position.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206392720333459457


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @YvesBurri We use the terms noun (name, disambiguates referents) adjective (disambiguates names) and verb (operation) and adverb (disambiguates verbs) for recursive disambiguation. Math uses a small number of verbs all of which are variations on addition: one change in position.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1206392720333459457