Theme: Education

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51378914_10156956557677264_470501782

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51378914_10156956557677264_470501782

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51378914_10156956557677264_4705017826727952384_o_10156956557657264.jpg Aaron LongDisagree. Replacing important things with Sports is what quickened Rome’s declineFeb 1, 2019, 7:38 PMByron PrinceArabists do get rather flustered when one points out the IE influences that they claim are inherent to Hamito-Semites. I don’t even usually bring up the Mittani influences on Syria and Lebanon.Feb 1, 2019, 7:39 PMByron PrinceSports isn’t the issue, its sports are used.Feb 1, 2019, 7:40 PMAaron LongByron Prince Valid. I think the same about religion though. It was used to build an army against Islam successfully.Feb 1, 2019, 7:42 PMNick DahlheimByron Prince Making sports into spectator events rather than participatory initiation–that is the root of the corruption of sport. In other words, the replacement of amateurism and community sport with professionalization and sensationalism in the athletic domain.Feb 1, 2019, 8:07 PMDaniel Roland AndersonNick Dahlheim

    Nailed it.

    The English, as I understand it, prohibited some sports that took focus of archery.Feb 1, 2019, 8:18 PMHeather JoiWhy you call me daft đŸ˜„Feb 1, 2019, 8:32 PMCurt Doolittlerhetorical device to both capture your attention and reward you when you realize you are right, and to taunt those who are wrong into defensive posture. ;)Feb 1, 2019, 8:41 PMHeather Joi——^ daft in ScottishFeb 1, 2019, 8:46 PMChristian KalafutThe Chinese did not skip out on religion at all; easily one of the most superstitious cultures ever.Feb 1, 2019, 9:21 PMChristian KalafutThe confucian literati basically acted as the priestly class since Emperor Shi and lets not forget the “divine mandate” which any Chinese government needs to operate.Feb 1, 2019, 9:26 PMCurt Doolittlewhat was their religion?Feb 1, 2019, 11:47 PMCurt DoolittleDo they consider it a religion?Feb 1, 2019, 11:50 PMChristian KalafutThe Dao would be thrir mystery religion and the worship of the emperor and later the confucians would qualify as the priestly class.Feb 1, 2019, 11:51 PMChristian KalafutI-ching is essentially their torahFeb 1, 2019, 11:52 PMChristian KalafutAlso, the the state buddhismFeb 1, 2019, 11:53 PMArby HydeCurt Doolittle in the east the lines between sacred and profane were quite blurred so while they might not have a religion as formalized as the abrahamic ones, much of its ontology was already fulfilled through their myths and rituals.Feb 2, 2019, 4:40 AMCurt DoolittleWell, again, Christian Kalafut is attempting to create a conflation between…

    – natural religion (ancestor, nature worship),

    – mental discipline (buddhism), and;

    – wisdom literature (confucianism, daoism),

    And…

    – political religion (abrahamic religion). that claims (a) the name of a divinity, (b) monopoly, (c) omnicience/omnipotence, (d) submission, (e) conflation of myth/history, wisdom/law, reason/abandonment of reason.

    Buddhism was, like stoicism, an attempt to leave behind supernatural religions.

    Confucianism (upper class) and Daoism (lower class) are wisdom literatures.

    Ancestor and Nature worship are means of intergenerational transfer of debts.

    Replace buddhism with stoicism and you have a nearly perfect ‘religion’ (training in mindfulness).

    Furthermore, the story of Siddhartha Buddha is true. The story of abraham, moses, and jesus is nonsense.

    The conversion of buddhism from “act like eternal recurrence” into “supernatural eternal occurrence” transformed it from a virtue system to a supernatural religion.

    It is very easy to ridicule jewish, muslim, and christian ‘prayer’ as one step above dancing around the fire.

    The only competitor to confucian wisdom lit is greco/roman/anglo lit: science. Compare either western reason and science, or confucianism daoism, or the Hindu tradition with the torah, bible, and koran. Abrahamic religions are childlike. They are little better than african tribal myths.

    Natural Religion: Ancestor Worship, and Nature Worship (teaching of respect for that which has been inherited) is hard to object to on any grounds.

    I could go on, but in comparative religion, there are three evil political monopoly religions and the rest are wisdom literatures for the intergenerational transfer of group strategy and the mindfulness to adhere to it.Feb 2, 2019, 7:41 AMCurt DoolittleReligion is either education in the application of reason, or it is submission to ignorance.Feb 2, 2019, 7:42 AMCurt DoolittleThe gnostics were right. Jehovah is a devil (demon).Feb 2, 2019, 7:42 AMCurt Doolittle(a) chinese think we are ‘ridiculous’ with our ‘superstitions’.

    (b) chinese (rightfully) do not consider their wisdom literature a ‘religon’.

    (c) chinese do not consider their folk religions (natural religions) ‘religion’ in the sense we consider monotheism a religion. whatsoever.Feb 2, 2019, 7:45 AMCurt DoolittleNO MORE LIESFeb 2, 2019, 7:48 AMCurt Doolittlehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China#Definition_of_what_in_China_is_spiritual_and_religiousFeb 2, 2019, 7:50 AMCurt DoolittleREAD THIS SECTIONFeb 2, 2019, 7:50 AMDaniel JordanI think your Aspergers is getting in the way of understanding what religious belief actually is on a psychological level.Feb 2, 2019, 12:32 PMCurt DoolittleNo. It’s that I understand that a demand exists, and having studied all societies and all methods of fuliflling that demand, I understand that there are good and bad, true and false enabling and disabling methods of doing so.

    Religion is either a discipline or a drug.Feb 2, 2019, 12:44 PMChristian KalafutWrong and I would caution using any statistics from the Chinese government, especially considering there are at least 200 million Christians in China.Feb 2, 2019, 2:05 PMChristian KalafutI also suppose you have no knowledge of the Taiping Rebellion in the 19th century, where a protestant Chinamen fought an 18 year war for religious freedom against the state religion in China (he consindered himself the brother and heir of Christ’s kingdom) in which 20 million people died.Feb 2, 2019, 2:08 PMChristian KalafutAlso, there are two distinct forms of Buddhism: the original, almost atheist path of Siddhartha Guatama and the Mahayana, which is like a Catholicized version, introduced a system of saints, priests, holy orders and the such. Like how Christanity captivated the West, so too did the Mahayana captivate and control Chinese civilization and like Christanity, it sank to an awful minority in it’s own home Indic civilization.Feb 2, 2019, 2:12 PMChristian KalafutOne of the great stories of Chinese literature (Journey to the West) is a magical exodus to India to go find the sacred scrolls of the Buddha.Feb 2, 2019, 2:13 PMChristian KalafutWhy do you think they invaded Tibet in their drive to eradicate Chinese religiousity? To strike at the Pope of Buddhism, the Dalai Lama.Feb 2, 2019, 2:14 PMChristian KalafutRead any of the other four great chinese novels and even before the Mahayana, the Chinese are as superstitious as us Western Christians if not more.Feb 2, 2019, 2:15 PMChristian KalafutYou obviously are not familiar with Far Eastern history in the least.Feb 2, 2019, 2:16 PMCurt DoolittleThat is not a criticism. That is an opinion.Feb 2, 2019, 2:24 PMChristian Kalafuthttps://goo.gl/images/xC7CXaFeb 2, 2019, 2:35 PMChristian KalafutCultural revolution much?Feb 2, 2019, 2:35 PMChristian KalafutThis sounds like nothing more than regurgitated 18th century Enlightenment discovery of China, where the decriers of the Church tried to find a natural religion and they seeked such a thing in the supposed “kingdom ruled by philosophers” i.e. ChinaFeb 2, 2019, 2:39 PMChristian KalafutNaked power and ignorance and superstition is what kept the alien manchus at the time in power.Feb 2, 2019, 2:39 PMChristian KalafutWestern civilization did not stop at the enlightenment curt get out of the 18th century.Feb 2, 2019, 2:40 PMCurt DoolittleHow very odd that you should think operationalism and algorithmic logic are 18th c. ;)Feb 2, 2019, 2:57 PMChristian KalafutNo, I’m saying your assessment of China is 18th century and a bunk.Feb 2, 2019, 3:24 PMChristian KalafutChina, in no way, may be compared to the West in any meaningful manner, which is why world history is a sham.Feb 2, 2019, 3:24 PMArby Hydeyou both seem to be talking past each other. The main point is that even if China has a different structure instead of a “religion”(for the lack of a better word) it doesn’t necessarily make them less prone to superstition. Buddhism afaik is quite syncretic and often meshed into polytheistic religion in the east unlike Christianity which entirely replaced paganism.Feb 3, 2019, 12:27 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 19:30:00 UTC

  • Today I have: 1- The Taleb/Molly thing (just organizing my thoughts) 2- The Orwo

    Today I have:

    1- The Taleb/Molly thing (just organizing my thoughts)

    2- The Orwoll Metaphysics thing. (waste of time but gotta do it)

    3- One of the course topics on the grammars (book to course form)

    4- The research for the course topics of ePrime. (because we can really teach that fairly thoroughly).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 14:03:00 UTC

  • “Q: Curtus Maximus. I want to learn more about this. Any suggestions as to where

    —“Q: Curtus Maximus. I want to learn more about this. Any suggestions as to where to start?”—Dominic DeLuca

    By Curtus Maxiumus

    A: This website gives a nice explanation of e-prime. Start with trying to write in E-Prime.

    My list of disallowed and allowed words:

    DISALLOWED WORDS

    be; being; been; am; is; isn’t; are; aren’t; was; wasn’t; were; weren’t;

    Contractions formed from a pronoun and a form of to be:

    I’m; you’re; we’re; they’re; he’s; she’s; it’s; there’s; here’s; where’s; how’s; what’s; who’s; that’s;

    ALLOWED WORDS

    The following words, do not derive from forms of to be. Some of these serve similar grammatical functions (see auxiliary verbs).

    become; has; have; having; had (I’ve; you’ve); do; does; doing; did; can; could; will; would (they’d); shall; should; ought; may; might; must; remain; equal.

    https://www.nobeliefs.com/eprime.htm

    NOBELIEFS.COM http://NOBELIEFS.COM

    ( Maximus: FYI: I also prohibit ‘become’ )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 09:04:00 UTC

  • CURZON ON STRETCHINESS OF PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS by Andy Curzon I see IQ as the

    CURZON ON STRETCHINESS OF PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS

    by Andy Curzon

    I see IQ as the sixth personality dimension.

    Each one has a ‘stretchiness’, a trainability.

    1 – Conscientiousness [the activity & in some cases overlapping into the agency dimension] (the most trainable of all the traits upwards although after 11-12 years old this becomes harder, and increasingly so into one’s 20s and 30s);

    2 – Agreeableness [in some sense the agency dimension and separates men as disagreeable and women agreeable] (remarkably stable throughout life, although there are Kuhnian paradigm shifts [huge life-changing events or epiphanies usually] that slide extremely disagreeable people to the other end of the scale or vice versa [I might suggest more often than not through brain trauma/restructuring]);

    3 – Neuroticism [the right hemisphere / threat perceiving / negative emotion dimension](immovable upwards in a similar way to IQ [we haven’t found a way other than drugs yet] and bad life events oft make neurotic people hyper-neurotic);

    4 – Openness [the creativity dimension, highly correlated with IQ] (the most interesting in that it appears people can train only toward their side of the fence…open people can ‘open the doors of perception’ [to use a Huxlian term] and closed people tend to become even more specialised as they mature, but cases of Kuhnian shifts have not been documented afaik, but there are almost always exceptions);

    5 – Extraversion [the left hemisphere / opportunity perceiving / positive emotion dimension] (low-mid range trainability either way but high reversion rate so training has to be maintained);

    6 – IQ [pattern recognition] many things bring IQ down (smart professors not doing exercise for example) but nothing is known to raise it, yet.

    I don’t know if you’re on board with all that but the key is they were all statistically derived….as a parallel to English common law, rather than by ‘fiat’ like the Myers-Briggs.

    I find the six dimension extremely useful when profiling people.



    ( CD: I use male (compartmental) vs female (integrated) first. then the six dimensions that includes above, which then explains male-female difference in Factor TRAITS, including male vs female in IQ distribution as well. )

    METHOD: Gender > Factor(dimension) > Trait (bias)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-31 17:04:00 UTC

  • For the courses we need: The Intellectual (academic – argument ) The Martial (mi

    For the courses we need:

    The Intellectual (academic – argument )

    The Martial (military – force)

    The Spiritual (social – mindfulness)

    The Physical. (personal – fitness)

    The only hard ones are the physical because it is very hard to ‘authenticate’ talent that isn’t already part of our ‘fitness’ circle on one hand an our ‘combat sports’ circle on the other.

    it’s just an IQ thing, I know. But it’s harder to find that than you think.

    Anyway, we will start with Art, History, Law, and War and build out from there.

    Very excited.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-29 23:17:00 UTC

  • UNDERSTAND: RELIGION IS THE HARDEST PROBLEM OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Because it is educ

    UNDERSTAND: RELIGION IS THE HARDEST PROBLEM OF SOCIAL SCIENCE

    Because it is education and training of the intuition by suggestion using narrative, ritual, oath, and debt.

    And because the intuition is the lowest common denominator of decidability in a population, demanding the least reason, calculation, and calculation.

    We are not ignorant as we have been throughout history. What we call ‘spirituality’ is the evolutionary artifact of the reduction of cognitive, social, physical, and therefore emotional burden by submission to and membership in the pack(male bias) or herd (female bias), and the resulting feeling of peace, safety, and mindfulness that results from that submission (surrender of individuality) to the pack or herd.

    The more agency, opportunity, experience, peace, safety, and mindfulness one has the lower the demand for the feeling of ‘spirituality’. The less agency, opportunity, experience, pace, safety and mindfulness on has, the greater the demand for the mindfulness that results from submission(surrender of individuality) to the pack or herd.

    We cannot demand those lacking interpersonal, social, economic, political, and military market value survive without the training in mindfulness that makes possible individual, interpersonal, social, economic, political, and military cooperation with others and the benefits that come from it.

    That would be IRRECIPROCAL.

    However, we can at the same time limit the external agency of those who lack the agency and market value to use the political process to influence others where such an influence is against the natural law.

    By the demand for truthful speech in the commons in matters commercial, … we eliminate the incentive to use the untestifiable for profit. By eliminating the need for churches to obtain donations, we likewise eliminate the incentive to use the untestifiable for profit. By demanding the churches warranty their due diligence in the production of education in the personal, interpersonal, social, commercial, financial, economic, political, and military.

    This will have the effect of driving groups that are hostile to the natural law and to european civilization out of every aspect of life, and make ‘religions’ liable for the actions of their ‘products’: citizens.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-29 11:25:00 UTC

  • Where did I say ‘economy’? I said ‘expansion’. I meant ‘the totality of influenc

    Where did I say ‘economy’? I said ‘expansion’. I meant ‘the totality of influence’ 😉 If you think the heroism in english civ is from the bible you have a rather odd understanding of the content of the culture, or the literature – particularly from the 14thc forward.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-29 02:04:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090068040509739009

    Reply addressees: @Logo_Daedalus @KalishJantzen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090026628359565312


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Logo_Daedalus

    @curtdoolittle @KalishJantzen Total non sequitur when I said “English literary canon” not “drives the economy”

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090026628359565312

  • It wasn’t the bible that drove the anglo expansion or the middle class education

    It wasn’t the bible that drove the anglo expansion or the middle class education, it as Aristotle’s ethics, military service, and he law. The Bible was for the poor, ignorant, and women and children.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 22:54:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090020210361462785

    Reply addressees: @Logo_Daedalus @KalishJantzen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089887134687866881


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Logo_Daedalus

    Not studying the Bible in school is abandoning the bedrock of the English literary canon. The idea that the Founders were opposed to bible studies in school is a farce. It’s important to be biblically literate for more than purely “religious” reasons. Anyone opposing me is wrong.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089887134687866881

  • COURSES UPDATE Application for Courses should be working …. ~should be~ now. I

    COURSES UPDATE

    Application for Courses should be working …. ~should be~ now. If you are interested, then please consider registering, applying, and in doing so, helping us test the software.

    🙂 Curt.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 16:22:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089921666145312768

  • COURSES UPDATE Application for Courses should be working …. ~should be~ … no

    COURSES UPDATE

    Application for Courses should be working …. ~should be~ … now. If you are interested, then please consider registering, applying, and in doing so, helping us test the software.

    http://propertarianism.com/

    🙂 Curt.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-28 11:22:00 UTC