Theme: Education

  • MARTIN IS UPDATING THE LIBRARY AND HAS QUESTIONS by ‎Martin Štěpán‎ I’ll be maki

    MARTIN IS UPDATING THE LIBRARY AND HAS QUESTIONS

    by ‎Martin Štěpán‎

    I’ll be making a new propertarian library.

    The goal is to complete the reading list as much as possible

    But also to add a lot more that isn’t on the list.

    Q1: ORGANIZATION: Would you prefer it organized based on the reading list just like the current library or by the author?

    Q2: AUDIOBOOKS: Would there be a demand for audiobooks?

    Q3: OTHER SUGGESTIONS: Any other suggestions are welcome.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-05 14:54:00 UTC

  • COURSE UPDATE: LAW 103 The bugs seem mostly out of the system now. We have peopl

    COURSE UPDATE: LAW 103

    The bugs seem mostly out of the system now. We have people paying for the class already. Seems like there is a lot of interest. Late comers or the cautious can start late if they want. I will drip the course material out on a weekly basis.

    So, Well be starting LAW 103 on FEB 25th.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-05 14:43:00 UTC

  • 7) India has huge population, only 300M of which are in the real economy, but be

    7) India has huge population, only 300M of which are in the real economy, but because of scale it provides asymmetric resources to the west with something that is hard to tax, corrupt, is exportable, and does not require many resources.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-05 14:37:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092794341297410050

    Reply addressees: @webdevMason @ESYudkowsky @MrRiotDiet @Elixir_Beats @PointlessSpike

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092513984874405888


    IN REPLY TO:

    @webdevMason

    @ESYudkowsky @MrRiotDiet @Elixir_Beats @PointlessSpike Produce more coders, get more products/employers — (a) the ability to code is a toolkit for building products, but beyond that atm every strong coder has to turn down a deliciously inflated salary if they want to have a go at entrepreneurship

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092513984874405888

  • 7) Russia and Ukraine have large poor populations, an excellent education system

    7) Russia and Ukraine have large poor populations, an excellent education system, a culture of engineering and personal responsibility for engineering quality. It is also the one of the best businesses because coding is hard to tax or feed corruption.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-05 14:35:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092793735891562498

    Reply addressees: @webdevMason @ESYudkowsky @MrRiotDiet @Elixir_Beats @PointlessSpike

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092513984874405888


    IN REPLY TO:

    @webdevMason

    @ESYudkowsky @MrRiotDiet @Elixir_Beats @PointlessSpike Produce more coders, get more products/employers — (a) the ability to code is a toolkit for building products, but beyond that atm every strong coder has to turn down a deliciously inflated salary if they want to have a go at entrepreneurship

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092513984874405888

  • 6) Programming is a language with a grammar, vocabulary, and syntax. But just as

    6) Programming is a language with a grammar, vocabulary, and syntax. But just as some of us are capable of complex text and speech, and some of us not, and this ability remains the same across all fields, with pure mathematics and mathematical physics two of the hardest.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-05 14:29:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092792448068345857

    Reply addressees: @webdevMason @ESYudkowsky @MrRiotDiet @Elixir_Beats @PointlessSpike

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092513984874405888


    IN REPLY TO:

    @webdevMason

    @ESYudkowsky @MrRiotDiet @Elixir_Beats @PointlessSpike Produce more coders, get more products/employers — (a) the ability to code is a toolkit for building products, but beyond that atm every strong coder has to turn down a deliciously inflated salary if they want to have a go at entrepreneurship

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092513984874405888

  • 3) The number of people who can continuously solve problems under continuous tec

    3) The number of people who can continuously solve problems under continuous technological change and do so well enough to compete in the job market is smaller still. The number that can solve reasonably hard problems in reasonable time frames, when working in teams, smaller.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-05 14:25:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092791416361758724

    Reply addressees: @webdevMason @ESYudkowsky @MrRiotDiet @Elixir_Beats @PointlessSpike

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092513984874405888


    IN REPLY TO:

    @webdevMason

    @ESYudkowsky @MrRiotDiet @Elixir_Beats @PointlessSpike Produce more coders, get more products/employers — (a) the ability to code is a toolkit for building products, but beyond that atm every strong coder has to turn down a deliciously inflated salary if they want to have a go at entrepreneurship

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092513984874405888

  • 2) The percentage of people that can articulate their ideas clearly in words or

    2) The percentage of people that can articulate their ideas clearly in words or writing and the number of people who can code clearly is lower. The number of people who can solve real world problems is significantly lower. The number who can continuously adapt to change is lower.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-05 14:23:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092790804798681089

    Reply addressees: @webdevMason @ESYudkowsky @MrRiotDiet @Elixir_Beats @PointlessSpike

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092513984874405888


    IN REPLY TO:

    @webdevMason

    @ESYudkowsky @MrRiotDiet @Elixir_Beats @PointlessSpike Produce more coders, get more products/employers — (a) the ability to code is a toolkit for building products, but beyond that atm every strong coder has to turn down a deliciously inflated salary if they want to have a go at entrepreneurship

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092513984874405888

  • THE MANY WHO SPEAK IN IGNORANCE —“…does propertarianism have representatives

    THE MANY WHO SPEAK IN IGNORANCE

    —“…does propertarianism have representatives?…”—

    Speaking in ignorance is speaking in ignorance. Opening in ignorance with confidence is arrogance. If someone asked me to review your work I would do it before commenting.

    1 – “Propertarianism consists of the completion of the Scientific Method; its application to the totality of human knowledge; a universally commensurable language of all thought; their embodiment in the common law of tort; and as a consequence the eradication of superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit from the commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational commons.” …. “Propertarianism completes the Wilsonian Synthesis.”

    2 – With strictly constructed law of reciprocity (natural law) it is possible to create any given political order – transparently.

    3 – The optimum form of government depends first, on the level of the development of the population, and its demographic distribution. Second, on whether one is at war or behind (authoritarian), operating under ordinary conditions (meritocratic), or operating under windfalls (redistributive).

    4 – A “Perfect Government” (ideal) consist of a militia of men of genetic and cultural relations (shareholders), an army consisting of professional warriors, an independent judiciary demanding universal application and granting universal standing in matters of the commons, an hereditary monarchy with and executive professional management (council), an independent treasury, houses for each of the classes, and one of a various number of schemes for authorizing the distribution of proceeds in the production of commons by the council.

    5 – Perfect governments are not always possible or valuable, since there is very little evidence that political participation on the part o the population is superior to the judgement of the monarchies. Worse, markets for political influence are the enemy of the people. Which is why the population must retain rights of standing in matters private AND common.

    6 – The principle difference in propertarianism is the extension of demand for warranty of due diligence on one’s speech from specific commercial to all commercial, financial, economic, political, legal, and academic speech – thereby making it impossible for the supernaturalisms, pseudosciences, sophisms and denialisms of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, judaism, and islam to exist without punishment by any and every citizen wishing to do so. christianity is a special case because while it is nonsense, the underlying ethics of christianity expressed scientifically is not only reciprocal, and thereby adherent to natural law, but optimum since no alternative prisoner’s dilemma strategy is superior.

    Decentralization, Separatism, Nationalism, definancialization, depoliticization, voluntary disassociation, restoration of our high trust polity, and all done by simply creating a market for profiting from the prosecution of falsehood and reciprocity in courts.

    Continuous superiority, by continuous velocity, by continuous agency, by the combination of sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, law and jury, and markets in association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, and polities.

    Restoration of our group evolutionary strategy: maneuver.

    At 10,000 feet, that is propertarianism. But that is only 10% of it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-03 23:07:00 UTC

  • 4NEWBS – THE FORMAT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF POSTS (repost) THE FORMAT OF DIFFERENT

    4NEWBS – THE FORMAT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF POSTS

    (repost)

    THE FORMAT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF POSTS

    1 – A POST

    ————————–

    THIS MEANS I WROTE IT FOR YOU TO READ AS AN ARGUMENT

    (this cues you to important stuff)

    And this is the body text here.

    Particularly if I break it into paragraphs.

    –“this is quoting someone else”–

    –this is quoting myself–

    … this

    … … is a

    … … … series that you might want to learn.

    |SERIES|: This > Is > A > Dimensional > Definition

    SUBHEADING

    And more text goes here. Subheadings cue you to the content.

    Signature Line

    I use the signature line for myself. So that I can search for the posts I want to publish on my web site later. So they are sort of a ‘stamp of approval’.

    2 – A NOTE OR SKETCH

    ————————–

    this doesn’t have header, isn’t broken into paragraphs, and doesn’t even use init-caps, so it’s just a record from elsewhere or quick thought or observation, or a work in progress – rumination.

    3 – A PERSONAL OPINION

    ————————–

    (this doesn’t have a header, is in parenthesis and in all lower case, which means it’s possibly something to ignore … because it’s not an argument. it’s just an opinion or feeling.)

    4 – A DIARY ENTRY

    ————————–

    (diary entry)

    this is something I wrote for myself that is unfiltered, and likely includes very personal feelings of my own, or on the state of my thinking, and not something that you will probably want to read unless the psychology that I operate under is of some interest to you or other.

    ===========================

    Closing:

    I work in public, partly to conduct experiments. I am personally open in public because this prevents people attributing psychological motivations to me that I don’t have. I create conflict in order to run tests. The purpose of running a test is to attempt to create a proof.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-02 21:46:00 UTC

  • UNDERSTANDING OF USE VS CONSTRUCTION The general public need only understand pol

    UNDERSTANDING OF USE VS CONSTRUCTION

    The general public need only understand policy and benefits.

    —“That attitude tells me all I need know about your organization.”—Mark Wright

    What??? The general public needs to understand How to write strictly constructed law? And deflation, disambiguation and serialization, operational semantics and grammar, transactionally expanded sentences, dimensions of testing available to the human mind, the means of warrantying due diligence in both in and across those dimensions? falsificationism vs justificationism? The difference between ontological, axiomatic, and theoretic systems? Why does the public need to understand that? They can’t.

    The general public doesn’t study formal logic, advanced mathematics, political, institutional, financial or micro economics, the law, engineering, physics, or cognitive science. they use the products of those who do.

    “For sovereignty, liberty and freedom to exist, the Law must consist of very simple rules.” And there is only one sentence the public needs to understand: *”Natural Law, the rights of anglo saxons, the Adams-Jefferson constitution, and western civilization’s success in the ancient, modern, and future worlds, depended and depends upon the continuous production of velocity by the continuous production of agency by the continuous use of sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, law and jury, and markets in association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and group strategy, at the cost of minimizing the rates of reproduction of those unable to contribute to those demands.”*

    They need to understand we can de financialize, de politicize, restore truthful speech in commerce, finance, economics, law, politics, and group evolutionary strategy; restore the civic society and . They need to understand the rights and obligations in the policies that produce those ends. To follow a simple law does not require that men understand its underlying science. If so it would be useless. We must not understand how to build any given set of tools, only once built, how to use them within our sphere of agency.

    Do not assume I am a fool.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-02 10:18:00 UTC