Curt Doolittle

Theme: Education

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51816572_10156975527472264_908346010

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51816572_10156975527472264_908346010

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51816572_10156975527472264_9083460109933215744_o_10156975527467264.jpg HOW TO ANSWER GSRRM CRITICISMS

    (Do not treat all our people as equal in agency.)Christian KalafutI do think that it’s too materialistic – not even the Hellenes were this materialist in pholosophy (depending on who you read)Feb 9, 2019, 4:27 PMCurt Doolittlewell you are a dishonest advocate for supernatural authoritarianism and the continued imprisonment and conquest of our people by our eternal enemy.Feb 9, 2019, 4:29 PMChristian KalafutThis was no denunciation curtFeb 9, 2019, 4:29 PMChristian KalafutBut while in theory its about markets, and often times in practice, I think therr is more to the breath of life then material goods.Feb 9, 2019, 4:30 PMCurt DoolittleOnly because you are an addict defending your addiction.Feb 9, 2019, 4:30 PMCurt DoolittleChristian Kalafut not an argument. You think many false and foolish things. Why would what you think matter?Feb 9, 2019, 4:30 PMCurt DoolittleI mean, youi’re a liar and a carrier of lies. I only don’t block you to mock you.Feb 9, 2019, 4:31 PMChristian KalafutI say things you disagree with but many things I do say you happen to agreeFeb 9, 2019, 4:31 PMChristian KalafutYou’ve shared quotes of mine (earnestly) on your wall.Feb 9, 2019, 4:32 PMChristian KalafutPhilosophers do not always agreeFeb 9, 2019, 4:33 PMChristian KalafutDiedrot had many a skirmish with Voltaire.Feb 9, 2019, 4:33 PMChristian KalafutThe spirit and ethos of ehst your saying is very Voltairian.Feb 9, 2019, 4:34 PMGreg HamiltonI’m not sure how all of reality, your nation and people, and your family is “materialistic”

    I mean if you can’t find inspiration for being in all of that I don’t see how an invisible man is going to help any.Feb 9, 2019, 4:35 PMCurt DoolittleHalf truths are still half lies, and you are nothing but a sophist, supernaturalist, and liar, and a threat to the survival of our people.

    Even a broken clock is right twice a day. I do not care if madmen or my enemy says something useful. The origin of information has no bearing on its truth content. That would be contra falsificationary.

    You are still a dishonest apologist for christianity, and I only call myself a philosopher to avoid confusion. As far as I know what I do is a science of the law (cooperation).

    You are not a philosopher. The requirement to make that claim requires a system of thought. Or publication of an amendment to a system of thought. there are many people who write philosophy or philosophize (rationalise) but that tells us nothing. As far as I know philosophy is dead, and the evidence is it’s inclusion in religion rather than math, logic, science, engineering, economics, law.

    There is nothing ‘voluntarian’ it is simplyr eciprocity under the rule of law of the anglo saxons and their germanic ancestors, and the european IE expansion before them.

    All you do is waste my time and provide vehicles for how others can conduct arguments against others such fictionalists.

    ;)Feb 9, 2019, 4:40 PMCurt Doolittleit’s more that ‘if you can’t find inspiration in that, then you are dead weight and an ongoing threat to our people’s survival.”Feb 9, 2019, 4:44 PMSteven KolpekCoding an Ideal for Propertarianism? [Live up to your forefather’s by defending your future]?Feb 9, 2019, 4:45 PMRichard HeathenGSRRM?Feb 9, 2019, 4:46 PMChristian KalafutI am talking about the 18th century philosopher Voltaire, not “voluntary”Feb 9, 2019, 4:56 PMChristian KalafutYou see I am an historian and a musician/lyricist first and foremost.Feb 9, 2019, 4:58 PMChristian KalafutI think that you dwell too much on my faith rather than the Truth of what I am saying.Feb 9, 2019, 4:59 PMChristian KalafutWhat I am saying is what you believe, is nothing new in Western history; most of the upper classes of West Europe carried views, though less systematized and apportioned, very similar to yours. The view that there was a ‘thousand years of darkness between Julian and the Enlightenment” is an old, tired meme; in terms of Historiography it’s purely a Gibbonian smear and a rejection of History as it actually was.Feb 9, 2019, 5:04 PMGreg HamiltonCurt Doolittle and honestly people can believe in whatever they want in private.Feb 9, 2019, 5:08 PMCurt DoolittleGood point. Thank you . I always assume everyone presumes that and I shouldn’t. sorry.Feb 9, 2019, 5:12 PMGreg HamiltonI think these critics may think you’re saying that. But I’ve never heard that. Just that invisible men in the sky don’t get to be part of the law.Feb 9, 2019, 5:19 PMAlexander ByronNot worth engaging in my opinion. Those comments are just noise, if one keeps listening to them, they will drown in said noise.Feb 9, 2019, 5:27 PMCurt DoolittleWhat’s wrong with materialism is meritocracy. Fictions, Supernaturalism and Sophism, and pseudoscience and their conflations provide an alternative mental model in which one’s lower status and therefore mindfulness is not continuously challenged daily evidence in reality.Feb 9, 2019, 5:34 PMAlain DwightGuilt, shame, rally, ridicule, mock.. something like that.

    What the left does instead of making arguments or developing agency.Feb 9, 2019, 5:37 PMGreg HamiltonCurt Doolittle nice. True. “If only” becomes the excuse for lack of success

    This is where communists, libertarians, objectivists etc all meet. Their beliefs require “if just only everybody would”Feb 9, 2019, 5:39 PMAlain Dwight*G is for gossipFeb 9, 2019, 5:47 PMCurt Doolittlegossip, shaming, ralling, ridiculing, and moralizing.

    in other words, demonstrating female disapproval.Feb 9, 2019, 5:49 PMChristian KalafutMaterialistic outlook is what got the commons into this mess in first place; I am not decrying the benifets that it has given us but such a way of viewing the world leads to ideologies like Marxism or Communism or things like the Party of Davos.Feb 9, 2019, 5:52 PMChristian KalafutRampant materialism and decadence what is killing our civilization the most right now. Remember that the houses of the leading men of Athens during the golden age were sparsley furnished in comparison to the decadent furnishings of the later Roman Republic. In fact, the sparser furnishing of the Athenian household is one of the many measures of brilliance in the history of that period.Feb 9, 2019, 5:56 PMRichard HeathenOk so rallying and shamingFeb 9, 2019, 5:58 PMCJ CarverChristian Kalafut If you could give yourself a smoker, would you do it?Feb 9, 2019, 6:10 PMBryan Nova BreyYour responses are highbrow hilarious.Feb 9, 2019, 6:19 PMAlain DwightMoralizing, that really ties it together.Feb 9, 2019, 6:55 PMEric BurkettI do not view truth as a materialistic desire, but as an idealistic construct to impose with the side effect of creating markets that optimize human interaction, reducing transactional costs and creating the conditions for affluence in many ways, not just resource accumulation.Feb 9, 2019, 7:20 PMSteven KolpekDoesn’t “ridicule” fall under “shame”? I liked the 4-letter acronym better.

    Gossip (slander, libel, defame)

    Shaming (ridicule, humiliate, chastize)

    Rallying (appeal to audience, dogpile)

    Moralizing (good vs. evil)Feb 9, 2019, 7:36 PMThomas NorgateCharlie Eddleston-Haynes Caspian Lipman-England Robert Henke this guy on the money againFeb 11, 2019, 8:41 AMHOW TO ANSWER GSRRM CRITICISMS

    (Do not treat all our people as equal in agency.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 16:25:00 UTC

  • LETS UNDERSTAND: JOHN MARK IS SUCCESSFUL He’s meteorically successful. And that’

    LETS UNDERSTAND: JOHN MARK IS SUCCESSFUL

    He’s meteorically successful. And that’s good and bad. I would like to have meteoric success after the institute had graduated a few courses, and the book was published, so that it was much harder to ‘make shit up’ rather than defend the work.

    So, this meteoric rise increases our reach at the expense of the burden of those on the right who have failed for years. Our success illustrates their failure.

    These members of the failed-right are envious of John’s success and are using his success as a coattail to ride on. By attacking our work (and me) they can generate interest from the tinfoil hat and zig-heil crowds. And so it’s expected.

    Now, my strategy with the libertine-libertarians, was to understand, and then destroy the movement as best I could – which at this point is pretty much the ‘lol-bertarians’.

    The failed-right needs the same treatment as the failed-libertarians. The winning right is not destined for the limited demographic of keyboard meme-warriors seeking ideology, nor those seeking paternal authority to save them, nor those seeking religion to save them. Those without agency cannot be saved – they can only stay out of the way.

    So my strategy is to pivot.

    Because the conservative mainstream is vast. And they care about policy, because they have agency, because they have skin in the game.

    And the failed-right is death sentence for anything touching it.

    The purpose of any movement is to obtain power. And to obtain power one needs something that can sell. And not to the fringe, but to the mainstream. Once one has power, then the future consists of a field of choices.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-07 21:16:00 UTC

  • What I Do Here: An Experimental Classroom (King of the Hill, and No Hate)

    (regular repost) ===AN EXPERIMENTAL CLASSROOM=== [F]or new friends and followers, please understand what I do here and on FB. It is my sketch pad. I work in public like a village blacksmith where you can peer into the forge and see the experimental work being done – good and bad. Propertarianism is a very special thing and you can learn a lot about the world by following me. But it does require that you keep in mind that I am constantly using the community as an experimental pool to test ideas and seek criticism. I am slaying a few hundred years of sacred western ideas, and doing so mercilessly. This often requires that I experiment in everything from very rigorous philosophy, to the most general of aphorisms and narratives. Some of which are guaranteed to offend you. (And me sometimes, too.) But my goal is to capture what made the west competitively successful in our history in formal logical and scientific terms – for the first time, to capture it as an analytic political philosophy, recommend formal institutions, espouse it as an ideology, and provide moral authority for revolution, the strategic and tactical means of conducting that revolution. I am not so much a populist as an engineer. Its not my job to be popular. It’s my job to discover the truth. === KING OF THE HILL GAME: TEACHING MEN === I have developed the “King of the Hill” strategy of discourse (teaching) because it is actually THE BEST method of teaching (masculine) men. I’ve been doing this since we used 300 baud dial up modems and 80 character monochrome screens. And I learned it early. Men can attack me and my ideas, without acting vulnerable, or submissive, or begging for attention, but by exercising their dominance. And they can fail and no one cares. This is actually the optimum method of reaching men: we create a dominance game of low risk. We learn from playing this dominance game. The secret is to reward dominance expression if it’s backed by insight, argument, or wit. And to stop on effeminate, abrahamic, and non-argument. I make serious arguments to teach. I make half arguments to encourage debate. And I push controversial ideas to encourage them to refute them. My role in this game is to play king of the hill, and say “come get me“. I provide symbolic rewards (sharing quotes), and meaningful rewards (investing time in those with potential), and lifetime rewards (skill development). That is why this game works. Not everyone can play this game. But if they can play this game, and get good at it they will master a very special skill. And it’s that collection of talent I’m interested in creating. The internet does change. Men don’t change. The number of stupid men with access to digital discourse simply increases. The internet of such men requires street fighting, and I try to create a locker room for street fighters. In that locker room we play king of the hill. WE PUT DOMINANCE PLAY TO CONSTRUCTIVE USE. If you want beta-and-chick-friendly theatre watch TED videos. It’s a cult of pseudoscience. I teach argument.. I teach men. (And the occasional woman with character, intellectual honesty, and brains.) You might not realize I know this is a game, and that we are playing a game until you meet me in person or talk to me in an interview – because I’m not very much like my online persona. This is educational entertainment and theatre. === I DON’T DO HATE === Um. I’m pro natural law; pro my people; pro humanity; and pro transcendence; Yes, I will dig on genetic differences, biological differences, genetic differences, cultural differences, class, gender, and racial differences. Yes I will make objective analysis of the those differences. I will work to destroy the cherished lies of every race, civilization, culture, nation, tribe, and class. And I will crush those lies with some sense of both desperation, conviction and joy. But I don’t do racism. I hate on parasitism predation, and fictionalism to justify it. But I don’t hate on people. I fault my people for not using their superiority to defend against the group evolutionary strategies of other groups. I fault my people for failing to rule and rule well. I fault my people for intellectual folly and dishonesty. I advocate nationalism, tribalism, sovereignty and natural law of reciprocity and markets in everything for all human beings. And as many nations as it takes to transcend all humans through the gradual improvement of all and the gradual reduction of the underclasses that prohibit our transcendence. I don’t like hating on people. It’s not Christian and therefore not European. And not even Aryan. The beauty of christianity is that it seeks to extirpate all hatred from the human heart. And once extirpated we are free to use reason, with clear minds and clear judgement. I have no problem with war, murder, violence and destruction. i have no problem with rule, punishment, and if necessary incarceration or enslavement. I have a problem with hatred. A problem with deception. And a problem with any order other than the laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, and the transcendence of man.

  • Blocking Policy

    [I] hate blocking people and my block list was very short until peers and followers asked me to stop wasting my time; to clean up the feed; and to preserve the educational environment. I teach the Law and its application. I run a class 24×7 to a global audience. My goal is to preserve the environment. I (WE) BLOCK FOR: 1 – Wasting my (our) time. Which consists of: 2 – Ridicule, Sarcasm, Gossiping, Rallying Shaming, Moralizing (GSRM) as a substitute for argument. 3 – Memes as a substitute for argument. (no meme zone) 4 – Intellectual Dishonesty in argument 5 – Antagonism as a substitute for argument. 6 – Faith or Sophism as a substitute for argument. 7 – Occasionally: Argument from Ignorance and Arrogance (attacking the work while not knowing enough to do so.) 8 – Occasionally also: Common Stupidity, Schizotypal stupidity (paranoia), Other Psychological Problems. I (WE) DO NOT BLOCK FOR – Good natured teasing. I am easy to tease. Height, age, generation, weight, aspieness, number of women/divorces, tech stuff, abundance of typing mistakes, being a 1%er, teaching by king of the hill game, the difference between my real and online personalities. You know, the list is endless. NOTE: I (we) practice reciprocity. So if you use GSRM against me (us) , I(we) will use it against you … and then return to the central point – over, and over, and over again.

  • What I Do Here: An Experimental Classroom (King of the Hill, and No Hate)

    (regular repost) ===AN EXPERIMENTAL CLASSROOM=== [F]or new friends and followers, please understand what I do here and on FB. It is my sketch pad. I work in public like a village blacksmith where you can peer into the forge and see the experimental work being done – good and bad. Propertarianism is a very special thing and you can learn a lot about the world by following me. But it does require that you keep in mind that I am constantly using the community as an experimental pool to test ideas and seek criticism. I am slaying a few hundred years of sacred western ideas, and doing so mercilessly. This often requires that I experiment in everything from very rigorous philosophy, to the most general of aphorisms and narratives. Some of which are guaranteed to offend you. (And me sometimes, too.) But my goal is to capture what made the west competitively successful in our history in formal logical and scientific terms – for the first time, to capture it as an analytic political philosophy, recommend formal institutions, espouse it as an ideology, and provide moral authority for revolution, the strategic and tactical means of conducting that revolution. I am not so much a populist as an engineer. Its not my job to be popular. It’s my job to discover the truth. === KING OF THE HILL GAME: TEACHING MEN === I have developed the “King of the Hill” strategy of discourse (teaching) because it is actually THE BEST method of teaching (masculine) men. I’ve been doing this since we used 300 baud dial up modems and 80 character monochrome screens. And I learned it early. Men can attack me and my ideas, without acting vulnerable, or submissive, or begging for attention, but by exercising their dominance. And they can fail and no one cares. This is actually the optimum method of reaching men: we create a dominance game of low risk. We learn from playing this dominance game. The secret is to reward dominance expression if it’s backed by insight, argument, or wit. And to stop on effeminate, abrahamic, and non-argument. I make serious arguments to teach. I make half arguments to encourage debate. And I push controversial ideas to encourage them to refute them. My role in this game is to play king of the hill, and say “come get me“. I provide symbolic rewards (sharing quotes), and meaningful rewards (investing time in those with potential), and lifetime rewards (skill development). That is why this game works. Not everyone can play this game. But if they can play this game, and get good at it they will master a very special skill. And it’s that collection of talent I’m interested in creating. The internet does change. Men don’t change. The number of stupid men with access to digital discourse simply increases. The internet of such men requires street fighting, and I try to create a locker room for street fighters. In that locker room we play king of the hill. WE PUT DOMINANCE PLAY TO CONSTRUCTIVE USE. If you want beta-and-chick-friendly theatre watch TED videos. It’s a cult of pseudoscience. I teach argument.. I teach men. (And the occasional woman with character, intellectual honesty, and brains.) You might not realize I know this is a game, and that we are playing a game until you meet me in person or talk to me in an interview – because I’m not very much like my online persona. This is educational entertainment and theatre. === I DON’T DO HATE === Um. I’m pro natural law; pro my people; pro humanity; and pro transcendence; Yes, I will dig on genetic differences, biological differences, genetic differences, cultural differences, class, gender, and racial differences. Yes I will make objective analysis of the those differences. I will work to destroy the cherished lies of every race, civilization, culture, nation, tribe, and class. And I will crush those lies with some sense of both desperation, conviction and joy. But I don’t do racism. I hate on parasitism predation, and fictionalism to justify it. But I don’t hate on people. I fault my people for not using their superiority to defend against the group evolutionary strategies of other groups. I fault my people for failing to rule and rule well. I fault my people for intellectual folly and dishonesty. I advocate nationalism, tribalism, sovereignty and natural law of reciprocity and markets in everything for all human beings. And as many nations as it takes to transcend all humans through the gradual improvement of all and the gradual reduction of the underclasses that prohibit our transcendence. I don’t like hating on people. It’s not Christian and therefore not European. And not even Aryan. The beauty of christianity is that it seeks to extirpate all hatred from the human heart. And once extirpated we are free to use reason, with clear minds and clear judgement. I have no problem with war, murder, violence and destruction. i have no problem with rule, punishment, and if necessary incarceration or enslavement. I have a problem with hatred. A problem with deception. And a problem with any order other than the laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, and the transcendence of man.

  • Blocking Policy

    [I] hate blocking people and my block list was very short until peers and followers asked me to stop wasting my time; to clean up the feed; and to preserve the educational environment. I teach the Law and its application. I run a class 24×7 to a global audience. My goal is to preserve the environment. I (WE) BLOCK FOR: 1 – Wasting my (our) time. Which consists of: 2 – Ridicule, Sarcasm, Gossiping, Rallying Shaming, Moralizing (GSRM) as a substitute for argument. 3 – Memes as a substitute for argument. (no meme zone) 4 – Intellectual Dishonesty in argument 5 – Antagonism as a substitute for argument. 6 – Faith or Sophism as a substitute for argument. 7 – Occasionally: Argument from Ignorance and Arrogance (attacking the work while not knowing enough to do so.) 8 – Occasionally also: Common Stupidity, Schizotypal stupidity (paranoia), Other Psychological Problems. I (WE) DO NOT BLOCK FOR – Good natured teasing. I am easy to tease. Height, age, generation, weight, aspieness, number of women/divorces, tech stuff, abundance of typing mistakes, being a 1%er, teaching by king of the hill game, the difference between my real and online personalities. You know, the list is endless. NOTE: I (we) practice reciprocity. So if you use GSRM against me (us) , I(we) will use it against you … and then return to the central point – over, and over, and over again.

  • POLICY: RESPECT —“…. largest problem is your obnoxious temperament … ”— You me

    POLICY: RESPECT

    —“…. largest problem is your obnoxious temperament … ”—

    You mean my way of filtering intellectually dishonest, lazy, stupid people from wasting my (our) time? Of demanding you do some research and construct an argument before offering criticism? You mean, the way I demand respect, by requiring respect first? Or do you mean the way I prosecute pseudoscience, sophism, pilpul, critique, GSRRM?

    I am not at all like my online personality. I have a job. that job requires certain things.I do my job.

    ASK QUESTIONS DON”T OFFER CRITICISMS IN IGNORANCE.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-06 12:39:00 UTC

  • POLICY: WHAT I DO HERE (regular repost) ===AN EXPERIMENTAL CLASSROOM=== For new

    POLICY: WHAT I DO HERE

    (regular repost)

    ===AN EXPERIMENTAL CLASSROOM===

    For new friends and followers, please understand what I do here and on FB. It is my sketch pad. I work in public like a village blacksmith where you can peer into the forge and see the experimental work being done – good and bad.

    Propertarianism is a very special thing and you can learn a lot about the world by following me. But it does require that you keep in mind that I am constantly using the community as an experimental pool to test ideas and seek criticism.

    I am slaying a few hundred years of sacred western ideas, and doing so mercilessly. This often requires that I experiment in everything from very rigorous philosophy, to the most general of aphorisms and narratives. Some of which are guaranteed to offend you. (And me sometimes, too.)

    But my goal is to capture what made the west competitively successful in our history in formal logical and scientific terms – for the first time, to capture it as an analytic political philosophy, recommend formal institutions, espouse it as an ideology, and provide moral authority for revolution, the strategic and tactical means of conducting that revolution.

    I am not so much a populist as an engineer. Its not my job to be popular. It’s my job to discover the truth.

    === KING OF THE HILL GAME: TEACHING MEN ===

    I have developed the “King of the Hill” strategy of discourse (teaching) because it is actually THE BEST method of teaching (masculine) men. I’ve been doing this since we used 300 baud dial up modems and 80 character monochrome screens. And I learned it early.

    Men can attack me and my ideas, without acting vulnerable, or submissive, or begging for attention, but by exercising their dominance. And they can fail and no one cares. This is actually the optimum method of reaching men: we create a dominance game of low risk. We learn from playing this dominance game. The secret is to reward dominance expression if it’s backed by insight, argument, or wit. And to stop on effeminate, abrahamic, and non-argument.

    I make serious arguments to teach. I make half arguments to encourage debate. And I push controversial ideas to encourage them to refute them.

    My role in this ‘game’ is to play king of the hill, and say ‘come get me’. I provide symbolic rewards (sharing quotes), and meaningful rewards (investing time in those with potential), and lifetime rewards (skill development). That is why this game works.

    Not everyone can play this game. But if they can play this game, and get good at it they will master a very special skill. And it’s that collection of talent I’m interested in creating.

    The internet does change. Men don’t change. The number of stupid men with access to digital discourse simply increases.

    The internet of such men requires street fighting, and I try to create a locker room for street fighters. In that locker room we play king of the hill. WE PUT DOMINANCE PLAY TO CONSTRUCTIVE USE. If you want beta-and-chick-friendly theatre watch TED videos. It’s a cult of pseudoscience.

    I teach argument.. I teach men. (And the occasional woman with character, intellectual honesty, and brains.)

    You might not realize I know this is a game, and that we are playing a game until you meet me in person or talk to me in an interview – because I’m not very much like my online persona.

    This is educational entertainment and theatre.

    === I DON’T DO HATE ===

    Um. I’m pro natural law; pro my people; pro humanity; and pro transcendence; Yes, I will dig on genetic differences, biological differences, genetic differences, cultural differences, class, gender, and racial differences. Yes I will make objective analysis of the those differences. I will work to destroy the cherished lies of every race, civilization, culture, nation, tribe, and class. And I will crush those lies with some sense of both desperation, conviction and joy.

    But I don’t do racism. I hate on parasitism predation, and fictionalism to justify it. But I don’t hate on people. I fault my people for not using their superiority to defend against the group evolutionary strategies of other groups. I fault my people for failing to rule and rule well. I fault my people for intellectual folly and dishonesty.

    I advocate nationalism, tribalism, sovereignty and natural law of reciprocity and markets in everything for all human beings. And as many nations as it takes to transcend all humans through the gradual improvement of all and the gradual reduction of the underclasses that prohibit our transcendence.

    I don’t like hating on people. It’s not Christian and therefore not European. And not even Aryan. The beauty of christianity is that it seeks to extirpate all hatred from the human heart. And once extirpated we are free to use reason, with clear minds and clear judgement.

    I have no problem with war, murder, violence and destruction. i have no problem with rule, punishment, and if necessary incarceration or enslavement.

    I have a problem with hatred. A problem with deception. And a problem with any order other than the laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, and the transcendence of man.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-06 12:33:00 UTC

  • POSTING POLICY: THE FORMAT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF POSTS (repost) 1 =========ARGUM

    POSTING POLICY: THE FORMAT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF POSTS

    (repost)

    1 =========ARGUMENTS===============

    THIS MEANS I WROTE IT FOR YOU TO READ AS AN ARGUMENT OR STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION

    (this is a tag that cues you to important stuff)

    And this is the body text here.

    ––“this is quoting someone else”––

    —this is quoting myself—

    … this

    … … is a

    … … … series that you might want to learn.

    |series| another series > you might > want to > learn.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine <– Signature means I want to save it.

    2 =========NOTES TO SELF========

    this doesn’t have header so it’s just a record from elsewhere or quick thought or observation, or a work in progress. a sketchpad.

    3 ====OPINIONS OR OBSERVATIONS===

    (this doesn’t have a header, is in parenthesis and in all lower case, which means it’s possibly something to ignore … because it’s not an argument, but an opinion, or comment, or thought. )

    4 =========DIARY ENTRIES=========

    (diary entry)

    this is something I wrote for myself that is unfiltered, and likely includes very personal feelings of my own, or on the state of my thinking, and not something that you will probably want to read unless the psychology that I operate under is of some interest to you or other.

    ===========================

    Closing:

    I work in public, partly to conduct experiments. I am personally open in public because this prevents people attributing psychological motivations to me that I don’t have. I create conflict in order to run tests. The purpose of running a test is to attempt to create a proof of possibility.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-06 12:25:00 UTC

  • BLOCKING POLICY I hate blocking people and my block list was very short until pe

    BLOCKING POLICY

    I hate blocking people and my block list was very short until peers and followers asked me to stop wasting my time; to clean up the feed; and to preserve the educational environment.

    I teach the Law and its application. I run a class 24×7 to a global audience. My goal is to preserve the environment.

    I (WE) BLOCK FOR:

    1 – Wasting my (our) time. Which consists of:

    2 – Ridicule, Sarcasm, Gossiping, Rallying Shaming, Moralizing (GSRM) as a substitute for argument.

    3 – Memes as a substitute for argument. (no meme zone)

    4 – Intellectual Dishonesty in argument

    5 – Antagonism as a substitute for argument.

    6 – Faith or Sophism as a substitute for argument.

    7 – Occasionally: Argument from Ignorance and Arrogance (attacking the work while not knowing enough to do so.)

    8 – Occasionally also: Common Stupidity, Schizotypal stupidity (paranoia), Other Psychological Problems.

    I (WE) DO NOT BLOCK FOR

    – Good natured teasing. I am easy to tease. Height, age, generation, weight, aspieness, number of women/divorces, tech stuff, abundance of typing mistakes, being a 1%er, teaching by king of the hill game, the difference between my real and online personalities. You know, the list is endless.

    NOTE:

    I (we) practice reciprocity. So if you use GSRM against me (us) , I(we) will use it against you … and then return to the central point – over, and over, and over again.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-06 12:03:00 UTC