Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • Why? Because the people who fight are the people who matter

    Why? Because the people who fight are the people who matter.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 06:30:00 UTC

  • One is kin, friend, ally, useful, unuseful, problematic or enemy. We do not care

    One is kin, friend, ally, useful, unuseful, problematic or enemy. We do not care about an enemy’s opinion. Only his defeat. 🙂

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 22:47:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794310107056263175

    Reply addressees: @NorthBayTeky

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794309416287768577

    IN REPLY TO:

    @NorthBayTeky

    @curtdoolittle in your own mind

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794309416287768577

  • Do you mean to imply that your political advocacy is not one of kleptocracy? And

    Do you mean to imply that your political advocacy is not one of kleptocracy? And that you’re just hiding it?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 14:39:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793824767795232768

    Reply addressees: @daemoskisame @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793799514012393473

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DaemosKisame

    @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump no im not trump or hilary. im much to blunt to lie about doing something stupid i own my mistakes 😛

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793799514012393473

  • Might Makes Right By Righting Wrongs – A Declaration

    MightMakesRight By Righting Wrongs – A Declaration of Reformation (get image version , or get  PDF Version ) Might, in and of itself, does not determine right or wrong. But right is always, and must be, constructed by the use of or constraint of might. Those with might determine whether a condition of right or wrong exists or not. Everyone else merely has the permission of those with might. And when a series of abuses and usurpations pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under other’s discretion, thereby depriving them of their Sovereignty, it is those with might that can restore their Sovereignty over the objections of those who lack the might. All revolutions in history are caused by a minority of men willing to use their might to change the status quo. And it is the virtue of our ancient Anglo-Saxon system of contractual government that allows redress of those abuses through restoration of that Sovereignty; and to restore it by the revision of that common contract between those with might: the Constitution – under which they agree to reserve their might and defer to tradition, norm, legislation, and Natural Law of Sovereign men. And by that revision alter the institutions and laws that govern all actions thereunder, restoring their Sovereignty. And because it is in the nature of all humans in all organizations of all scales, to seek power to circumvent the limits of their productivity, and to extract from others and others kin, their normative, cultural, institutional, informational, material, and territorial capital, by the circumvention of that Natural Law and by abuse that Sovereignty – then those with might must periodically revise that constitution through the use of might, just as we revise legislation through the proxy of might we call the legislature; and just as we revise the common law through the proxy of might we call the courts; just as we revise the current relations with outsiders by the direct use of might by means of information, conversion, immigration, economic and material warfare. There is only one judgment history lays upon us: persistence of one’s kin by survival, invention, adaptation, and competition. Might used to make Sovereignty is well judged by man’s history and nature’s laws. Because it is by that very Sovereignty that the western man dragged all mankind out of superstition, mysticism, pseudoscience, ignorance, poverty, disease, and dysgenia – kicking and screaming all the while – one calamitous conflict of tribe, nation, state, religion, and civilization at a time. A series of Conflicts through which the Sovereign continue to persevere, and by our might and Sovereignty shall continue to do so.

    — Curt Doolittle, The Philosophy of Aristocracy, The Propertarian Institute

  • Might Makes Right By Righting Wrongs – A Declaration

    MightMakesRight By Righting Wrongs – A Declaration of Reformation (get image version , or get  PDF Version ) Might, in and of itself, does not determine right or wrong. But right is always, and must be, constructed by the use of or constraint of might. Those with might determine whether a condition of right or wrong exists or not. Everyone else merely has the permission of those with might. And when a series of abuses and usurpations pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under other’s discretion, thereby depriving them of their Sovereignty, it is those with might that can restore their Sovereignty over the objections of those who lack the might. All revolutions in history are caused by a minority of men willing to use their might to change the status quo. And it is the virtue of our ancient Anglo-Saxon system of contractual government that allows redress of those abuses through restoration of that Sovereignty; and to restore it by the revision of that common contract between those with might: the Constitution – under which they agree to reserve their might and defer to tradition, norm, legislation, and Natural Law of Sovereign men. And by that revision alter the institutions and laws that govern all actions thereunder, restoring their Sovereignty. And because it is in the nature of all humans in all organizations of all scales, to seek power to circumvent the limits of their productivity, and to extract from others and others kin, their normative, cultural, institutional, informational, material, and territorial capital, by the circumvention of that Natural Law and by abuse that Sovereignty – then those with might must periodically revise that constitution through the use of might, just as we revise legislation through the proxy of might we call the legislature; and just as we revise the common law through the proxy of might we call the courts; just as we revise the current relations with outsiders by the direct use of might by means of information, conversion, immigration, economic and material warfare. There is only one judgment history lays upon us: persistence of one’s kin by survival, invention, adaptation, and competition. Might used to make Sovereignty is well judged by man’s history and nature’s laws. Because it is by that very Sovereignty that the western man dragged all mankind out of superstition, mysticism, pseudoscience, ignorance, poverty, disease, and dysgenia – kicking and screaming all the while – one calamitous conflict of tribe, nation, state, religion, and civilization at a time. A series of Conflicts through which the Sovereign continue to persevere, and by our might and Sovereignty shall continue to do so.

    — Curt Doolittle, The Philosophy of Aristocracy, The Propertarian Institute

  • Might in and of itself may not make right. But all right is made by the use or r

    Might in and of itself may not make right. But all right is made by the use or restraint of might. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 12:57:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793799231224045568

    Reply addressees: @daemoskisame @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793771124584751104

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DaemosKisame

    @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump so what your saying is. WAAAH I WANT IF I DONT GET MY WAY IMMA THROW A FIT LIKE A LIL BITCH WAH GIMME BOTTLE

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793771124584751104

  • Actually what I’m saying is, that those who can destroy a thing, own a thing.All

    Actually what I’m saying is, that those who can destroy a thing, own a thing.All else is at their permission.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 12:56:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793799005444665345

    Reply addressees: @daemoskisame @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793771124584751104

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DaemosKisame

    @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump so what your saying is. WAAAH I WANT IF I DONT GET MY WAY IMMA THROW A FIT LIKE A LIL BITCH WAH GIMME BOTTLE

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793771124584751104

  • THE ONLY LIMIT OF GOVERNMENT EXCESS IS THE MILITIA 1. The only way to limit a go

    THE ONLY LIMIT OF GOVERNMENT EXCESS IS THE MILITIA

    1. The only way to limit a government is with organized violence.

    2. The only way to organize violence to limit the government while keeping power distributed is a militia.

    3. The only way to train a militia is by participation in a standing army.

    4. The only way to train a standing army to organize violence to control the government is to train a militia.

    5. The only way to ensure the army trains a militia to organize violence to control the government is to require reciprocal insurance of the oath.

    6. The only way to ensure the oath is to place it in the constitution, in the oath of allegiance, and by reciprocal insurance of the members – demanding death of those who break it, either universally, or by lot, or by both.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 07:09:00 UTC

  • But then, all that really matters is whether a sufficient minority of males find

    But then, all that really matters is whether a sufficient minority of males find the status quo in Washington intolerable.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 00:23:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793609484660768768

    Reply addressees: @boysek

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793602224639254530

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793602224639254530

  • I wonder why is it an achievement to increase the degree of parasitism, decrease

    I wonder why is it an achievement to increase the degree of parasitism, decrease the rule of law, and destroy the family?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-02 00:22:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793609214417592320

    Reply addressees: @boysek

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793602224639254530

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793602224639254530