Theme: Coercion

  • They burn. Fast. And at night it’s pretty. Not as pretty as PYRES or HANGING TRE

    They burn. Fast. And at night it’s pretty. Not as pretty as PYRES or HANGING TRESS, but smells better.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 21:36:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796466395055722496

    Reply addressees: @RPTC2020 @shannessian

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796463420694331392


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796463420694331392

  • NEBRASKA RESTORES THE DEATH PENALTY!

    NEBRASKA RESTORES THE DEATH PENALTY!


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 13:38:00 UTC

  • MAKE DISTRIBUTION OF PSEUDOSCIENCE ILLEGAL 1) Defund and deny loans to universit

    MAKE DISTRIBUTION OF PSEUDOSCIENCE ILLEGAL

    1) Defund and deny loans to universities, colleges, or schools that teach Critical Theory, Marxism, or their derivatives, as a pseudoscientific religion. (Put left universities out of business)

    2) Require warranty of truthfulness, and warranty of due diligence, and warranty that one’s speech is not a hazard to voluntary exchange when speaking into the informational commons. (put the news industry out of business)

    3) Grant universal standing under the same criteria as to racketeering to the public in matters of defense of the informational commons


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 10:38:00 UTC

  • Meme For 2017 “Make It Physical”

    Meme For 2017 “Make It Physical”


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-08 18:46:00 UTC

  • “Democracy is stable if and only if it is less costly than violent conflict, to

    —“Democracy is stable if and only if it is less costly than violent conflict, to those capable of winning a violent conflict.

    But high time preference people discount the future cost of their present demands.

    Even if they WANTED to preserve democracy and its boons for themselves by limiting their rapacity (that is, if they understood what is at stake and why) they would still lack the perspective necessary to know how much.

    Violence is the only way to provide that, the only way to communicate that.

    If they demand death and destruction, we simply prefer to supply it now, rather than later.

    That way, they may get what they desire, and we may get what we desire – to go back about our business unmolested.

    Win-win.”— Eli Harman


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-08 18:01:00 UTC

  • “The left seems to be doing everything in their power to make cooperation with t

    —“The left seems to be doing everything in their power to make cooperation with them expensive and violence against them cheap.”—Ben B. Rodríguez


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-08 17:17:00 UTC

  • “YOU’RE MAKING IT HARDER AND HARDER TO PREFER NOT TO KILL YOU AND TAKE YOUR STUF

    “YOU’RE MAKING IT HARDER AND HARDER TO PREFER NOT TO KILL YOU AND TAKE YOUR STUFF”.

    (by James Augustus Berens)

    —“Majoritarian Democracy can only function in a state of Perpetual Prisoner Dilemmas, where zero-sum outcomes are not deterministic and sub-optimal outcomes are preferable to default aggression. We choose to cooperate via comprise (sub-optimal outcomes) because the comprise is preferable to war and defection.

    When the rules (normative & legal) make the outcome of the game zero-sum & deterministic, favoring one set of agents over another (as opposed to a sub-optimal agreement) players will abandon the rules and start playing a different game.

    Or, plainly worded: why don’t I kill you and take your stuff?

    You’re making it harder, and harder, to prefer not to.”—James Augustus Berens


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-08 16:10:00 UTC

  • Fist, Club, Noose, Pike, and Pyre

    Fist, Club, Noose, Pike, and Pyre.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-08 14:47:00 UTC

  • Well you know I don’t think reducing relative equality of material condition is

    Well you know I don’t think reducing relative equality of material condition is a bad thing. I think that doing it by command at the point of a gun, whether by one tyrant, a tyrannical oligarchy, or a majority tyranny, makes no difference. Most of us will prefer it if we obtain behavioral payment in exchanges, so that our commons both physical and human improves. If one cannot produce in the commercial economy that does not mean one cannot produce in the normative, economy of behavior, nor in the production of commons – which is almost entirely one of casual daily maintenance and care. The Russians didn’t get it all wrong you know. The build a good commons economy with the working and underclass, just like we built a good commercial economy with the working and middle and upper middle classes. But monopoly of economic models makes no more sense than a monopoly provision of commons by majority rule. There is no reason we cannot have commercial, commons, and normative economies, each operating with different members and different methods of compensation. Becuase the normative, common, and commercial all depend upon each other.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-08 10:40:00 UTC

  • NO: DOLLARS ARE NOT MORE INNOCENT THAN VOTES. —“Dollars are not at all like vo

    NO: DOLLARS ARE NOT MORE INNOCENT THAN VOTES.

    —“Dollars are not at all like votes. A vote may be a slight thing in a large electorate but is, nevertheless, a proactive, illiberal, gratuitous, coercive move against others but spending a dollar, by contrast, is not coercive at all; not even one iota.”– David McDonagh

    Assuming however, that rule of law limits the externalities that can be produced by the spending of that dollar to those that are productive, and that the transaction involving that dollar is reciprocally productive, fully informed, warrantied, and voluntary.

    Libertarians seem to have a problem with complete sentences despite the first principle of economic theory: the broken window’s demand for full accounting. Yet libertarians speak in incomplete sentences using not full accounting but rational justification. And they do so in order to rely upon suggestion: causing the audience to subjectively substitute that information that is not provided in the incomplete sentence. So this obvious conflict between the first principle of economics which requires full accounting, and the use of justificationary rationalism to circumvent it by means of incomplete sentences and suggestion is the reason for the failure of the program to produce intellectuals that produce meaningful results, rather than simply attracting justificationists: free riders.

    It is not market activity that creates demand for authority and then state. But the externalities to the transaction that create demand for authority and the state.

    Why? Because humans retaliate, even at high cost, against any imposition of any investment that they have made. So liberty is constructed by the suppression of any activity that causes retaliation.

    Ergo, this is why the NAP is a fraud. Because it does not specify the scope of the prohibitions one may not aggress against without encouraging retaliation (demonstrated interest), and therefore generates rather than suppresses demand for the state. Hence why the only existential semi-libertarian polities have existed in border regions under the defense of states and empires, who tolerate free riding on the commons in exchange for holding territory in the state’s name at a discount – thereby preventing other states from doing the same without invoking retaliation.

    One may not impose a cost upon that for which others have borne a cost. And that constitutes every form of capital that humans produce. And since some capital is strategic rather than productive, then that which demarcates competition between preferences is TRUTH content.

    ERGO: votes are proxy for violence. Dollars are a proxy for expenditures of time, mind, effort, and resources – usually from the proceeds of trade that created a surplus because of a division of knowledge and labor.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-08 10:10:00 UTC