Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • BUTCH AND STEVE ON THE DECLINING COST OF CIVIL WAR “Remember, democracy never la

    BUTCH AND STEVE ON THE DECLINING COST OF CIVIL WAR

    “Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”- John Adams

    Adams makes sense now. As the outcome of an election diverges from the outcome of a war, as more and more of those with no capacity to generate violence are allowed suffrage, then eventually the cost of war falls far enough below the cost of the election, that those with the capacity to generate violence rise up and take violent control of the state.— William Butchman

    And also, when revolutions occur they are due to the state ignoring the changes in sympathy of those with violent capacity. To rule, you must keep the violent majority on your side at all times.—Steve Pender

    —-original post—

    —“Democratic elections, being an alternative to war – a demonstration of violent capacity (in theory, no longer in practice) – to avoid the need for fighting by showing one’s strength without loss of life, was then subverted by universal suffrage which diluted the implied violence behind voting, without diluting the actual violent capacity. It’s now probable that a minority may have far more violent capacity than 51% of the voters.”—Steve Pender

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 11:38:00 UTC

  • “Democratic elections, being an alternative to war – a demonstration of violent

    —“Democratic elections, being an alternative to war – a demonstration of violent capacity (in theory, no longer in practice) – to avoid the need for fighting by showing one’s strength without loss of life, was then subverted by universal suffrage which diluted the implied violence behind voting, without diluting the actual violent capacity. It’s now probable that a minority may have far more violent capacity than 51% of the voters.”—Steve Pender

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 11:23:00 UTC

  • There are always agitated men. What they require is a moral justification for vi

    There are always agitated men. What they require is a moral justification for violence; an alternative to demand; and a crisis to exploit.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 07:39:00 UTC

  • NOTES ON GATTO’s ANALYSIS OF EDUCATION Education is a term. What we do is ritual

    NOTES ON GATTO’s ANALYSIS OF EDUCATION

    Education is a term.

    What we do is ritualize.

    And having ritualized we Indoctrinate.

    In groups we submit to the pack.

    We are conditioned from infancy not to see or relate the truth.

    The first step in education is mistrust everything you think.

    And to mistrust everything you are told.

    And to mistrust increasingly any authority.

    School removes your volition.

    we are wage slaves because it is cheaper.

    we are told to memorize because we’re able to be obedient.

    we are indoctrinated because it is cheaper.

    This does not produce people who have to adapt to changing circumstances in reality – especially our reality.

    We are not taught how to question and inquire and criticize.

    Harvard and Princeton accept you based on your potential to become rich or famous. they’re looking for people who add value to those around them. Hobbies are the only honest information in a resume that you are likely to get. How does someone spend their time when they have the choice? “Ideally someone has all Intellectual, Social, and Physical hobbies, where the physical should not be a team sport. We prefer solo hobbies that require physical danger.”

    Smart people succeed IN SPITE of our education, not because of it.

    Our nation has been ‘schooled to the point of extinction’.

    Nation comes however, not from school, but from the family.

    We have no non-rhetorical concern for one another.

    We have evolved an economy that depends upon constant individualism, mobility, competition, conflict, and warfare.

    Authoritarian and eQUALitarian (Feminine and Jewish) – fear of conflict and risk / desire for security and predictability

    -vs-

    Libertarian and eGALitarian (Male and Aryan) – fear of being controlled / desire for opportunity and liberty.

    -and therefore-

    Both masculine and feminine interests are just reproductive expressions.

    As reproductive expressions

    MY THOUGHTS

    SERIES 1

    …. Manners and Appearance

    …. Questioning and Understanding (

    …. Mythology and Biography (listening)

    …. Numbers and Letters and Shapes And ‘Physics’.

    …. Fitness and Sport

    SERIES 2

    …. …. Virtue Ethics

    …. …. Arithmetic, Money, and Accounting (determinism)

    …. …. Reading, Literature, and History

    …. …. Writing, Opinion, Letters and Diary (output)(introspection)

    …. …. Assembly, Construction, and Measurement

    SERIES 3

    …. …. …. Math and

    …. …. …. Engineering and physics (action)

    …. …. …. Speech and argument (language and logic)

    …. …. …. Family, Cooperation and Politics ( ethics and economics )

    …. …. …. Conflict and War (religion, war, immigration…)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-23 14:08:00 UTC

  • I BET YOU DIDN’T THINK OF THAT (I think very few people who read me understand t

    I BET YOU DIDN’T THINK OF THAT

    (I think very few people who read me understand the consequences of my emphasis on consent limited by the one law of non-imposition of costs against property in toto: the result is a eugenic meritocracy wherein groups will self-sort by kin out of self-interest and necessity. Markets make nationalism too you know. But I bet you didn’t think of that. 😉 )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-22 10:55:00 UTC

  • MARKET FASCISM VS ANARCHISM Some Major Differences: the prohibition on free ridi

    MARKET FASCISM VS ANARCHISM

    Some Major Differences: the prohibition on free riding on social order.

    1 – Ancapism = Low trust rothbardian ghetto ethics under intersubjectively verifiable property.

    Aristocracy (Market fascism) = High trust ethics of natural law under property in toto.

    2 – Ancapism = Legal polylogism and undecidability across courts. Aristocracy (market fascism) logical decidability across all individuals and groups.

    3 – Ancapism = no mandatory defense of others property.

    Aristocracy (Market Fascism) Mandatory reciprocal insurance through the organized application of violence.

    4 – Ancapism = no right of retaliation in court against violation of the commons – including informational commons.

    Aristocracy (Market fascism) Mandatory punishment of violators of the private or commons.

    5 – Ancapism = freedom of speech including lying blackmail and fraud.

    Aristocrxacy (Market Fascism) no falsehood or fraud including Non-Criticism of markets (no deceit and fraud)

    6 – Ancapism = no commons.

    Aristocracy (Market Fascism) mandatory contribution to commons, but choice of what commons you contribute to.

    7 – Ancapism = No Aggressive expansion of markets against the will of lower trust polities.

    Aristocracy (Market Fascism) Aggressive expansion of markets over lower trust polities when profitable.

    And that’s just getting started….

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-21 15:49:00 UTC

  • Q&A: “CURT:WHAT’S MARKET FASCISM?” Good question. Lets look at Fascism first. FA

    Q&A: “CURT:WHAT’S MARKET FASCISM?”

    Good question. Lets look at Fascism first.

    FASCISM:

    A political system headed by a dictator in which the government controls business and labor and opposition is not permitted.

    —“The only official definition of Fascism comes from Benito Mussolini, the founder of fascism, in which he outlines three principles of a fascist philosophy.

    1.”Everything in the state”. The Government is supreme and the country is all-encompasing, and all within it must conform to the ruling body, often a dictator.

    2.”Nothing outside the state”. The country must grow and the implied goal of any fascist nation is to rule the world, and have every human submit to the government.

    3.”Nothing against the state”. Any type of questioning the government is not to be tolerated. If you do not see things our way, you are wrong. If you do not agree with the government, you cannot be allowed to live and taint the minds of the rest of the good citizens.

    The use of militarism was implied only as a means to accomplish one of the three above principles, mainly to keep the people and rest of the world in line. Fascist countries are known for their harmony and lack of internal strife. There are no conflicting parties or elections in fascist countries.”—

    MARKET FASCISM

    1. Nothing but voluntary: Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, and Subsidy.

    2. Nothing but markets: Market for association ( and disassociation) Market for consumption (economy), market for reproduction( marriage and family), market for commons (multiple houses), market for rule (freedom of exit), all differences adjudicated by natural, judge discovered, common, law.

    3. Nothing but obedience or exit – no opposition is tolerated.

    In other words instead of enforcing socialist production without opportunity for criticism, we enforce markets in everything without opportunity for criticism.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-21 15:18:00 UTC

  • (Like Eli I am increasingly comfortable with market-fascism. In other words, imp

    (Like Eli I am increasingly comfortable with market-fascism. In other words, imposing the eugenic market on others in defense of kith, kin, and self. Tolerance is a failed experiment. We must rule, force rule by our betters, or be ruled and the victim of genocide by our inferiors. In other words, they have aggressed against us, not sought to meet us on aristocratic common ground.)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-21 09:40:00 UTC

  • A steel machete if pointed, sharpened, even primitively on a grinding wheel, is

    A steel machete if pointed, sharpened, even primitively on a grinding wheel, is a an exceptional relatively invisible weapon. With one in the left hand, inverted as a shield, and a second held point forward, it is very capable pair of weapons. Add a motorcycle helmet and some football pads, and you’re pretty dangerous hand-to-hand. Especially in formation. A row of spearmen behind using broomstick handles with butcher knives attached, and a bit of rope nailed on here and there for grip, and now it’s getting difficult to close on you. A row of men with molotovs behind and now you’ve got a retreat mechanism, or the ability to attack buildings. A set of runners who replenish the molotovs – throwing them is a skill, so use skilled throwers like skilled archers – and so use runners to keep them busy. None of this costs any real money.

    I watched men making shields out of steel plate during the revolution. They set-up shop right inside one of the captured bulidings. They won’t stop a rifle bullet. But they force the government to use rifle bullets against you – and thus invalidate themselves.

    You can however, buy shields that will, and it’s possible for a host of men to hide behind five of them if they hit the ground, and aren’t vulnerable from multiple sides.

    The strategy is to use these men to attract police in force, to oppose them, and then to use rifles from a distance to take out the police in large numbers once they’re in the open.

    Bait power, and kill it. Until there is no power left to bait. Or no power willing to take the bait. And once you have freedom of movement, you have won.

    Soldiers return to barracks. politicians and police return to homes. In ukraine, men followed them home. You must only exhaust their willingness to fight. Most men will flee if they lost ten percent of their corps. Police are no different.

    The goal is not to gain control. But to face the military to take control. It is in their interest at present to take control. They need only the opportunity and justification. So we must remove the option not to take control.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-19 12:55:00 UTC

  • Jefferson misunderstood. It is not the method of governance that matters so much

    Jefferson misunderstood.

    It is not the method of governance that matters so much as rule of law that constrains the action of all – governing and governed alike.

    He justified majoritarianism, possible only under homogenity, yet enfranchised all hoping that the church would create the homogenaity.

    But the ‘priesthood’ that ‘kept the faith’ of western civilization in prehistory, and in the ancient, medieval, and modern periods, has been the judiciary. The church was just another house of government.

    The question we must solve is quite simple: how to preserve the independence, scholarship, and exclusivity of the judiciary, as the final arbiter of disputes over property-in-toto.

    The truth is that self interest alone is what drives these people. And self defense of their status is enough, so long as the militia stands, and the miitary indocrtinates.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-19 09:09:00 UTC