Curt Doolittle

Theme: Coercion

  • NO. THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR THE ORGANIZED AND INSTITUTIONALIZED APPLICATION O

    NO. THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR THE ORGANIZED AND INSTITUTIONALIZED APPLICATION OF VIOLENCE FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF HARM, THEFT, FRAUD, PSEUDOSCIENCE, AND LIES.

    —“How do we realistically become less tolerant of these lies. Reading the culture of critique was pretty eye opening. But whenever I try to have conversations about this stuff with people they tend to shut down pretty hard. Is there anything we can do to get rid of pseudoscience that doesn’t involve violence?” —Pepper Le Angus

    No. All increases in criminal ability are solved by violence distributed by various forms of institutions: education, sheriff, police, judge, courts, politics, and war.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-07 11:38:00 UTC

  • ENSLAVEMENT OF ENEMIES IS PREFERABLE TO ENSLAVEMENT BY THEM. —“It is preferabl

    ENSLAVEMENT OF ENEMIES IS PREFERABLE TO ENSLAVEMENT BY THEM.

    —“It is preferable to ME to enslave rather than to be enslaved. For some others, the reverse may be true, or may or may not be true, depending on circumstances. Therefore, slavery may be a mutually beneficial institution.

    However, even where this is not the case, if someone desires, and acts, to enslave me, then we are not cooperating, we are at war.

    And the preferences of my enemies in war carry no positive weight with me. It is MY preferences which I will act to realize, unless and until the enemy offers terms in good faith which make cooperation preferable.”—Eli Harman

    (The left is our enemy. Because they have made our women our enemy. And our women have voted to empower our enemies.)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 18:55:00 UTC

  • “Parasitism or leftism is simply a tool used to transfer wealth using moral and

    —“Parasitism or leftism is simply a tool used to transfer wealth using moral and emotional blackmail first,and the barrel of a gun later. In the closed nationstate model of the 20th century it was used to shift blocks of capital to different competing institutions. In a global neoliberal anarchic sense it’s used to loot dying nation states and transfer wealth to global oligarchic power confederacies. We must (temporarily?) embrace nationalism not necessarily along moral lines (nationalism has become a form of nostalgic romanticism that is fun obviously) but as “firewalls” against nomadic oligarchs looting and robbing and destroying our crumbling cultural and and bureaucratic institutions.”— Murray Sell

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 13:21:00 UTC

  • NO GOVERNMENT REGISTRATION NEEDED The Restoration: Fist, Club, Noose, Pike, and

    NO GOVERNMENT REGISTRATION NEEDED

    The Restoration: Fist, Club, Noose, Pike, and Pyre

    —“No Government registration needed….just need yo train yourself how to use them effectively.”— Rolf Shiner

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 12:46:00 UTC

  • The Restoration: Fist, Club, Noose, Pike, and Pyre

    The Restoration: Fist, Club, Noose, Pike, and Pyre

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 10:57:00 UTC

  • NEVER TURN THE OTHER CHEEK ON PARASITISM (LEFTISM) Never, Never, Never, Never, N

    NEVER TURN THE OTHER CHEEK ON PARASITISM (LEFTISM)

    Never, Never, Never, Never, Never.

    If you encounter ridicule, shaming, rallying, shouting-down, or propagandism to obscure an attempt at circumvention of voluntary exchange and to force or justify parasitic extraction, then hit first and instruct later.

    If you encounter free riding on commons, avoidance of maintenance of the commons, socialization of losses into the commons, privatization of commons, damage to the commons, conspiracy to free ride, avoid, socialize, privatize, or damage the commons, or act of war against the commons by violence, immigration, trade policy, religious conversion, or informational warfare – then strike first and instruct later.

    NEVER TURN THE OTHER CHEEK.

    Instead, PROSECUTE the slightest imposition upon the commons.

    This is the most important cost you pay for living in the Eden we had made.

    Every property owner a juror, sheriff, a judge, a warrior. That is the price of Property In Toto: constant diligence.

    And those that do not pay that cost of constant diligence are merely parasites upon the commons that those who defend it have made.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 10:53:00 UTC

  • I remember. It was horrible. The business men in my town stood in front of their

    I remember. It was horrible. The business men in my town stood in front of their shops with shotguns and took photos as a threat.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-05 17:28:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794954559223373826

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794865793171394560

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794865793171394560

  • EVERONE STEALS BUT CONSERVATIVES – THEY JUST CONSTRAIN. Marxists want to steal e

    EVERONE STEALS BUT CONSERVATIVES – THEY JUST CONSTRAIN.

    Marxists want to steal everything and tell you what to do with it. Social Democrats want to steal the proceeds of your risk taking and tell you what they will do with it. Libertarians want to steal from the commons and tell you that you can’t have any. And conservatives want to prevent not only stealing but whatever consumption they can, and to direct it to investment in family and commons.

    It’s not complicated. Children are costly, women redistribute, nest, and consume locally at all costs. Libertarians want to keep everything they produce because they’re undervalued in cooperation in large groups. And conservatives try to concentrate capital in the empirically demonstrated productive family, community, nation, and it’s capital.

    The universe operates by simple rules. Humans are simple creatures. It’s the vast network of excuses, justifications, wishful thinkings, falsehoods, and lies we tell that create the appearance of complexity.

    We acquire, and we justify the means of our acquisition. yet some of us are better at stealing and some better at rent-seeking, and some better at free-riding, and some better at producing, and some better at saving and defending.

    And we all claim our method is better rather than a necessary function in a division of intergenerational reproduction.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Cult of Sovereignty.

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Social Science of Western Civilization

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-05 11:28:00 UTC

  • RESTORING VIOLENCE TO LIBERTY Propertarianism: Putting Violence Back Into Libert

    RESTORING VIOLENCE TO LIBERTY

    Propertarianism: Putting Violence Back Into Liberty One Argument At A Time. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-05 07:19:00 UTC

  • THE FOUR GENERATIONS OF WARFARE 1GW: First-generation warfare refers to Ancient

    THE FOUR GENERATIONS OF WARFARE

    1GW: First-generation warfare refers to Ancient and Post-classical battles fought with massed manpower, using line and column tactics with uniformed soldiers governed by the state.

    2GW: Second-generation warfare is the Early modern tactics used after the invention of the rifled musket and breech-loading weapons and continuing through the development of the machine gun and indirect fire. The term second generation warfare was created by the U.S. military in 1989.

    3GW – Third-generation warfare focuses on using Late modern technology-derived tactics of leveraging speed, stealth and surprise to bypass the enemy’s lines and collapse their forces from the rear. Essentially, this was the end of linear warfare on a tactical level, with units seeking not simply to meet each other face to face but to outmaneuver each other to gain the greatest advantage.

    4GW – Fourth-generation warfare as presented by Lind et al. is characterized by “Post-modern” a return to decentralized forms of warfare, blurring of the lines between war and politics, combatants and civilians due to nation states’ loss of their near-monopoly on combat forces, returning to modes of conflict common in pre-modern times. (I See 4GW as a return to normalcy prior to 2GW).

    ~5GW – We ‘hypothesize’ this is robotic warfare where more advanced societies protect themselves by expensive mechanical means.

    ~6GW – We ‘hypothesize’ this is artificial intelligence warfare, under the “Collossus” rule: that politics have been removed from the decision criteria and our defense is effectively in the hands of a computerized ‘god’. So that humans are no longer accountable for retaliation. (The Russians are halfway there already)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 23:21:00 UTC